Detection and adjustment of abnormal testday yields - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Detection and adjustment of abnormal testday yields

Description:

If test-day yield still detected as abnormal, predicted yield recalculated again ... All test-day yields evaluated as potential outliers (not just sick tests) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: smh
Learn more at: https://aipl.arsusda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Detection and adjustment of abnormal testday yields


1
Detection and adjustment of abnormal test-day
yields
(abstract 125)
G.R. WIGGANS, P.M. VANRADEN, and J.C.
PHILPOT Animal Improvement Programs
Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
USDA Beltsville, MD 20705-2350,
USA wiggans_at_aipl.arsusda.gov ? 301-504-8334
2
Estimation of lactation yields
  • Inclusion of abnormal yields may reduce accuracy
  • Cow may be reported as sick on test day
  • ICAR procedures exclude sick tests below a
    threshold

3
Calculation of lactation records
  • Best prediction used since February 1999 for
    calvings during 1997 or later
  • All sick tests have been excluded
  • Many sick tests with milk yields gt45 kg
  • Sick coding varies by herd and dairy records
    processing center
  • No check for abnormally high test-day yield
    compared with cow's other test days

4
Objectives
  • Check every test for abnormal yield (not just
    those coded as sick)
  • Detect abnormally high or low test yields by
    comparison with yield from adjacent test days
  • Define approximately 1 of each tail of the
    distribution as abnormal
  • Adjust test-day yield to floor or ceiling

5
Methods
  • Calculate predicted yield
  • Compare test-day yield with thresholds
  • Upper 150 of predicted yield
  • Lower 60 of predicted yield
  • If test-day yield detected to be abnormal,
    recalculate predicted yield based on yield from
    adjacent test days

6
Methods (continued)
  • If test-day yield still detected to be abnormal,
    adjust to threshold
  • Calculate lactation yields using best prediction
    with adjusted test-day yields

7
Predicted yield calculation
  • For first test day
  • predicted yield following yield slope
    (interval)
  • For second test day and later
  • predicted yield previous yield slope
    (interval)

8
Predicted yield calculation (continued)
  • Slope is function of DIM, DIM2, test-day yield,
    and interaction
  • Coefficients differ by
  • Test day (first vs. second and later)
  • Trait (milk, fat, protein)
  • Parity (1, 2, 3)
  • DIM group (5-49, 50) to account for peak yield
  • Previously identified abnormal yields not used
  • Sick tests with milk yields of lt4.5 kg ignored

9
Abnormal yield detected
  • Predicted yield recalculated by interpolating
    between adjacent test days
  • If test-day yield still detected as abnormal,
    predicted yield recalculated again using second
    test day after outlier
  • Herd average used when only 2 test days available

10
Component percentage limits
  • Detection of abnormal fat and protein yields
    based on weight (not percentage)
  • Unlikely component percentages possible
  • Component percentage limits
  • Fat 2-7 and
  • herd mean 1 to herd mean 2
  • Protein 2-5 and
  • herd mean 1 to herd mean 1.5

11
Outlier results
  • Calvings during 1997 or later
  • Among gt93 million test-day records, abnormal
    yields found
  • Milk 1.8
  • Fat 3.4
  • Protein 1.9

12
Improved accuracy?
  • Correlations of lactations with ?1 adjusted
    outlier with following lactation
  • Adjustment of abnormal yields should increase
    similarity between consecutive lactations

13
August 2002 implementation
  • Lactation records for calvings during 1997 or
    later recalculated
  • Adjusted yields shown on industry web queries of
    test-day data
  • Additional data may cause change in status of
    detected outlier and adjusted yield

14
Summary
  • All test-day yields evaluated as potential
    outliers (not just sick tests)
  • Improved accuracy in estimation of expected yield
  • Floor or ceiling (instead of deletion) for
    abnormal yields to reflect actual yield better
  • Improved correlation between consecutive
    lactations with outlier adjustment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com