Phosphorus Transport From the Soil to Surface Water - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Phosphorus Transport From the Soil to Surface Water

Description:

Substantial High flow continued for 2 more days. Lake Erie-Western Basin ... A.N. Sharpley, T. Daniel, T. Sims, J. Lemunyon, R. Stevens, and R. Parry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: rwil89
Learn more at: https://streams.osu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Phosphorus Transport From the Soil to Surface Water


1
Phosphorus Transport From the Soil to Surface
Water
  • Field Observations Supported by a Review of
    Current Literature

By Rick Wilson Ohio EPA-Division of Surface
Water September 15, 2008
2
Ohio EPAs interest in Dissolved and Ortho-P and
monitoring strategy adjustment
  • Claim or Myth? Phosphorus only moves when is
    sorbed or attached to sediment
  • Dissolved Phosphorus is highly bioavailable. It
    is a key ingredient to harmful algal blooms and
    Lake Erie.
  • Obstacle Field filtration for dissolved and
    Ortho-P analysis historically difficult and time
    consuming.

3
Nonpoint source water quality pollution is all
about runoff and land useField Modeling Staff
effort to collect Dissolved/Ortho P data during
substantial runoff event in Paint Creek watershed
on June 4, 2008
  • Paint Creek watershed predominant land use is
    agriculture. (77 agriculture, 19 wooded, lt1
    urban) photo.
  • Total flowLooking back from 9-11-08
  • Last 30 days 217 Million gallons (as low as 3.1
    cfs)
  • Previous to that 30 days-- 3.7 Billion gallons
  • June 4, 2008 3.9 Billion gallons (6080 cfs)
    (16,000 kg P)
  • June 4-6, 2008---10.6 Billion gallons (45,000 kg
    P)

4
Example High Flow event WQ data
  • 12 samples collected in Paint Creek and largest
    Paint Creek tributaries during high flow on June
    4, 2008
  • Samples field filtered to determine what fraction
    of Total Phosphorus is Dissolved or
    Ortho-Phosphorus (i.e., what fraction is readily
    bioavailable?
  • Flow on June 4, 2008 was 6080 cfs at one gauge on
    Paint Creek. Compared to August 24 when the flow
    dipped to 3.1 cfs (2000X lower)

5
12 samples from Paint Creek watershed mainstem
and largest tributaries on 6-4-08
  • Average Total P 0.401 mg/L
  • Average Ortho P 0.232 mg/L (Highly bioavailable)
  • Average Suspended Solids 318 mg/L
  • DRP concentration was 58 of Total P
  • Approx 16,000 kg P between the banks in Paint
    Creek on June 4, 2008. Substantial High flow
    continued for 2 more days

6
Lake Erie-Western BasinResearch from Heidelberg
College (Baker et al)
  • Past 33 years of data from Ohio Tributary Loading
    program has shown dissolved reactive phosphorus
    (DRP) loading decreased 65 through mid 1990s.
    Since then, DRP loads have increased rapidly and
    in 2007 reached historic highs.
  • The high bioavailability of DRP make it a prime
    suspect in the recurrence of harmful algal blooms
    within Lake Erie.
  • Excessive phosphorus loading identified as cause
    for increases in Blue-green algae (Microcystis).

Photo by Thomas Bridgeman, University of Toledo
7
Lake Erie-Western BasinResearch from Heidelberg
College (Baker et al)
  • The increases in DRP loading are derived from
    cropland and are linked to changing fertilizer
    management associated with conservation tillage
    and to stratification in the soil column.
  • Storm water from cropland runoff entering
    southern shores of Lake Erie contain high
    concentrations of dissolved nutrients, including
    DRP and Nitrate. As sediments settle out of the
    water column, these nutrients are available to
    support algal growth

Photo by Thomas Bridgeman, University of Toledo
8
(No Transcript)
9
Baker et al, 2007
10
Western and Central Basins---Lake ErieSatellite
Image, April 2, 2008Sagady Associates, East
Lansing, MI.
11
Agricultural Phosphorus and Eutrophication,
Second Edition A.N. Sharpley, T. Daniel, T. Sims,
J. Lemunyon, R. Stevens, and R. Parry United
States Department of Agriculture Agricultural
Research Service, ARS149, September 2003
12
Thaw Hydrograph Feb 22-March 3, 2007
13
Phosphorus Leaching Through Intact Soil Columns
Before and After Poultry Manure Application-March
2005Kleinman, Srinivasan, Sharpley, Gburek
  • The study highlights the role of manure in
    temporarily increasing the potential for
    subsuraface P transport in soils.
  • Before manure application, concentrations of P
    in leachate were low, with DRP consisting of less
    than 10 of total P in leachate.
  • After manure application, all columns exhibitied
    significant increases in leachate P
    concentrations, primarily due to DRP, identifying
    soluble P in manure as the major source of
    leachate P.

14
Composted Poultry Manure Water Extraction--Dissolv
ed-P test results1.0 gram Composted Poultry
manure stirred into 1.00 liter H2O
Almost 60 of Dissolved P went into solution in
the first 10 minutes
15
Poultry-Layer Manure Land Application-Union
CountySamples Collected Feb 26, 2007
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Thaw Hydrograph Feb 22-March 3, 2007
19
Effect of Broadcast Manure on Runoff Phosphorus
Concentrations over Successive Rainfall
EventsPeter J.A. Kleinman and Andrew N. Sharpley
(JEQ-2003)
  • Implication to Phosphorus Site Assessment Indices
  • findings of this study suggest that differential
    erosion of broadcast manure can be an important
    contributor to the variation in runoff TP
    concentrations among soils. In many areas,
    manure is broadcast onto no-till and grassed
    soils that have low erosion rates. While soil
    erosion is included as a transport factor in all
    site assessment indices, it is possible that
    erosion of applied manure is not adequately
    represented.

20
Downstream land where separated sand solids from
Dairy Manure were land applied onto frozen /snow
covered land
March 1, 2007, 1538 hrs.
February 26, 2007, 1225 hrs
21
Effect of Broadcast Manure on Runoff Phosphorus
Concentrations over Successive Rainfall
EventsPeter J.A. Kleinman and Andrew N. Sharpley
(JEQ-2003)
  • Broadcast manure concentrates soluble P at the
    soil surface where it is readily available to
    runoff into water (Sharpley et al., 1984)
  • Of existing manure application methods,
    broadcasting generally results in the greatest
    potential for soluble P losses in runoff (Zhao et
    al., 2001)

22
How does phosphorus move from fields to streams?
Under conservation tillage phosphorus
accumulates at the soil surface.
From Heidelberg College Baker et al.
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Poultry Manure Runoff Associated with Thaw
27
Water Quality Sample Results(From One Poultry
Manure Runoff Incident)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Effect of Broadcast Manure on Runoff Phosphorus
Concentrations over Successive Rainfall
EventsPeter J.A. Kleinman and Andrew N. Sharpley
(JEQ-2003)
  • Trends with successive Rain Events
  • Results confirm the importance of timing and
    sequence of runoff event relative to manure
    application on runoff P concentrations, as
    illustrated by DRP, TP, and SS concentration in
    runoff from Buchanan soil broadcast with 100 kg
    TP/ha
  • Runoff water may remove sufficient quantities of
    P from the soil surface such that less P is
    available to runoff over time.
  • McDowell and Sharpley (2002, 2003) found that
    eroded sediments are generally enriched with P
    relative to other solids at the soil surface, and
    are a key source of P in runoff from soils
    receiving recent applications of manure

30
Effect of Broadcast Manure on Runoff Phosphorus
Concentrations over Successive Rainfall
EventsPeter J.A. Kleinman and Andrew N. Sharpley
(JEQ-2003)
  • Due to the high concentration of soluble P in
    manure, much of the increase in runoff TP
    concentrations from manure-amended soils was
    related to soluble P losses, as evidenced by the
    contribution of DRP to runoff TP concentrations.
    In runoff from soils broadcast with manure, DRP
    concentrations ranged from 30-93 of TP
    concentrations, with the contribution of DRP to
    TP increasing with application rate.

31
GLSM WatershedDecember 05
32
(No Transcript)
33
GLSM Thaw- December 2005
34
Feedlot RunoffA lot of manure concentrated in
one spot Higher concentration of pollutants
(load?)
35
Robin ShepardJSWC-J/A 2005
  • Study results show implementation of current
    nutrient management plans is far from fully
    achieved, and the evolution to phosphorus
    (P)-based CNMPS would require even more follow up
    assistance to farmers. The complexity of P-based
    plans, and because so few farmers currently
    credit on-farm sources of P2O5 will make
    widespread success difficult, possibly
    unrealistic. Given the information and
    educational needs associated with implementing a
    plan, it may be more effective to work
    extensively with a few farmers in targeted areas
    that are determined to be more susceptible to
    nutrient loss (Eghball and Power 1999
    Heathwaite, et al., 2000, Nowak and Chabot,
    2004).Although tremendous effort has gone into
    federal and state programs to protect water
    resources from nonpoint sources of pollution by
    promoting and/or requiring a nutrient management
    plan (NMP), just having an NMP does not reduce
    excess nutrient application nor does it guarantee
    improvements in water quality.

36
P-Task Force
  • Recommendations to Director Korleski expected in
    2008.
  • OEPA should monitor or require monitoring for
    dissolved reactive P.
  • Agriculture and Agronomics (laundry list)
  • Soil tests (soil test methods and use)
  • Work toward updated and Improved Agricultural
    BMPs which specifically address to issues raised
    today. Improve and Phosphorus Index and use it.
  • Should open doors for increase for water quality
    research in agricultural landscape, for
    multivariate study
  • Point sources (ortho-phosphate in Drinking water,
    lawns fertilizers and detergents) arent off the
    hook

37
  • Thaw event

38
For Questions or More Info Call
  • cathy.alexander_at_epa.state.oh.us
  • (614) 644-2021
  • rick.wilson_at_epa.state.oh.us
  • (614) 644-2032
  • Information on Ohio EPA Water Quality
    Information http//www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/index.
    html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com