MIR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

MIR

Description:

2 x 3 year PhD Students AND. 1 x 1 year Masters Student ... Official Project: The mechanism of ion-exchange' processes in feldspar minerals. Actual Project: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ericho93
Category:
Tags: mir | feldspar

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MIR


1
MIR
  • Management Meeting

2
Outline of MIR Management Meeting
  • Who Are we?
  • Our Time Line
  • Winter/summer Schools
  • Funding/Budget
  • One-by-one student review
  • Open questions

3
Who are we?
  • University Paul Sabatier/CNRS Toulouse
  • University of Copenhagen/Nanogeoscience
  • University of Leeds
  • University of Meunster
  • Oviedo University

4
Human Resources
  • 2 x 3 year PhD Students AND
  • 1 x 1 year Masters Student
  • Per team for a total of 10 PhD and 5 Masters
    students

5
Original Time table
6
MIR Summer/Winter Schools
  • Four major summer schools will be organized
  • Complementary skills (COPENHAGEN) Spring 07
  • Fundamentals of the thermodynamics and kinetics
    of fluid-mineral interaction (TOULOUSE). (THIS
    MEETING)
  • Microscopy and Spectroscopy at the Nano-scale,
    Part I (LEEDS) Fall 07
  • Microscopy and Spectroscopy at the Nano-scale,
    Part II (MUNSTER) Spring 08

7
Summer Schools consist of
  • Training classes
  • Research presentations by each young scientist
  • Management meetings

8
Questions
  • How will we practically organize summer schools
    (e.g. should they be centrally managed)?
  • Should we change the sites?
  • Can we open these up to the general public or
    make more than one of these European Wide
    Conferences at least in part?

9
Funding Official Overall Budget
  • Toulouse 414,011.21
  • Copenhagen 485,851.10
  • Oviedo 381,624.37
  • Munster 411,361.38
  • Leeds 436976.42
  • For a grand total of 2.13 Million Euros

10
Actual Overall Budget after adjustments
  • I decided that MIR management will take place in
    Toulouse, Plus I retained 1,000 Euro/team/year to
    pay for invited speakers attendance at meetings)
    Total management costs are 63.9 kE
  • Toulouse 481,485. ( 67,474)
  • Copenhagen 467,275. (-18,575)
  • Oviedo 381,624.37 (-15,448)
  • Munster 411,361.38 (-16,340)
  • Leeds 436976.42 (-17,109)

11
What we have to spend above salaries etc.
  • 500/student/month for Research Expenses
  • 500/student/month for Research/Transfer of
    Knowledge
  • Two above items fixed by Europe.
  • 4,000 currently retained per team for Invited
    Speakers
  • Total of 80 kE per team total over the contract.

12
Funding Original Distribution
  • Toulouse 140,588
  • Copenhagen 136,439.
  • Oviedo 106,919.
  • Munster 115,431
  • Leeds 122,596
  • For a grand total of 631 kEuros or 29 of total.

13
How Europe runs funding
  • First 18 months of budget sent out at beginning
    of contract
  • End of each year we send Europe a list of what we
    spent that year.
  • Europe sends us what we spent up to 85 of total
    contract (note new rule (need to have spent 80
    of what we have to be reimbursed each year) and
    its ambiguity).
  • Europe sends final 15 only after final report is
    received.

14
Funding, the absolute essential
  • Clare and I need financial reports as soon as
    possible at end of each fiscal year
  • I need updated bank account details each year
    ASAP when funds arrive.

15
Annual Reports
  • I need a report by 1 December each year from each
    student to create annual report. NO EXCEPTIONS
    AND I DO NOT WANT TO ASK THREE TIMES!!!!!!!
  • I need a report of all trips all members travel
    within the network, changes in personnel, all
    network articles and abstracts written
  • I use these reports to create the MIR annual
    reports and put these on the web.

16
On to each students project
  • One at a time

17
Student 1 Giuseppe SALDI
  • Primary lab CNRS-Toulouse (OELKERS,)
  • Secondary Lab KU/WWU. (STIPP)
  • Project Controls on carbonate mineral
    precipitation/growth and its application to CO2
    sequestration

18
Student 2Dionisis KATSIKOPOULOS
  • Primary lab UNIOVI (PRIETO)
  • Secondary Lab WWU /KU (PUTNIS,).
  • Project Trace element uptake by carbonates a
    step toward sustainable resource-waste
  • Actual project??

19
Student 3Dina BELOVA
  • Primary lab KU (STIPP)
  • Secondary Lab LU (BENNING).
  • Official Project Green Rust innovative
    strategies for immobilising toxic waste
  • Actual Project ??

20
Student 4Ivan SANCHEZ PASARIN
  • Based in Primary lab KU (STIPP)
  • Secondary Lab UNIOVI (PRIETO)
  • ProjectBiomineralisation unlocking the secrets
    of architecture at molecular dimensions

21
Student 5Gabriella KAKONYI
  • Primary lab Leeds (BENNING)
  • Secondary Lab UNIOVI (PRIETO).
  • Official ProjectWhat mechanisms drive and
    control the aggregation or crystallisation of
    amorphous mineral precursors

22
Student 6 Fabricio CASARIN
  • Based in Primary lab WWU (PUTNIS),
  • Secondary Lab UNIOVI/CNRS-Toulouse (PRIETO).
  • Official Project The mechanism of ion-exchange
    processes in feldspar minerals.
  • Actual Project??

23
PhD Student 7Magdalena KOWACZ
  • Primary lab WWU(PUTNIS)
  • Secondary Lab CNRS-Toulouse / UNIOVI (OELKERS).
  • Official Project The dissolution mechanisms of
    mineral solid-solutions
  • Actual project??

24
PhD Student 8Joana CARNEIRO
  • Primary lab UNIOVI (PRIETO)
  • Secondary Lab CNRS-Toulouse/LU (OELKERS).
  • Official Project Sr/Ca partitioning in marine
    biogenic carbonates.
  • Actual Project ??

25
PhD Student 9Aryani SUMOONDUR
  • Primary lab LU (BENNING)
  • Secondary Lab KU (STIPP)
  • Official Project Green rust 2 Controls on
    formation of iron nano-particles
  • Actual Project ??

26
PhD Student 10Teresa RONCAL HERRERO
  • Primary lab CNRS-Toulouse (OELKERS,)
  • Secondary Lab LU (BENNING).
  • Official ProjectTransformations among phosphate
    minerals and their role in soil fertility.

27
Open questions
  • How do we best run student exchanges?
  • Do students do joint PhDs between two
    Universities?
  • Encouragement to publish between and among teams.
  • How do we best promote our students vis-à-vis
    promoting their careers?

28
Web page
  • What purpose should it serve beyond helping us
    keep track of MIR?
  • How often should each student be required to
    update the site?
  • How can we drive traffic to this web site?

29
The session is now open for general
questions/discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com