Title: The transition to DTT in Italy economic and market aspects
1The transition to DTT in Italy - economic and
market aspects -
Lisa Di Feliciantonio AGCOM, Italian Authority
for Communications Warsaw, 25 February 2004
2Summary
- DTT in Italy state of the market
- Why should terrestrial TV go digital threats and
opportunities of the transition - Costs benefits
- Public policies and regulatory actions to support
the take off
3Some country peculiarities
State of the market
- Regulatory model gives leadership to terrestrial
channels - Incumbent terrestrial broadcasters pushed to
develop DTT not as market choice but as a legal
strategy - Mediaset RAI both need to develop DTT in order
to avoid antitrust and anticoncentration measures - Very strong duopoly in the terrestrial market
- Terrestrial broadcasters are interested in
keeping the broadcasting environment as it is
4DTT start up in Italy line-up
State of the market
- Transition to DTT led by terrestrial incumbent
broadcasters -
- Two additional multiplex due to be launched
shortly - 1 by terrestrial broadcaster La7 (Telecom
Italia) - 1 by a new terrestrial operator consortium led
by TF1 and media entrepreneur Tarek ben Ammar -
5DTT start up in Italy key features
State of the market
- Free-to-air
- Poor in terms of new content (no childrens
programming, no entertainment, etc.) - No coordination between platforms
- Ambiguous attuitude towards DTT by terrestrial
operators - Very little information /awareness campaign
- Limited investment for coverage and content
- coverage limited to approx. 50 of population
- only RAI has developed two new channels
- Only RAI has so far planned interactive features
6DTT coverage
50 population coverage of mediaset DTT network
only main cities are served
7Summary
- DTT in Italy a brief history and state of the
market - Why should terrestrial TV go digital threats
and opportunities of the transition - Costs benefits
- Public policies and regulatory actions to support
the take off
8DTT threat or opportunity?
Why should terrestrial broadcasters go digital
- Threats
- A more open and competitive market
- Audience fragmentation
- A new paradigm for television and communication
business
- Opportunities
- new revenue sources
- better competition with satellite/cable/convergenc
e operators - For PSB repositioning of public service
Very ambiguous attitude towards DTT
9The Murdoch effect in the UK
Why should terrestrial broadcaster go digital
Audience share in the UK 1998-2003
10The Murdoch effect in the UK
Why should terrestrial broadcaster go digital
Advertising market shares 1998-2003
11Digital pay-tv and broadband in Italy
Why should terrestrial broadcaster go digital
- 2.300.000 subscribers to Sky Italia (and
growing fast) - Digital cable (FTTH) rolling out in major urban
areas offering triple play - 1.620.000 DSL broadband lines potentially able
to receive broadcasting and VOD services
Terrestrial TV is at a crossroad
12DTT a new mission for PSB
Why should terrestrial broadcaster go digital
- Supporting the development of DTT and interactive
features could give back to the PSB a new
leadership and a role - Bridging the digital divide
- Providing new digital free-to-air content in a
pay-tv dominated broadcasting environment - Providing access to its networks and capacity to
independent broadcasters and new operators.
13Summary
- DTT in Italy state of the market
- Why should terrestrial TV go digital threats and
opportunities of the transition - Cost benefits
- Public policies and regulatory actions to support
the take off
14Costs and financing
Cost benefits
- Three different kinds of costs involved in the
development of DTT for the operators the
community - Cost to build the network
- RAI 20M to build the network
- Mediaset 70M (acquisition of the frequencies
network development) - Cost for new content and additional
enhanced/interactive features - RAI has budgeted 3,7M for new content in 2004
- Cost to subsidize the receiver
- 150M for subsidies (150 per family for 1M
receivers) - Important role to be played by electronicindustry
provide a extensive range of receivers at
different prices
15Potential revenues benefits
Cost benefits
- Broadcasters
- segmentation increased, more targeted
advertising - T-commerce and interactive service revenues
- increased customer loyalty
- Community
- Rationalization of frequency spectrum and
capacity left to other use - Increased choice and pluralism
- A step forward the e-society
16Summary
- DTT in Italy state of the market
- Why should terrestrial TV go digital threats and
opportunities of the transition - Cost benefits
- Public policies and regulatory actions to
support the take off
17DTT penetration scenarios
Public policies to support DTT take-off
DTT penetration
Timely switch off date
100
Introduction of public policies
80
50
DTT development left to market forces
time
18Financial and regulatory measures
Public policies to support DTT take-off
- policies to support network operator
- Reduction of the fee paid by the broadcaster for
the frequencies - Financial support to PSB for the creation of the
network - policies to support content providers
- Financial support to PSB
- Asymmetryc regulation
- financial aid to new editors if they committ to
DTT for a medium term period (5 years) - Tax reduction
- policies to support the penetration of digital
receivers - Labeling of equipment
- Financial incentives to families
19The right regulatory model
Public policies to support DTT take-off
- Has to take into consideration the country
specificities but so far some lesson can be drawn
by other experiences - Allocation by channel or by multiplex
- Free to air or basic pay
- Let the existing incumbent operator in other
platforms play a role or not - Give the leadership role to existing terrestrial
channels (if they have also market startegy and
real resaon to support DTT) - Establish or not the switch off date