Title: Incorporating additional types of information in structure calculation: recent advances
1Incorporating additional types of information in
structure calculationrecent advances
- chemical shift potentials
- residual dipolar couplings
2Chemical shift potentials
- structure calculation suites such as X-PLOR and
CNS now incorporate the ability to directly
refine the structure against chemical shift,
based on the ability to accurately calculate
chemical shifts from structure. - the most commonly used potentials are for 13Ca
and 13Cb chemical shifts and 1H chemical shifts
see Clore and Gronenborn, PNAS (1998) 95, 5891.
313C chemical shift potentials
- 13Ca and 13Cb chemical shifts are determined
largely by the backbone angles f and y, so
potential energy functions can be used which
compare the observed chemical shifts to
calculated shifts based on (f, y) values in the
structure being refined - VCshift(f, y) KCshift (DCa (f, y))2 (DCb (f,
y))2 - where DCn (f, y)2 Cnexpected (f, y) -
Cnobserved (f, y), na or b, and KCshift is a
force constant arbitrarily chosen to reflect
accuracy of calculated shifts
4 1H chemical shift potentials
- 1H chemical shifts are a little more complicated
to calculate from structure--they depend on more
factors - however, it has been shown that, given a high
resolution crystal structure, the 1H chemical
shifts in solution can be predicted to within
0.2-0.25 ppm using a four term function scalc
srandom sring sE sani. - srandom is a random coil value, sring depends
upon proximity and orientation of nearby aromatic
rings, sani is the magnetic anisotropy resulting
from backbone and side chain CO and C-N bonds,
and sE is effects due to nearby charged groups.
51H chemical shift potentials
- so a 1H chemical shift potential would have the
form - Vprot Kprot (scalc, i - sobs,i)2
- summed over all protons in the protein, where
Kprot is a force constant and scalc, i and sobs,i
are calculated and observed shifts for proton i,
respectively.
a portion of thioredoxin before (blue) and after
(red) 1H chemical shift refinement--some
significant differences in the vicinity of W31,
which has an aromatic ring that affects nearby
chemical shifts
6Long-range information in NMR
- a traditional weakness of NMR is that all the
structural restraints are short-range in nature
(meaning short-range in terms of distance, not in
terms of the sequence), i.e. nOe restraints are
only between atoms lt5 Å apart, dihedral angle
restraints only restrict groups of atoms
separated by three bonds or fewer - over large distances, uncertainties in
short-range restraints will add up--this means
that NMR structures of large, elongated systems
(such as B-form DNA, for instance) will be poor
overall even though individual regions of the
structure will be well-defined.
long-range structure bad
to illustrate this point, in the picture at left,
simulated nOe restraints were generated from the
red DNA structure and then used to calculate the
ensemble of black structures
best fit superposition done for this end
short-range structure OK
Zhou et al. Biopolymers (1999-2000) 52, 168.
7Residual dipolar couplings
- recall that the spin dipolar coupling depends on
the distance between 2 spins, and also on their
orientation with respect to the static magnetic
field B0. - In solution, the orientational term averages to
zero as the molecule tumbles, so that splittings
in resonance lines are not observed--i.e. we
cant measure dipolar couplings. This is too
bad, in a way, because this orientational term
carries structural info, as well see - In solids, on the other hand, the couplings dont
average to zero, but they are huge, on the order
of the width of a whole protein spectrum. This
is too big to be of practical use in
high-resolution protein work - compromise it turns out that you can use various
kinds of media, from liquid crystals to phage, to
partially orient samples, so that the dipolar
coupling no longer averages to zero but has some
small residual value
8- the residual dipolar coupling will be related to
the angle between the internuclear axis and the
direction of the partial ordering. The equations
for this are given in Tjandra et al. Nat Struct
Biol, 4, 732 (1997), which I will hand out as
supplementary reading on Monday. Now suppose we
have two different residues in a protein and we
are measuring the residual dipolar coupling
between the amide nitrogen and amide hydrogen
internuclear axis
axis of partial ordering principal
axis system of magnetic susceptibility tensor
15N-1H residual dipolar coupling will differ for
these two residues. This difference depends on
the relative orientation of the two NH groups,
but not on the distance between them
long-range information!
9Prestegard et al. Biochemistry (2001) 40, 8677.
this picture shows 15N-1H residual dipolar
couplings measured in an 15N-1H HSQC spectrum of
a protein sample partially oriented using
bicelles (fragments of lipid bilayer). One of
the nice things about residual dipolar couplings
is that they are easy to measure.
10illustration of effect of using residual dipolar
couplings on the quality of nucleic acid
structure determination by NMR
a) without rdc b) with rdc
Zhou et al. Biopolymers (1999-2000) 52, 168.
11Refining initial models with RDCs
A problem with dipolar couplings is that one
cannot distinguish the direction of an
internuclear vector from its inverse. Thus the
two orientations below give the same dipolar
coupling
1H--15N
15N--1H
This ambiguity makes calculating a structure de
novo (i.e. from a random starting model) using
only residual dipolar couplings very
computationally difficult. If there is a
reasonable starting model, however, this is not a
problem. So residual dipolar couplings are
especially good for refining models/low
resolution structures.