Between the end of the Civil War and 1900, more new farms were started in the U'S' than in any other - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Between the end of the Civil War and 1900, more new farms were started in the U'S' than in any other

Description:

The entire western half of the country was taken from the ... manipulation of speculators and the lavishness by which western land was given to the railroads ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Chr488
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Between the end of the Civil War and 1900, more new farms were started in the U'S' than in any other


1
INTRODUCTION
  • Between the end of the Civil War and 1900, more
    new farms were started in the U.S. than in any
    other time in our history
  • The entire western half of the country was taken
    from the Indians and turned into farms and
    ranches
  • Despite the fact that the U.S. was turning into
    an industrial and urban nation, the agrarian
    ideal remained an extraordinarily powerful force
    for millions of Americans
  • But for the three million families who started
    new farms during this period, their dream often
    became a nightmare
  • The result of this sort of suffering was a great
    surge of agrarian protest known as the Populist
    Revolt

2
THE WEST IN 1860
In 1860, the westernmost states were Minnesota,
Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, and Texas
These states were thinly settled. Texas, for
example, only had 2.4 people per square mile in
1868
Indian population of the West was approx.
300,000. Not a large number but appropriate for
a hunting people who ranged over huge tracts of
wilderness in search of game
3
Western Indian tribes had been promised in
various treaties that they would be left alone
As long as this idea held, the Western tribes
were safe
These promises were made at a time when most
Americans saw little reason to settle the West
Most Americans, until the Civil War, believed the
West could not support civilization. Maps
called the region The Great American Desert, an
area believed to be as worthless as the Sahara
Desert and incapable of supporting agriculture.
4
FIRST ENCROACHERS
  • Great California Gold Rush of the late 1840s was
    followed by similar rushes in Nevada and Colorado
    (1850s), Idaho and Montana (1860s), and South
    Dakota (1870s)
  • All encroached on former Indian territory
  • Ranchers moved into the Great Plains
  • Cattlemen who found the endless prairies of the
    West ideal for cattle grazing
  • Followed by farmers

5
WHY FARMERS MOVED WEST I
  • Completion of transcontinental rail line by Union
    Pacific Railroad
  • Shortly after Civil War
  • Linked east and west coasts by rail
  • Made it possible to deliver crops grown in West
    to eastern markets at a reasonable cost

6
WHY FARMERS MOVED WEST 2
  • Shortage of trees in West made construction of
    fences and so forth very expensive
  • Barb wire resolved this problem
  • Still expensive to build a wooden cabin
  • But settlers discovered they could build huts out
    of prairie sod
  • Never saw sod houses as permanent but as
    temporary shelters

7
WHY FARMERS MOVED WEST 3
  • Limited rainfall remained a serious problem
  • One solution was dry farming
  • Another solution was to dig a well and draw water
    up for irrigation with a windmill
  • These options worked well enough to convince
    potential settlers that they could turn the Great
    American Desert into a Garden of Eden

8
THE PROCESS
  • White prospectors and/or farmers would pile up
    along the boundaries of Indian territory and then
    begin to filter into it
  • Difficult for government to enforce these treaty
    violations
  • And most federal officials did not even try to
  • Federal government felt no moral or legal
    obligation to protect Indian land from white
    settlers
  • So, most of the time, it didnt even try

9
LOUSY DEAL
  • Government pressured tribes to renegotiate
    original treaties and confine themselves on
    reservations
  • This meant that tribes would no longer be able to
    support themselves by hunting
  • But the government promised to give them supplies
    until they could make the transition to
    self-supporting farmers

10
WAR
  • Indians who did not want to accept life on the
    reservation had no choice but to resort to armed
    force
  • U.S. army would not expel whites who trespassed
    on Indian territory but the full military power
    of the U.S. was turned on those Indians who tried
    to take matters into their own hands
  • The result was the eruption of a series of Indian
    wars throughout the West in the 1870s and 1880s

11
CUSTERS LAST STAND
  • Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho won a few victories
    in the beginning
  • The most famous occurred in 1876 when General
    George Armstrong Custer led a unit of the 7th
    Cavalry into a trap at Little Big Horn, west of
    the Black Hills
  • Set by Sioux and Cheyenne
  • All 264 of his men were killed

12
WHITE ADVANTAGES
  • Indians never really stood much of a chance
  • Railroad gave federal troops superior mobility
  • Repeating firearms gave Army tremendous advantage
    in firepower
  • The buffalo, the principal source of food for
    most Western tribes, was wiped out by white
    hunters
  • In 1865, there were 10 million buffalo in the
    West by 1890, there were only 1000 left

13
LIFE ON THE RESERVATION 1
  • By 1880, most Western tribes had been forced onto
    reservations and put under the control of white
    official charged with the duty of civilizing
    them
  • Most of these officials lacked any understanding
    of traditional native culture and were determined
    to stamp it out completely
  • Many were selected by eastern Protestant churches
    and regarded tribal religious beliefs and
    practices as stupid superstitions
  • Therefore tried to force Indians to become good
    little Protestants

14
LIFE ON THE RESERVATION 2
  • White reservation teachers disdained Indian
    culture and customs
  • Tried to alienate Indian children from their
    parents by teaching them that their entire
    history and belief system was ignorant and wrong
  • When parents fought back and kept their kids out
    of school than had their government supplied cut
    off

15
BACKGROUND TO DAWES SEVERALTY ACT
  • Before 1887, reservation land was owned in common
    by the entire tribe
  • Individual tribal members could not sell portions
    off
  • Individual land ownership was completely alien to
    Indian tradition
  • White reformers argued that the reason why
    Indians were not making progress on reservations
    was because tribal land ownership stifled the
    incentive for individual self-improvement
  • Also sustained uncivilized beliefs and
    traditions

16
DAWES SEVERALTY ACT OF 1887
  • Did away with tribal ownership of land
  • Each reservation family received 160 acres of
    land which became their private property
  • Goal was to turn Indians into individualistic
    small property owners who would then be able to
    assimilate into white society more easily

17
FAILURE OF THE DAWES ACT
  • It was abused by white businessmen who tricked
    many Indians out of their allotments
  • Rested on false assumption that Indians wanted to
    be American-style businessmen farmers
  • Most did not
  • Attempt to impose individualistic competitive
    behavior on a people with powerful tribal
    loyalties and a long tradition of common property
    ownership doomed the act to failure

18
DISASTER
  • Within 50 years of the passage of the Dawes Act,
    63 of the land Indians had received as
    individual allotments had slipped out of their
    hands
  • And into the possession of white farmers,
    ranchers, and speculators
  • Most of the land that remained in Indian hands
    was useless for farming
  • Most Indians sunk into hopeless poverty
  • Some did assimilate but most were caught in a
    hopeless no-mans land
  • Result was poverty, disease, alcoholism, and
    apathy

19
NEW STATES
Idaho and Wyoming 1890
North and South Dakota, Washington, and Montana
1889
Utah 1896
Between 1865 and 1890, 8 new states from the West
joined the Union
Colorado 1876
20
HOMESTEAD ACT
  • Many settlers attracted to the West because of
    the Homestead Act Promised 160 acres of free
    land to those who were willing to clear and
    then work it
  • Getting suitable land with Homestead Act was not
    easy
  • Available land was limited and often in
    undesirable locations
  • Much of the best land was grabbed up by
    speculators All they wanted to do was hang on to
    it for a while and then sell it for as much as
    they could
  • Fraud was widespread
  • Government did not have agents to make sure
    people who obtained land actually lived and
    worked on it

21
RAILROADS
  • Much land was already owned by the railroads
  • Federal and state authorities had offered the
    railroads huge tracts of land free in order to
    convince them to build lines through areas of
    light traffic
  • Huge strips of land, sometimes extending 40 miles
    on each side of the line
  • Railroads sold as much of this land as they could
  • And because it was often advantageous to be
    located as close to a railroad as possible,
    farmers thought it was better to pay a higher
    price for this land than take free Homestead land

22
LAND IN THE WEST
  • Six out of seven new farms in the West were
    obtained by purchase from either the railroads or
    private land speculators
  • The Homestead Act helped some families who were
    too poor to make a start at farming without it,
    but its overall impact was diminished by the
    manipulation of speculators and the lavishness by
    which western land was given to the railroads

23
CONDITIONS IN THE WEST
  • Harsh and bleak environment
  • Winters were long and bitter and summers were
    blazing hot
  • Frequent droughts devastated crops
  • Plagues of grasshoppers destroyed every green
    thing for miles in every direction
  • Tornadoes tore up everything in their path
  • Corn and wheat were not well adapted to these
    conditions
  • Previous experience in the Old Midwest and South
    did not prepare farmers for conditions in the West

24
BUSTED DREAMS
  • Prosperity was not easy to obtain for the Western
    farmer
  • Farm incomes fluctuated wildly from year to year
  • In bad years, farmers were buried under a
    mountain of debt
  • Many lost their farms to creditors and were
    forced to return east or become tenant farmers

25
VILLAINS
  • Western farmers claimed they victims of ruthless
    railroads who overcharged them for shipping their
    products
  • Claimed they were exploited by middlemen who
    handled their sales
  • Paid them low prices and then sold their produce
    a hugely marked up products
  • Claimed they were victimized by bankers who
    charged unfair interest for farm loans
  • Claimed they were screwed by giant corporations
    in the east who demanded unfair high prices for
    manufactured products

26
REALITY CHECK
  • Western farmers had dreamed and worked hard to
    become independent and self-sufficient farmers
    and has instead ended up bankrupt and evicted
    from the homesteads they had sacrificed to create
  • Yet, while we should be sympathetic to their
    plight, we should also find the real reasons for
    their hardship and suffering and not be satisfied
    with their own simplistic explanations for their
    problems

27
GREED
  • Farmers themselves were a big part of their
    problems
  • Simply were not prepared for farming under the
    extreme environmental conditions of the West
  • Others were greedy
  • Had bought more land than they planned to farm,
    hoping to sell this extra land later at higher
    prices
  • They were land speculators too

28
DECLINING WHEAT PRICES
  • Wheat prices fluctuated wildly from year to year
    and, overall, declined from 1865 to 1900
  • Reason was because output outstripped demand
  • Introduction of farm machinery after 1870
    multiplied productivity of average farm worker
  • Increase in productivity was not accompanied by
    decrease in farmers producing wheat
  • Too many people entered wheat farming for the
    overall economic well-being of wheat farming

29
CHRONIC OVERPRODUCTION
  • Western farmers had no control over how much
    wheat would be produced in the country during any
    given year and thus had no control over the price
    for their crop
  • All an individual farmer could do was try to
    harvest as much as he could, in the hope that an
    increase in his output would compensate for any
    drop in price per bushel
  • But when every farmer followed this strategy, it
    result in such a huge annual crop that prices
    dropped even further

30
INTERNATIONAL MARKET
  • Vast new tracts of foreign land opened up to
    farming after the end of the Civil War
  • In Argentina, Australia, Canada, Russia, and New
    Zealand
  • New international markets for American wheat also
    were created
  • Creation of an international market for
    agricultural products gave American farmers new
    outlets for their crops
  • But it also exposed them to worldwide competition
    and made them more dependent than ever on forces
    beyond their control

31
EXPLANATION
  • When American farmers had produced only for the
    American market, a poor harvest would at least be
    partially compensated for by a rise in prices
  • But once the American farmer entered the
    international market, this compensating mechanism
    no longer operated
  • Since a year of poor crops in South Dakota became
    disastrous if it coincided with bumper crops in
    Argentina or Australia
  • Because this meant the international price for
    wheat would remain low even though South Dakotan
    farmers did not produce much that year

32
REAL REASONS
  • Speculative over-extension, overproduction, and
    the dangers of the international market were the
    root causes for the economic difficulties of
    western farmers during the late 19th century
  • In comparison, the reasons that they gave for
    their plight were not all that important

33
RAILROAD RATES
  • Farmers complaint that railroads charged them
    exorbitant rates to carry their crops to market
    was an exaggeration
  • Although there were some abuses, railroad rates
    for agricultural products actually declined
    throughout the late 19th century

34
COMPLICATED PROBLEM
  • Western farmers claimed that Eastern banks
    depressed crop prices through the manipulation of
    the money supply
  • Late 19th century was a period of severe
    deflation
  • Average price for everything dropped 50 between
    1865 and 1890
  • Cause was that the production of products (both
    agricultural and industrial) was growing faster
    than the money supply
  • As supply of products grew faster than the supply
    of money needed to buy them, prices fell

35
FEDERAL DECISIONS
  • Money supply remained stagnant because of 3
    decisions made by the federal government
  • Removal of paper money printed during Civil War
    from circulation
  • Limited amount of silver coins minted in any
    given year
  • Put country on gold standard
  • Every paper dollar had to have a dollars worth
    of gold in Fort Knox to back it up

36
FARMER POINT-OF-VIEW
  • Federal government made these decisions to
    stabilize U.S. currency after the unstable and
    inflationary period of the Civil War and to make
    American products competitive in the world market
  • But many farmers saw these decisions as the work
    of corrupt politicians in the pay of Wall Street
  • Argued that the deflation that resulted from
    these decisions hurt agriculture by depressing
    the price of agricultural products and only
    benefitted Wall Street

37
A BETTER EXPLANATION
  • Deflation affected all prices, not just
    agricultural prices
  • Deflation did bring less cash for farmers crops
    but it also meant that they needed
    correspondingly less money to by manufactured
    products
  • Price of wheat fell more sharply than prices in
    general
  • But this was the result of unique conditions
    governing the supply and demand of wheat
  • Not from monetary decisions that depressed
    overall price levels

38
THE BIG PROBLEM
  • Grievances of farmers would be embodied in the
    program of Populist Movement of the 1890s
  • A vast rural movement that tried to rectify the
    farmers plight
  • But it is doubtful that farmers would have been
    helped that much even if the entire Populist
    program had been adopted
  • Their analysis of the sources of their problems
    was incorrect and too superficial to yield
    effective remedies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com