Imaging the TIA Patient - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Imaging the TIA Patient

Description:

CT Angiogram. Advantages. perform with CT-head. available, accurate ... Angiogram ... MR angiogram. MRA. Advantages. Completed with DWI and entire sequence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:384
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: HFH52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Imaging the TIA Patient


1
Imaging the TIA Patient
  • Christopher Lewandowski, MD
  • Henry Ford Hospital
  • May 2009

2
Case
  • SB is a 57 yo AAF with a past history of DM II
    and hyperlipidemia who come to the ED with sudden
    onset of R chin, R tongue, and later R sided
    numbness. Her R leg felt weak with walking. Onset
    -2 hrs PTA
  • VS 180/90 P-82, RR-16, T-36.5 c
  • PE revealed decrease to pinprick on R face, arm,
    and leg. Sx resolved shortly after arrival
  • Now what?

Image the patient
3
Purpose of Imaging
  • Exclude non-cerebrovascular causes
  • of focal neurologic deficits
  • Determine if the event was a stroke or a TIA
  • Determine the etiology
  • cardiogenic, non-cardiogenic
  • large vessel disease, small vessel disease
  • Treatment Decision

4
Treatment Options
  • Risk Factor Control
  • Antiplatelet
  • Anticoagulation
  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
  • stent (CAS)
  • PFO closure
  • Intracranial stenosis stent (wingspan)

5
What needs to be Imaged
6
Non-contrast CT -Head
  • AHA Guidelines
  • general agreement that patients should receive
    a CT scan of the head .. to exclude a rare lesion
    such as a subdural hematoma or brain tumor (Class
    III, type C).
  • CT may reveal an area of brain infarction . 29
    to 34 of patients. may influence subsequent
    management (Class III, type C)
  • CT of the head has a limited role in
    vertebrobasilar TIA (Class III).

Culebras, Stroke 1997 281480-1497
7
Utility of the Non-contrast CT-Head
  • Douglas 322 pts ED diagnosis of TIA, CTlt48h
  • Normal 46
  • New infarct 4
  • Old stroke 21
  • Non-ischemic cause 1.2
  • 3-tumors, 1-chronic subdural
  • Risk of stroke at 90d 10.9
  • Highest risk with new infarct on initial CT
    (5/13)
  • OR 4.06 for stroke in 90d

Douglas VC, Stroke.2003 Dec34(12)2894-8
8
Is an MRI better for new infarcts?
  • DWI is very sensitive for early ischemia
  • Kidwell, 42 patients with TIA
  • DWI in 20/42, 48
  • DWI patients
  • Longer duration of sx (7.3h v 3.2h)
  • DWI changed the suspected cause in 33
  • Not all DWI lesion evolved into strokes
  • 50 reversible

Kidwell, Stroke 1999 301174-1180
9
DWI for TIA
  • Crisostomo, 75 patients with 78 TIAs
  • DWI lt 3days
  • 21 (16/78) DWI
  • 7/16 DWI pts also on T2 or FLAIR
  • DWI pts had
  • Sx gt1h
  • Motor deficits
  • Speech deficits

Crisostomo, Stroke 2003 43932-937
10
DWI predicts risk
  • Ay, 87 pts admitted with TIA
  • DWI 41.3 (36/87)
  • DWI 19.4 inpatient risk of recurrent stroke
  • Coutts, 120 pts minor stroke or TIA (57.5)
  • DWI-, no vessel occl 4.3 90d risk
  • DWI, no vessel occl 10.8 90d risk
  • DWI, vessel occl, 32.6 90 d risk

Coutts, Ann Neurol 200557848 Ay, Ann Neurol
2005, 57679
11
Clinical Score Imaging risk assessment
  • Ay, 601 TIA patients, all with MRI
  • Clinical score DWI to predict 7d stroke risk
  • ABCD2 gt 4 2.0 7d risk
  • DWI 4.9 7d risk
  • ABCD2 gt 4, DWI 14.9 7d risk

Ay, Stroke 200940181-6
12
What About PWI
  • Restrepo, 22 pts with TIA and DWI/PWI
  • 12 DWI (54)
  • 7 PWI (32) (14 only PWI)
  • 4 DWI and PWI (18)
  • 15 DWI or PWI (68)
  • Krol, 69 pts with TIA, 62 had PWI
  • 21 PWI (34)
  • 12 PWI and sx resolution
  • No relation of PWI to clinical outcome

Restrepo, AJNR 2004251645 Krol Stroke 2005
362487-89
13
DWI/PWI
  • Mlynash, 43 TIA patients
  • DWI / PWI within 48 hrs
  • PWI 33 (16 only PWI)
  • DWI 35
  • DWI and PWI 16
  • DWI or PWI 51
  • PWI lesions more frequent with
  • MRIlt12 hrs, speech deficit, lt60 yo
  • PWI increases the sensitivity of MRI for ischemia

Mlynash, Neurology 2009 72(13) 1127-33
14
DWI
  • Precise evaluation of TIA
  • 40 of TIA pts have DWI (25-67)
  • increased risk of recurrent stroke
  • Guides localization and treatment
  • Identifies patients to admit
  • PWI
  • identifies another 3-14 of TIA patients with
    ischemia/hypoperfusion, significance uncertain

15
Imaging of Vessels in TIAAHA Guidelines
  • A noninvasive screening technique is indicated
  • carotid duplex or Doppler ultrasonography
  • MRA provides noninvasive imaging
  • leads to overestimation of degree of arterial
    stenosis (Class II)
  • high-quality MRA
  • sufficient vascular overview for
    vertebrobasilar ischemia
  • contrast-enhanced CT scanning ..
  • may be helpful as a screening tool in centers
    where it is available (Class III)
  • radiographic arteriography (DSA)
  • best defines surgically remediable lesions
  • recommended for a symptomatic patient when
    noninvasive tests indicate 70 occlusion

16
Duplex US
  • Anatomic US image Doppler flow velocity
  • Carotid lesions are found in 8-31 of TIA pts

17
Imaging of the neck
  • Doppler US is the standard initial evaluation
  • Advantages
  • Inexpensive
  • Reliably excludes critical stenosis,lt 50
  • Disadvantages
  • Operator dependant
  • Over-estimates stenosis
  • Can be limited by severe calcifications
  • 88 sensitivity, 76 specificity

18
CT Angiogram
  • Advantages
  • perform with CT-head
  • available, accurate
  • Images head and neck
  • Disadvantages
  • cost
  • contrast
  • radiation
  • reformatting

19
How good is CT-Angiogram
  • Josephson 81 vessels with both CTA and DSA for
    stenosis gt70, 2 blinded readers
  • Agreed on 78/81, 96 95CI90-99
  • CT-A 100 sensitive, 63 specific
  • NPV of CTA for stenosis gt70 100
  • Comparable to MRA
  • Wyers 59 pts with 3-D CTA and planned carotid
    stent
  • influenced the planned approach in 37
  • reliably identified anatomic contraindications to
    CAS without DSA

Josephson, Neurology 200463457-60 Wyers, J Vasc
Surg 2009 49614-22
20
What about contrast nephropathy
  • Josephson reviewed 1,075 patients that underwent
    CT-A and CT-Perfusion
  • 52 creatinine increased by gt 0.5
  • 4 possible renal failure due to contrast
  • 2 temporary hemodialysis

Josephson, Neurology 2005641805-6
21
MR angiogram
22
MRA
  • Advantages
  • Completed with DWI and entire sequence
  • Covers head and neck
  • Disadvantages
  • Availability, cost
  • Patient exclusion, tolerance
  • Gadolinium
  • Image acquisition time
  • MRA
  • 92 sensitivity 76 specificity
  • CE-MRA
  • 94 sensitivity 93 specificity

23
DUS, MRA, DSAWhich one when?
  • Busken 350 pts with DUS, MRA, and DSA
  • DSA gold standard
  • DUS
  • 88 sensitive 76 specific
  • MRA
  • 92 sensitive 76 specific
  • Strategy of DUS, then MRA
  • 96 sensitive 80 specific
  • DUS alone was the most efficient strategy, adding
    MRA as necessary

Busken, Radiology 2004233101-112
24
What is the best strategy
  • Wardlaw,
  • Can DUS, CTA, MRA, or CE-MRA replace DSA
  • Literature review with expert panel
  • 41 studies, 2404 pts, 22 different strategies
  • For 70-99 Stenosis
  • CE-MRA most accurate 94 sens, 93 specific
  • DUS, CTA, MRA all similar
  • 89 sens, 84 specific
  • For 50-69 Stenosis
  • Literature overestimates accuracy because the
    sensitivity/specificity is better in asymptomatic
    arteries
  • 1st DUS, confirm with CE-MRA

Wardlaw JM, Health Technol Asses 2006301-182
25
What do vascular surgeons do?
  • Long 2002, survey of 382 vascular surgeons in
    France, 9390 stenoses
  • Decision for surgery based on
  • DUS DSA 69
  • DUS MRA 14
  • DUS CTA 9
  • DUS alone 8

Long, Ann Vasc Surg 2002 16261-5
26
What about Intracranial (IC) Stenosis
  • Transcranial Doppler TCD
  • Advantages
  • Noninvasive, easy to perform
  • Disadvantages
  • operator dependant
  • Rely on appropriate
  • bone windows

27
TCD for IC Stenosis
  • Feldmann 407 pts, SONIA Trial
  • All patients with TCD, MRA, DSA
  • TCD 50 PPV, 85 NPV
  • MRA 66 PPV, 87 NPV
  • Low incidence of IC stenosis
  • TCD provides similar information as MRA
  • Zubkov 93 pts with AIS,
  • CTA found 10 occlusions, 22 stenosis (EC/IC)
  • Good correlation with DUS
  • CTA demonstrates IC stenosis better than TCD

Feldmann, Neurology 2007682099-2106 Zubkov,
Neurol Res, 20088835-8
28
What if you do find a IC stenosis
  • WASID study
  • IC stenosis gt50 after TIA or minor stroke
  • 90d risk of Stroke - 4.7
  • 90d risk of TIA - 6.9
  • After TIA alone
  • 60 (15/25) events occur w/in 90 days
  • Treatment
  • Antiplatelet agents
  • stent under study (Wingspan)

Ovbiagele, Arch Neurol 2008 65(6)733-7
29
Imaging the Heart ECG
  • ECG Primarily for dx of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Christensen ECG of 233 TIA pts
  • Abnormal in 44 (ectopic beats and AV block)
  • No ECG finding was assoc with poor outcome or
    mortality
  • Elkins 1327 pts ED dx of TIA and ECG
  • 2.3 with new AF
  • 4.2 with abnormal ECGs had cardiac events
  • Abn ECG LVH, AF, AV conduction delays
  • Cardiac event AMI, CHF, Arrhythmia, ACS
  • vs 0.6 with normal ECGs (OR 6.9 1.6-29.5)
  • No increase risk of stroke or death with abnormal
    ECG

Christensen, J Neurol Sci 200523499-103 Elkins,
Arch Neurol 2002591437-41
30
Cardiac Monitoring
  • Purpose is to find Paroxysmal Atrial Fib
  • Jabaudon 149 pts with stroke or TIA
  • ECG for AF 2.7 - on day 1 (4/149)
  • 4.1 - by day 5 (6/145)
  • 24 hr Holter 5 w AF (7/139)
  • 7d ELR 5.7 w AF (5/88)
  • Tayal 56 pts- cryptogenic stroke
  • 21 d of OPD monitoring, 23 w AF
  • AF detected 7-21 days, 0 lt 7 d
  • Low yield in general, consider longer monitoring
    if cardioembolic cause suspected

Jabaudon, Stroke 2004351647-1651 Tayal,
Neurology 2008, 181696-701
31
EchocardiographyA traditional part of the TIA
evaluation
  • 3 yield in unselected patients
  • Suspect cardiac source
  • Young patients
  • No large vessel source or
  • no small vessel disease
  • Known cardiac disease
  • AF (atrial thrombi)
  • valvular disease, valve replaced
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Endocarditis
  • TEE gtgt TTE for
  • Aortic arch atheroma
  • Atrial thrombi
  • Valvular disease
  • R to L shunts (PFO)

32
Transesophageal Echocardiography
  • Force 132 pts with TIA / minor stroke
  • 70 -known cause, 62 cryptogenic
  • TEE Positive for PFO/ASA in
  • 3 w known cause
  • 19 w cryptogenic
  • deBruijn TEE gtTTE
  • 231 TIA patients, both TTE TEE
  • 55 (127/231) potential source
  • 39 (90/321) only on TEE
  • 40 of pts with (-) TTE had ()TEE

Force, Clin Neirol Neurosurg 2008110779-83 deBru
ijn, Stroke 2006 372531-2534
33
SummarySimple and Rapid approach
  • SOS-TIA (Lancet Neurlogy Nov 20076953-960)
  • MRI or CT, DUS, EKG, TTE or TEE as needed
  • 90d stroke risk 1.24
  • EXPRESS (Lancet 2007369254-55)
  • CT, ECG, DUS, TTE or TEE as needed
  • 90d stroke risk 2.1
  • EDOU (Stead, Neurocrit Care, 2008)
  • CT, EKG, DUS,
  • neurology consult with further testing as needed
  • 90d stroke risk 2.4
  • 80 Risk reduction

34
SummaryWhat do you need to do
  • Do something, and do it quickly
  • Brain imaging CT or MRI
  • Connect to CTA or MRA if possible
  • Vascular imaging DUS
  • Cardiac Imaging ECG, monitor
  • TEE or TTE as indicated

35
Back to the Case
  • ECG- normal
  • Monitor NSR
  • CT normal
  • DWI
  • MRA normal
  • TEE normal
  • Discharged
  • ASA, Simvistatin, glucatrol

36
Stroke, 2009 June 402276-2293
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com