Title: Planning for SAFETEALU: MPO Listening Session
1Planning for SAFETEA-LUMPO Listening Session
WELCOME!
2Planning for SAFETEA-LUPurpose and Need
- The purpose of this listening session is to
solicit input on the planning provisions of
SAFETEA-LU. Your input is valuable to FHWA and
FTA - This session will be devoted to listening to your
comments and questions - FHWA and FTA are interested in how best to
implement the SAFETEA-LU planning provisions
regulation, guidance, best practices, etc.
3Planning for SAFETEA-LUAgenda
- Consultation
- Existing Transportation Facilities
- Operations and Maintenance
- Congestion Management Process
- Public Participation Plan
- Visualization
- Publication
- Coordinated Pubic Transit Human Services
Transportation Plan - Air Quality/Conformity
- General/Other
- Planning Cycles
- Statewide/Metro Plan
- STIP/TIP
- Annual List of Projects
- Fiscal Constraint
- Planning Factors
- Consistency of Plan with Planned Growth and
Development - Transportation Security
- Safety in Planning
- Environment in Planning
- Mitigation
- MIS/Linking Planning and NEPA
4Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Planning Cycles
- Metropolitan transportation plans must be updated
at least every four years in air quality
nonattainment and maintenance areas - Metropolitan transportation plans in attainment
areas must be updated at least every five years
5Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Planning Cycles
- STIPs and metropolitan TIPs must be updated every
4 years - Must contain at least 4 years of projects and
strategies - The 4-year cycle and requirements for including
4-years of projects and strategies go hand in
hand and must be implemented together - All TIPs, STIPs, and Plans adopted (or amended,
revised, updated, etc.) after July 1, 2007, must
comply with all SAFETEA-LU planning provisions
6Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Annual List of Projects
- Development shall be a cooperative effort of the
State, transit operator, and MPO - Include two new project types, pedestrian
walkways and bicycle transportation facilities
7Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Fiscal Constraint
- Requirements unchanged in SAFETEA-LU
- Fiscal constraint required for STIPs, TIPs, and
metropolitan plans - Ensures that plans, STIPs, and TIPs reflect
realistic assumptions of capital, operations, and
maintenance costs - See FHWA/FTA Interim Guidance issued June 2005,
at http//www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/fcindex.htm
8Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Planning Factors
- Consistency of Plan with planned growth and
development - Expands previous planning factor related to the
environment - Adds promot(ing) consistency between
transportation improvements and State/local
planned growth and economic development - Transportation Security
- Stand alone planning factor
- Signals increase in importance from prior
legislation
9Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Safety
- Stand alone planning factor
- Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
- Includes policies, priorities, and strategies to
improve the safety of the transportation system - States are required to develop the SHSP after
consultation with stakeholders, including MPOs
and RPOs - Goals and objectives of approved SHSPs must be
reflected in state and metro transportation plans
10Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Environment in Planning
- Mitigation
- Metro and statewide transportation plans must
include discussion of potential environmental
mitigation - Developed in consultation with Federal, State and
Tribal wildlife, land management, and regulatory
agencies - Does not require discussion of environmental
mitigation for individual projects
11Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Environment in Planning
- MIS and Linking Planning and NEPA
- TEA-21 eliminated MIS as separate requirement,
but must be integrated into transportation
planning and NEPA - See FHWA/FTA Guidance on Linking Planning and
NEPA issued February 2005, at http//environment.f
hwa.dot.gov/strmlng/Planning_NEPAGuidance.pdf
12Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Statewide Transportation Plan Consultation
- Statewide Plan shall be developed in
- Cooperation with metropolitan planning
organizations - Consultation with affected nonmetropolitan
officials - Consultation with tribal government and the
Secretary of Interior
13Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Statewide Transportation Plan Consultation
- Statewide Plan shall be developed, as
appropriate, in consultation with State, tribal,
and local agencies responsible for - Land use management
- Natural Resources
- Environmental Protection
- Conservation
- Historic Preservation
- This consultation shall involve comparison of
transportation plans to State and tribal
conservation plans and maps, if available and to
inventories of natural or historic resources, if
available
14Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
MPO Transportation Plan Consultation
- MPO shall consult, as appropriate, with State and
local agencies responsible for - Land use management
- Natural Resources
- Environmental Protection
- Conservation
- Historic Preservation
- This consultation shall involve comparison with
State conservation plans or maps, if available
or comparison to inventories of natural or
historic resources, if available.
15Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Existing Transportation Facilities
- Operational and Management
- Metropolitan plans shall include operational and
management strategies to - Improve the performance of existing
transportation facilities to relieve congestion - Maximize the safety and mobility of people and
goods - Statewide Transportation Plans should include
capital, operations and management strategies,
investments, procedures, and other measures to
ensure the preservation and most efficient use of
existing transportation system
16Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Existing Transportation Facilities
- Congestion Management Process (CMP) required in
TMAs - Replaces ISTEA/TEA-21 requirement for Congestion
Management System (CMS) - Each TMA must define a plan and schedule for CMP
implementation
17Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Public Participation Plan
- To the maximum extent possible MPOs and States
must - Publish or make available for public view
transportation plans, STIPs and TIPs - Hold public meetings at convenient and accessible
times and locations - Employ visualization techniques to describe
Plans, STIPs, and TIPs - Visualization techniques can vary
18Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Coordinated Public Transit Human Services
Transportation Plan
- Proposed projects must be derived from a locally
developed public transit-human services
transportation plan - Condition for receiving formula funding under 3
FTA Programs - 5310 Special Needs of Elderly Individuals with
Disabilities - 5316(g) Job Access and Reverse Commute
- 5317(f) New Freedom
- Plan developed through process that includes
representatives of public, private, and
non-profit transportation and human service
providers, as well as the public - Service providers should ensure full coordination
with applicable metropolitan and statewide
planning process
19Planning for SAFETEA-LU Key Planning Provisions
Conformity
- New grace period for conformity lapse 12 months
- Update of conformity cycles at least every
4-years - Conformity redetermination on existing plans and
TIPs within 2 years of certain action on SIP - Options to shorten time horizon for conformity
demonstration - TCM substitution easier
20Planning for SAFETEA-LUMPO Listening Session
THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING!
Your input is valuable to FHWA and FTA