Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching

Description:

What personal experiences of peer review have you encountered (in teaching or elsewhere? ... why did you participate in peer review? what did you find were the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: vas1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching


1
Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching
  • Ginny Saich Ruth Watkins
  • (DAICE)

2
Context
  • QAA Enhancement Agenda
  • Enhancement Themes (Linking Research and
    Teaching?)
  • HE Academy Professional Standards Framework
  • HE Academy CPD Framework
  • QAA ELIR feedback
  • Academic advancement and promotion

3
Peer Review Purpose
  • In your opinion, what is the purpose of peer
    review of teaching?

4
Peer Review Personal Experiences
  • What personal experiences of peer review have
    you encountered (in teaching or elsewhere?)
  • have you been through peer review
  • As a reviewer?
  • As the reviewed?
  • why did you participate in peer review?
  • what did you find were the benefits and
    drawbacks?
  • What were the outcomes for you and your peer?

5
Peer Review Potential Benefits
  • Encourage reflection on the teaching process
  • Provide mutual feedback on the teaching process
  • Encourage collaboration/partnership working
  • Encourage innovation in teaching methodology
  • Develop the curriculum
  • Enhance the students learning experience
  • Enable individuals to become aware of the
    strengths and weaknesses of their teaching
    practice and provide a means through which
    individuals can improve the effectiveness of all
    aspects of their teaching.

6
Peer Review Types
  • What does Peer Review of Teaching mean to you
    now in your current context?

7
Peer Review Range
  • Peer observation
  • External examining
  • Departmental review
  • Learning and Teaching committees
  • QAA ELIR
  • Team teaching
  • Programme/module development teams
  • Mentoring/Senior colleague
  • Workshops/conferences/seminars
  • Co-supervision of students
  • Analysis and discussion of student evaluations
  • Interviews/discussions with students on a
    programme
  • Preview of teaching materials
  • Double marking/moderation of assessments
  • Review of student feedback
  • Retracing teaching
  • Teaching portfolio
  • Much of this occurs in departments, but it is
    rarely made explicit or public (except during
    probation)

8
Peer Review Sources of data
  • Multiple sources of data
  • Peer observation
  • Student evaluations
  • Teaching materials
  • Written feedback to students on their work
  • Module and Programme design documentation
  • Review Papers
  • Critical friend
  • Portfolio?

9
Requirements for Peer Review
  • From your experiences/expectations, what kind of
    environment/context promotes participation in
    peer review?
  • What would your role be in peer review
  • as a reviewer?
  • as the reviewed?

10
Peer Review Requirements
  • Critical reflection and self-assessment
  • Collaborative environment of mutual trust
  • Colleagues willing to explore, share and develop
    their views on what constitutes good (effective?)
    teaching
  • Is learning taking place?
  • Is the intended learning taking place?
  • What else is happening?
  • A collaborative, team process that is supportive
    and informative (avoiding mutual back slapping)
  • Personal ownership of the scheme and its outputs
  • Developmental and supportive rather than
    judgemental process
  • criteria for assessment (what is
    good teaching?)

11
Peer Review Schemes Example 1
  • University of Gloucestershire
  • Review of Professional Practice focuses on peer
    development of an aspect of teaching/student
    learning rather than focusing on performance.
  • Collaborative process
  • Designed to improve the quality of student
    learning
  • Informed by, and promotes the scholarship of
    learning and teaching

12
Peer Review Schemes Example 2
  • University of Tasmania
  • Comprehensive scheme
  • Recognises differences in diverse contexts within
    which learning and teaching takes place
  • Provides a range of schedules and outlines for
    differing contexts

13
Peer Review Schemes Example 3
  • Interviewing students
  • providing an evidence-base (what are students
    doing/learning, rather than what are they
    supposed to be doing/learning?)
  • what and how students are learning
  • More immediate feedback mechanisms
  • One minute papers
  • Stop, Start, Continue

14
Next Stage
  • What activity (if any) would you be interested
    in pursuing further?
  • Do you have any specific requirements for
    assistance, support, guidance for this?
  • How will you proceed from here?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com