Title: Understanding and overcoming barriers to progression Lisa Naylor Senior Research Officer BASE Annual
1Understanding and overcoming barriers to
progression Lisa NaylorSenior Research
OfficerBASE Annual ConferenceJune 2006
2Government Social Research (GSR)
- Good quality social research helps government to
make better policies and deliver better services
Evidence based policy - Government Social Research comprises
approximately 1,000 social researchers located in
20 government departments
3Client characteristics (_at_ April 05)
- The typical WORKSTEP client?
- Clearly no such thing. However, the very diverse
client group is a considerable challenge for both
policy makers and providers delivering the
service. - 14,172 clients in WORKSTEP supported employment
(excluding Remploy) - Just 30 female
- 54.6 joined under previous Supported
Employment Programme
4Client characteristics (_at_ April 05)
5Client characteristics (_at_ April 05)
6Current progression levels
7References
- Forthcoming report WORKSTEP Modernisation Funds
Evaluation by Purvis, Smith, Lowrey and Dobbs
(July 2006) - WORKSTEP Evaluation Case Studies Exploring the
design, delivery and performance of WORKSTEP by
Purvis, Lowrey and Dobbs, (April 2006) - Accessing User and Provider Views on Desirable
Outcomes of WORKSTEP by Thornton et al. (July
2005) - A study of Providers New to WORKSTEP by Thornton
et al. (June 2004) - Empowering People with Disabilities A guide to
good practice in supported employment by CRG
(June 2002) - Results-based Funded Supported Employment
avoiding disincentives to serving people with
greatest need by Corden and Thornton (June 2003)
- The Net Costs and Individual Benefits of the
Supported Employment Programme by Beyer et al.
(March 2003) - User views of Supported Employment by Caron
Walker (May 2000) Web links to these reports on
back page of handouts - Web links to these reports on back page of
handouts
8Barriers to Progression Programme Design
- Progression is not suitable for everyone
- Complex and cumulative barriers may never be
overcome to levels acceptable to mainstream open
employers - A persons health condition or job retention needs
may require ongoing support - A persons health condition could mean support
needs increase over time - Current outcome funding structure does not
provide incentive for progression - Total 1000 progression payments versus 400
monthly payment - Not cost effective for providers to progress
clients unless contracted places are full - Remploy grant funding
- Lack of clarity on self employment for WORKSTEP
customers - Lack of clarity around what level of performance
at work is required before a supported employee
should be considered for open employment - Timing if progression doesnt happen within
approx two years of joining WORKSTEP, barriers
intensify and progression is much less likely to
occur.
9Barriers to Progression Employer related issues
- Expectations and understanding of the programme.
- difficulties changing the expectations of
employers where customers transferred to WORKSTEP
from former SEP - many employers have limited understanding of the
programme - Difficulties moving away from wage subsidies,
- public sector employers and smaller businesses
particularly reluctant - some employers insist on compensation for
reduced levels of productivity - harder to reduce subsidy where customers have
been employed for a long time with a subsidy. - Employers was reluctant to relinquish the
non-financial support from WORKSTEP - Lack of confidence in employing disabled people.
- Anxieties about the DDA
- Lack of internal support
- Supported businesses, disincentives to progress
most productive staff - Employer discrimination
- reluctance to employ without carrot of
financial support - reduced opportunities for disabled people
10Barriers to Progression Customer related issues
- Expectations and understanding of the programme.
- difficulties changing the expectations of
customers who transferred to WORKSTEP from former
SEP - many customers have limited understanding of the
programme, including the progression aim,
especially those with learning disabilities and
those on the programme for a long time - Customers may lose relatively good terms and
conditions if progression means moving to another
employer - More of an issues for those employed by local
authorities and supported businesses, including
Remploy businesses - Potential reduction in salary, pension, annual
leave, sick pay entitlement etc. - Decreased job security
11Barriers to Progression Customer concerns
- Many customers are understandable fearful of
progression for a number of reasons - The biggest concern is a misunderstanding that
progression would always mean the customer would
have to change employer and with that all the
other concerns around finding suitable
employment, employer discrimination etc. - Although some customers do not currently need the
level of support available, some customers are
not confident of working without any support at
all - even when customers have not needed any support
for a long period of time they still appreciate
the idea of the provider being on the end of the
phone if they need them, and talk of a
safety-net in case anything does go wrong - one provider described this as some customers
being afraid to let go - Fear of leaving the supported business
environment safe, supportive - Some customers have indicated they are of afraid
of trying to work without support in case they
this doesnt work out for them. Concerns for
these customers include - the negative impact this would have on their
confidence - being forced off the programme before they feel
ready including a misunderstanding that support
is time limited to 2 years - not being able to return to their current post,
which can be a problem with some of the smaller
providers
12Overcoming barriers to progression
- Suggestions from the research to overcome these
barriers are in your handouts - Opportunity to discuss and feedback based on your
own understanding and experiences
13New research
- WORKSTEP Distance Travelled ResearchAnn Purvis
and James Lowrey - Centre for Public Policy
- Northumbria University