Title: Major%20Objectives
1Major Objectives
- (McIntire-Stennis, 1997-2001 2 graduate
students) - Initiated spatial measurements and geostatistical
analysis of LAI and NPP - (NASA Land Surface Hydrology, 1999-2003
3 graduate students, 1 post-doc) - Implications of converting forests from one
species to another - Implications for scaling up to landscapes
- Inter-annual variability
- (NSF Hydrologic Sciences, 2004-2007
3 graduate students) - Quantifying spatial gradients
- Carbon vs hydraulic limits to stomatal
conductance - Building simple, yet mechanistically more
realistic models
2Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study(ChEAS)
3Burrows et al., 2002, Ecosystems
4Burrows et al., 2002, Ecosystems
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
5Taxonomy of vegetation details
IGBP
IGBP
Site
-
Specific
Sap
-
Flux
Site
-
Specific
Sap
-
Flux
Classification
Classification
Classification
Species
Classification
Species
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Forested wetland
Alder
Forested wetland
Alder
Mixed
Mixed
Cedar
Cedar
Wetland fir
Wetland fir
Deciduous broadleaf forest
Aspen
Deciduous broadleaf forest
Aspen
Aspen
Aspen
Upland fir
Upland fir
Hardwoods
Sugar maple
Hardwoods
Sugar maple
Basswood
Basswood
Evergreen
needleleaf
forest
Red pine
Red pine
forest
Red pine
Red pine
Jack pine
Jack pine
Upland conifer
Upland conifer
Open
shrublands
shrublands
Grass/Disturbed
Grass/Disturbed
Permanent wetlands
Permanent wetlands
Nonforested
wetland
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
6Whole canopy transpiration
Ewers et al., 2002, Water Resources Research
7Landscape scale water fluxes
Average annual precipitation 800 mm Growing
season precipitation 300-500 mm Growing season
evapotranspiration 350-450 mm Canopy
transpiration (forest) 150-200 mm Canopy
transpiration (aspen) 300 mm
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
8Effects of taxonomic aggregation
Total Evapotranspiration
Forest Transpiration
Biome-based models
Mackay et al., 2002, Global Change Biology
9Simpler, species-specific empirical models
Mackay et al., 2003, Advances in Water Resources
10Many different models meet the conditions
for calibration gt highly non-specific
11A more informed model identification
Efficient
Safe
Mackay et al., 2003, Advances in Water Resources
12Informed models are potentially scalable
13Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
14Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
15Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
16Ewers et al., 2006, Ag. For. Met.
17Ewers et al., 2006, Tree Physiology
18Plants will prevent hydraulic failure
(Oren et al., 1999)
19Spatial Gradient Approach
GSref f(L, edge distance, wetland distance) m
0.6GSref
20What if we increase edge effects?
Center-of-Stand Basis
Spatial Gradient Basis
Transpiration mm (30-min) 1
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Future Directions
- Phenology proposal (NSF ?)
- NSF Carbon/Water ?
- Forest manipulation (USDA ?)
- Continental scale, multi-tower inter-comparison
(NASA ?)
25Publications
- Ewers, B.E., D.S. Mackay, and S. Samanta. 2006.
Interannual consistency in canopy stomatal
conductance control of leaf water potential
across seven tree species. Tree Physiology, in
press. - Ewers, B.E., D.S. Mackay, J. Tang, P. Bolstad,
and S. Samanta. 2006. Intercomparison of Sugar
Maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stand transpiration
responses to environmental conditions from the
Western Great Lakes Region of the United State.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, in press. - Ahl, D.E., Gower, S.T., Mackay, D.S., Burrows,
S.N., Norman, J.M., and Diak, G. 2005. The
effects of aggregated land cover data on
estimating NPP in northern Wisconsin. Remote
Sensing of Environment, 97, 1-14. - Ahl, D.E., S.T. Gower, D.S. Mackay, S.N.
Burrows, J.M. Norman, and G.R. Diak. 2004.
Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a
northern Wisconsin forest implications for
modeling net primary production with remote
sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93,
168-178. - Burrows, S.N., S.T. Gower, J.M. Norman, G. Diak,
D.S. Mackay, D.E. Ahl, and M.K. Clayton. 2003.
Spatial variability of aboveground net primary
productivity for a forested landscape in northern
Wisconsin. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,
33, 2007-2018. - Mackay, D.S., D.E. Ahl, B.E. Ewers, S.
Samanta, S.T. Gower, and S.N. Burrows. 2003.
Physiological tradeoffs in the parameterization
of a model of canopy transpiration. Advances in
Water Resources, 26(2), 179-194. - Mackay, D.S., S. Samanta, D.E. Ahl, B.E.
Ewers, S.T. Gower, and S.N. Burrows. 2003.
Automated parameterization of land surface
process models using fuzzy logic. Transactions in
GIS, 7(1), 139-153. - Mackay, D.S., D.E. Ahl, B.E. Ewers, S.T. Gower,
S.N. Burrows, S. Samanta, and K.J. Davis. 2002.
Effects of aggregated classifications of forest
composition on estimates of evapotranspiration in
a northern Wisconsin forest. Global Change
Biology, 8(12), 1253-1265. - Burrows, S.N., S.T. Gower, M.K. Clayton, D.S.
Mackay, D.E. Ahl, J.M. Norman, and G. Diak.
2002. Application of geostatistics to
characterize LAI for flux towers to landscapes.
Ecosystems, 5(7), 667-679. - Ewers, B.E., D.S. Mackay, S.T. Gower, D.E. Ahl,
S.N. Burrows, S. Samanta. 2002. Tree species
effects on stand transpiration in northern
Wisconsin. Water Resources Research, 38(7),
10.1029/2001WR000830.
Downloadable from http//water.geog.buffalo.edu/ma
ckay/pubs
26(No Transcript)