EFECTIVE ADVOCACY FOR HEALTH Bled, Slovenia April 2224, 2004 Working Group SEE Public Health Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

EFECTIVE ADVOCACY FOR HEALTH Bled, Slovenia April 2224, 2004 Working Group SEE Public Health Policy

Description:

EFECTIVE ADVOCACY FOR HEALTH. Bled, Slovenia. April 22-24, 2004. Working Group - SEE Public Health Policy Discussions: 'Healing the Crisis' CRISTIAN VLADESCU ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: idar1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EFECTIVE ADVOCACY FOR HEALTH Bled, Slovenia April 2224, 2004 Working Group SEE Public Health Policy


1
EFECTIVE ADVOCACY FOR HEALTHBled,
SloveniaApril 22-24, 2004Working Group - SEE
Public Health Policy Discussions Healing the
Crisis
  • CRISTIAN VLADESCU
  • Center for Health Policies and Services, Romania

2
OVERVIEW OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN ROMANIA
  • 1. Burden of disease morbidity and mortality
  • Increased mortality increased SMR by
    cardiovascular disease disease due to behavior
    risk factors that are responsible for most DALY
    lost and which have a relative high potential of
    being avoided.
  • Increased incidence for communicable diseases
    (TB, STDs, etc.)
  • Development of National Health Programs
  • Dedicated programs for surveillance of
    communicable diseases
  • Inter-sectoral health programs (anti-smoking,
    health promotion, etc.)

3
Life Expectancy
4
Ratio of Death Rates / 1000 inhabitants
5
SMR from cardio-vascular diseases
6
  • 2. Resources
  • Important public capital investments in Hitech
    equipment for hospitals (over 500 millions USD in
    the last 3 years)
  • Concordance with EU requirements for basic
    training for medical professionals (there are
    differences concerning specialty training and
    competences)
  • Human resources unequal coverage with medical
    staff among different regions.
  • Poor endowment with basic medical technology in
    primary health care units.
  • Too many acute beds in the system and fewer long
    term beds/units

7
No. of Physicians / 100,000 locuitori
8
  • 3. Organization
  • Purchaser-Provider split in health care services
  • Inception of the decentralization of process
    towards local councils
  • Increased freedom of choice for consumers
  • Lack of stability in the decision-making
    process(14MoH in 14 years)
  • Mismatch between people health care needs and
    health services structure
  • Too many types of health care facilities
  • Overuse of some services and lack of efficiency
    for others
  • Excessive focus on hospital services in detriment
    to the outpatient and community services
  • Lack of institutional patterns for alternative
    care
  • Poor horizontal and vertical integration of
    providers
  • Reduced involvement of private sector in health
    care both at providers and insurers level
  • Lack of responsiveness and accountability of the
    system

9
ROMANIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM CHART
Court of Account
College of Physicians College of Pharmacists
National Health Insurance House
Ministry of Health
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Labour and Social Protection
District Council Local Council
District Health Insurance House
College of Physicians College of
Pharmacists -district branch-
District Public Health Authority
Prefect District Executive Council
District Public Finance Department
District Dpt. of Labour and Social Protection
(b)
(a)
(c)
Joint Commission of Quality Control and
Accreditation
Ambulatory Care
Primary Health Care
Hospitals
control contracts
subord. colab.
10
  • 4. Financing
  • Increased funds allotted to the health care
    sector in the last 3 years
  • Implementation of the new financing mechanism for
    PHC
  • Piloting of new financing mechanisms at hospital
    level (DRG)
  • Lack of transparency and clear performance
    criteria in resource allocation both at macro and
    micro level
  • Still relative low share of GDP allotted to
    health care (in comparison with accession
    countries and UE)
  • Reduced mechanisms for supporting private
    investment in health.
  • Important private contribution in health care
    financing (1/4 of total).

11
Health care expenditure as from GDP
12
CONCLUSIONS AND (POSSIBLE) RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Development of a clear and shared vision for the
    health care system, consistent with the
    governments goal of improving health in a
    sustainable and credible manner.
  • A coherent legal and regulatory framework, based
    on transparent criteria of equity and efficiency
    should be developed, in order to order to
    increase the accountability and responsiveness of
    health system to the needs of the population.
  • Building management capacity at central, local
    and organizational level. Skills in strategic
    planning and evaluation, decision-making,
    leadership, practice management need to be
    developed system wide.
  • Enhancing primary health care, preventive
    services, health promotion and health education
    and target the poor. Shifting the emphasis away
    from curative, inpatient interventions would have
    efficiency and equity benefits.

13
  • Develop integrated health care and social
    programs addressing the needs of specific groups
    stimulating functional integration and
    coordination among different levels and types of
    social and health services.
  • Moving away from unofficial payments.
  • Develop a national drug policy ensure
    availability and affordability of drugs,
    especially for poor and marginal groups and in
    rural areas
  • Develop an inter-sectoral approach to health and
    encourage a real partnership with the civil
    society, private sector and other international
    organizations.

14
Health Care Systems Performance Review in
Countries members of the W.H.O. (2000)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com