Title: Between the end of the Civil War and 1900, more new farms were started in the U'S' than in any other
1INTRODUCTION
- Between the end of the Civil War and 1900, more
new farms were started in the U.S. than in any
other time in our history - The entire western half of the country was taken
from the Indians and turned into farms and
ranches - Despite the fact that the U.S. was turning into
an industrial and urban nation, the agrarian
ideal remained an extraordinarily powerful force
for millions of Americans - But for the three million families who started
new farms during this period, their dream often
became a nightmare - The result of this sort of suffering was a great
surge of agrarian protest known as the Populist
Revolt
2THE WEST IN 1860
In 1860, the westernmost states were Minnesota,
Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, and Texas
These states were thinly settled. Texas, for
example, only had 2.4 people per square mile in
1868
Indian population of the West was approx.
300,000. Not a large number but appropriate for
a hunting people who ranged over huge tracts of
wilderness in search of game
3Western Indian tribes had been promised in
various treaties that they would be left alone
As long as this idea held, the Western tribes
were safe
These promises were made at a time when most
Americans saw little reason to settle the West
Most Americans, until the Civil War, believed the
West could not support civilization. Maps
called the region The Great American Desert, an
area believed to be as worthless as the Sahara
Desert and incapable of supporting agriculture.
4FIRST ENCROACHERS
- Great California Gold Rush of the late 1840s was
followed by similar rushes in Nevada and Colorado
(1850s), Idaho and Montana (1860s), and South
Dakota (1870s) - All encroached on former Indian territory
- Ranchers moved into the Great Plains
- Cattlemen who found the endless prairies of the
West ideal for cattle grazing - Followed by farmers
5WHY FARMERS MOVED WEST I
- Completion of transcontinental rail line by Union
Pacific Railroad - Shortly after Civil War
- Linked east and west coasts by rail
- Made it possible to deliver crops grown in West
to eastern markets at a reasonable cost
6WHY FARMERS MOVED WEST 2
- Shortage of trees in West made construction of
fences and so forth very expensive - Barb wire resolved this problem
- Still expensive to build a wooden cabin
- But settlers discovered they could build huts out
of prairie sod - Never saw sod houses as permanent but as
temporary shelters
7WHY FARMERS MOVED WEST 3
- Limited rainfall remained a serious problem
- One solution was dry farming
- Another solution was to dig a well and draw water
up for irrigation with a windmill - These options worked well enough to convince
potential settlers that they could turn the Great
American Desert into a Garden of Eden
8THE PROCESS
- White prospectors and/or farmers would pile up
along the boundaries of Indian territory and then
begin to filter into it - Difficult for government to enforce these treaty
violations - And most federal officials did not even try to
- Federal government felt no moral or legal
obligation to protect Indian land from white
settlers - So, most of the time, it didnt even try
9LOUSY DEAL
- Government pressured tribes to renegotiate
original treaties and confine themselves on
reservations - This meant that tribes would no longer be able to
support themselves by hunting - But the government promised to give them supplies
until they could make the transition to
self-supporting farmers
10WAR
- Indians who did not want to accept life on the
reservation had no choice but to resort to armed
force - U.S. army would not expel whites who trespassed
on Indian territory but the full military power
of the U.S. was turned on those Indians who tried
to take matters into their own hands - The result was the eruption of a series of Indian
wars throughout the West in the 1870s and 1880s
11CUSTERS LAST STAND
- Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho won a few victories
in the beginning - The most famous occurred in 1876 when General
George Armstrong Custer led a unit of the 7th
Cavalry into a trap at Little Big Horn, west of
the Black Hills - Set by Sioux and Cheyenne
- All 264 of his men were killed
12WHITE ADVANTAGES
- Indians never really stood much of a chance
- Railroad gave federal troops superior mobility
- Repeating firearms gave Army tremendous advantage
in firepower - The buffalo, the principal source of food for
most Western tribes, was wiped out by white
hunters - In 1865, there were 10 million buffalo in the
West by 1890, there were only 1000 left
13LIFE ON THE RESERVATION 1
- By 1880, most Western tribes had been forced onto
reservations and put under the control of white
official charged with the duty of civilizing
them - Most of these officials lacked any understanding
of traditional native culture and were determined
to stamp it out completely - Many were selected by eastern Protestant churches
and regarded tribal religious beliefs and
practices as stupid superstitions - Therefore tried to force Indians to become good
little Protestants
14LIFE ON THE RESERVATION 2
- White reservation teachers disdained Indian
culture and customs - Tried to alienate Indian children from their
parents by teaching them that their entire
history and belief system was ignorant and wrong - When parents fought back and kept their kids out
of school than had their government supplied cut
off
15BACKGROUND TO DAWES SEVERALTY ACT
- Before 1887, reservation land was owned in common
by the entire tribe - Individual tribal members could not sell portions
off - Individual land ownership was completely alien to
Indian tradition - White reformers argued that the reason why
Indians were not making progress on reservations
was because tribal land ownership stifled the
incentive for individual self-improvement - Also sustained uncivilized beliefs and
traditions
16DAWES SEVERALTY ACT OF 1887
- Did away with tribal ownership of land
- Each reservation family received 160 acres of
land which became their private property - Goal was to turn Indians into individualistic
small property owners who would then be able to
assimilate into white society more easily
17FAILURE OF THE DAWES ACT
- It was abused by white businessmen who tricked
many Indians out of their allotments - Rested on false assumption that Indians wanted to
be American-style businessmen farmers - Most did not
- Attempt to impose individualistic competitive
behavior on a people with powerful tribal
loyalties and a long tradition of common property
ownership doomed the act to failure
18DISASTER
- Within 50 years of the passage of the Dawes Act,
63 of the land Indians had received as
individual allotments had slipped out of their
hands - And into the possession of white farmers,
ranchers, and speculators - Most of the land that remained in Indian hands
was useless for farming - Most Indians sunk into hopeless poverty
- Some did assimilate but most were caught in a
hopeless no-mans land - Result was poverty, disease, alcoholism, and
apathy
19NEW STATES
Idaho and Wyoming 1890
North and South Dakota, Washington, and Montana
1889
Utah 1896
Between 1865 and 1890, 8 new states from the West
joined the Union
Colorado 1876
20HOMESTEAD ACT
- Many settlers attracted to the West because of
the Homestead Act Promised 160 acres of free
land to those who were willing to clear and
then work it - Getting suitable land with Homestead Act was not
easy - Available land was limited and often in
undesirable locations - Much of the best land was grabbed up by
speculators All they wanted to do was hang on to
it for a while and then sell it for as much as
they could - Fraud was widespread
- Government did not have agents to make sure
people who obtained land actually lived and
worked on it
21RAILROADS
- Much land was already owned by the railroads
- Federal and state authorities had offered the
railroads huge tracts of land free in order to
convince them to build lines through areas of
light traffic - Huge strips of land, sometimes extending 40 miles
on each side of the line - Railroads sold as much of this land as they could
- And because it was often advantageous to be
located as close to a railroad as possible,
farmers thought it was better to pay a higher
price for this land than take free Homestead land
22LAND IN THE WEST
- Six out of seven new farms in the West were
obtained by purchase from either the railroads or
private land speculators - The Homestead Act helped some families who were
too poor to make a start at farming without it,
but its overall impact was diminished by the
manipulation of speculators and the lavishness by
which western land was given to the railroads
23CONDITIONS IN THE WEST
- Harsh and bleak environment
- Winters were long and bitter and summers were
blazing hot - Frequent droughts devastated crops
- Plagues of grasshoppers destroyed every green
thing for miles in every direction - Tornadoes tore up everything in their path
- Corn and wheat were not well adapted to these
conditions - Previous experience in the Old Midwest and South
did not prepare farmers for conditions in the West
24BUSTED DREAMS
- Prosperity was not easy to obtain for the Western
farmer - Farm incomes fluctuated wildly from year to year
- In bad years, farmers were buried under a
mountain of debt - Many lost their farms to creditors and were
forced to return east or become tenant farmers
25VILLAINS
- Western farmers claimed they victims of ruthless
railroads who overcharged them for shipping their
products - Claimed they were exploited by middlemen who
handled their sales - Paid them low prices and then sold their produce
a hugely marked up products - Claimed they were victimized by bankers who
charged unfair interest for farm loans - Claimed they were screwed by giant corporations
in the east who demanded unfair high prices for
manufactured products
26REALITY CHECK
- Western farmers had dreamed and worked hard to
become independent and self-sufficient farmers
and has instead ended up bankrupt and evicted
from the homesteads they had sacrificed to create - Yet, while we should be sympathetic to their
plight, we should also find the real reasons for
their hardship and suffering and not be satisfied
with their own simplistic explanations for their
problems
27GREED
- Farmers themselves were a big part of their
problems - Simply were not prepared for farming under the
extreme environmental conditions of the West - Others were greedy
- Had bought more land than they planned to farm,
hoping to sell this extra land later at higher
prices - They were land speculators too
28DECLINING WHEAT PRICES
- Wheat prices fluctuated wildly from year to year
and, overall, declined from 1865 to 1900 - Reason was because output outstripped demand
- Introduction of farm machinery after 1870
multiplied productivity of average farm worker - Increase in productivity was not accompanied by
decrease in farmers producing wheat - Too many people entered wheat farming for the
overall economic well-being of wheat farming
29CHRONIC OVERPRODUCTION
- Western farmers had no control over how much
wheat would be produced in the country during any
given year and thus had no control over the price
for their crop - All an individual farmer could do was try to
harvest as much as he could, in the hope that an
increase in his output would compensate for any
drop in price per bushel - But when every farmer followed this strategy, it
result in such a huge annual crop that prices
dropped even further
30INTERNATIONAL MARKET
- Vast new tracts of foreign land opened up to
farming after the end of the Civil War - In Argentina, Australia, Canada, Russia, and New
Zealand - New international markets for American wheat also
were created - Creation of an international market for
agricultural products gave American farmers new
outlets for their crops - But it also exposed them to worldwide competition
and made them more dependent than ever on forces
beyond their control
31EXPLANATION
- When American farmers had produced only for the
American market, a poor harvest would at least be
partially compensated for by a rise in prices - But once the American farmer entered the
international market, this compensating mechanism
no longer operated - Since a year of poor crops in South Dakota became
disastrous if it coincided with bumper crops in
Argentina or Australia - Because this meant the international price for
wheat would remain low even though South Dakotan
farmers did not produce much that year
32REAL REASONS
- Speculative over-extension, overproduction, and
the dangers of the international market were the
root causes for the economic difficulties of
western farmers during the late 19th century - In comparison, the reasons that they gave for
their plight were not all that important
33RAILROAD RATES
- Farmers complaint that railroads charged them
exorbitant rates to carry their crops to market
was an exaggeration - Although there were some abuses, railroad rates
for agricultural products actually declined
throughout the late 19th century
34COMPLICATED PROBLEM
- Western farmers claimed that Eastern banks
depressed crop prices through the manipulation of
the money supply - Late 19th century was a period of severe
deflation - Average price for everything dropped 50 between
1865 and 1890 - Cause was that the production of products (both
agricultural and industrial) was growing faster
than the money supply - As supply of products grew faster than the supply
of money needed to buy them, prices fell
35FEDERAL DECISIONS
- Money supply remained stagnant because of 3
decisions made by the federal government - Removal of paper money printed during Civil War
from circulation - Limited amount of silver coins minted in any
given year - Put country on gold standard
- Every paper dollar had to have a dollars worth
of gold in Fort Knox to back it up
36FARMER POINT-OF-VIEW
- Federal government made these decisions to
stabilize U.S. currency after the unstable and
inflationary period of the Civil War and to make
American products competitive in the world market - But many farmers saw these decisions as the work
of corrupt politicians in the pay of Wall Street - Argued that the deflation that resulted from
these decisions hurt agriculture by depressing
the price of agricultural products and only
benefitted Wall Street
37A BETTER EXPLANATION
- Deflation affected all prices, not just
agricultural prices - Deflation did bring less cash for farmers crops
but it also meant that they needed
correspondingly less money to by manufactured
products - Price of wheat fell more sharply than prices in
general - But this was the result of unique conditions
governing the supply and demand of wheat - Not from monetary decisions that depressed
overall price levels
38THE BIG PROBLEM
- Grievances of farmers would be embodied in the
program of Populist Movement of the 1890s - A vast rural movement that tried to rectify the
farmers plight - But it is doubtful that farmers would have been
helped that much even if the entire Populist
program had been adopted - Their analysis of the sources of their problems
was incorrect and too superficial to yield
effective remedies