The Outlook for Nuclear Energy in the United Stated - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The Outlook for Nuclear Energy in the United Stated

Description:

Regulatory insurance (stand by support): $500million for the first two new ... Price Anderson Act for nuclear liability protection. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: brads91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Outlook for Nuclear Energy in the United Stated


1
The Outlook for Nuclear Energy in the United
Stated Dark Ages, Renaissance, or Age of
Enlightment By John R. Brodman for the
Institute Francaise des Relations
Internationales September 2009
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Challenges Ahead
  • Investment Risk Cost Uncertainty Still a Major
    Obstacle
  • History of cost overruns Deja Vu all over
    again?
  • Escalating costs in recent years High Cost vs.
    Market Cap
  • Limited recent experience with actual
    construction, no one really knows.

Moodys the complexity and long-term
construction associated with building a new
nuclear plant expose a utility to material
adverse change conditions related to political,
regulatory, economic and commodity price
environments as well as technology developments
associated with supply and demand alternatives.
This Says it all.
15
(No Transcript)
16
Other Challenges and Risks
  • Untested Regulatory Process
  • Design Certification
  • Construction and Operating license approvals

Spent Fuel Disposal
Public Opposition
  • Uncertainties
  • Economic Growth Electricity Demand
  • Technology Competition
  • Large vs. Small clean vs. green
  • Carbon Policy

17
(No Transcript)
18
  • Financial Incentives
  • Nuclear Power 2010.
  • Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • Government loan guarantees of 18.5 billion for
    new reactors and 2 billion for enrichment
    facilities. 100 of debt, up to 80 of project
    cost.
  • Production tax credits 18 per MWh for the
    first 6000MW of new capacity for first 8 years of
    operation.
  • Regulatory insurance (stand by support)
    500million for the first two new reactors, and
    250 million for the next four. Covers NRC
    delays and litigation.
  • Price Anderson Act for nuclear liability
    protection.
  • States 10 states have some form of cost recovery
    for CWIP. One state (Ohio) has nuclear in its
    clean energy portfolio standard. Two considering.

19
  • Rational for Government Support
  • Dispel uncertainties and risks first mover test
    cases.
  • Us hasnt applied for a COL or started
    construction of a new nuclear unit in 30 years.
  • Demonstrate commercial feasibility of new reactor
    designs and the new NRC license and regulatory
    processes.
  • Show that industry can learn from past mistakes
    and prove that it can manage large, complex
    construction projects on time and within budget.
    Contain costs and reduce risks.


Nevertheless, new build is being watched
closely. Delays, cost overruns, mismanagement,
poor performance may impact conviction to
proceed, and progress of other units in the
planning, licensing, and construction
pipeline. New designs under consideration in the
US will all be built overseas prior to US
construction. US should benefit from learning
curve.
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
A Word on Technology Albert Einstein once said
Technological progress is like an ax in the
hands of a pathological criminal. It can change
everything in its path. (He also said that if
you can drive a car and kiss a pretty girl at the
same time, you are not giving the kiss the
attention it deservesWhich is why I like to
quote Einstein.) Standardization is a great
economic concept, but it almost always gives way
to technological progress. Many new reactor
designs (Gen IV, fast reactors, high temperature
reactors, modular designs and small reactors) are
all on the horizon, as are advanced fuel cycle
technologies. Many promise to overcome the
financial risks associated with large, baseload
projects. The US was and still is a leader in
nuclear technology. There is a lot of political
and economic support for maintaining a long-term
commitment to the technology.
24
SUMMARY
  • Nuclear power has come a long way in the US
  • Many things are now in place to support
    expansion, but many things (cost uncertaintyand
    risks) need to be resolved.
  • Competition from natural gas, wind, and
    thin-film solar PV is strong right now, but how
    long will it last?
  • All technologies, including Nuclear benefit
    from acceptance of the portfolio approach to
    our climate and energy security challenges.
  • Nuclear energy has a bright future in the US
    and it will eventually find its way. But progress
    will be slow and deliberate in the next few years.
  • Real renaissance will depend on US approach to
    climate change and an expansion of the
    governments loan guarantee program. The
    technology is here to stay.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com