Ins and Outs of Indirect Costs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Ins and Outs of Indirect Costs

Description:

Information specifically requested by CA in prior correspondence or advance agreements ... significant changes in level of NPOs activities. Rates typically based on most recent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: cap7
Category:
Tags: costs | indirect | ins | national | outs

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ins and Outs of Indirect Costs


1
Ins and Outs of Indirect Costs
CAPLAW National Training Conference
Presented by Carr, Riggs Ingram, LLC William H.
Carr, CPA J. Michael Maddox, CPA,
CFE www.cricpa.com
  • June 21 , 2007

2
AGENDA
  • Welcome and Introductions
  • What is Indirect Cost
  • Types of Rates
  • Selecting the appropriate base
  • Preparing IDC Proposal
  • Common Pitfalls
  • Barriers to Full Recovery
  • FAQs
  • Questions

3
  • What is
  • Indirect Cost???

4
  • Applicable Standards
  • OMB Circular A-122
  • Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations
  • OMB Circular A-110
  • Uniform Administrative Requirements
  • OMB Circular A-133
  • Audits of States, Local Governments and
    Non-Profit Organizations

5
  • Two types of costs
  • Direct Costs
  • Costs that can be identified specifically with a
    particular project relatively easily and with a
    high degree of accuracy
  • Indirect Costs
  • Costs that are incurred for common or joint
    objectives
  • a.k.a. Facilities and Administrative Costs

Both can be programmatic or administrative
6
Characteristics of Two Types of Costs
  • Direct Costs
  • Easily identified to a cost objective
  • Head Start teacher salaries
  • LIHEAP client benefits
  • CACFP Food Costs
  • Typically benefit one program
  • Can be charged directly to applicable cost
    objective
  • Indirect Costs
  • Not easily identified to a particular cost
    objective
  • Fiscal officer salaries
  • Cost of IT systems
  • Facilities costs
  • Typically benefit more than one program
  • Must be allocated to various benefiting programs

7
(No Transcript)
8
Direct Costs
Indirect Costs
9
  • Challenge becomes
  • How do we equitably recover our indirect costs?

10
(No Transcript)
11
  • OMB Circular A-122 Cost Principles for
    Non-Profit Organizations
  • Requires equitable allocation to benefiting cost
    objectives
  • Sets forth two methods to allocate indirect cost
  • Simplified allocation method
  • Used when major functions benefit to
    approximately same degree
  • Utilizes single rate
  • Multiple allocation base method
  • Used when major functions benefit in varying
    degrees
  • Utilizes multiple pools and rates
  • Utilizes multiple bases
  • Square footage for space
  • Modified Total Direct Cost for GA

12
  • Direct Allocation Method as option to indirect
    cost allocation
  • Treats all costs as Direct Costs except GA and
    general expenses
  • Joint Costs (depreciation, rental costs,
    telephone expense, facilities, etc.)
  • Prorated individually as direct costs using most
    appropriate base
  • Acceptable method as long as base
  • Accurately measures benefits provided to each
    award/activity
  • Are established in accordance with reasonable
    criteria
  • Are supported by current data

13
Recovery of Indirect Cost
  • Negotiate IDC Rate(s)
  • Identify Indirect Costs
  • Accumulate in IDC Pool(s)
  • Allocate to Programs via approved Indirect Cost
    Rate

14
Steps to Negotiating Your Rate
  • Determine type of Rate desired
  • Determine most appropriate base
  • Prepare and Submit IDC Proposal
  • Negotiate Rate with Cognizant Agency
  • Formalized written agreement

15
Types of Indirect Cost Rates
  • Provisional Rate
  • Temporary Rate
  • Established for a prospective period of time
  • Based on estimated costs
  • Later revised to Final Rate based on operating
    experience
  • Final Rate
  • Established after actual costs for period are
    known
  • Replaces Provisional Rate
  • Based on audited financial statements

16
Types of Indirect Cost Rates (cont.)
  • Predetermined Rate
  • Effective for a specified period of time (i.e.
    fiscal year)
  • Based on estimate of costs to be incurred during
    the period
  • Not subject to adjustment
  • Fixed Rate
  • Same characteristics as Predetermined Rate
  • Subject to prospective adjustment
  • Actual vs. Estimated costs carried forward as
    adjustment to rate of subsequent period

17
Types of Indirect Cost Rates (cont.)
  • Special Rate
  • Developed to deal with unique situations
  • Often used by colleges/universities when IDCs are
    different for on-campus and off-campus activities
  • Multiple Indirect Cost Rates
  • Utilized where organization-wide rate not
    appropriate
  • Consider when departments, divisions or programs
    use services of IDC pool disproportionately

18
Step Two
  • Determining
  • Appropriate
  • Base

19
  • Typical IDC Bases
  • Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC)
  • Excludes Capital Expenditures, flow through funds
    and subcontracts
  • Direct Salaries and Wages
  • Direct Salaries and Wages, including fringe
    benefits

20
Sample Rate Calculation
  • Total IDC Pool - 500,000
  • Total Direct Cost - 5,000,000
  • Resulting IDC Rate 10
  • (500,000/5,000,000)
  • Total Salaries and Wages - 2,000,000
  • Resulting IDC Rate 25
  • (500,000/2,000,000)

21
Factors Affecting Base Selection
  • Types of Direct Costs Incurred
  • Are some programs more labor intensive than
    others?
  • Do some programs benefit from pooled costs
    disproportionately to their direct costs?
  • Restrictions on Admin/IDC Costs within Grants
  • Some programs are more restrictive
  • Over-Arching Principle
  • Base utilized must result in equitable allocation
    with respect to benefits derived

22
Steps to Determining Your Rate
  • Determine type of Rate desired
  • Determine most appropriate base
  • Prepare and Submit IDC Proposal
  • Negotiate Rate with Cognizant Agency
  • Formalized written agreement

23
Elements of Indirect Cost Proposal
  • Narrative
  • Introduction describing entity, types of programs
    and period covered
  • Cost allocation methodology
  • How agency identifies direct vs. indirect costs
  • Nature of proposal (seeking indirect rate,
    multiple rates, special rate, etc.)
  • Definition of Direct and Indirect costs and how
    captured
  • Description of cost pool and base for
    distribution
  • Reconciliation to audited financial statements
  • List of Salaries by position and Fringe costs
    included in indirect pool
  • Salaries listed must identify percentage charged
    to pool if not 100

24
Elements of Indirect Cost Proposal
  • Schedule of Total Direct Cost
  • Subtotal for labor costs
  • Columnar format broken down by programs
  • Schedule of Indirect Cost Pool
  • Can include with Direct Cost in Schedule of
    Functional Expenditures
  • Exclude unallowable costs
  • Exclude capital expenditures
  • Include depreciation and use allowance on
    indirect portion of faciliites
  • Calculation of Proposed Rate
  • Indirect Costs divided by Applicable Base
  • Lobbying Cost Certificate
  • Certifies compliance with OMB A-122 re lobbying
    costs
  • IDC Proposal Checklist

http//rates.psc.gov/fms/dca/np_exall.pdf
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
  • Your proposal is just that.a Proposal
  • Must be negotiated with your cognizant agency
  • Cognizant Agency
  • Typically largest funding source
  • HHS Division of Cost Allocation (DCA)
  • Role is to maximize cost savings
  • Cost Savings defined as negotiating plan or rate
    that is less than proposal
  • Cost Savings for FYE 6/30/03
  • Total 717,637,000 (2,044 plans)
  • Includes over 73,000,000 in cash refunds
  • NPOs 47,303,000 (1,012 plans)
  • 46,700 per NPO plan

Source http//www.ncura.edu/data/conferences/45/
handouts/CognizantAgencies_Talesnik.pdf
28
Negotiation Process
  • Cognizant Agency Review and Negotiation
  • Review for required documentation
  • Review prior negotiation work papers
  • Reconcile proposal to financial statements
  • Review proposed base for equitable distribution
  • Perform trend analysis
  • Review costs for allowability, consistency and
    treatment of costs
  • Concluding steps and rate negotiations

Source DCA Review Guide for NPO Indirect Cost
Proposals
29
  • Review for Required Documentation
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking for
  • Proposal itself
  • Audited financial statement
  • For period of proposal
  • Reconciliation between Proposal and Audited
    Financials
  • Notice of Grant Award or Financial Assistance
    Award Document
  • Evidence that NPO has current award that is
    eligible to receive IDC
  • Information specifically requested by CA in prior
    correspondence or advance agreements established
    in previous negotiations

30
  • RECONCILIATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking for
  • Incorporation of prior corrections or adjustments
    into current proposal
  • Existence of Special Rates
  • For period of proposal
  • Did prior agreement contain conditions and did
    NPO comply?
  • Proper Carryforward in Fixed Rate Agreements
  • Over-recovery in prior year will reduce rate in
    current year
  • Need for site visit
  • Usually associated with multiple rates
  • Perform math check

31
  • REVIEW PRIOR NEGOTIATED WORK PAPERS
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking to
  • Reconcile total of Direct and Indirect Costs to
    expenses reflected in financial statements
  • Analyze adjustments for unallowable and
    extraneous costs that should be excluded
  • Analyze and verify accuracy and necessity for
    adjustments and reclassifications
  • Adjustments may include known changes in
    circumstances for upcoming periods

32
  • REVIEW FOR ACCEPTABLE BASE
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking to
  • Determine that proposed base results in most
    equitable distribution of indirect costs
  • Verify that base is consistent with base used in
    previous submissions and rates
  • i.e. Use of Total Direct Salaries and Fringe in
    past and exclusion of fringe in current proposal
  • Base change can be negotiated must prove to be
    more equitable

33
  • TREND ANALYSIS
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will perform detailed trend
    analysis of indirect costs, rates and allocation
    base for last three years, including proposal
    year
  • Be prepared to explain unusual increases in
    indirect cost in comparison to increase in Base
  • i.e. Base increases 5 and indirect travel
    increases 40.
  • Reviewer will want substantiation of increase in
    indirect travel

34
  • ALLOWABILITY, CONSISTENCY AND TREATMENT OF COSTS
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking to
  • Determine whether proposed costs benefit federal
    awardsa
  • Determine that types of costs in IDC pool are
    consistently treated as indirect costs
  • Review proposal and financial statements for
    unallowable costs
  • Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
  • Financial Statement Disclosures
  • Alcoholic beverages, bad debts, contingencies,
    contributions and donations, fines and penalties,
    fund raising, lobbying, etc.
  • Review financial statements for any applicable
    offsets
  • Income generated by activites in indirect cost
    pool
  • i.e. Rents generated from facilities costs
    charged to pool

35
  • CONCLUDING STEPS AND RATE NEGOTIATIONS
  • Cognizant Agency (CA) will
  • Look for anticipated significant changes in level
    of NPOs activities
  • Rates typically based on most recent years
    actual costs
  • Adjustments may be made for anticipated changes
  • Determine whether advance agreements should be
    established
  • May be needed to preclude future
    disputes/problems
  • May be related to changes/refinements in base
  • May be in reference to agreed upon treatment of
    certain types of costs
  • Negotiate appropriate type of rate
  • Provisional negotiator has little confidence in
    consistency of costs, organization has plans for
    significant operational changes, accuracy of
    rates contingent on occurrence of future events
  • Predetermined only if high probability that
    recovery will approximate proposed costs
  • Fixed May be used unless unlikely to have
    future awards, erratic mix of federal vs.
    non-federal funds from year to year, operating
    activities unstable, etc.

36
  • Understanding How Pools Function and Potential
    Pitfalls

37
Pitfalls
  • Predetermined Rate
  • Cant loseright?
  • What if indirect Costs Pool grows faster than
    base?
  • Base Year Base 1,000,000
  • Pool 100,000
  • Rate 10
  • Year 1 Base 1,100,000
  • Pool 105,000
  • Recover - 110,000 (5,000 excess)
  • Year 2 Base 1,250,000
  • Pool 150,000
  • Recover 125,000 (25,000 unrecovered IDC)
  • Management of Indirect Budget in proportion to
    Budgeted Base is critical with this type of
    rate

38
Pitfalls
  • Provisional/Final Rate
  • Base grows faster than pool costs
  • Base Year Base 1,000,000
  • Pool 100,000
  • Rate 10
  • Year 1 Base 1,100,000
  • Pool 105,000
  • Final Rate 9.55
  • Recovered - 110,000
  • 5,000 excess (must be repaid)
  • Management of Base Costs in proportion to
    Budgeted Pool is critical with this type of rate
  • Rememberthis type of rate is subject to
    adjustment

39
Pitfalls
  • Fixed Rate with carryforward
  • Base grows faster than pool costs
  • Base Year Base 1,000,000
  • Pool 100,000
  • Rate 10
  • Year 1 Base 1,100,000
  • Pool 105,000
  • Recovered - 110,000
  • 5,000 excess
  • Year 2 Rate Computation
  • Year 1 Actual excess/Year 1 base
  • New Rate (105-5/1100) 9.091
  • Year 2 Base 1,100,000
  • Pool 105,000
  • Recovered - 100,000
  • 5,000 unrecovered cost

40
  • Other Barriers to Full IDC Recovery

41
  • Other Barriers/Pittfalls
  • Failure to Properly Identify Indirect Costs
  • Charged as direct charges to non-federal programs
  • Misclassified on general ledger as unallowable
    type of cost
  • Failure to include Depreciation/Use allowance for
    indirect facilities costs
  • Administrative/IDC limits on Specific Grants
  • Certain grants/programs limit Admin costs to 10
    - 15
  • Certain grants/programs allow no indirect costs
  • Costs allocable to these programs must be
    absorbed by non-federal funds
  • Cannot be used as match without prior approval
    (OMB A-110 sub-part B, section 23(b))

42
Helpful Hints
  • INDIRECT vs. ADMINSTRATIVE
  • Indirect does not necessarily mean administrative
  • Example Facilities Cost
  • Remote office housing intake staff for three
    grants
  • Common space is programmatic in nature but may
    not be directly allocable
  • Example Exec. Director Salaries
  • May have programmatic and administrative duties

43
  • EXAMPLE
  • Assumptions
  • Grant of 600,000
  • Admin Limit 10
  • Indirect Costs to be charged to grant total
    65,000
  • Did we exceed admin limit????

44
  • Pool of Indirect Costs
  • Accounting System Admin
  • Travel Admin
  • Director Salary Prog/Admin
  • Facilities Prog/Admin
  • Supplies Admin
  • Telephone Admin
  • Assume this calculates to 65 Admin and 35
    program

45
  • Resulting Calculations
  • Total IDC 65,000 65 admin portion 42,250
    administrative IDC
  • Admin Limit 60,000
  • Leaves room for 17,750 Direct Admin Costs
  • Important to understand the true nature of costs
    within IDC Pool

46
Common Indirect Cost Problems
  • Timekeeping Systems
  • To be allowable, labor costs, whether direct or
    indirect must be based on accurate time sheets
    reflecting actual activities of all employees.

47
Common Indirect Cost Problems
  • Cost of Unallowable Activities
  • Must not be charged to indirect cost pool
  • Must be treated as direct costs (charged to
    separate final cost objectives) and allocated an
    equitable portion of indirect cost. (OMB A-122,
    Attachment A, paragraphs B.3 and B.4)

48
Common Indirect Cost Problems
  • Credits
  • Failure to reduce total costs incurred (both
    direct costs of a specific program or indirect
    costs) by credits applicable to those costs.
  • Fees for conferences
  • Building rental programs
  • Insurance credits or adustments
  • Data processing and office services performed for
    others

49
Common Indirect Cost Problems
  • Inter-Organizational Transfers and Related-Party
    Transactions
  • Supplies and services acquired from affiliates,
    related parties and organizations under common
    control must be based on the supplying
    organizations actual costs
  • Cannot include profit
  • Applies to rental of buildings owned by related
    parties

50
Common Indirect Cost Problems
  • Unsupported Costs
  • To be allowable, all direct and indirect costs
    must be adequately supported by source
    documentation
  • Cancelled checks and credit card receipts not
    sufficient
  • Must meet purpose and circumstance test

51
FAQs
  • What do we do if some grants/contracts provide
    for no indirect costs or rates lower than our
    approved indirect rate?
  • All indirect costs must be allocated using the
    approved indirect rate. Any allocated cost that
    exceeds approved rates or ceiling under a
    specific project may not be shifted to other
    Federal grants/contracts, unless specifically
    authorized by legislation. Non-federal sources
    must be used to pay for these un-recovered costs.

52
FAQs
  • Can our indirect cost rate be based on Federal
    funds only since they only represent 15 of our
    total revenue?
  • No. Your indirect cost rate proposal must be
    accompanied by a schedule of costs incurred for
    all projects, Federal and non-Federal, and the
    amount of the proposed allocation base must
    tie-in with the applicable direct cost base for
    all projects.

53
FAQs
  • What is the difference between bid and proposal
    costs and fund raising costs and how should
    they be treated in our indirect cost proposal
  • Bid and proposal costs represent salaries,
    consultant fees, printing, postage, travel etc.
    associated with proposals and applications to
    perform specific tasks for renumeration under
    Federal and non-federal grants/contracts. Treat
    as allowable indirect costs subject to any
    limitations imposed by cognizant agency.
  • Fund raising costs represent these types of costs
    associated with seeking donation of funds for
    non-specific purposes from private institutions
    or individuals. Unallowable for Federal
    reimbursement purposes. Must be included in
    direct costs and allocated an appropriate share
    of indirect.

54
FAQs
  • Can audit costs under OMB Circular A-133 be
    recovered?
  • A-133 allows audit costs to be recovered as
    either direct or indirect costs in accordance
    with applicable cost principles. However, there
    is no specific appropriation for audit costs.
    Must be built into specific grant/contract
    document (if direct) or into the indirect cost
    proposal (if indirect).

55
FAQs
  • What is the relationship of OMB A-122, Cost
    Principles for Non-Profit Organizations and OMB
    Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local
    Governmentes and Non-Profit Organizations in
    regard to indirect costs?
  • The compliance supplement for OMB Circular A-133
    incorporates OMB Circular A-122 and requires the
    auditor to audit direct and indirect costs to
    determine whether costs claimed are in compliance
    with OMB Circular A-122.

56
FAQs
  • Can transactions with an affiliate affect
    allowable costs
  • Yes. The cost of goods and services delivered
    from an affiliate must exclude any profit
    component. (OMB Circular A-122)
  • This works in reverse also. If the non-profit
    provides goods or services to an affiliate, a
    credit must be applied to the appropriate cost
    center, whether direct or indirect.

FAQs obtained from www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/
costdeterminationguide/sec4/htm
57
FAQs
  • Is the cost of accrued annual leave allowable
    under OMB Circular A-122?
  • In most instances, yes.
  • Under A-122, cost charged to grants/contracts
    must be determined in accordance with GAAP. (OMB
    Circular A-122, Attachment A, Part A., paragraph
    2.e.
  • GAAP requires recording of accrued leave if
  • Employers obligation relating to employees
    rights to receive compensation for future
    absences is attributable to employees services
    already rendered
  • The obligation relates to rights that vest or
    accumulate
  • Payment of the compensation is probable
  • The amount can be reasonably estimated
  • Does not result in increased costs, but allows
    for recognition of costs in the proper accounting
    period

FAQs obtained from www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/
costdeterminationguide/sec4/htm
58
OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for
Non-Profit Organizations, http//www.whitehouse.
gov/omb/circulars/a122/a122.html
OMB Circular A-110, Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and
Other Non-Profit Organizations http//www.whiteh
ouse.gov/omb/circulars/a110/a110.html
OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local
Governments and Non-Profit Organizations http/
/www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a133/a133.html
HHS Division of Cost Allocation http//rates.psc.
gov/
59
QUESTIONS???
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com