Intergovernmental fiscal relations in South Africa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Intergovernmental fiscal relations in South Africa

Description:

SA state with differentiated political rights for some groups ... cities (2 in Johannesburg, 1 each in Cape Town, Durban, Pretoria, Port Elizabeth) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Add92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intergovernmental fiscal relations in South Africa


1
Intergovernmental fiscal relations in South Africa
  • Chris Heymans
  • Presentation at NRB/WBI Conference on Fiscal
    Decentralization
  • Islamabad, 3 May 2006

2
Foundations of current system
  • Constitutional negotiations of 1993-94 sought
    national unity to overcome apartheid
    fragmentation
  • SA state with differentiated political rights for
    some groups
  • 4 provinces and racially demarcated local
    government
  • Provinces fiscally dependent
  • White municipalities fiscal capacity varied
    others lacked fiscal base yet people worked
    contributed to core economy
  • 4 independent and 7 self-governing states for
    africans
  • Negotiators faced
  • Institutional inheritance in regions out of sync
    with economic reality
  • Some parties demanding institutionalized regional
    influence
  • A powerful local government pressure group in
    sub-negotiations
  • Outcome a decentralized unitary state
  • Numerous legislative and policy reforms 1994

3
The South African system at a glance
  • Constitution underpins decentralized unitary
    state
  • Three distinct spheres of government
  • National
  • 9 provinces
  • 283 local governments (metro/ district primary)
  • Administrative fiscal decentralization
  • Revenue sharing
  • Institutionalized co-operative governance
  • Advisory Fiscal and Financial Commission

4
Institutional framework
  • 9 provinces
  • Elected governments and own budgets
  • Social sector responsibilities
  • Represented in 2nd House of parliament (CoP)
  • 283 municipalities
  • Elected councils with own budgets
  • One-tier metropolitan municipalities in 6 largest
    cities (2 in Johannesburg, 1 each in Cape Town,
    Durban, Pretoria, Port Elizabeth)
  • Two tier system elsewhere
  • 231 local municipalities, all simultaneously
    falling into district municipalities covering 3
    to 6 local municipalities
  • 42 districts, each covering 3 to 6 of the local
    municipalities

5
Some key elements of fiscal system
  • Vertical imbalance through revenue-sharing
  • Some fiscal powers at provincial and local levels
  • Each provincial and local government has own
    budget
  • Co-operative governance
  • Constitutional requirement
  • Intergovernmental forums, including Budget
    Council (national-provinces Budget Forum
    local government )
  • Fiscal and Financial Commission
  • Constitutional permanent
  • Advisory powers
  • National government makes final proposal
  • Division of Revenue approved 2 Houses of
    Parliament
  • Powers for higher level intervention, but no bail
    outs hard budget constraints

6
Key fiscal legislation
  • Constitution
  • National policy and laws take precedence
  • Transparent annual Division of Revenue
  • Independent advisory FFC
  • National and provincial legislation
  • Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations Act
  • Provincial Tax Regulation Process Act
  • Borrowing Powers of Provincial Government Act
  • Public Finance Management Act (PFMA)
  • Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA)
  • Annual Division of Revenue Act
  • National and Provincial Appropriation Acts
  • Taxation and Revenue Amendment Acts

7
Expenditure assignment
  • National government
  • Defence, justice, prisons and police
  • Higher education
  • Admin, policy, regulatory
  • Provinces
  • School education, health, social grants
  • Housing, Provincial Roads, Agriculture
  • Local government
  • Water, electricity, refuse removal
  • Housing infrastructure, municipal roads

8
Tax Assignment fiscal capacity
  • National government
  • Received 51.4 of national revenue in 2006
  • Personal Income Tax (29), Corporate Tax (28),
    VAT (28.7), fuel levy, excise duties etc.
  • Provinces
  • Received 42.3 of national revenue in 2006
  • Entitled to surcharge on income tax and fuel
    levy, but prefer revenue-sharing
  • Own revenue less than 4 - car license fees
  • Municipalities
  • Received 6.3 of national revenue in 2006
  • Own revenue more than 4 times transfers amount,
    but aggregate disguises major variation (e.g.
    metro vs rural)
  • Property taxes and charges for basic services
  • Regional levy just been phased out, replaced for
    now by grant

9
Grant framework
National Government
Division of Revenue Act
Unconditional
Sector grants
Provinces
10
Provinces the fiscal system
  • Fiscal, budget and policy processes
  • Multi-year MTEF
  • Budget council with National Finance Minister
  • Series of sector committees with national
    government (MinMECs)
  • Grants
  • Over 80 from equitable share based on
    population, poverty
  • Conditional grants for health, education housing
    provincial infrastructure
  • Social assistance grants transferred to national
    level in 2006 to combat corruption
  • Expenditure
  • 74 on social sectors
  • Recent growth in social economic infrastructure
    spending
  • Personnel consume 57 of expenditure

11
Local Government fiscal system
  • Direct allocations from national to
    municipalities
  • Three types of grants
  • Formula based Equitable Share (over 50 of
    grants)
  • Conditional grants for infrastructure
  • Conditional grants for capacity-building/restructu
    ring/ reform
  • National allocations range from 2 to 85
  • Equitable share grant formula simple, same and
    transparent
  • Basic services
  • Development
  • Institutional support
  • Revenue raising
  • Stabilization
  • Own revenue integral to system

12
National priorities reflected in municipal grants
  • Build effective local institutions
  • Capacity building and restructuring grants over
    3 years to support infrastructure and services,
    MFMA, restructuring, governance and planning
    systems
  • Restructuring grant incentive for major cities
  • Accelerate the rollout of free basic services
  • Electricity, water and sanitation, refuse removal
  • Local infrastructure development
  • MIG to provide the infrastructure to rollout free
    basic services
  • Contributing to job creation
  • Facilitate better planning and decision making

13
Some lessons
  • Decentralization or devolution facilitate service
    delivery accountability if key conditions in
    system exist
  • Resources should be commensurate with
    responsibilities
  • Finance should follow function
  • Overcome major fiscal gaps revenue sharing
  • Targeted transfers for common service levels,
    equity and capacity
  • Prevent end-of-year transfers
  • 3 year budgeting system brings certainty
  • Promotes better planning and spending
  • A hard budget constraint ensures local
    accountability interventions should not be bail
    outs

14
Process lessons
  • Get the big picture, but stay flexible in
    implementation learn as you go
  • Fiscal arrangements work best when driven by
    political momentum
  • Local accountability mechanisms vital
  • Democratic governance
  • Citizen participation
  • Service provider accountability and fiscal
    viability
  • Build systems and forums for intergovernmental
    exchange
  • Set policy targets, enforce them, but dont
    over-control accountability grows where it is
    allowed to
  • Regular reporting schedule
  • Link budget to measurable outputs and service
    implementation plan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com