The Effect of Autonomous-Assisted Classroom Teaching on College English Listening Ability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Effect of Autonomous-Assisted Classroom Teaching on College English Listening Ability

Description:

The Effect of Autonomous-Assisted Classroom Teaching on College English Listening Ability Beijing Institute of Tourism Fan Guangli phyllisfan_at_hotmail.com – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:200
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: beiw4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Effect of Autonomous-Assisted Classroom Teaching on College English Listening Ability


1
The Effect of Autonomous-Assisted Classroom
Teaching on College English Listening Ability
  • Beijing Institute of Tourism
  • Fan Guangli
  • phyllisfan_at_hotmail.com

2
1 Introduction
  • The development of network-based multimedia
    technology brings opportunities to the teaching
    of college English listening course. Many journal
    articles are for the idea that traditional
    classroom teaching can not meet the versatile
    needs of the new era.

3
  • Some (Tian, 2007, Cheng et al 2006) even set up
    zero class-hour teaching model, aiming at
    promoting students language ability and forming
    self-study habits. And Professor Su Dingfang
    (2004) proposes that autonomous learning can not
    merely be regarded as independent study.

4
  • Phil Benson (2005)
  • Practices associated with the development of
    autonomy can be classified under six broad
    headings.
  • resource-based approaches, technology-based
    approaches, learner-based approaches,
    classroom-based approaches, teacher-based
    approaches.

5
  • On the basis of analyzing
  • -- traditional listening course and autonomous
    listening practice
  • -- students background and their language base
  • -- requirement of their future work
  • the following 2 hypotheses are put forward

6
  • (1) The complimentary model is preferred to
    foster students listening ability when their
    English is relatively at lower level
  • (2) The combination of formative and summative
    assessment will enhance students self management
    and autonomous learning ability

7
2 Methodology
  • 2.1 Subject Non-English major 4 year full-time
    students, 54 art, 46 science. 36 as 1
    priority, 20 as supplement, 44 has lower score.
  • Lower self assessment

8
Table 1 Pretest Scores

9
  • 2.2 measurement 2 pairs of tests and a
    questionnaire
  • 2.2.1 Pre-test vs. Level 1 Final
  • Aims to decide the experimental group 06
    Management 3 (59) and 06 Food and Nutrition (64)
    and the control group 06 Finance (61) and 06
    Management 1 (64)

10
Table 2 Level 1 Final
11
  • 2.2.2 Level II Mid-term vs. Level II Final

12
  • 2.3 Questionnaire
  • 16 groups of multiple choice questions and 1
    open question
  • -- Starting year of their formal listening
    course
  • -- Main approaches of English learning outside
    class
  • -- Main strategies applied in learning listening
  • -- Their self assessment
  • -- Their attitudes towards autonomous listening
    and classroom teaching etc.

13
  • 44.1 no formal listening course
  • 13.8 from senior high school
  • 34.5 from middle school
  • 7.6 from primary school

14
  • 2.4 Steps
  • 2.4.1 preparatory steps

15
Table 4 Range Analysis
16
  • 2.4.2 Implementation
  • Experimental group
  • Normal class after-class autonomous study
  • Control group
  • Normal class every other week
  • Autonomous study every other week

17
  • 2.4.3 Material
  • -- Listening
  • -- Role play
  • -- Oral practice
  • From Level 0 Level 9
  • Each level has 15-20 units
  • Level 3-6 correspond to CET 1-4

18
  • 2.5 Assessment
  • Daily score 40 from self study
  • Mid-term 20 from outside school
  • Final 40 mostly from outside school

19
3 Conclusion
  • -- More time to do listening
  • -- Form good self study habits
  • -- Higher score
  • -- Pay more attention to basic skills

20
Weaknesses
  • Pretest vs. Posttest
  • Daily score

21
References
  • (?)??.????????M.????????????.2005.11
  • ??,???.???????????J.?????.2006.21
  • ???.???????????M.???????????,2004
  • ???.???????????????????J. ??????.2007.1
  • ??,???,???,???.????????????????????????????J.???
    ????.2005.11
  • ???,???.???????????????????????.J????????(??????
    ?)2007.2

22
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com