IBM Files Appeals Against Order Of Single Judge Over Mining Scheme Licences Says VV Mineral - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

IBM Files Appeals Against Order Of Single Judge Over Mining Scheme Licences Says VV Mineral

Description:

Up till now 32 writ appeals have been filed by The Regional Controller of Mines in Madras High Court against the order passed by the single judge. The Regional Controller of Mines has filed a total of 32 writ appeals over a period of time in Madras High Court against the order of a single judge, who quashed the rejection of mining scheme of mining licences of VV Mineral India. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IBM Files Appeals Against Order Of Single Judge Over Mining Scheme Licences Says VV Mineral


1
IBM Files Appeals Against Order Of Single Judge
Over Mining Scheme Licences Says VV Mineral
2
Up till now 32 writ appeals have been filed by
The Regional Controller of Mines in Madras High
Court against the order passed by the single
judge.
The Regional Controller of Mines has filed a
total of 32 writ appeals over a period of time in
Madras High Court against the order of a single
judge, who quashed the rejection of mining scheme
of mining licences of VV Mineral India.
http//vvmineralblog.wordpress.com
3
The company was engaged in extracting major
minerals in Tuticorin, Tirunelveli and
Kanyakumari districts' coastal regions.
VV Mineral Managing Director S Vaikundarajan and
others had filed a batch of writ petitions after
the Centre issued orders rejecting their schemes
of mining.
http//vvmineral.wordpress.com
4
In July last year, a single judge had quashed the
orders though the Centre did not file its counter
affidavits. The court heard neither the arguments
of the Regional Controller of Mines nor received
counter-affidavits before passing the orders,
said Indian Bureau of Mines (IMB) in their
appeals.
http//vvmineralmining.wordpress.com
5
Additional Solicitor General of India G
Rajagopalan represented the Centre before the
first bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay
Kishan Kaul and Justice T S Sivagnanam last week
and sought condonation of delay of more than 210
days in filing appeals.
Counters were received after pronouncement of
judgments these were not considered and taken
into account before passing the orders, senior
Central Government Standing Counsel Rabu Manohar
submitted.
http//vvmineral-mining.blogspot.in
6
The orders suspending their mining operations
were issued only because they failed to submit
their mining scheme at least 120 days before
expiry of their approved mining scheme, he
contended.
They were first issued show-cause notices giving
30 days for submitting reply, and then suspended
after no reply was forthcoming, he said. "Without
giving reply to show-cause notice, VV Mineral
hurriedly came to court without exhausting the
appeal remedy," he said.
http//vvmineralmining.blogspot.in
7
The single judge failed to note that the company
had already approached civil courts in
Tirunelveli and filed a number of civil suits for
the very same relief. All suits are pending.
"Having approached civil courts, the company
ought to have waited till the disposal of civil
suits," he said.
http//vvmineral.wordpress.com
8
VV Minerals Blogs
http//vvmineralblog.wordpress.com
http//vvmineral.wordpress.com
http//vvmineralmining.wordpress.com
http//vvmineral-mining.blogspot.in
http//vvmineralmining.blogspot.in
9
Social Media
https//www.facebook.com/vvmineralmining
https//twitter.com/vvmineralsindia
https//plus.google.com/115427745398374600571
10
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com