The Asheville Project An Ounce of Prevention Really IS Worth a Pound of Cure

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

The Asheville Project An Ounce of Prevention Really IS Worth a Pound of Cure

Description:

DENIAL/FATALISM/LOW EXPECTATIONS. LACK OF FEEDBACK ON HOW THEY ARE DOING ... FREQUENTLY LACK UNDERSTANDING OF COST DRIVERS. BELIEF THAT DISCOUNTS ARE THE WAY TO ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: stat193

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Asheville Project An Ounce of Prevention Really IS Worth a Pound of Cure


1
The Asheville Project An Ounce of Prevention
Really IS Worth a Pound of Cure
  • December 7, 2007
  • Rhode Island Business Group on Health
  • Barry A. Bunting, Pharm.D.
  • Clinical Manager of Pharmacy Services
  • Mission Hospitals
  • Asheville, NC

2
THE HJ PKKKHHROJECT
3
WHY ARENT WE DOING BETTER?
4
PATIENT BARRIERS
  • COST
  • ACCESS
  • KNOWLEDGE DEFICITS
  • LACK OF MOTIVATION TO CHANGE
  • COMPLIANCE/ADHERENCE ISSUES
  • DENIAL/FATALISM/LOW EXPECTATIONS
  • LACK OF FEEDBACK ON HOW THEY ARE DOING
  • LACK OF HELP WITH THEIR DAY-TO-DAY DECISIONS

5
PURCHASER BARRIERS
  • FREQUENTLY LACK UNDERSTANDING OF COST DRIVERS
  • BELIEF THAT DISCOUNTS ARE THE WAY TO CONTROL
    HEALTH CARE COSTS
  • BELIEF THAT CONTROLLING HEALTH CARE COSTS IS
    OUT OF THEIR CONTROL
  • HAVENT SEEN CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT AN
    OUNCE OF PREVENTION IS WORTH A POUND OF CURE
  • SKEPTICISM OF PREVENTIVE/DISEASE MANAGEMENT
    PROGRAMS

6
PHYSICIAN BARRIERS
  • TOO MANY GUIDELINES NOT ENOUGH TIME
  • TIME PRESSURES CAN RESULT IN TRIAL ERROR VS.
    EVIDENCE BASED APPROACHES
  • BUSINESS DEMANDS DICTATE HIGH VOLUME NOT
    HIGH-TOUCH
  • INABILITY TO KNOW IF PATIENT IS FOLLOWING
    THEIR PLAN
  • INABILITY TO SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCE PEOPLES
    BEHAVIOR

7
IDENTIFYING BARRIERS IS THE EASY PART!!
  • WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THEM?????

8
WHAT IF
  • A health plan invested in long-term health
    rather than sick- care?
  • The cost of medications suddenly became a
    non-issue?
  • Patients were incentivized to adhere to their tx
    plan?
  • Patients received as much self-care education as
    they needed for as long as they needed?
  • Patients had easy access to a knowledgeable
    health care provider to ask even their
    little questions?
  • Patients were monitored frequently for key
    outcomes?
  • Patients who were not succeeding were quickly
    identified referred to their physician w
    recommendations?

9
WHAT IF
  • Physicians were informed when their patients
    were not adhering to their treatment plan?
  • Patients had a person health coach to whom they
    were accountable?
  • Patients their health care providers were
    educated in guideline therapy, not just their
    physician?
  • Physicians were educated on guideline therapy
    one patient at a time?

10
MODEL SUMMARY
  • INTENSE SELF-CARE EDUCATION.
  • FREQUENT FACE-TO-FACE CONTACT WITH A PERSONAL
    HEALTH COACH (specially trained
    pharmacists/educators).
  • FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION.

11
EMPLOYER/HEALTH PLANCOMMITMENT
  • Notifies employees wellness programs are
    available.
  • Agrees to pay for self-care classes face-to
    face care manager sessions.
  • Agrees to waive co-pays for disease related
    medications/ supplies/education as an reward for
    active participation.

12
PATIENTS COMMITMENT
  • Agrees to attend self-care education classes.
  • Goes to a pharmacy or health education center
    they choose from a list of participating
    locations.
  • Meets with a pharmacist or educator 1x/month for
    20-30 minutes.
  • Has lab work done at baseline repeat Q 6 months
    at no cost to them.

13
PHYSICIANINVOLVEMENT
  • Informed their patient has voluntarily agreed to
    participate.
  • Asked to share their treatment goals for the
    patient.
  • Informed when patient is not adhering to the
    plan.
  • Given suggestions on management options.
  • Are educated one patient at a time on guideline
    compliance.
  • Provided outcomes information on their patient.

14
ASHEVILLE PROJECT STATUS
  • gt 1400 INDIVIDUALS CLOSELY MONITORED BY TWO DOZEN
    PHARMACISTS EDUCATORS FOR 9 EMPLOYERS IN THE
    ASHEVILLE AREA.
  • - 560 IN HTN/LIPID PROGRAM
  • - 410 IN DIABETES PROGRAM
  • - 295 IN ASTHMA PROGRAM
  • - 155 IN DEPRESSION PROGRAM

15
EACH PLAYER DOES WHAT THEY ARE GOOD AT
  • USES RESOURCES ALREADY AVAILABLE IN YOUR
    COMMUNITY.
  • Physicians diagnose implement treatments
    plans.
  • Educators educate.
  • Patients are coached to comply with treatment
    plan.
  • Patients self-manage 24-7.
  • Patients are regularly assessed, monitored, and
    ---
  • Changes recommended when Tx plan isnt working.
  • Convenient access to knowledgeable resource.
  • Employers encourage participation by providing
    incentives.
  • Patients TAKE their medications safely, and
    effectively.
  • Outcomes improve.
  • Health care costs decrease.

16
DIABETES GROUP DATA
17
DIABETES STUDY5 Year Hemoglobin A1c
Averages ADA GOAL __________
18
LDL (BAD) CHOLESTEROL DIABETES STUDY
19
SICK DAYSDIABETES STUDY
20
Total Diabetes Healthcare CostsMission Hospitals
City of Asheville
21
CARDIOVASCULAR GROUP DATA
22
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK GROUP(submitted for
publication Nov. 2007)
  • LDL (bad cholesterol) average decreased by 19
    points
  • Patients at blood pressure goal increased from
    40 to 67
  • 1261 historical patient-yrs vs. 1261 study
    patient-yrs
  • Events (heart attacks, strokes, mini-strokes ,
    unstable angina)93 historical events vs. 50
    events during the 6 year study
  • 155 ED/Hosp. visits vs. 82
  • 23 heart attacks vs. 6
  • Cardiovascular related medical costs decreased by
    47
  • 53 decrease in risk of a cardiovascular event
    happening
  • Cost/event 14,343/event vs. 9931/event
  • Event cost 1,333,899 vs. 496,550

23
CEREBRO-VASCULAR RISK REDUCTION

24
CARDIO-VASCULAR RISK REDUCTION

25
SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES
  • Net decrease in total health care costs avg.
    gt2000/pt/yr (diabetes)
  • Diabetes missed work hours decreased by 50
  • Net decrease in asthma related health care costs
    avg. 1950/pt/yr (direct and indirect cost
    savings)
  • Asthma related workdays missed decreased from
    avg. of 10.8 days/yr to 2.6 days/yr
  • ROI for the diabetes and the asthma programs of
    41
  • Significant improvement in depression scale
    scores

26
SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES
  • Missions Hospitals total health plan costs rose
    0 in 2004,
  • decreased by 1 in 2005, and decreased 3 in
    2006
  • City of Ashevilles total health plan costs rose
    0 in 2004, 0 in 2005,and decreased by 2.6 in
    2006
  • Mission City of Asheville have saved gt6
    million
  • 60 employers in 12 states with similar programs
  • State of West Virginia offers program for all
    state employees w diabetes(3000 people
    enrolled), expanding to blood pressure and
    cholesterol
  • North Dakota state legislature recently approved
    funding for diabetesprogram for state employees

27
CONCLUSIONAn Ounce of Prevention Really can be
Worth a Pound of Cure!
28
THE CHALLENGE
29
DOES IT COST LESS TO KEEP PEOPLE WELL THAN IT
DOES TO FIX THEM WHEN THEY BREAK?
30
HOW MUCH LONGER WILL WE BE ABLE TO AFFORD HEALTH
CARE?
31
QUESTIONS ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)