Fiscal Transparency, ROSCs and Budget Execution Marco Cangiano IMFFAD

1
Fiscal Transparency, ROSCs and Budget
ExecutionMarco CangianoIMF-FAD
World Bank Seminar Washington DC November 5, 2003
2
TOPICS

• Rationale for transparency
• ROSC process
• Key findings
• Linkages with GFS and accounting standards

3
Structure of the Code
The Code is based on four general principles

• Institutional clarity governments role and the
  way its agencies interact
• Commitment to make comprehensive information
  available to the public
• Open processes of budget preparation, execution,
  and reporting
• Assurance of integrity of information by strong
  oversight

4
The Codes Vertical Structure
The Code is organized in a hierarchy of
principles and practices, which progressively
define good practice in fiscal transparency

• 4 general principles
• 10 specific principles
• 37 good practices

5
Why Transparency?

• Improved transparency is seen as a necessary
  basis for improving efficiency and effectiveness
  of fiscal management
• Better information will make government more
  accountable and lead to better fiscal policies
• Transparency will be reinforced by financial
  marketswhich will provide further incentives for
  sound fiscal policies

6
Promotion depends on many groups...

• IFIs and bilateral support of government
• Financial analysts concern with transparency
• Civil society concern with public
  information and participation

7
Growing impact of transparency assessments

• Governments identify internal management
  reform priorities
• Rating agencies/market analysts use fiscal
  ROSCs
• Civil society use fiscal ROSCs and use code
  to make assessments

8
IMF Objectives and tools

• Promote principles and good practice --Code
  and Manual
• Integrate with Fund surveillance --ROSCs
• Build incentives improve practices --techni
  cal assistance outreach
• Reports on Observance of Standards and Codes

9
ROSC procedures

• Questionnaire and self-assessment
• Staff review and assessment
• Country review
• Publication
• Article IV and ROSCs

10
ROSCs play a central role

• Dialogue with member countries on importance
  of transparency
• Links with Fund programs and TA from Fund
  and others
• Publication signals a commitment to improve
  transparency

11
But need to coordinate....

• Many agencies assess standards or related
  aspects
• Duplication, inefficiency, high country
  costs, information overload
• Clarity of agency objectives
• Sustained, focused efforts.

12
http//www.imf.org/external/ IMF at Work/Reports
on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSCs)

• 54 countries have completed fiscal ROSCs
• 48 are published on the IMF website
• Some focus on emerging market
  countriesbut a wide range covered

13
Standards Codes http//www.imf.org/external/stan
dards/index.htm

• 62 countries have completed fiscal ROSCs
• Most are published on the IMF website
• Includes all G7, most Eastern European and CIS
  countries, and many Latin American countries

14
Key findings to date.

• Most ROSC participants are taking some steps to
  improve transparency
• Around 60 percent of market access countries are
  participating
• A range of common problems identified
• Poor fiscal data quality
• Off-budget activity
• Tax expenditures and discretionary tax
  administration
• Poor definition of intergovernmental relations
• See http//www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sac/2003/03
  0503.htm International Standards Strengthening
  Surveillance, Domestic Institutions, and
• International Markets (SM/O3/86) Supplement 2

15
GFSM 2001

• GFSM 2001 is an improved framework for collection
  and dissemination of government statistics.
• The focus will be on advantages and limitations
  of the framework for economic analysis of
  government operations and for budget management.

16
GFSM 2001

• Synchronized with national accounts1993 SNA
• Integrates flows and stocksa balance sheet
  approach
• Cash plus reportinginitially cash, but
  progressive move to accrual basis reporting
• Will link with international accounting
  standards