Major%20Objectives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Major%20Objectives

Description:

Major Objectives – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: davids216
Learn more at: http://cheas.psu.edu
Category:
Tags: 20objectives | ju | major

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Major%20Objectives


1
Major Objectives
  • (McIntire-Stennis, 1997-2001 2 graduate
    students)
  • Initiated spatial measurements and geostatistical
    analysis of LAI and NPP
  • (NASA Land Surface Hydrology, 1999-2003
    3 graduate students, 1 post-doc)
  • Implications of converting forests from one
    species to another
  • Implications for scaling up to landscapes
  • Inter-annual variability
  • (NSF Hydrologic Sciences, 2004-2007
    3 graduate students)
  • Quantifying spatial gradients
  • Carbon vs hydraulic limits to stomatal
    conductance
  • Building simple, yet mechanistically more
    realistic models

2
Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study(ChEAS)
3
Burrows et al., 2002, Ecosystems
4
Burrows et al., 2002, Ecosystems
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
5
Taxonomy of vegetation details
IGBP
IGBP
Site
-
Specific
Sap
-
Flux
Site
-
Specific
Sap
-
Flux
Classification
Classification
Classification
Species
Classification
Species
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Forested wetland
Alder
Forested wetland
Alder
Mixed
Mixed
Cedar
Cedar
Wetland fir
Wetland fir
Deciduous broadleaf forest
Aspen
Deciduous broadleaf forest
Aspen
Aspen
Aspen
Upland fir
Upland fir
Hardwoods
Sugar maple
Hardwoods
Sugar maple
Basswood
Basswood
Evergreen
needleleaf
forest
Red pine
Red pine
forest
Red pine
Red pine
Jack pine
Jack pine
Upland conifer
Upland conifer
Open
shrublands
shrublands
Grass/Disturbed
Grass/Disturbed
Permanent wetlands
Permanent wetlands
Nonforested
wetland
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
6
Whole canopy transpiration
Ewers et al., 2002, Water Resources Research
7
Landscape scale water fluxes
Average annual precipitation 800 mm Growing
season precipitation 300-500 mm Growing season
evapotranspiration 350-450 mm Canopy
transpiration (forest) 150-200 mm Canopy
transpiration (aspen) 300 mm
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
8
Effects of taxonomic aggregation
Total Evapotranspiration
Forest Transpiration
Biome-based models
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
9
Simpler, species-specific empirical models
Mackay et al., 2003, Advances in Water Resources
10
Many different models meet the conditions
for calibration gt highly non-specific
11
A more informed model identification
Efficient
Safe
Mackay et al., 2003, Advances in Water Resources
12
Informed models are potentially scalable
13
Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
14
Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
15
Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
16
Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
17
Ewers et al., 2006, Tree Physiology
18
Plants will prevent hydraulic failure
(Oren et al., 1999)
19
Spatial Gradient Approach
GSref f(L, edge distance, wetland distance) m
0.6GSref
20
What if we increase edge effects?
Center-of-Stand Basis
Spatial Gradient Basis
Transpiration mm (30-min) 1
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Future Directions
  • Phenology proposal (NSF ?)
  • NSF Carbon/Water ?
  • Forest manipulation (USDA ?)
  • Continental scale, multi-tower inter-comparison
    (NASA ?)

25
Publications
  • Ewers, B.E., D.S. Mackay, and S. Samanta. 2006.
    Interannual consistency in canopy stomatal
    conductance control of leaf water potential
    across seven tree species. Tree Physiology, in
    press.
  • Ewers, B.E., D.S. Mackay, J. Tang, P. Bolstad,
    and S. Samanta. 2006. Intercomparison of Sugar
    Maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stand transpiration
    responses to environmental conditions from the
    Western Great Lakes Region of the United State.
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, in press.
  • Ahl, D.E., Gower, S.T., Mackay, D.S., Burrows,
    S.N., Norman, J.M., and Diak, G. 2005. The
    effects of aggregated land cover data on
    estimating NPP in northern Wisconsin. Remote
    Sensing of Environment, 97, 1-14.
  • Ahl, D.E., S.T. Gower, D.S. Mackay, S.N.
    Burrows, J.M. Norman, and G.R. Diak. 2004.
    Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a
    northern Wisconsin forest implications for
    modeling net primary production with remote
    sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93,
    168-178.
  • Burrows, S.N., S.T. Gower, J.M. Norman, G. Diak,
    D.S. Mackay, D.E. Ahl, and M.K. Clayton. 2003.
    Spatial variability of aboveground net primary
    productivity for a forested landscape in northern
    Wisconsin. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,
    33, 2007-2018.
  • Mackay, D.S., D.E. Ahl, B.E. Ewers, S.
    Samanta, S.T. Gower, and S.N. Burrows. 2003.
    Physiological tradeoffs in the parameterization
    of a model of canopy transpiration. Advances in
    Water Resources, 26(2), 179-194.
  • Mackay, D.S., S. Samanta, D.E. Ahl, B.E.
    Ewers, S.T. Gower, and S.N. Burrows. 2003.
    Automated parameterization of land surface
    process models using fuzzy logic. Transactions in
    GIS, 7(1), 139-153.
  • Mackay, D.S., D.E. Ahl, B.E. Ewers, S.T. Gower,
    S.N. Burrows, S. Samanta, and K.J. Davis. 2002.
    Effects of aggregated classifications of forest
    composition on estimates of evapotranspiration in
    a northern Wisconsin forest. Global Change
    Biology, 8(12), 1253-1265.
  • Burrows, S.N., S.T. Gower, M.K. Clayton, D.S.
    Mackay, D.E. Ahl, J.M. Norman, and G. Diak.
    2002. Application of geostatistics to
    characterize LAI for flux towers to landscapes.
    Ecosystems, 5(7), 667-679.
  • Ewers, B.E., D.S. Mackay, S.T. Gower, D.E. Ahl,
    S.N. Burrows, S. Samanta. 2002. Tree species
    effects on stand transpiration in northern
    Wisconsin. Water Resources Research, 38(7),
    10.1029/2001WR000830.

Downloadable from http//water.geog.buffalo.edu/ma
ckay/pubs
26
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com