MARCY REISETTER, COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

MARCY REISETTER, COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION,

Description:

is ability and personal Persist. malleable ... Perform higher than low-efficacy students of equal ability ... Be mindful of inadvertent 'low-ability cues' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: hpcus442
Learn more at: http://www.edec.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MARCY REISETTER, COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION,


1
Essential Principles of Motivation
  • MARCY REISETTER, COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY IN
    EDUCATION,
  • ROSANNE YOST, CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
  • UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA
  • PLEASE PICK UP EACH OF THE MULTICOLORED SURVEYS
    AND COMPLETE THEM BEFORE WE BEGIN
  • FOR THE ACADEMIC MOTIVATION SCALE, SUBSTITUTE
    ATTEND STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR ATTEND COLLEGE

2
  • What motivates you to learn in an academic
    setting?
  • To what extent is lack of motivation an issue in
    your classroom?
  • How do you address the problem?
  • How would you assess the success of your
    interventions?

3
A Social Cognitive View of Motivation Contrast
to Behavior Modification
  • A Different way to think about Motivation
    Learner Centered
  • SocialLearners read the social and academic
    expectations of the setting
  • CognitiveMind Mediated
  • Motivation is a STATE not a trait

4
The Ultimate goal of Education Self-Regulated
Learners who. . .
  • Accept responsibility for their own learning
  • Are flexible in their thinking and problem
    solving
  • Develop and use self-monitoring skills
  • Are collaborative in task-focused skills
  • Are willing to seek help and support from others
  • Focus on personal progress
  • Focus on learning rather than grades or test
    scores
  • Welcome challenge
  • How does this compare to the learners
  • we cultivate now?

5
3 Basic Principles
  • Motivation can be defined as our willingness to
  • Engage?
  • Commit?
  • Persist in an academic task challenge
  • Motivation beliefs are stored in connections in
    our long term memory, schema based on our
    experiences and interpretations of them.
  • Our motivation is influenced by our
  • Expectations for Success and
  • Value for the Task
  • E multiplied by V

6
Schemata
  • Mental organizing structuresexisting idea
    networks-- that guide perception and categorize
    experiences
  • Whether we are aware of them or not, these
    networks determine how we interpret our
    experiences and extract meaning from them
  • Motivation schemas can be
  • Adaptive, or
  • Mal-adaptive
  • What happens when a motivation schema is
    Mal-adaptive?

7
Expectancy x Value Judgments
  • Our willingness to expend the effort on an
    academic task depends on
  • Our Expectations for success with reasonable
    effort
  • Our assessment of the Value and meaningfulness of
    the task.

8
Value for the Task
  • What kinds of tasks do your students VALUE?
  • Why?
  • What do you see when they dont value a task?

9
Value is Enhanced When the Task is
  • Meaningful
  • Connected
  • Relevant
  • Useful
  • How do we do that?

10
Reasonable Expectations for Success
  • Where do they come from?
  • How do learners with expectations for success
    approach tasks?
  • How do learners with lower expectations for
    success approach tasks?

11
Student Responses Based on E x V
12
Expectations for Success are Enhanced when
learners. . .
  • Believe in incremental rather than innate
    intelligence
  • Learn for internalized, self-regulated purposes
  • Pursue mastery goals
  • Have high self-efficacy
  • Attribute success and/or failure to an internal
    locus of control
  • Have necessary learning strategies and tools

13
Motivation Constructs
  • Each of the previous statements represents a set
    of ideas that individuals holdideas that
    influence their willingness to engage?commit,
    and particularly? PERSIST in an academic tasks
  • Each addresses learners expectations for success
    in a given task setting

14
Intrinsic/ Extrinsic
Goal Orientation
Beliefs about Knowledge
Self Efficacy
Hope
Motivation
Attributions
15
1 Beliefs About Intelligence Knowledge
  • What is Knowledge?
  • Who has it?
  • How do we get it?
  • Where does it come from?

16
Beliefs about Knowledge
  • Assumptions individuals hold about
  • The nature of knowledge
  • Certainty
  • Complexity
  • How knowledge is attained
  • Role of innate ability
  • Role of effort

17
Beliefs about Learning Survey blue
  • Factor 1 Fixed Ability.
  • Is ability fixed.. . . . . or is it. . . . . .
    Incremental?
  • high points
    low points
  • Factor 2 Simple Knowledge
  • Is knowledge simple. . . Or is it. . .
    Complex?
  • high points
    low points
  • Factor 3 Certain Knowledge
  • Is knowledge certain. . . Or is it. . . .
    Relative?
  • high points
    low points
  • Factor 4 Quick Learning
  • Accomplished quickly. . . . Or. . . with
    sustained effort?
  • high points
    low points

18
  • How are these beliefs relevant to educators and
    their practices?

19
Implications Recognize That. . .
  • Everyone holds beliefs about intelligence and
    knowledge that influence their learning AND
    behaviors.
  • These beliefs affect the way we reason
  • Beliefs about knowledge are NOT strongly related
    to ability, but they are strongly related to
    engagement and motivation issues

20
2 Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation
  • Extrinsic motivation for external motives, such
    as incentives and rewards
  • Intrinsic motivation for internal motives,
    please in the task for its own sake
  • Which do schools most actively promote? Why? How
    do you know? What is the message to learners?
  • Which is the most powerful approach for learning?

21
The continuum approach Self Determination
  • Assumption the element that defines the
    difference between Extrinsic and Intrinsic
    motivation is the degree to which the individual
    determines task value and importance--
  • BUY INaka Engagement

22
Levels of task buy in
  • Based on Who initiates the involvement and why?
  • Extrinsic Motivation has 4 levels
  • External Regulation
  • Introjected Regulation
  • Identified Regulation
  • Integrated Regulation

23
Buy-In
Extrinsic
Completely initiated outside Reward or
punishment
External Regulation
Introjected Regulation
Accepts standards other have specified
Identified Regulation
Values standards Willing engagement
Integrated Regulation
Fits own ultimate goals
Intrinsic
24
  • Think of a learning experience in which YOU
    moved along the continuum.
  • What happened to your learning?
  • How was your experience related to Expectation
    for Success and Value for the Task?
  • So HOW do we move learners along the continuum?

25
Basic Learner Needs
  • Competence
  • Belief that one can accomplish the task
  • Autonomy
  • Self initiation, self direction, and self
    regulation
  • Relatedness
  • To others in the learning setting
  • Connections to overall learning goals

26
Implications Support for Basic Needs
  • Competence Attention to task definition
  • Clear
  • Manageable
  • Challenging
  • Criterion referenced success standards
  • Autonomy Choices
  • Time flexibility
  • Alternative ways to reach goals
  • Participation in decision making
  • Relatedness De-emphasize competition
  • Emphasis on effort
  • Collaboration
  • Social construction How could YOU support
    each of these?

27
Academic Motivation Scale white
  • What did this instrument tell you about your
    intrinsic/extrinsic balance?
  • Did it seem accurate? Why/why not?
  • Comments?

28
3. Goal Orientations
  • Beliefs individuals hold about the purposes of
    learning
  • Why we learn
  • For whom
  • How success is achieved
  • IMPACT How we approach challenging tasks
  • Two basic types of goals
  • Mastery Goals
  • Performance Goals

29
Underlying Theories of Intelligence
  • Entity Theories
  • Incremental Theories

30
Goal Orientation
  • Performance
  • Goal is to gain
  • positive judgments
  • avoid negative
  • judgments of ability
  • Prove
  • Mastery
  • Goal is to increase
  • ability and personal
  • competence

  • Improve

31
Theory of Intelligence
  • Entity Performance
  • Intelligence Goal is to gain
  • is a fixed positive judgments
  • trait avoid negative
  • judgments of ability
  • Prove
  • Incremental Mastery
  • Intelligence Goal is to increase
  • is ability and personal
  • malleable competence

  • Improve

32
Typical Behavior
  • Entity Performance
    Helplessness
  • Intelligence Goal is to gain Avoid
    risk
  • is a fixed positive judgments Give up
    easily
  • trait avoid negative Make
    excuses
  • judgments of ability
  • Prove
  • Incremental Mastery Effort
  • Intelligence Goal is to increase
    Seek challenge
  • is ability and personal Persist
  • malleable competence
    Take responsibility

  • Improve Problem Solve

33
Goal Orientations Beliefs Compare/Contrast
Performance Orientation
Mastery Orientation
  • Competenceyou have it or you dont!
  • Avoidance of challenging tasks
  • Easy tasks are desirable
  • Effort low competence
  • More extrinsic motivation
  • Reliance on rote learning
  • Comparison of self to others
  • Errors seen as failures
  • Failure low ability
  • Teacher viewed as judge, rewarder, and punisher
  • Competence develops through effort practice
  • Enjoyment of challenging tasks
  • Easy tasks viewed as boring
  • Effort competence
  • More intrinsic motivation to learn
  • Use of learning strategies for deep
    comprehension
  • Self-evaluative
  • Errors are viewed as useful
  • Failure can be informational
  • Teacher seen as resource/guide
  • Which learner do you prefer? Why?


34
Quadrants
Mastery Orientation
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
Performance
Orientation
LOW
35
Goals Inventory yellow
  • Eliminate s 7, 9, 13
  • Mark the following with P
  • 2, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18
  • Mark the following with M
  • 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 14, 16
  • Add P scores and divide by 7
  • Add M scores and divide by 8

36
PERFORMANCE
5
LM/HP
HM/HP
4
3
1
2
5
4
MASTERY
HM/LP
LM/LP
2
1
37
  • Students with a strong mastery orientation are
    more successful learners , REGARDLESS of whether
    performance orientation is high or low.
  • Implications?

38
4 Self-Efficacy
  • Beliefs about the degree of effect we can have
    on a learning situation.
  • Think about a situation in which you perceive you
    can have an impact. Now think of one where you
    dont believe you can have much. Compare your
    motivation to engage in each of these settings
  • Context and topic specific

Perception!
39
(No Transcript)
40
Factors Influencing Self-Efficacy
41
Implications Improving Self-Efficacy
  • Increase students awareness of the self-efficacy
    concept
  • Use expert and inexpert modelingscaffold
  • so that students can understand developing
    expertise
  • Provide feedback
  • that functions to help students develop expertise
    through analysis of own performance
  • specific
  • Build self-efficacy rather than reduce
    expectations
  • reductions undermine efficacy
  • Encourage self-regulation
  • students take control of their learning process

42
5. Causal Attributions
  • Who or what is responsible for our successes and
    failures? Are these. . .
  • Internal or External ?
  • Stable or Unstable?
  • Controllable or Uncontrollable?
  • Locus of control
  • Learned helplessness

43
3 Issues in Attribution Theory
Locus of control ? Where does control lie? ?
Internal vs. external ? I vs. They thinking
Attribution Theory
Stability ? Stable vs. unstable ? Does outcome
change or fluctuate?
Controllability ? Controllable vs. un-
controllable ? Are any variables with- in my
control?
44
Possible Attributions
  • Effort
  • Ability
  • Task difficulty
  • Luck

Which is most adaptive and why?
45
Controllability is any of this within my
control?
Locus of Control
Task Difficulty
Ability
Stable
Stability
This isnt up to me.
I cant really control this.
Effort
Luck
Unstable
This is something I have control over!
This is completely out of my control.
46
Attribution Dimensions
  • Locus

Stability
Controllability
47
Implications Improving Student Attributions
  • Discuss effects of attributions with students
  • leading to emphasis on the role of effort
  • Help students focus on controllable causes
  • in order to increase task engagement,
    persistence, and performance
  • Consider alternative causes of success and
    failure
  • identify and help students modify
  • Be mindful of inadvertent low-ability cues
  • which undermine both self-efficacy and
    attributions to controllable factors
  • How do we do these things?

48
Attribution Inventory green
  • Specific to Locus of Control Dimension Only
  • Scoring--
  • Eliminate item 8
  • Reverse score s 1, 3, 4, 9, 12
  • 15 24 33
  • Add your points, divide by 11
  • Higher the score, the more EXTERNAL the perceived
    locus of control
  • Did this instrument describe you accurately?
    Why/why not? contrast to Behavior Modification
    contrast to Behavior Modification

49
5. The Hope Construct
  • Agency the Will
  • Pathways the Ways
  • aka study strategies
  • Connect this construct with
  • Self Regulation
  • Self Efficacy
  • Self Determination

50
The Hope Scale
  • Eliminate 3, 5, 7, 11,
  • Add for Pathways Score
  • 1, 4, 6, 8
  • Divide by 4
  • Add for Agency Score
  • 2, 9, 10, 12
  • Divide by 4

51
Intrinsic/ Extrinsic
Goal Orientation
Beliefs about Knowledge
Self Efficacy
Motivation
Hope
Attributions
52
Synthesis
  • What ideas link each of these constructs?
  • How can you summarize the implications for
    classroom practice?
  • Specifically, what can you implement in your
    classroom?
  • What do you need to think more about?
  • What questions do you still have?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com