DDS 5year Plan NCHSD conference Javier Robles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

DDS 5year Plan NCHSD conference Javier Robles

Description:

Meeting the Employment Transportation Needs of People with Disabilities in New Jersey ... In New Jersey Transportation was only second to housing in numbers of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: jonaca
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DDS 5year Plan NCHSD conference Javier Robles


1
NJ Division of Disability Services Five-Year
Transportation Plan Meeting the Employment
Transportation Needs of People with Disabilities
in New Jersey Presented By Javier Robles,
JD NCHSD Conference November 9, 2006
Presentation courtesy of the Alan M. Voorhees
Transportation Center Rutgers, The State
University of New Jersey
2
Acknowledgements
  • Funding for this study was provided by the
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    Medicaid Infrastructure Grant No. CODA 93.779
  • This study was made possible through the
    participation and contributions of many
  • NJDHS Division of Disability Services
  • NJ TRANSIT
  • Hundreds of survey and focus group participants
  • County paratransit providers
  • Nonprofit service providers
  • Research team Dr. Richard Brail, Jon Carnegie,
    Dr. Brenda Johnson, Andrea Lubin, Pippa Woods,
    and research assistants Aaron Cardon, Jianye
    Chen, Jeffrey Perlman, Richard Rabinowitz and
    Ginna Smith

3
Why Study Transportation?
  • In New Jersey Transportation was only second to
    housing in numbers of calls the Division of
    Disability Services received
  • There was no clear study on transportation needs
    of people with disabilities who wished to work
  • New Jersey lacked a plan or roadmap as to what
    to do about transportation for this group
  • No study or plan meant no way to approach the
    Governor or Legislature

4
Quote
  • The reasonable man adapts himself to
  • the world the unreasonable one
  • persists in trying to adapt the world to
  • himself. Therefore all progress
  • depends on the unreasonable man.
  • George Bernard Shaw

5
5 Year Plan Cost
  • New Jersey spent 252,000 on this Project
  • Project was conducted by the Alan M. Voorhees
    Transportation Policy Institute with Assistance
    from the MIG Project Staff
  • Main Problem Issues Included
  • State and Department Approval
  • State and Department Approvals
  • State and Department Approvals

6
Study Objectives
  • Document the transportation needs of people with
    disabilities in New Jersey with particular
    emphasis on those working or seeking work in a
    competitive work environment
  • Inventory available transportation services
  • Identify and document transportation barriers to
    work for people with disabilities
  • Recommend ways to address the identified barriers

7
Geography of Disability in New Jersey
  • One in five (17 percent) New Jersey residents
    report having a disability
  • Two-thirds (68 percent) of the States disabled
    population report having a disability that makes
    it difficult to work
  • Essex County has the greatest number of disabled
    residents (140,551) Hunterdon County has the
    lowest (12,130)
  • The density of people with disabilities range
    from twenty six persons/sq. mile in Salem county
    to 2,292 persons/sq. mile in Hudson County
  • Patterns vary widely by county and municipality

8
Accessible Transportation Options in NJ
  • NJ TRANSIT Buses, trains and Access Link
  • County Services
  • Municipal Services
  • Nongovernmental Services
  • Private Transportation Taxis and Medical Access
    Vehicles

9
Transportation Provider Inventory and Survey
  • Type of services provided
  • Service area and hours of operation
  • Fleet characteristics size of fleet, mix of
    vehicles and vehicle accessibility
  • Customers served
  • Trip purposes
  • Funding sources
  • Eligibility requirements
  • Driver training

10
Transportation Needs Assessment
  • Consumer survey
  • 4,600 surveys distributed
  • 381 respondents
  • 8.2 percent response rate
  • Focus groups
  • Consumers 45 individuals participated in four
    in-person focus groups (Trenton, Vineland, New
    Brunswick, Newark) and two on-line bulletin board
    discussions
  • Vocational rehabilitation counselors
  • Paratransit drivers and managers (Middlesex
    County)
  • Transportation Access and Work Opportunity
    Analysis

11
Consumer Survey Findings
  • 75 percent of survey respondents were working age
    (18 and 64 years old) and approximately half (46
    percent) were employed
  • Most (74 percent) unemployed working age
    respondents reported they were not actively
    looking for work
  • 14 percent reported lack of transportation was a
    barrier to employment
  • Less than one quarter (18 percent) employed
    respondents reported needing a wheelchair
    accessible or specially equipped vehicle
  • At the same time, nearly two in five (38 percent)
    unemployed respondents reported such a need
  • 69 percent of survey respondents reported using
    Access Link to travel to/from work, 18 percent
    traveled by private car/van as a passenger, 15
    percent used a bus/train and 13 percent used
    county paratransit

12
Consumer Survey Findings
  • Two thirds (66 percent) of survey respondents had
    a generally favorable opinion of NJ TRANSIT bus
    and rail services however, less than half agreed
    that services were easily accessible for
    someone with their disability or sufficiently
    flexible to meet their needs.
  • The vast majority (85 percent) of survey
    respondents had a generally favorable opinion of
    NJ TRANSIT Access Link service. Access Link
    received its lowest ratings in the categories of
    flexibility (69 percent) and reliability (75
    percent).
  • More than two thirds (70 percent) of survey
    respondents expressed a favorable opinion of
    county paratransit services. Lowest ratings were
    in the categories of flexibility (48 percent) and
    convenience (56 percent).

13
Focus Group Findings
  • The availability and quality of transportation
    services often varies depending on geographic
    location and transportation needs often vary
    depending on client disability.
  • Residential location and accessibility to
    different transportation options greatly
    influences individual decisions to seek
    employment.
  • The task of trip planning within the current
    system is often overwhelming and the
    uncertainty/irregularity of service can affect an
    individuals work experience as well as their
    decision to remain employed.
  • The fragmented nature of the current
    transportation system makes it challenging to
    find an appropriate means of getting to/from
    work.

14
Focus Group Findings
  • There is no central source for transportation
    information and/or trip planning assistance.
    Issues related to trip planning, scheduling and
    personal safety often hinders employment options.
  • There are differing and often conflicting
    expectations related to the level of service
    offered and possible from county paratransit
    systems in particular. This creates problems for
    clients, drivers and managers.
  • Travel behavior of persons with disabilities is
    highly dependant on the nature and extent of
    their disability as well as the transportation
    environment. Both of these factors may influence
    whether or not a disabled person is working or
    able to retain employment.

15
Focus Group Findings
  • Specific transportation challenges facing
    disabled persons seeking employment include
  • Variation in eligibility requirements
  • Multiple pick-ups and long routes
  • Lack of advance notice or communication regarding
    schedule delays and arrival times
  • Policies regarding boarding and alighting
    assistance
  • Driver rudeness, impatience, and insensitivity
  • Policies related to scheduling, including advance
    reservation requirements and cancellation
    consequences
  • Access Links 3/4 mile service area
  • Pick-up/drop-off windows (e.g., 20 minutes before
    and 20 minutes after scheduled time)
  • Lack of transportation options/alternatives in
    some areas
  • Vehicle safety issues and
  • Restrictions related to making linked trips.

16
Access and Work Opportunity Analysis
  • Work opportunity for people with disabilities
    is a function of many complex and often related
    factors
  • Disability type and severity
  • Availability of skill-appropriate jobs within a
    reasonable commute
  • Labor force competition and local economic
    conditions
  • Employer willingness to make needed
    accommodations
  • Quantity and quality of available transportation
    options
  • For the purpose of this analysis, we examined
    three primary factors
  • Transit coverage and proximity of residence
    location to fixed route transit and/or Access
    Link
  • Proximity of jobs to fixed route transit and/or
    Access Link
  • Quality and quantity of county paratransit
    services

17
Area Served by NJ TRANSIT Fixed Route Transit
and Access Link
18
Bus, Rail and Access Link Coverage
19
Proximity of Disabled Residents to Transit
Services
20
Proximity of Jobs to Transit Services
21
Characteristics of County Paratransit
22
Composite Analysis
23
Institutional Barriers
  • The most pressing need relative to enhancing
    transportation services for people with
    disabilities continues to be the need for
    improved coordination
  • Frequently cited barriers to coordination
    include
  • Unwillingness or inability to share vehicles due
    to different needs and characteristics of client
    populations
  • Perception of the high costs of coordination from
    the provider perspective
  • Limited feasibility for coordination in areas
    lacking transportation options
  • Inconsistency among programs with regard to
    eligibility requirements, funding sources,
    accounting/reporting requirements, safety
    standards, and program goals
  • Inadequate guidance on potential implementation
    strategies
  • Insufficient state-level leadership or commitment
    to guide coordination (USGAO 2003)

24
Best Practices and Model Programs
  • Best practices and Model Programs
  • Coordinate paratransit with fixed route services
  • Use flex-route services to enhance mobility and
    paratransit system efficiency
  • Use taxi coupons/vouchers to expand transport
    options
  • Provide travel training for people with
    disabilities
  • Create One-stop transportation centers
  • Use Job Access Reverse Commute funding to support
    employment transportation for people with
    disabilities
  • Provide emergency ride home programs for people
    with disabilities commuting to/from work by
    transit/paratransit
  • Use mobility managers/brokers to coordinate human
    services transportation

25
Recommendations
  • Foster awareness and understanding regarding the
    employment transportation needs of people with
    disabilities in New Jersey, the range of
    transportation options available and the benefits
    of better coordination
  • Participate fully in the Federal United We Ride
    initiative, which is designed to improve and
    enhance the coordination of human services
    transportation
  • Expand the resources available to improve/enhance
    transportation services for people with
    disabilities
  • The State should reexamine the SCDRTAP funding
    allocation formula to ensure the needs of people
    with disabilities are adequately addressed
  • County and NGO providers should consider making
    greater use of fares to supplement public funds
    available for transportation

26
Recommendations
  • Work cooperatively to create a more seamless
    community transportation system and consistently
    work toward improving and expanding travel
    options available to people with disabilities
  • Expand the use of flex-route services
  • Explore opportunities to better link paratransit
    services with fixed route transit
  • Develop ways to facilitate and/or provide county
    paratransit service across county boundaries
  • Employ advanced technologies to better meet
    consumer needs and service expectations with
    regard to advance scheduling, wait time windows,
    general service reliability and timeliness
  • Create more uniform policies and procedures
    concerning eligibility requirements, passenger
    assistance practices, scheduling and fare/payment
    policies
  • Ensure emergency ride home programs can
    accommodate rides for people with disabilities

27
Recommendations
  • Create an Internet-based one-stop for information
    on available transportation options and services
    for people with disabilities
  • Develop and implement a regional travel
    concierge service designed to provide
    coordinated, seamless trip planning and
    scheduling assistance to people with disabilities
    and demonstrate the benefits of enhanced
    coordination
  • Increase the number of accessible vehicles and
    facilities available from all public, private and
    NGO service providers
  • Ensure NJ TRANSIT is complying with all ADA
    requirements
  • Reform the States taxi and livery license laws
    to require that a minimum portion of each
    operators fleet is wheel chair accessible
  • Establish minimum accessibility requirements for
    county paratransit fleets and NGO service
    providers receiving Federal and State funds

28
Recommendations
  • Increase driver education and training on a
    variety of topics, including the use of wheel
    chair tie-downs, lifts, and bridge plate
    operation emergency preparedness and first aid
    as well as driver sensitivity
  • Expand the quality and availability of travel
    training programs for people with disabilities
    and the employment/social service counselors that
    serve them
  • Ensure transportation service planning at all
    levels incorporates and addresses the needs of
    people with disabilities
  • All agencies and organizations involved in the
    transportation planning process should solicit
    input from the disable community on an on-going
    and regular basis.
  • Agencies should seek to create non-traditional
    opportunities for input and take extraordinary
    steps to include consumers in the planning and
    policy making process

29
Now What?
  • Following Recommendations Are In Process
  • Create an Internet-based one-stop for information
    on available transportation options and services
    for people with disabilities
  • Develop and implement a regional travel
    concierge service designed to provide
    coordinated, seamless trip planning and
    scheduling assistance to people with disabilities
    and demonstrate the benefits of enhanced
    coordination

30
Now What?
  • The Following Recommendations Are Accomplished
  • Participate fully in the Federal United We Ride
    initiative, which is designed to improve and
    enhance the coordination of human services
    transportation
  • Forum to Educate Consumers, Government,
    Legislature and others about the 5 Year Plan
  • Distribution of 5 Year Plan to Numerous
    Constituencies

31
Framework for Implementation
32
http//www.state.nj.us/humanservices/dds/publicati
ons.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com