Transportation 2005: An Overview

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

Transportation 2005: An Overview

Description:

Transportation 2005: An Overview – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: COR8150

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transportation 2005: An Overview


1
Transportation 2005 An Overview
  • Presented by
  • James S. Leanos, Principal
  • Corporate Property Solutions, L.L.C
  • And
  • Henry Kay, Director of Transportation
  • The Greater Baltimore Committee

2
Congestion
  • Traffic Congestion exists wherever there is
    sprawl, rapid population growth and unbalanced
    transportation systems.

3
Possible Solution 1Additional System Capacity
  • One 12 Highway Lane 2,200-2,300 cars/hr.
  • One Person/Car 2,200-2,300 people/hr.
  • One single-track rail guideway (also 12
    wide)gt25,000 people/hr.
  • Problem ridership in rail transit
  • Trend ridership has increased as congestion has
    increased

4
Possible Solution 2Travel Demand Modification
  • Change Travel Times, Paths, or Modes
  • Congestion occurs mostly at peak hours
  • Shift away from peak hours less congestion
  • Possibilities
  • Flex Time
  • M.O.V.s (i.e., Carpools), not S.O.V.s
  • TransitUsers demand good service.
  • Transit User perception of transit varies
    directly with congestion.

5
Possible Solution 3Travel Demand Reduction
  • Tele-commuting
  • 4-day Work Week
  • Trip Chaining

6
Possible Solution 4New Infrastructure
  • New Roads
  • Improved Roads, Intersections, Lanes
  • Fixed Guideway TransitNew and Extended
  • Dedicated Transit Lanes

7
Whats Fueling Congestion?
  • Historic Growth in Auto Ownership, Use and
    Vehicle Miles Travelled

8
Consequences of VMT
  • Each Day in the USA
  • 100 Million People
  • gt1 Billion Miles
  • 90 in Cars
  • 3 per year growth may be reducing to 2 per year
    in cars
  • Freight may pick up the slack with 82 of
    shipments by truck

9
Observations
  • The Relationship between traffic volume and speed
    on highways in not linear.
  • At higher levels of congestion, smaller VMT
    increases trigger proportionally larger
    congestion consequences.
  • Therefore, even if VMT moderates, congestion will
    likely increase.

10
(No Transcript)
11
How Roads are Funded
  • TEA-21 The Transportation Equity Act for the
    21st Century
  • Describes specific Highway and Transit Projects
    eligible for federal funding

12
Four Basic Urban Road Functions
  • Local Roads Streets
  • Collectors
  • Arterials
  • Interstate System

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
State Funding
  • 70 from Highway User Fees
  • Gas Tax Tolls
  • 30 from
  • Bond Issues
  • General Fund Appropriations
  • Non-highway Related Sources

16
Local Funding
  • General Fund Appropriations
  • Property Taxes
  • Local-option Transportation Taxes
  • Transportation Sales Taxes

17
Federal Aid
  • TEA-21
  • 18.4 /gallon gas-tax
  • Up to 80 of the eligible costs
  • Remaining contribution is state local
  • Examples of TEA-21 Eligible Projects
  • Interstate system/Interstate maintenance
  • Surface Transportation Program (STP)
  • Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality Improvement
  • Transportation Enhancements

18
Maryland State Transportation Revenues
  • Motor Fuel Taxes
  • Vehicle Titling Fees
  • Registration Fees
  • Corporate Income Taxes
  • User Fees

19
MD Transportation Revenues
20
(No Transcript)
21
Where does Transit Fit In?
  • Best fit in high density regions
  • An alternative to road congestion
  • Six Regions have transit ridership exceeding 10
    of total commuters
  • New York, Chicago, Washington, D.C.
  • Boston, San Francisco, Philadelphia
  • The next 15 Regions have 3-7 share

22
Transits Problems
  • Low Density
  • Use-segregated Development

23
Transits Problems
  • U of California, Berkeley
  • Urban population densities they report fell 20
    percent from 1980 to 2000, from 4.5 to 3.5
    persons per urban acre. Of 281 metro areas, only
    six percent became denser over the same time
    period.

24
For Transit to be Effective
  • Douglas Porter, a Smart Growth advocate says
  • Local and Regional Transit Services must function
    interactively with highway travel
  • Investment in Transit needs to be reinforced with
    development strategies aimed at building a
    compelling market for transitthe mix of uses and
    major traffic congestion.

25
Transit has changed!
  • Traditional 40-60 foot bus, Articulated bus
  • Light Rail
  • Heavy RailMetro
  • Commuter RailMARC
  • Bus Rapid TransitThe Red Line?
  • Small BusesHampden Shuttle
  • Demand-responsive servicesMobility/Paratransit

26
Transit Improvements
  • Bus System Maps and Schedules at Bus Stops
  • Electronic Signs announcing next bus arrival
  • Electronic fareboxes with ubiquitous farecard
    availability.
  • Bus transponders for signal priority

27
2000 Transit Modal Share Journey to Work
  • New York/New Jersey/Long Island CMSA 24.0
  • Chicago/Gary/Kenosha CMSA 11.49
  • Boston/Worcester/Lawrence CMSA 9.03
  • Washington/Baltimore/CMSA 9.43
  • Philadelphia/Wilmington/Atlantic City CMSA 8.73

28
Current Topic in Transportation
  • Induced Travel
  • Traffic quickly fills any new road capacity
  • e.g., I-270, when doubled in lanes from 6 to 12,
    quickly exceeded planned 2010 traffic levels

29
Induced Travel
  • Mark Hansons 1995 Study
  • On average, every 10 increase in new road
    capacity spurres a 9 increase in new traffic
    volume within 3-4 years
  • These are new trips that would not have been
    taken without new road capacity.

30
Induced Travel
  • Not building roads not a viable option, Cervero
    study in California
  • Cervero found that Induced Demand does exist, but
    at a lower rate that earlier studies found
  • 40 in 3 4 years
  • Increased capacity benefit lasts 10 15 years

31
Congestion Pricing
  • Highway user fees according to the level of
    congestion in a specific section of road
  • Similar to peak load airline or electric pricing
  • Encourages Mode-shift or Time-shift.
  • FHWA calls it Value Pricing
  • Discussed for ICC and possibly I-95

32
HOT Lanes
  • High Occupancy Travel
  • Solo or 2-passenger cars are allowed to buy
    access to HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) express
    lanes that are free or discounted
  • Another approach, all lanes on a toll road are
    charged in accordance with level of congestionno
    unpriced or express lanes.
  • Possible with EZ-Pass style toll collection.

33
FAIR Lanes
  • Non Express Lane drivers get a credit for not
    using express lanes while Express Lane drivers
    pay a surcharge
  • Alternatively, credits could be applied to
    transit fares or commuter park-and-ride lot fees

34
Equity Issues
  • HOT Lanes Lexus Lanes Unfair?
  • Encourages Car Pooling as price increases
  • Pay for themselves and generate additional
    revenues
  • Not as comprehensive or equitable as Gas Tax,
    particularly for Gas Guzzlers and their effect on
    Global Warming

35
Desperation Fuels Innovation
  • Atlanta MARTA, HOT Lanes, TOD's
  • Dallas Commuter Rail DART LRT
  • Denver Commuter Rail LRT
  • San Jose Commuter Rail LRT and Buses
  • Charlotte Integrated Transit/Land Use
  • Phoenix Aztec ITS

36
Vancouver, BC Does It All!www.translink.bc.ca
  • Translink GVTA, a true regional approach--
  • Based upon goals of GVRD Livable Region Strategic
    Plan
  • An all-in regional Authority handling Roads,
    Goods Movement, Bridges, Ferries, Buses, BRT,
    Light Rail, SkyTrain (high-speed rail), and
    Commuter Rail

37
Wheres the Moolah?
38
Wheres the Moolah?
  • Gas Tax 32.9
  • Vehicle Tax 21.5
  • Tolls 8.1
  • Levies General Funds 4.2
  • Misc 2.8
  • Bond Proceeds 0.0
  • Federal Payments 26.9
  • Local Payments 0.1

39
Wheres the Moolah?
  • Transit fund sources

40
Wheres the Moolah?
41
Wheres the Moolah?
42
Wheres the Moolah?
43
Wheres the Moolah?
44
Wheres the Moolah?
45
Smart Growth Transportation
  • As of 2003, it was estimated that 78 billion
    per year is wasted, both in lost time and burned
    gasoline, because of congestion.
  • 7 billion of extra fuel is blamed on these
    delays, enough to keep more than half the
    vehicles in California the third largest fuel
    consumer in the world on the road for an entire
    year!
  • In 1999, the average USA motorist spent 36 hours
    /week stuck in traffic, with no financial benefit
    resulting from it.
  • Source, NAR

46
Smart Growth Transportation
  • Smart Growth, in a transportation context,
    results in reduced dependence on only one form of
    transportation, and environmentally friendly
    transport choices.

47
Smart Growth Transportation
  • Transit-using cities are correlated to their
    densities. New York, London, Paris, Shanghai,
    Hong Kong and Tokyo are among the most
    transit-dependent cities.
  • Baltimore City is among the five most densely
    populated cities in the USA, thereby making it
    fertile ground for improved transit use rates.
    We already succeed in ridership rates among our
    peer cities however, its not a transit of
    choice, but a transit of necessity.

48
Smart Growth Transportation
  • The challenge is to improve the performance and
    operations of transit while invoking land-use
    standards, expectations, and regulations which
    concentrate density around transit systems. We
    must think in terms of Transit Oriented
    Development.

49
New Behaviors/Technologies
  • As an example of behavior modification, if we
    used the funds expended by the USA in its Iraq
    campaign to buy Toyota Priuss for Americans, we
    would eliminate a need or 1/3rd of the potential
    oil output of Iraq by replacing the related
    vehicle fleet and directly reduce the USA oil
    import requirements and thereby similarly reduce
    carbon dioxide emissions.

50
(No Transcript)
51
The TEA-21 Toolkit
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Walkway Projects
  • Budgetary Firewall for Highway and Transit
    Funds
  • Clean Fuels Grant Program
  • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
    Program (CMAQ)
  • Demonstration Projects Congressional
    Identification

52
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • Environmental Streamlining
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
  • Federal Highway Trust Fund
  • Highways
  • Mass Transit
  • Federal Transit Administration
  • Ferry Boat Programs
  • Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicle Garvee
    Bonds Proposed to fund the ICC

53
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • High-speed Rail Program
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems Program
  • Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
    (ISTEA) precursor to TEA-21
  • Job Access Grants
  • MAGLEV Technology Deployment Program gt240 MPH

54
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • Federal Matching Requirements now approaching
    50 local match, though originally 20
  • Mimimum Guarantee ensures state receive 90.5
    on their contributions to the federal highway
    trust with 1 million minimum.
  • Metro Planning Process cooperative, continuous,
    and comprehensive

55
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • National Corridor Planning and Development
    Program National Significance for USA economic
    growth
  • National Highway System Program includes
    Interstate Program and NHS
  • National Scenic Byways Program
  • New Starts fixed guideways
  • Reverse Commute Grants Suburban Centers

56
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • State Infrastructure Banks (SIB) Program Below
    Market Rate subordinate loans, interest rate
    buy-downs on third party loans, guarantees and
    credit enhancement
  • Statewide Planning Process
  • Surface Transportation Program (STP)
  • Transferability of Highway Program e.g., 100
    of NHS to STP, up to 50 of NHS and Interstate
    Maint. To Congestion Mitigation and AQI Program

57
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • Transit Benefits employee parking and
    transit/van-pool
  • Transit Investment Capital Grants Loans
  • Transit Enhancement Program 1 set-aside for
    urbanized areas of gt200,000 9 eligible project
    areas
  • Transit Revenue Bonds per TEA-21, can be used as
    part of local matching funds

58
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • Transit Urbanized Area Formula (Operating) Grants
    Program gt50,000, lt200,000. PM in gt200,000.
  • Transportation Community System Preservation
    Pilot Program High growth areas, urban growth
    boundaries to guide metro expansion, green
    corridors.
  • Transportation Enhancements Non-traditional
    projects to strengthen intermodal systems

59
TEA-21 Toolkit
  • Transportation Infrastructure Finance
    Innovation Act (TIFIA) Federal credit
    assistance for project of critical national
    importance, e.g., intermodal, border crossings,
    multi-state trade corridors
  • Value Pricing Program Experimental, e.g., HOT
    Lanes, etc.

60
The MPO Process
  • MPT Metropolitan Planning Organization the
    Baltimore Metropolitan Councils Baltimore
    Regional Transportation Board
  • Established by agreement with the Governor of
    Maryland
  • Require
  • Long Range Plan, e.g., Transportation 2020
  • 5-year update cycle (3-years in non-attainment
    areas)
  • Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
  • 3-year cycle, 2-year update, including congestion
    management

61
The MPO Process
  • Project must be in TIP to receive federal funds
  • No Pie in Sky only those with identifiable
    funding sources
  • From MPO TIP ? State TIP
  • State may impose addl planning requirements
  • MPOs rarely administer federal funds
    Exceptions, Portlands MTRO and Bay Area MTC

62
The MPO Process
  • MPO must have proactive, inclusive Public
    Involvement Process, ensuring far-reaching
    impacts of transportation investment decisions
    are adequately considered
  • CAC, of which JSL is representative for GBBR
  • Environmental Equity

63
The MPO Process
  • 7 Required Areas
  • Economic Vitality of metro area
  • Safety and security of transportation System
  • Accessibility and mobility for people freight
  • Environmental Protection, energy conservation,
    quality of life
  • Integration/Connectivity of Transportation system
  • Efficient system management/operation
  • Preservation of the existing system
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)