Prologue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Prologue

Description:

Tuesday's child is full of grace. Wednesday's ... Context: Diana the 'ambassador' ... do you feel that you have the right to think of yourself as an ambassador? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: viv8
Category:
Tags: prologue

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prologue


1
Prologue
2
Folk theory of personality
  • Monday's child is fair of face.
  • Tuesday's child is full of grace.
  • Wednesday's child is full of woe.
  • Thursday's child has far to go.
  • Friday's child is loving and giving.
  • Saturday's child works hard for a living.
  • But the child that's born on the Sabbath day, Is
    bonny and lithe and good and gay.

3
Ashanti folk theory
  • On different days of the week
  • Different types of kra (soul) enter the body
  • Produce different dispositions (not destiny)
  • Mondays boy-child
  • Soul name of Kwadwo
  • quiet, retiring, peaceful
  • Wednesdays boy-child
  • Soul name of Kwaku
  • quick-tempered, aggressive, trouble maker

4
Ashanti folk theory
  • Tested by Jahoda (1954)
  • Sampling
  • 446 delinquents (Juvenile Court records
    1948-1953)
  • 1254 schoolboys (all boys in 10 schools)
  • Used ?2 to test relations between
  • Day of birth (kradin)
  • Delinquency (schoolboy vs delinquent)
  • Type of offence (against person vs other)

5
Ashanti schoolboys
6
Ashanti delinquents
p lt .05
7
Offences by all delinquents
8
Offences by kwaku delinquents
p lt .01
9
Jahodas conclusion
  • The results here presented are consistent with
    the hypothesis that Ashanti beliefs about a
    connexion between personality characteristics and
    day of birth may be effective in selectively
    enhancing certain traits which otherwise may have
    remained latent. ... The correspondence appears
    too striking to be easily dismissed.
  • (Jahoda, 1954, p. 195)

10
Social construction of personality
  • Enter the self-concept

11
Overview of topic
  • Essentialism vs constructionism
  • Social construction of personality
  • Discursive perspectives
  • Social cognitive/symbolic interactionist
    perspectives

12
Essentialism vs. constructionism
  • Mainstream approaches to personality and
    intelligence tend to assume that these individual
    differences reflect objective or essential
    properties of the person.
  • Behavioural genetics research suggests that much
    of the variance in measures of individual
    differences (IQ, Big 5) can indeed be accounted
    for by genetic factors.
  • Effects of shared environment are much less
    evident, while effects of non-shared
    environment are entirely confounded with error
    variance in these studies.

13
Essentialism vs. constructionism
  • Little attention is paid in this research to how
    genetic factors contribute to the formation of
    intelligence and personality molecular genetics
    research is needed.
  • Even less attention is paid to how environmental
    factors contribute to the construction of
    individual differences thus we need to develop
    our concept of environment.
  • Further research into genetic predispositions
    will be largely the province of geneticist and
    neuropsychologist, but research into the
    individual-environment relation is clearly the
    province of the social psychologist.

14
What does the environment include?
  • Physical environment
  • Social relationships and interactions
  • Mass communication and media
  • Widespread cultural beliefs

15
What does the environment include?
  • The individuals experience of
  • Physical environment
  • Social relationships and interactions
  • Mass communication and media
  • Widespread cultural beliefs,
  • much of which is mediated by language and
    communication proceses ...

16
Language and truth
  • Psychological research and theorising is hugely
    dependent on language.
  • Traditionally, this dependence on language is not
    problematised. We readily assume
  • that language is used to describe reality.
  • that words have fixed, unambiguous meanings.
  • that inner states (beliefs, attitudes, traits,
    emotions, and so on) can be inferred from the
    language used by our respondents in interviews,
    questionnaires, etc.

17
Language and truth
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein (1921) questioned whether the
    meanings of words are really transparent
  • Language disguises thought. So much so, that
    from the outward form of the clothing it is
    impossible to infer the form of the thought
    beneath it, because the outward form of the
    clothing is not designed to reveal the form of
    the body, but for entirely different purposes.
    Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 4.002
  • Wittgenstein argued that the meaning of words is
    in their use not in dictionary definitions.

18
Language and truth
  • J. L. Austin (1962) argued that words can be
    actions not just descriptions
  • I declare war on the Philippines.
  • I sentence you to 30 years imprisonment.
  • I now declare you husband and wife.
  • Hello.
  • These are performative utterances they are not
    describing reality, but constructing reality.

19
Social constructionism
  • Scientific and everyday concepts are not
    reflections of external reality gained through
    observation, but are only intelligible with
    respect to a vast array of other concepts.
  • Our assumptions about reality arise from social
    interaction within historical, cultural and
    social contexts.
  • The extent to which a form of understanding is
    accepted as true is not dependent on empirical
    validity, but on social processes involving
    negotiation, power, conflict.
  • Which theories or versions of reality are
    accepted has far-reaching implications for social
    action.
  • Gergen, 1985, see also Berger Luckmann, 1966

20
Aims of social constructionism
  • Social constructionist inquiry is principally
    concerned with explicating the processes by which
    people come to describe, explain, or otherwise
    account for the world (including themselves) in
    which they live.
  • (Gergen, 1985, p. 266)

21
A critical orientation
  • Social constructionist theory often adopts a
    critical or de-constructionist perspective
  • Questioning peoples accounts of themselves
  • Are these accounts descriptive or performative?
  • What sort of social assumptions are they based
    on?
  • Questioning the reality of concepts and
    categories we take for granted (e.g., gender,
    nationality)
  • Includes questioning the truth status of
    theoretical concepts (e.g. personality, self,
    intelligence)

22
Discourse analysis
  • Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell (1987)
    applied critical arguments about language to
    social psychological concepts and methods
  • Do not infer mental states from language.
  • Focus on performative rather than descriptive
    functions.
  • Language understood to construct, not reflect,
    meaning.
  • Social psychological concepts (e.g., attitudes,
    emotions, personality, self) reinterpreted as
    resources existing in language for constructing
    shared meanings.

23
Two forms of discourse analysis
  • Micro approach
  • grounded in conversation analysis
  • focuses on the performative functions of language
  • avoids cognitive-level explanations of actions
  • avoids going beyond the text
  • Macro approach
  • grounded in social constructionist theory
  • focuses on implications of societal discourses
  • effects of discursive resources on action
  • (Abell Stokoe, British Journal of Social
    Psychology 2001)

24
Example 1 Margaret Thatcher
  • Excerpt from speech at Conservative Party annual
    conference 1984. Context miners strike.
  • The nation faces what is probably the most
    testing crisis of our time--the battle between
    the extremists and the rest. We are fighting, as
    we have always fought, for the weak as well as
    for the strong. We are fighting for great and
    good causes. We are fighting to defend them
    against the power and might of those who rise up
    to challenge them. This Government will not
    weaken. This nation will meet that challenge.
    Democracy will prevail.
  • (Reicher Hopkins, European Journal of Social
    Psychology 1996)

25
Example 2 Princess Diana
  • Excerpt from BBC Panorama interview with Martin
    Bashir, 1995. Context Diana the ambassador.
  • Bashir On what grounds do you feel that you
    have the right to think of yourself as an
    ambassador?
  • Diana Ive been in a (.) privileged position
    for fifteen years (.) and Ive got (.) tremendous
    knowledge (.) about people and how to communicate
    (.) Ive learnt that (.) Ive got it (.) and I
    want to use it (1) and when I look at people in
    (.) public life (1) .hhh Im not a political
    animal (.) but (.) I think the biggest disease
    this world (.) suffers from (.) in this day and
    age (.) is the disease of people feeling unloved
    (.) and I know that (.) I can give (.) love for a
    minute (.) for half an hour for a day for a month
    but I can give (.) Im very happy to do that (.)
    and I want to do that
  • (Abell Stokoe, British Journal of Social
    Psychology 2001)

26
Discourse and cognition
  • Shows manipulation of self-identity categories to
    achieve interactional goals (e.g. persuasion)
  • Makes no claims about cognition
  • What about speakers intentions?
  • What about effects on audience?
  • Why look at discourse if not prepared to consider
    relationship with cognition?

27
Hampsons model of personality
28
The actor
  • Characteristics residing in the individual
  • Domain of personality psychology
  • Single trait theories
  • Multiple trait theories
  • Hereditary and environmental influences

29
The observer
  • How person is perceived/judged by others
  • Domain of social psychology
  • Person perception
  • Attribution theories
  • Impression formation

30
The self-observer
  • Persons beliefs about own characteristics
  • Domain of social and clinical psychology
  • Self-concept or identity
  • Self-concept
  • Self-evaluation
  • Self-awareness

31
Behavioural confirmation
  • Effects of observers expectations on actor
  • Self-fulfilling prophecy effects
  • Snyder, Tanke Berscheid (1977)
  • M/F dyads in phone conversation
  • Manipulated attractiveness of F with photo

32
Behavioural confirmation
  • Measured M expectations of F target
  • attractive target
  • sociable, poised, humorous, socially adept
  • unattractive target
  • unsociable, awkward, serious, socially inept
  • attractiveness stereotype false expectations

33
Behavioural confirmation
  • Actual behaviour of F target
  • naïve judges hearing F recording only
  • attractive target gt unattractive target on
    stereotypically attractive traits
  • e.g. sociable, poised, sexually warm, outgoing
  • (false) expectations of observer confirmed

34
Behavioural confirmation
  • What about behaviour of M?
  • naïve judges hearing M recording only
  • M interacting with attractive F
  • more sociable, sexually warm, interesting,
    independent, sexually permissive, bold, outgoing,
    humorous, obvious and socially adept
  • presumed mediator of F responses

35
Behavioural confirmation
  • Replicated with other dimensions
  • Hostility (Snyder Swann, 1978)
  • Extraversion (Fazio et al., 1981)
  • Gender roles (Skrypnek Snyder, 1982)
  • Could behavioural confirmation effects explain
    perpetuation of gender roles? (cf. Smith Lloyd,
    1978)
  • Effects generalise to subsequent interactions
  • but only when target alters self-concept

36
Other construction processes
  • Always about relationships between actor,
    observer and self-observer
  • Self-presentation
  • Self-verification
  • Self-stereotyping
  • ... ?
  • Observer is also an actor!

37
Conclusions
  • Social constructionist ideas examined using
    discursive and mainstream methods
  • Focus on meaning systems and the individuals
    experience of the environment
  • Meaning systems shaped by social interaction and
    by widespread beliefs
  • Language and communication construct and do not
    just reflect individual differences
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com