Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs

Description:

Serpentine curve. 15. Closed orbits. Iteration gives closed orbits. ... Serpentine curve ... Serpentine curve for different initial phase (horizontal only) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: mach87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs


1
Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs
  • S. Machida
  • RAL/ASTeC
  • 6 December, 2005
  • http//hadron.kek.jp/machida/doc/nufact/
  • ffag/machida_20051206.ppt pdf

2
Contents
  • Code development
  • Example of scaling and non-scaling muon rings
  • Beam dynamics study

3
Code development

4
Tracking philosophy
  • Combination of Teapot, Simpsons, and PTC.
  • All the elements are thin lens like Teapot.
  • Time as the independent variable like Simpsons.
  • We keep track of absolute time (of flight.)
  • Separation of orbit from magnet geometry like
    PTC.
  • No implementation of polymorphism unlike PTC.
  • Read B fields map as an external data file.
  • Scaling as well as non-scaling (semi-scaling)
    FFAGs are modeled in the same platform.
  • At the moment, analytical model instead.

5
Four criteria of Berg for correct tracking
  • No TPS.
  • Geometry is separated from orbit.
  • Modeling of end fields
  • Initial matching

6
Why another code?
  • Tracking codes always have some approximations.
  • I would like to know exactly what approximations
    are taken.
  • Fields in sector bend
  • Modeling of end fields
  • Can be optimized for FFAG.
  • Superperiodicity is large and a ring consists of
    simple cell.
  • Scaling and non-scaling can be compared with same
    kinds of approximations (for ISS).

7
Lattice geometry for non-scaling doublet
  • First, all magnets center are placed on a circle
    whose radius is circumference/2p.
  • Shift QD outward to obtain net kick angle at QD.
    The magnitude was chosen such that time of flight
    at the minimum and maximum momenta becomes equal.
  • Rotate QF counterclockwise to make the axis of QF
    parallel to line E-F.

8
Integration method
  • Kick and drift
  • Magnetic fields including fringe region is split
    into thin lenses.
  • When a particle reach one of thin lenses, Bx, By,
    and Bz are obtained analytically or interpolated
    using pre-calculated data at neighboring four
    grid points.
  • Lorentz force is applied and direction of the
    momentum is changed.
  • Between thin lenses, a particle goes straight.

9
Analytical modeling for non-scaling magnet (1)
  • Shifted quadrupole
  • Soft edge model with Enge type fall off.
  • Scalar potential in cylindrical coordinates.
  • where
  • and
  • s distance from hard edge.
  • g scaling parameter of the order of
    gap.
  • Ci Enge coefficient.

10
Analytical modeling for non-scaling magnets (2)
  • Up to G20 and G21
  • Edge focusing
  • Up to G22 and G23
  • Octupole components of fringe fields
  • Up to G24 and G25
  • Dodecapole
  • Feed-down of multipole (octupole) has large
    effects when G22 and higher order is included.
  • It is not clear if it is real or numerical
    defects due to subtraction of two large numbers.

11
Analytical modeling for scaling magnet
  • rk type magnet
  • Soft edge model with Enge type fall off.
  • Scalar potential in cylindrical coordinates.
  • where
  • s distance from hard edge.
  • g scaling parameter of the order of
    gap.
  • Ci Enge coefficient.

12
Acceleration
  • At the center of long straight, longitudinal
    momentum is increased.
  • RF acceleration at every other cells. Can be any
    place.

13
Scaling and non-scaling machines

14
Check of the code in non-scaling FFAG
  • With the following parameters
  • B fields expansion up to G21.
  • thin lens kick every 1 mm.
  • We check
  • Tune and time of flight in EMMA and 10-20 GeV
    ring.
  • Serpentine curve.

15
Closed orbits
  • Iteration gives closed orbits.

Whole view.
One cell.
16
Tune and time of flight of EMMA
- Good agreement with Bergs results.
17
Choice of longitudinal parameters
ns from tracking result (previous page).
If , kV per cell
(x2 per cavity). We chose
according to a reference by Berg 1. Then,
. RF frequency is
Hz.
DT
T0
1 J. S. Berg, Longitudinal acceptance in
linear non-scaling FFAGS.
18
Serpentine curve
  • With 337 passages of RF cavity (674 cells), a
    particle is accelerated from 10 to 20 MeV.

19
Tune, ToF and displacement of 10-20 GeV muon ring

20
Check of the code in 0.3 to 1 GeV scaling FFAG
  • Closed orbit in horizontal direction.

21
Beam dynamics study- EMMA (electron model) as an
example -

22
Study items
  • Distortion of longitudinal emittance.
  • With zero initial transverse amplitude.
  • Dynamic aperture without acceleration.
  • At injection energy.
  • Alignment errors of 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 mm (rms),
    but with only one error seed.
  • Resonance crossing with acceleration.
  • 1000 and 5000 p mm-mrad, normalized
  • Strength of linear resonance is independent of
    particle amplitude.
  • Higher order resonance becomes significant with
    larger particle amplitude.
  • Alignment errors of 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 mm (rms),
    but with only one error seed.

23
Distortion of longitudinal emittance
Less tilted (-50).
Initial ellipse (-0.125 ns, -0.25 MeV) is
tilted as about the same slope of separatrix.
More tilted (50).
24
Distortion of longitudinal emittance
Less tilted (-50).
Animation
Matched
Kinetic energy GeV
More tilted (50).
RF phase/2Pi
25
Dynamic aperture without acceleration.
  • Without acceleration. Kinetic energy is 10 MeV.
    16 turns.
  • Errors of 0, 0.01, 0.02 mm (rms), with only one
    error seed.

26
Dynamic aperture without acceleration.
  • Without acceleration. Kinetic energy is 10 MeV.
    16 turns.
  • Errors of 0.02 mm (rms), with only one error seed.

27
Resonance crossing with acceleration
  • Horizontal is 1000 p mm-mrad, normalized, zero
    vertical emittance.
  • Errors of 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 mm (rms), only one
    error seed.

Horizontal phase space (x, xp)
0. mm
0.01 mm
0.02 mm
0.05 mm
28
Resonance crossing with acceleration
  • Horizontal is 5000 p mm-mrad, normalized, zero
    vertical emittance.
  • Errors of 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 mm (rms), only one
    error seed.

Horizontal phase space (x, xp)
0.01 mm
0.05 mm
Longitudinal phase space (phi, energy)
29
Dynamic aperture
  • Transverse acceptance is limited by longitudinal
    motion, as well as resonance crossing ?

30
Parameters of EMMA
  • a1/12, b1/5 (it was 1/4 before.)
  • RF cavity every other cell.
  • Voltage is 32.8 kV per cavity.
  • Harmonic number is 68 (about 1.3 GHz.)
  • Acceleration is completed in 673 cells.

31
Acceleration with finite transverse emittance
  • 11 particles starting from the same longitudinal
    coordinates (0.092p, 10 MeV).
  • Transverse amplitude is different (0, 0.04, 0.16,
    0.36, 0.64, 1.00, 1.44, 1.96, 2.56, 3.24, 4.0 p
    mm normalized).
  • For vertical only, we choose (0, 0.1, 0.4, 0.9,
    1.6, 2.5, 3.6, 4.9, 6.4, 8.1, 10. p mm
    normalized)

horizontal only
vertical only
4.9
2.56
6.4
0
3.24
0
4.0
8.1
horizontal and vertical
1.44
1.96
0
2.56
32
Acceleration with finite transverse emittance
  • Initial phase dependence
  • 4 particles have same amplitude, but different
    phase.
  • Time of flight for each particles.
  • Measure time to finish one revolution for each
    accelerating particle.
  • With increased a parameter. (meaning more
    voltage.)

33
Initial phase dependence
  • Serpentine curve for different initial phase
    (horizontal only).
  • Not so much deference among particle with
    different initial phase.
  • Particle 1 is always gain less energy.

horizontal2.56 p
horizontal3.24 p
4
3
4 3
2 1
2 1
34
Initial phase dependence
  • Serpentine curve for different initial phase
    (vertical only).
  • As one expects, particles 1 has the same curve as
    3, and 2 has the same curve as 4 in vertical
    plane.

vertical4.90 p
vertical6.40 p
2, 4
2, 4
1, 3
1, 3
35
Time of flight for different amplitude
  • Time of flight is calculated for each particle.
  • Legend shows horizontal amplitude (p mm,
    normalized). Xp0.
  • Vertical amplitude is zero.

36
With increased a parameter. (meaning more
voltage.)
  • Increase the voltage twice as much (a1/6).
  • With a1/6, all particles are accelerated, but
    trajectory in phase space still strongly depends
    on transverse amplitude.

horizontal only
horizontal only
a1/12
a1/6
37
Acceleration with finite transverse emittance
  • A particle with horizontal emittance of more than
    4 p mm is not accelerated. (When vertical
    emittance is zero.)
  • When both horizontal and vertical emittance are
    finite, a particle of more than 2.56 p mm is not
    accelerated.
  • Effects of finite vertical emittance is smaller
    than horizontal.

38
Parameters of 10 - 20 GeV muon ring
  • a1/12, b1/5
  • RF cavity every other cell.
  • Voltage is 16.246 MV per cavity.
  • Harmonic number is 274 (about 200.5 MHz.)
  • Acceleration is completed in 16 turns (1344
    cells.)

39
Acceleration with finite transverse emittance
  • Horizontal amplitude are
  • (0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100 x 103 p
    mm-mrad, normalized.)
  • Vertical amplitude is zero.
  • Difference of ToF becomes smaller as accelerated.

0
25
36
40
For 10 - 20 GeV muon ring
  • In 10-20 GeV muon ring, particle with horizontal
    emittance of more than 36 p mm is not
    accelerated. (When vertical emittance is zero.)
  • Effects of finite transverse amplitude is less
    than that of EMMA simply because of smaller
    physical emittance.

41
Summary
  • Tracking code is made to study FFAG dynamics.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com