5. WHAT ARE THE KEY BENEFIT/COST MEASUREMENT METHODS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

5. WHAT ARE THE KEY BENEFIT/COST MEASUREMENT METHODS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE

Description:

Purpose: to understand alternative ways to measure value of ... Hedonic Pricing/Wages. Travel Cost Method (TCM) 15. Economic Returns --Rent Applications (cont. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: LarryDS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 5. WHAT ARE THE KEY BENEFIT/COST MEASUREMENT METHODS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE


1
5. WHAT ARE THE KEY BENEFIT/COST MEASUREMENT
METHODS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
ISSUES?
  • SPRING 2002
  • Larry D. Sanders

Dept. of Ag Economics Oklahoma State
University
2
INTRODUCTION
  • Purpose to understand alternative ways to
    measure value of natural resource/environmental
    management options
  • Learning Objectives
  • 1. To understand how Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA)
    operationalizes utilitarian concepts of ethical
    social policy making with money as a common
    measure.
  • 2. BCA includes time future generations by
    searching for present value of net benefits.
  • 3. There are several methods to apply BCA to
    nonmarket goods, although ethical values
    cultural considerations are not likely to be
    quantified.

3
Overview of Benefit/Cost Analysis (BCA)
  • BCA provides a method to compare an array of
    alternative public policy choices
  • If BgtC for a given policy, it says that for every
    1 of project expense, more than a 1 of benefits
    would be generated by the project
  • If there are several alternative projects to
    resolve a problem, the project with the greatest
    net benefits would be preferred, assuming to
    ethical/cultural reasons to the contrary

4
Overview of BCA (continued)
  • For BCA to work
  • apples oranges measured by money
  • nonmarket goods/services measured by money
  • proxy measures are sought if no market exists
  • Alternatives to BCA
  • public vote (democracy)
  • those in power decide
  • use a noneconomic decision rule (social,
    cultural, religious, etc.)

5
BCA (continued)
  • Mix BCA w/others
  • BCA used to guide/educate public/decision makers
  • Integrated environmental assessment
  • economics plus ecological/social/political/ethical
    factors

6
BCA compared to others
  • BCA
  • may be scientific, objective, equitably applied
  • requires time/resources to conduct/evaluate
  • ethical questions
  • nonmarket goods problematic
  • interdependencies problematic
  • Noneconomic
  • may be easy to do
  • ethical questions (majority rule future
    generations, etc)
  • subject to manipulation

7
Efficiency is central to economic assessment...
  • Minimize waste (of resource, profits, time)
  • Ecosystem must be valued in monetary terms to be
    included in efficient solution
  • Efficient policy option selects alternative
    which generates most social utility relative to
    status quo
  • Kaldor-Hicks PDV or gt status quo
  • Pareto Criterion no other policy can make some
    better off without making anyone worse off
  • B/C ratio policy w/greatest benefit per of
    cost B/C gt 1

8
Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic Measures
  • Project evaluation, typically over time
  • Choice of Discount Rate Key
  • Higher rate lowers future value of b, c
  • Risk-free real market rate of interest may be
    preferred social discount rate (sdr)
  • Choice for sdr lt individual r suggests society
    values future gt individuals value future
  • Potential for Abuse
  • Assumptions who decides are critical
  • May run counter to Native American Ethic, Deep
    Ecology, Leopold land ethic, etc.

9
Dynamic Efficiency
  • Rapid development of resource drives price down
  • Future price rapidly increases
  • Hi future P suggests incentive to reduce current
    production, thus raising current P potentially
    reducing future P
  • Dynamic Efficiency maximum present discounted
    value (PDV)

10
Optimal Environmental Quality Level
  • Opportunity Costs to reduce externality increase
    as pollution levels approach zero
  • Marginal Abatement Cost Function (MAC)
  • Damage (real perceived) to physical/natural
    environment
  • Marginal Damage Function (MD)
  • Optimal Level MD MAC
  • Economics provides analytical tools society
    provides the goals (sometimes thru market,
    sometimes thru public action)

11
Marginal Damage/Marginal Abatement
Marginal Damage FunctionMD
Damages Costs ()
Marginal Abatement Cost Function MAC
Pollution Level
Total Damage
Total Abatement Cost
12
Economic Incentives to Improve Natural
Resource/Environmental Quality
  • Marketable Pollution Permits
  • Trade permits in market to equate MC across
    polluters
  • Initial distribution
  • history, auction, lottery
  • equity geographic concerns
  • Bonding Systems
  • Liability Systems
  • Pollution Subsidies

13
Natural Resource/Environmental Valuation
  • Determined by people willingness to make
    trade-offs
  • Producer Consumer Surplus
  • Nonmarket valuation--use non-use value

14
Non-market Valuation Techniques
  • Direct--hypothetical questions on willingness to
    pay/sell (wtp/wts)
  • Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)
  • open/closed-ended w/specific mechanism
  • Conjoint Analysis
  • preferences among bundles of characteristics
  • Indirect (revealed preference)--peoples
    decisions reveal preferences value
  • Hedonic Pricing/Wages
  • Travel Cost Method (TCM)

15
Economic Returns--Rent Applications (cont.)
  • Land Values In theory, current market value
    present value of expected future land rents
    worth of current investment held at acceptable
    interest rate
  • Discounting determines present worth of expected
    rental returns negative premium on waiting
  • Present Value Future Value / (1rate)
  • Future Value Present Value x (1 rate)
  • rate appropriate discount rate
  • social discount rate?
  • Risk-free real market rate of interest?

t
t
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com