BTO, LLT and periscope subsystems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

BTO, LLT and periscope subsystems

Description:

Beam quality error budget ... University of California. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. May 24-25, 2001 ... Composite Budget: 95.7% 80% required ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: FRig
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BTO, LLT and periscope subsystems


1
BTO, LLT and periscope subsystems
  • Celine dOrgeville

2
Outline
  • Introduction Celine dOrgeville
  • Laser path
  • BTO and LLT schematic
  • Top-level requirements
  • Error budgets summary
  • BTO performance and budgets Don Gavel
  • BTO optics Brian Bauman
  • BTO electronics Mark Hunten
  • LLT and periscope designs Celine dOrgeville
    Jim Catone

3
Laser path
  • Five 10-W beams
  • Preferred Laser System location on center
    section (A)
  • Mirror relay (fiber technology is not there yet)
  • On-axis LLT

A
B,C
4
BTO andLLT Schematic
5
LLT and BTO top-level requirements
6
Beam quality error budget
  • At CoDR MCAO performance calculations assumed a
    1.5 x DL combined beam quality for Laser BTO
    LLT
  • PDR revised beam quality error budget gives 1.73
    x DL (resp. 1.58 x DL) for
  • Use of 1.2 x DL laser beams
  • The LLT meeting its image quality specification
    (resp. goal)
  • Use of premium quality BTO optics
  • Impact on the MCAO overall performance
  • Requires a 21 (resp. 4) increase in laser power
    to balance the LGS spot size increase and
    maintain performance
  • Or accept small penalty in Strehl
  • NB this variability is within the margin
    presented at CoDR (36 ?? 0.5 magnitude in LGS
    signal level)

7
(No Transcript)
8
Optical throughput error budget
9
Heat dissipation error budget
10
Laser Beam Transfer OpticsPerformance and Budgets
  • Donald T. Gavel
  • University of California
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

11
BTO Alignment Control
  • Two pointing and centering systems

12
Requirements
  • Compatible with single beam system
  • Pointing control to 0.05 arcsecond rms on the sky
    for each of 5 beams
  • Beams overlap at the LLT entrance pupil (we take
    this to mean within 10 of beam diameter)

13
4 Stages of Adjustment
  • Stage 1 Mirror mounts placed so nominal beam
    line is within capture range of motorized
    adjustment
  • Stage 2 Mirrors remotely aligned into the
    capture range of slow PC loops
  • Stage 3 PC closed loop puts beam into capture
    range of high-bandwidth tip/tilt sensors
  • Stage 4 High bandwidth uplink tip/tilt loops
    closed

14
Motorized range and accuracy
  • Range mounting top-end flexure compensation
  • Accuracy capture range of uplink tip/tilt 1
    on the sky
  • Motorized Adjustments
  • Laser PC mirror array
  • Range to cover 2mm top-end sag, 30 top-end tilt
    30mr
  • Acquisition range of diagnostic PC sensor 20mr
  • Accuracy needed to stay centered behind spider
    0.5 mm, 0.1 mr
  • Accuracy in closed loop 1 on sky or 0.2
    mr/mirror
  • Top ring fold mirror
  • 5-beam shaping mirror array
  • Pointing and Centering mirrors
  • Range 30 on sky (LLT primary tilt) 9 mr
  • Stability 0.12 mr/mirror to capture fast t/t

15
Closed Loop Uplink Tip/Tilt
  • Range of fast tip/tilt mirrors 1 on sky 300
    mr
  • Accuracy 0.05 on sky 15 mr
  • Off-load the average deviation from mid-range to
    the PC mirrors ahead of the LLT

16
BTO Laser Transmission Budget
  • 17 surfaces in BTO path
  • Requirement Tgt80 (CoDR, Table 24, p74)

10
12
13
9
11
14 15 16
8
17
7
5 6 3 4
2
1
17
BTO Transmission Budget
  • Reflection
  • "V" band (narrowband 589 nm) coatings
  • gt999/surface gt 98 total
  • Surface roughness
  • Pscat/Pinc (4 p s / l)2
  • commercial polish s10-30A gt 91 total,
    precision s2-10A gt 99.1 total
  • Dust
  • Optical Cleanliness Specifications and
    Cleanliness Verification, SPIE 3782, 1999
  • 0.1 area coverage/surface gt 98.6 total
  • Composite Budget 95.7 gt 80 required
  • Transmission is specified high in order to meet
    the heat dissipation budget, which is more
    demanding

18
BTO Heat Dissipation Budget
  • Requirement lt 10 Watts total (CoDR, Table 24,
    p74)
  • Heat budget spreadsheet

19
BTO Heat Dissipation Budget
  • Total power in the light scattered by the optical
    surfaces
  • Coating 0.75 Watts
  • Surface roughness 0.45 Watts
  • Dust 0.7 Watts
  • Total 1.9 Watts
  • Heat budget is dominated by
  • Power used by diagnostic cameras (7.2 W)
  • Power scattered by optics (1.9 W). This drives
    the cleanliness and premium surface requirement
    for optics

20
Beam Quality
  • Requirement optical aberrations negligible
    compared to atmospheric distortions (CoDR Table
    24, p. 75)
  • Atmosphere s2 0.134 (D/r0)5/3 0.5 radians
    rms 1/12 wave 48 nm rms (D30cm, r020cm)
  • Surface error would have to be l/100 on each of
    17 surfaces to meet a 10 nm total error budget!
  • Heres a budget based on premium surface
    optics
  • Gemini used 95nm rms for the performance error
    budget, split in 88 and 35 nm rms between low and
    high order aberr. resp.

21
Scattered Light
  • Categories of stray laser light (Rayleigh and
    aerosol scatter)
  • 1) Scattered light along the beam path up the
    side of the telescope
  • 2) Scattered light along the beam path across the
    primary
  • 3) Scattered light along the atmospheric path to
    the sodium layer

22
Scattered Light from Behind the Secondary Spider
  • 25.2 photons per frame per subaperture without
    baffles (calculations in Appendix Q)

23
Scattered Light from Atmospheric Path to the
Sodium Layer
1
2
Gemini LGS geometry viewed from space
0
3
4
24
Scattered Light from Atmospheric Path to the
Sodium Layer
  • Wave-optic simulation of laser propagation
  • Backscatter simulated from layered (1km spacing)
    atmosphere
  • Backscatter coefficients taken from Gardners
    (1990) measurements
  • Scattered light imaged onto WFS focal plane

Subap 6,0, lasers 1 and 2, (WFS for lgs 1)
Subap 1,0, lasers 0 and 2 (WFS for lgs 0)
25
Pupil maps of Rayleigh scatter
26
Scattered Light from Atmospheric Path to the
Sodium Layer
  • Rayleigh from fratricide is significant, on the
    order of the same number of photocounts per
    subaperture as the guidestar itself, for some
    subapertures
  • Pulsed lasers with time-gated return will
    eliminate the fratricide issue.
  • Rayleigh from the sensed LGSs beam is small, but
    it is important to field-stop correctly

27
BTO Optics
  • Brian Bauman
  • University of California
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

28
BTO Beam Path and Control Surfaces
Diagnostic Split
Centering Mirror
X-shaping mirrors
K Mirror
Pointing Mirror
Top-end Ring Fold
Fast Tip/Tilt Array
Relay Optics
Centering Array
Pointing Array

29
Top-End Layout
30
BTO alignment diagnostics
  • Pointing sensor
  • Centering diagnostic
  • Chopper wheel to isolate each beam plus dark
    open positions
  • Outputs drive the PA and CA mirrors in a slow
    closed-loop

31
Pointing diagnostic
  • Pointing diagnostic has 170 arcsec field, cf. 85
    arcsec diameter LGS constellation some
    vignetting at edge of field
  • Plate scale is 0.165 arcsec/pixel
  • CCD is 1.3K x 1K with 6.8 micron pixels
  • Can be used as a beam quality diagnostic

32
Pointing diagnostic0, 42.5, 85 arcsec off-axis
33
Centering diagnostic
  • Centering diagnostic re-images desired plane to
    the CCD
  • Designed as afocal telescope to avoid
    magnification errors with defocus
  • Beam fills ½ of short dimension of CCD (allows
    for misalignment)
  • Can image either LLT entrance pupil plane or FSA
    plane to CCD either works for control purposes
  • Design imaging LLT entrance pupil shown in next
    slide

34
Centering diagnostic
35
X-shaping mirror (XSM)
36
K-mirror
37
Relay telescope
  • 1 to 1 relay with 5m focal length lenses
  • Pupils at CA (centering array) and FSA (fast
    steering array)
  • Exact prescription depends on exit pupil position
    of laser system
  • Very slow beam avoids air breakdown at focus and
    aberrations
  • Large (150mm diameter) lenses avoid clipping of
    beams

38
Relay telescope
39
BTO electronics
  • Mark Hunten

40
Beam Transfer Optics Electronics
  • Overview of the BTO diagram.

41
Beam Transfer Optics Electronics
  • The Beam Transfer Optics control consists of
    items that are on the main part of the telescope.
    These would include
  • Pointing Mirror
  • Centering Mirror
  • K Mirror
  • Quarter Wave Plate
  • Corner Cube Shutter
  • Top End Ring Mirror
  • Pointing Mirror Array
  • Centering Mirror Array
  • Fast Steering Mirror Array
  • Near Field Chopper Wheel
  • Near and Far Field Cameras
  • Polarization Sensor

42
Beam Transfer Optics Electronics
  • The Beam Transfer Optics also has some items that
    are not in the main control loop. These are
    under user control and mostly for monitoring
    purposes
  • Beam Dump Mirror
  • Power Meter (part of Beam Dump Mirror)
  • Alignment Camera selector (for 3 cameras)

43
Beam Transfer Optics Electronics
  • The Beam Transfer Optics control electronics will
    be located on the main part of the telescope,
    probably on the Center Section.
  • These will be located in a thermal enclosure to
    keep the radiated heat to a minimum.
  • Items in the enclosure will be the VME control
    computer, servo control electronics, mechanism
    control electronics, monitoring electronics and
    camera interfaces.
  • System is distributed on the telescope from the
    center section to the top end.
  • This will require substantial coordination with
    the telescope operations groups for the
    installation period.

44
PDR Agenda
  • Thursday, 5/24
  • 0800 Welcome
  • 0805 Project overview
  • 0830 Science case
  • 0930 Break
  • 0945 System overview
  • System modeling
  • 1100 AO Module optics
  • 1145 Lunch
  • 1245 AO Module mechanics
  • 1340 AO Module electronics
  • 1400 Break
  • 1415 Beam Transfer Optics
  • 1510 Laser Launch Telescope
  • Closed committee session
  • 1800 Adjourn
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com