Since 1987, more than 70 associations are federated under the RESEAU FINANCEMENT ALTERNATIF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Since 1987, more than 70 associations are federated under the RESEAU FINANCEMENT ALTERNATIF

Description:

Public/private partnership creation to promote fundamental ... With their regular meetings, these steering committees avoid creating any heavy organisation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: moi18
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Since 1987, more than 70 associations are federated under the RESEAU FINANCEMENT ALTERNATIF


1
Public/private partnership creation to promote
fundamental rights
  • Lisbon 20 September 2007

Financed by the DG Employment, Social Affairs and
Equal Opportunities
2
Introduction
  • Exercise - introduction
  • Trainer
  • Delegates why are you following this training
    and what is your interest in partnerships

3
EUFIN background
  • The Eufin project has two phases.
  • The first phase (2004-2005) was to benchmark 17
    partnerships (public/private/NGO) around Europe
    to collect best practices.
  • The second phase (2006-2007) aims to disseminate
    these best practices through a series of six
    trainings.
  • Also, four questions have been identified for
    further exchanges integration of new partners,
    partnership evaluation, crisis management and
    financial means.

4
Training objectives
  • You will understand how to prepare a partnership.
  • You will learn to select partners wisely to
    ensure the action's success and a common vision.
  • You will find out that sufficient financial
    resources are means to the partnerships success.
  • You will appreciate that communication is key to
    the well being of a partnership.

5
What is a partnership?
  • Exercise 2 teams
  • Each team agrees separately on how to define the
    word partnership.
  • Then report back to the group.

6
What is a partnership?
  • Exercise 2 teams
  • A partnership is defined as a relationship where
    two
  • or more parties, having compatible goals, form an
  • agreement to do something together.
  • Partnership implies the sharing of resources,
    work, risk,
  • responsibility, decision-making, power, benefits
    and
  • burdens.
  • Definition proposed by Flo Frank and Anne Smith
    in The partnership handbook, http//dsp-psd.pwgs
    c.gc.ca/Collection/MP43-373-1-2000E.pdf

A
7
Fundamental rights
  • The freedom to choose an occupation and the right
    to engage in work (article 15 of the European
    Union's Charter of fundamental rights)
  • The freedom to conduct a business (article 16)
  • Equality between men and women (article 23)
  • Protection of family life (article 33)
  • The right to social security and social
    assistance (article 34)
  • Access to services of general economic interest
    (article 36)
  • Environmental protection (article 37)

8
Fundamental rights
9
Table of content
  • 1. Preparation period
  • 2. Selecting partners
  • 3. Sufficient financial resources
  • 4. Supporting the partnership

Creation
Application
Audit assessment
Development
10
1. Preparation period
  • First step in a partnership life
  • Taking the time to prepare

Implementation
Application
  • The preparation time is crucial to a partnership
  • Have organisational devices become operational
  • Build a common vision

Control and evaluation
Development
11
1. Preparation period
  • Example Semaine de la Solidarité (FR)?
  • For the Semaine de lépargne solidaire
    Finansol, canvassing for partners was done
    relying on members of the network which
    introduced Finansol to potential partners.
  • Later, an individual meeting was arranged with
    these prospects.
  • However, most importantly, a meeting to mobilise
    banking institutions and local governments in
    general made it possible to finalise the
    financial pool for the French project.

12
1. Preparation period
  • 1.1. Delineate the action supported by the
    partnership
  • What? -defining the goal of the action
  • Who? -defining the public targeted by the
    action
  • Where? -delineating the scope of the action
  • How? -determining resources available

13
1. Preparation period
  • 1.1. Delineate the action supported by the
    partnership
  • Example Fonds Flamand dassurance soins
    (BEL)?
  • For example, the geographic scope was dismissed
    as key factor for the success of an initiative
    because half of the projects reviewed during this
    initial workshop are being undertaken at local
    level (this is the case with good practices
    originating from Lille, Portsmouth and Göteborg).
  • Others, such as the Flemish Health Insurance Fund
    in Belgium are operating on a regional basis.

14
1. Preparation period
  • 1.2. Adjusting the partnership structure to the
    requirements of the local action
  • Action near the target group
  • Defining the geographical zone
  • Partners proximity
  • The need for a local network even if the contract
    is on a national level

15
1. Preparation period
  • 1.2. Adjusting the partnership structure to the
    requirements of the local action
  • Example ADIE (FR)?
  • Structures with a smaller but far-reaching scope
    is a key factor for success these structures are
    based on a 'core' team comprising one to 11
    full-time paid staff.
  • Conversely, the team may be brought up to
    strength with several hundred employees when the
    staff of regional structures taking part in a
    project are taken into account (network of
    volunteers and people employed by local banking
    agencies).

16
1. Preparation period
  • 1.3. Defining the reasons underpinning the
    implementation of the partnership
  • Exercise 2 teams
  • List potential reasons that could motivate the
    implementation of a partnership. Give concrete
    examples.

17
1. Preparation period
  • 1.3. Defining the reasons underpinning the
    implementation of the partnership
  • Fill a gap not yet fulfilled by existing entities
  • Defend fundamental rights
  • Build complementary and synergies
  • Private or public partner bring credibility
  • Pool resources to reduce costs and administrative
    tasks

A
18
1. Preparation period
  • 1.4. Determining the expected part of each
    partner
  • Exercise 3 teams
  • Each team represents an actor (public authority,
    NGO or private bank). Discuss and define your
    role in a partnership.

19
1. Preparation period
  • 1.4. Determining the expected part of each
    partner

A
20
Coffee break
21
2. Selecting partners
Example - Mairie de Lille (FR)? It is also
instructive to note that in the case of two
projects initiated by the authorities, the choice
of partner banks was a lot smoother process than
in the other cases. In Lille, 95 of the
project is funded by public authorities.
22
2. Selecting partners
  • 2.1 Contacting and selecting partners
  • Exercise - Together
  • What steps would you take to find partners for a
    project?
  • What aspects should be thought of?

23
2. Selecting partners
A
  • 2.1 Contacting and selecting partners
  • Where can partners be found?
  • Current contacts
  • Networking
  • Sector players

List of potential partners
  • Decision-making contacts
  • The needs of the action

Trick of the trade Always contact more partners
than needed to avoid last minute desistance
  • Geographical proximity
  • Dependence issue

Partners selection
Be careful!!! Not to create dependency
relationships with a type of actor
24
2. Selecting partners
  • 2.2. Convincing potential partners
  • Which stakes?
  • Proving the relevance of the project
  • Sharing a common vision
  • Optimum communication since the beginning
  • In which way? Adjusting arguments to the target
    (private public)?
  • A strategic target public authorities

25
2. Selecting partners
  • 2.2. Convincing potential partners
  • Example - Integra (SK)?
  • It is important to persuade banks to forge a
    partnership to promote fundamental rights with
    social economy organisations, but first of all
    public authorities need to be convinced.
  • In the case of the Integra Foundation for women
    entrepreneurs (Slovakia), the focus was more on
    getting the public authorities to see the value
    of the project, as they were not very familiar
    with innovative schemes. However, their
    reluctance was soon overcome.

26
2. Selecting partners
  • 2.3. Writing partnership agreements
  • Detail all points and check partners have well
    understood them
  • Usually bilateral, in rare cases trilateral
  • Beware translations!

27
2. Selecting partners
  • 2.3. Writing partnership agreements
  • Example ANDC (PT)?
  • Project sponsors all acknowledged the importance
    of drawing up bilateral partnership agreements to
    define a project's key values, aim, target
    audience, etc. and putting this down on paper.
  • The ANDC, among others, uses contracts as a basis
    for defining the part played by each partner,
    thereby establishing each partner's contribution
    and level of involvement.

28
Lunch break
29
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • Example Bridges Community Venture (UK)?
  • A higher level of financial resources generally
    involves a search for further partners.
  • For example, Bridges Community Venture reserves
    the right to allow its capital to be opened up to
    new partners so as to be able to make fresh
    investments in the most economically deprived
    areas of England as a result of setting up new
    companies or expanding existing businesses.

30
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • 3.1. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • Financial needs identification
  • 3 funds collection approaches
  • top down
    bottom up
    mix
  • Remark sometimes funds coming from public
    sources can harm other granting possibilities
    (for example religious funds)?

public
public
public
private
private
private
31
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • 3.1. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • Example Portsmouth Savers Credit Union (UK)?
  • The financial resources are of crucial importance
    for the longevity of a project but capital is
    often in short supply for these structures, so a
    partnership is obviously justified for financial
    reasons.
  • Funding for the activities of a social economy
    organisation therefore takes the form of
    financial grants or guarantees awarded by
    public-sector partners, as is the case with
    Portsmouth Savers Credit Union.
  • This British entity has also appealed to
    financial institutions to take a stake in the
    capital or grant a subordinated loan.

32
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • 3.2. Foresee and answer cash-flow needs
  • Exercise 2 teams
  • List potential cash-flow problems and think about
    possible solutions to these issues.

33
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • 3.2. Foresee and answer cash-flow needs

A
34
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • 3.3. Increasing financial resources for the
    action
  • Which goal? Financial self-sufficiency
  • How?
  • Increasing the capital
  • Integrating new partners
  • Loans
  • Sponsors
  • Public issue of shares
  • Raising funds through donations
  • Good results
  • Remark Financial self-sufficiency must not be
    achieved by losing management autonomy.

35
3. Providing sufficient financial resources
  • 3.3. Increasing financial resources for the
    action
  • Example Microfinance Coalition (RO)?
  • For example, in the case of MicroFinance
    Coalition, the success of micro-credit
    development programmes resulted in the payment of
    extra financial resources.
  • This will however not prevent searching for
    alternative financial resources so as to be less
    financially dependent on current partners.

36
Coffee break
37
4. Supporting the partnership
  • Example Guarantee Fund (SV)?
  • The Guarantee Fund in Göteborg project sponsors
    agreed that the written reports that have to be
    handed in at regular intervals and meetings
    between partners promote management transparency
    and, consequently, encourage more accountability.

38
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.1. Developing feedback mechanisms among
    partners
  • Exercise Together
  • List all communication and interaction means a
    partnership could use.

39
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.1. Developing feedback mechanisms among
    partners
  • Information sharing
  • Management reports
  • Newsletters
  • Adjust information to partners

A
40
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.2. Developing interpersonal relationship with
    partners
  • Which goal?
  • Establish an atmosphere of trust
  • How?
  • Regular meeting
  • Steering committees
  • Personal and informal relationships
  • Important to involve partners in these events

41
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.2. Developing interpersonal relationship with
    partners
  • Example Mairie de Lille (FR)?
  • Looking beyond the regular meetings, some good
    practices have been successful in establishing an
    informal or even a personal relationship with the
    partners. An example is the policy conducted in
    Lille by forging informal ties, the project
    sponsors also encourage the partners to espouse
    the sponsors' values and objectives.
  • Promoting an appropriation of the values and
    objectives is one of the keys for ensuring the
    longevity of a project this provides a means of
    settling disputes more straightforwardly in the
    event of a crisis or when a founder decides to
    leave, for example. Informal contacts (through
    telephone conversations, exchanging e-mail
    messages and any other type of contact apart from
    formal ones) are therefore of crucial importance
    for the launch of a partnership.
  • This applies not only to institutions but also to
    individuals, as part of the bid to guarantee that
    the structure as a whole espouses a project.

42
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.3. Owning the action
  • Which goals?
  • Settle more easily a dispute
  • How?
  • Selecting wisely your partners
  • Each partner should mobilise his/her organisation
    globally
  • Issue dependence toward one person in a partner
    organisation.

43
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.3. Owning the action
  • Example ADIE (FR)?
  • Once the partners have been shown just how
    important the cooperation is and the need to
    encourage each structure to back a project, the
    next step is to ensure that the partners adopt
    the same approach towards the project.
  • In the case of the ADIE, for example, meetings
    were held with each partner as often as necessary
    and each partner was included in the project as
    soon as the activities had been decided upon.

44
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.4. Assessing the partnership
  • Which goals?
  • Improve the quality of the partnership
  • Improve credibility
  • Be transparent with the use of partners funds
  • How?
  • Internal assessment
  • External assessment
  • Frequency of assessment
  • What methodology ?
  • Compare the goals (qualitative/ quantitative)
    with achievements
  • Identify new needs
  • Implement the corrections required

45
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.4 Assessing the partnership
  • Example Enigma (DE)?
  • The key players in the social economy typically
    call for an external assessment. In the case of
    Enigma Siebte Saüle Microlending, this system has
    turned out to be extremely valuable for making a
    root-and-branch assessment of the partnership
    mechanism, such as the crisis management
    methodology.
  • More importantly, an external audit has enabled
    the quality of work undertaken to be
    acknowledged, thereby allowing Enigma Siebte
    Saüle Microlending to be recognised as expert in
    their field.

46
4. Supporting the partnership
  • 4.4 Assessing the partnership
  • Example Microcrèdits per a dones
  • emprenedores sense avals (ES)?
  • Ideally, a steering committee will be set up to
    monitor how the partnership develops, and how the
    action is prepared, carried out and assessed.
  • This is the case for Microcrèdits per a dones
    emprenedores sense avals. Public authorities are
    part of the credit acceptance committee which is
    convened every three weeks.
  • With their regular meetings, these steering
    committees avoid creating any heavy organisation.

47
5. Training assessment and thank you
  • Please take the time to fill the training
    assessment form and thank you for your attention!
  • Have a nice evening!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com