Understanding and overcoming barriers to progression Lisa Naylor Senior Research Officer BASE Annual - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding and overcoming barriers to progression Lisa Naylor Senior Research Officer BASE Annual

Description:

... Walker (May 2000) Web links to these reports on back page of handouts. Web links to these reports on back page of handouts. Barriers to Progression. Programme Design ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: marksm155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding and overcoming barriers to progression Lisa Naylor Senior Research Officer BASE Annual


1
Understanding and overcoming barriers to
progression Lisa NaylorSenior Research
OfficerBASE Annual ConferenceJune 2006
2
Government Social Research (GSR)
  • Good quality social research helps government to
    make better policies and deliver better services
    Evidence based policy
  • Government Social Research comprises
    approximately 1,000 social researchers located in
    20 government departments

3
Client characteristics (_at_ April 05)
  • The typical WORKSTEP client?
  • Clearly no such thing. However, the very diverse
    client group is a considerable challenge for both
    policy makers and providers delivering the
    service.
  • 14,172 clients in WORKSTEP supported employment
    (excluding Remploy)
  • Just 30 female
  • 54.6 joined under previous Supported
    Employment Programme

4
Client characteristics (_at_ April 05)
5
Client characteristics (_at_ April 05)
6
Current progression levels
7
References
  • Forthcoming report WORKSTEP Modernisation Funds
    Evaluation by Purvis, Smith, Lowrey and Dobbs
    (July 2006)
  • WORKSTEP Evaluation Case Studies Exploring the
    design, delivery and performance of WORKSTEP by
    Purvis, Lowrey and Dobbs, (April 2006)
  • Accessing User and Provider Views on Desirable
    Outcomes of WORKSTEP by Thornton et al. (July
    2005)
  • A study of Providers New to WORKSTEP by Thornton
    et al. (June 2004)
  • Empowering People with Disabilities A guide to
    good practice in supported employment by CRG
    (June 2002)
  • Results-based Funded Supported Employment
    avoiding disincentives to serving people with
    greatest need by Corden and Thornton (June 2003)
  • The Net Costs and Individual Benefits of the
    Supported Employment Programme by Beyer et al.
    (March 2003)
  • User views of Supported Employment by Caron
    Walker (May 2000) Web links to these reports on
    back page of handouts
  • Web links to these reports on back page of
    handouts

8
Barriers to Progression Programme Design
  • Progression is not suitable for everyone
  • Complex and cumulative barriers may never be
    overcome to levels acceptable to mainstream open
    employers
  • A persons health condition or job retention needs
    may require ongoing support
  • A persons health condition could mean support
    needs increase over time
  • Current outcome funding structure does not
    provide incentive for progression
  • Total 1000 progression payments versus 400
    monthly payment
  • Not cost effective for providers to progress
    clients unless contracted places are full
  • Remploy grant funding
  • Lack of clarity on self employment for WORKSTEP
    customers
  • Lack of clarity around what level of performance
    at work is required before a supported employee
    should be considered for open employment
  • Timing if progression doesnt happen within
    approx two years of joining WORKSTEP, barriers
    intensify and progression is much less likely to
    occur.

9
Barriers to Progression Employer related issues
  • Expectations and understanding of the programme.
  • difficulties changing the expectations of
    employers where customers transferred to WORKSTEP
    from former SEP
  • many employers have limited understanding of the
    programme
  • Difficulties moving away from wage subsidies,
  • public sector employers and smaller businesses
    particularly reluctant
  • some employers insist on compensation for
    reduced levels of productivity
  • harder to reduce subsidy where customers have
    been employed for a long time with a subsidy.
  • Employers was reluctant to relinquish the
    non-financial support from WORKSTEP
  • Lack of confidence in employing disabled people.
  • Anxieties about the DDA
  • Lack of internal support
  • Supported businesses, disincentives to progress
    most productive staff
  • Employer discrimination
  • reluctance to employ without carrot of
    financial support
  • reduced opportunities for disabled people

10
Barriers to Progression Customer related issues
  • Expectations and understanding of the programme.
  • difficulties changing the expectations of
    customers who transferred to WORKSTEP from former
    SEP
  • many customers have limited understanding of the
    programme, including the progression aim,
    especially those with learning disabilities and
    those on the programme for a long time
  • Customers may lose relatively good terms and
    conditions if progression means moving to another
    employer
  • More of an issues for those employed by local
    authorities and supported businesses, including
    Remploy businesses
  • Potential reduction in salary, pension, annual
    leave, sick pay entitlement etc.
  • Decreased job security

11
Barriers to Progression Customer concerns
  • Many customers are understandable fearful of
    progression for a number of reasons
  • The biggest concern is a misunderstanding that
    progression would always mean the customer would
    have to change employer and with that all the
    other concerns around finding suitable
    employment, employer discrimination etc.
  • Although some customers do not currently need the
    level of support available, some customers are
    not confident of working without any support at
    all
  • even when customers have not needed any support
    for a long period of time they still appreciate
    the idea of the provider being on the end of the
    phone if they need them, and talk of a
    safety-net in case anything does go wrong
  • one provider described this as some customers
    being afraid to let go
  • Fear of leaving the supported business
    environment safe, supportive
  • Some customers have indicated they are of afraid
    of trying to work without support in case they
    this doesnt work out for them. Concerns for
    these customers include
  • the negative impact this would have on their
    confidence
  • being forced off the programme before they feel
    ready including a misunderstanding that support
    is time limited to 2 years
  • not being able to return to their current post,
    which can be a problem with some of the smaller
    providers

12
Overcoming barriers to progression
  • Suggestions from the research to overcome these
    barriers are in your handouts
  • Opportunity to discuss and feedback based on your
    own understanding and experiences

13
New research
  • WORKSTEP Distance Travelled ResearchAnn Purvis
    and James Lowrey
  • Centre for Public Policy
  • Northumbria University
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com