Title: Proposals for Universal Health Care or Back to the Health Care Future
1Proposals for Universal Health Careor Back to
the Health Care Future
- Leonard Rodberg
- New York Metro Chapter
- Physicians for a National Health Program
- February 27, 2007
2Why Health Is On the Agenda
3A Declining Number of Firms Are Offering
Insurance
4Firms Shift Health InsuranceCosts to Workers
5HIGH COST OF HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS
- National Average for Employer-provided
Insurance - Single Coverage 4,024 per year
- Family Coverage 10,880 per year
-
- Note Annual income at minimum wage
10,300 - Annual income of average
Wal-Mart worker 17,114 -
- Source Kaiser Family Foundation/HRET
Survey, 2005
6Rising Number of uninsured
Number of Uninsured Americans (Millions)
45
40
35
30
25
20
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
Source U.S. Census Bureau
7Bush Plan
- The problem Employers provide too much
insurance, leading to excessive spending - Bushs solution
- Tax employer-based insurance that is
gold-plated - Provide tax deductions (not credits) to allow
people to buy their own insurance. No mandates on
anyone. - The impact (Lewin)
- 9 M fewer uninsured (12 M lose employer coverage,
2 M would remain uninsured) - Newly-insured are mainly upper-income
- 62 B in annual federal expenditures
- No reform of individual insurance market
inaccessible to low- and middle-income families
or pre-existing conditions
8U.S .Out-of-Pocket Expenses are Greater than
Those of Other Countries
Source OECD 2006
9Physician Visits Per Capita
10Hospital Inpatient Days Per Capita
11Stephen Colbert on the Bush Health Plan
- It's so simple. Most people who can't afford
health insurance also are too poor to owe taxes.
But if you give them a deduction from the taxes
they don't owe, they can use the money they're
not getting back to buy the health care they
can't afford.
12New Health Care Proposals (as of February 27,
2007)
- Americas Health Insurance Plans
- Better Health Care Together Campaign
- Health Coverage Coalition for the Uninsured
- Sen. Ron Wyden, SEIU, Safeway
- Federation of American Hospitals
- John Edwards
13The Good News --and the Bad News
- Universal health care is accepted as the goal.
- This is defined to mean simply helping the
uninsured buy private insurance.
14Americas Health Insurance Plansthe private
insurance protection planand Federation of
American Hospitalsthe private hospital
protection plan
- Expand SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility for very
low-income - Provide federal and state subsidies and tax
deductibility to encourage everyone else to buy
private insurance
15Better Health Care Together Campaigngrand
coalition
- Members ATT, Kelly Services, Wal-Mart
- SEIU, CWA
- Center for American Progress
- Principles but no Program
- Quality affordable insurance coverage for
everyone - Individuals are responsible for maintaining and
protecting their health - Improved value for health care dollar
- Shared Responsibility Businesses, government,
individuals all contribute.
16Health Coverage Coalition for the Uninsuredeven
grander coalition
- Members UnitedHealth, Blue Cross, Kaiser
- AHA, AMA
- Chamber of Commerce, NAM, Pfizer
- AFL-CIO, SEIU
- AARP, Families USA
- Could agree only on
- Expanding coverage as a goal
- Expansion of SCHIP
- Tax credits for childrens insurance
17Wyden Healthy Americans Actslash and burn
- Supporters SEIU, Safeway, Families USA
- Eliminate the tax deductibility of
employer-based insurance ? end employer benefit - Require individual purchase of insurance
- Transitional payments by employers
- Subsidies to low-income individuals
- Relies on competition to contain costs
18John Edwards Planindividual mandate with a
pretty face
- Medicaid and SCHIP expansion
- Employer mandate (play or pay)
- Individual mandate with community rating
- Government subsidies for low-income
- Regional purchasing plans (Health Markets)
- Government program (single payer?) as well as
private plans. (cf Medicare Advantage) - Note Jacob Hacker plan Identical content,
different verbiage
19Edwards Seductive Verbiage
- For everyone Shared responsibility
- For the fearful Lets people keep what they have
- For those worried about cost Everyone will work
together to make the system more efficient - For single payer advocates Individuals and
businesses can choose if they want the government
plan if so, the system will evolve toward a
single-payer approach. - (For more, see www.johnedwards.com)
20Whats Wrong with an Individual Mandate (partial
list)?
- Will not lead to universal coverage
- Enforcement is anti-public health
- Affordable premium vs
- affordable health care
- Employers will drop coverage
- (crowd out)
- Insurance companies resist community rating
21Whats Wrong with an Individual Mandate (partial
list cont.)?
- Health insurance a consumers nightmare
- (copays, deductibles, exclusions, denials,
appeals) - Complexity/humiliation of means testing
- More bureaucracy (Health Markets, etc.)
- High cost (120B Federal ???B for
- individuals)
- No cost control/continuing rising cost
22Common Features of these Plans
- Identification of the problem too many
uninsured. - Their solution Require everyone to have
insurance - Employers should contribute but not necessarily
offer insurance - Their mission Save private insurers
23None of These Plans Will Happen!
- They cost hundreds of billions of dollars
- They benefit only those with low incomes and
those without insurance - Note Half of middle- and lower-income adults
experience serious problems paying medical bills
or insurance premiums. (Commonwealth Fund 2006)
These plans do nothing for them. - They dont solve any of the problems (especially
rising costs) that concern everyone - None envisions a real structural change.
24A Familiar Headline But Its Wrong!
- It is the unaffordable, inefficient private
- insurance system that is collapsing.
- Employers should contribute their fair share,
- just not through private insurance.
- Going backwards to individual purchase of
- insurance is not the answer.
25Some of the Problems created by private insurance
26SO HERES OUR REAL SINGLE PAYOR SOLUTION
- Expand Medicare to cover everyone
- Improve the coverage it offers
- Eliminate private insurance
- Automatic enrollment in Medicare for All
- Income-based financing through employers and
employees (shared responsibility) - Expand and Improve Medicare for All
- Conyers Bill - HR 676
27Conclusion
- Instead of moving backwards, to a time before
there was employer-based or group insurance, when
everyone was on their own to get health care, we
should be moving forward, to recognize health
care as a necessary public good that should be a
public responsibility. We should be expanding and
improving the Medicare program, which we know
provides reliable, cost-effective coverage and
has been doing so for more than forty years.
Public Medicare for All, not private for-profit
insurance, is the only path to a future that will
truly provide health care for all Americans.