UNEPGPA PILOT PROJECT PROPOSAL APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE LOW COST WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY WI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

UNEPGPA PILOT PROJECT PROPOSAL APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE LOW COST WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY WI

Description:

Final 2ry Clarifiers (Lamella) Aerobic. Sludge treatment. Building. Lamella Style. Clarifiers. UASB reactor. Section. UASB & BNR Second Stage ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Mar5162
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UNEPGPA PILOT PROJECT PROPOSAL APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE LOW COST WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY WI


1
UNEP/GPA PILOT PROJECT PROPOSAL APPLICATION OF
INNOVATIVE LOW COST WASTEWATER TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGY WITH NUTRIENT REMOVAL 
  • Second Regional Workshop on Municipal Wastewater
    Management for Latin America and the Caribbean
    June 10 11, 2003, Mexico City

2
Contact Institutions
  • Dr. Lorna Inniss
  • Director (Ag.)
  • Coastal Zone Management Unit
  • Ministry of Housing, Lands the Environment
  • Government of Barbados
  •  
  • Mr. Stan Harvey
  • Project Director (Ag.)
  • Sewerage Solid Waste Project Unit
  • Ministry of Health
  • Government of Barbados

3
Contact Institutions
  • Dr. Hugh Sealy
  • Vice-President
  • Caribbean Water Wastewater Association
  • C/O Stantec Consulting International Ltd.
  • Winslow House, Black Rock, St. Michael,
  • Barbados.

4
Overview of Domestic Wastewater Systems in
Caribbean Countries 
  • The majority of the Caribbean population resides
    on the coasts of the islands.
  • There is clear evidence that nearshore waters are
    severely stressed by nutrient and sediment loads
    from inadequate treatment and disposal of
    municipal wastewater.
  • Less than 20 of the populations of the islands
    have access to a sewerage system.

5
Overview of Domestic Wastewater Systems in
Caribbean Countries
  • The majority of the existing sewerage systems
    throughout the Caribbean are not in compliance
    with the LBS Protocol.
  • New sewerage systems either recently constructed
    or designed in some islands (e.g. Barbados) are
    not in compliance with the LBS Protocol (for
    either Class 1 or 2 Waters)
  • To achieve compliance will be prohibitively
    expensive for these Small Island Developing
    States (SIDS).

6
Wastewater Reuse
  • In addition to stressed coastal ecosystems, a
    number of countries in the sub-region suffer from
    a lack of adequate freshwater resources.
  • For example, Barbados is one of the most water
    scarce countries in the world with only
    approximately 170 m3 of available freshwater per
    capita per year.

7
Pilot Project Objectives
  • The overall objective of this pilot project is to
    investigate the feasibility of using innovative
    low cost (capital operating) treatment
    technology to upgrade existing treatment plants
    or for use in new plants to produce municipal
    wastewater effluent of a quality that will be in
    compliance with the LBS Protocol for Class 1
    waters.
  • Recognizing the importance of removing nutrients
    prior to discharge in sensitive tropical waters,
    the technology must also be capable of removing
    nitrogen and phosphorus at a rate equivalent to
    that achievable by conventional Biological
    Nutrient Removal (BNR) technology.
  • Further, recognising the benefits that would
    accrue from wastewater reuse, the evaluated
    technology must be capable of producing an
    effluent suitable for Urban Wastewater Reuse.

8
Proposed Pilot Project
  • It is proposed that the following innovative low
    cost technology is evaluated at a pilot scale
  • Anaerobic treatment BNR aerobic second-stage

9
UASB Technology
  • The Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)
    Technology was previously thought to be limited
    in its application to only high strength
    Industrial wastewaters. However, in the recent
    past, both in Colombia and Brazil, a slightly
    modified form of the basic technology has been
    proven repeatedly for many full-scale city sewage
    treatment plants.

10
UASB Technology
  • The key benefits of this anaerobic UASB
    Technology are to achieve basic biological
    wastewater treatment with a very low capital and
    operating cost, low energy consumption, and low
    waste sludge to be disposed.
  • This new style of anaerobic UASB Technology has
    now been proven and the technology can be applied
    for many international applications.

11
UASB Technology
  • However, the degree of treatment for conventional
    parameters (BOD5 and TSS) is substantially less
    than conventional activated sludge processes. In
    addition, the anaerobic UASB Technology does not
    remove nutrients such as Total Nitrogen (TN)
    Total Phosphorus (TP), such as is possible with
    BNR technology.

12
Brazil Piracicamirin, Sao Paulo State
  • 47,000 m3/d (540 L/s) UASB reactors

H2S biofilters
13
Brazil Piracicamirin, Sao Paulo State
Aerobic Sludge treatment Building
  • Final 2ry Clarifiers (Lamella)

Lamella Style Clarifiers
14
UASB reactorSection
15
UASB BNR Second Stage
  • Consultants have completed a process design
    concept using post-treatment BNR technology to
    not only have the UASB Technology benefits as
    listed above, but also TN TP treatment
    biologically using a low cost, low rate BNR
    system.
  • It is this combination of the anaerobic UASB
    Technology PLUS TN TP treatment biologically
    using a low cost, low rate BNR system that has
    never been proven on an operating basis, which
    will be the focus of this proposed pilot plant
    testing program.

16
UASB BNR
  • This demonstration of the two technologies in
    combination has not been done before and if
    proven successful, could form the basis of
    appropriate BNR treatment and recycle and reuse
    of high quality, treated wastewater throughout
    the developing world.

17
Description of the Process
  • The Proposed Pilot Plant will consist of three
    main components
  • Inlet headworks removal of large solids and
    heavy grit particles. This stage may be
    eliminated with existing preliminary plants.
  • UASB Reactor
  • Aerobic Activated Sludge Reactor

18
Expected Outcomes And Outputs
  • A pilot WWTP will be constructed and will be
    operated utilising effluent from the SCSP.
  • Four (4) months of operational and engineering
    data will be collected from the pilot plant.
  • Laboratory and field tests will be conducted to
    determine plant performance and effluent quality.
  • Unit capital and operating cost estimates will be
    generated.
  • A Final Report with recommendations, including a
    comparison with other technologies will be
    generated within six (6) months of mobilisation.

19
Project Justification Replicability
  • A number of Small Island Developing States in the
    Caribbean are faced with nutrient and sediment
    stressed coastal ecosystems caused by discharges
    of raw or poorly treated municipal wastewater.
    In addition, a number of these countries have
    scarce freshwater resources. Development of and
    proving the process feasibility of a low cost
    treatment technology that achieves compliance
    with the LBS Protocol and allows for wastewater
    reuse by BNR treatment would be very applicable
    in the sub-region.

20
Major Project Components And Activities
  • The expected major project components and
    activities will be as follows
  • Project Process Design and Pilot Plant Design
  • Construction of the Pilot Plant
  • Pilot Plant Commissioning and Operator Training
  • Operations and engineering troubleshooting,
    monitoring and reporting

21
Major Project Components And Activities
  • Laboratory and field tests
  • Final report and recommendations
  • Demobilisation
  • It should be noted that as part of the study,
    local operators (designated by the Barbados Water
    Authority) will be trained to operate the Pilot
    Plant.

22
Constraints
  • No logistical constraints are anticipated. Land
    is available at the site of the WWTP for the SCSP
    to construct the pilot plant.
  • Technical/operator support is available from the
    Barbados Water Authority.
  • Laboratory support is available from the
    Government Analytical Services.

23
Liaison With Other Projects And Initiatives
  • If the results of the pilot project are
    successful, a full-scale plant will be built and
    the treated effluent used to irrigate existing
    and pending tourism-related developments in
    Barbados.
  • It is further anticipated, that other countries
    in the region faced with similar issues will be
    interested in the results of the study. It is
    our intention to use fora such as the Annual
    Conference of the Caribbean Water and Wastewater
    Association to disseminate the results of the
    pilot project.

24
Partners and Stakeholders
  • Anticipated partners and stakeholders include
  • The Barbados Government
  • Caribbean Water and Wastewater Association
  • Private consultants
  • Private developers
  • Funding agency

25
Project Assessment For Success Or Failure
  • Technical criteria will include
  • Compliance with the LBS protocol for Class 1
    waters
  • Nutrient removal efficiency equivalent to
    conventional BNR
  • Effluent quality in compliance with USEPA
    requirement for Urban Reuse of wastewater

26
Project Assessment For Success Or Failure
  • Reliability and robustness of the technology
    The basic process components and technologies
    proposed for the pilot plant have all been used
    independently and proven for many years.
    Anaerobic technology for Municipal applications
    being proven in full scale for about 15 years.
    BNR treatment has been used and proven
    extensively throughout the world for almost 20
    years. But the combination of these 2
    technologies has yet to be proven on a pilot
    plant basis.

27
Project Assessment For Success Or Failure
  • Financial Criteria
  • Capital and Operating costs to be compared to
    conventional technology and membrane filtration.

28
Projected Capital Costs
29
Projected Operating Costs
30
Total Estimated Costs
31
Thank youQuestions and Comments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com