V' NELLY SALGADO DE SNYDER - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

V' NELLY SALGADO DE SNYDER

Description:

V' NELLY SALGADO DE SNYDER – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: dravnellys
Category:
Tags: nelly | salgado | snyder | goa

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: V' NELLY SALGADO DE SNYDER


1
The impact of Mexico-US migration in the life
styles of those who go and those who stay behind
  • V. NELLY SALGADO DE SNYDER
  • nsnyder_at_insp.mx

Immigration Summit Thursday, September 25, 2007
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública www.insp.mx
2
Heterogeneity of Mexicans
  • Race and ethnicity (Indian, African, European and
    Mestizo).
  • Social Class (from extreme poverty to extreme
    wealth).
  • Social Organization (family structure, religious
    beliefs, political ideology).

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Voluntary vs involuntary resettlement
  • Direct participation in the resettlement process
    will determine the successful adaptation to the
    host country
  • Voluntary immigrants --when compared to forced
    refugees-- have more opportunities of being
    successful and manifest more satisfaction with
    their living conditions in the host country.

Source Salgado de Snyder, V.N. et al., 1996
11
How many immigrants and refugees in the
world? More than 175 million people live outside
their countries of birth (50 are
women). Migrants comprise more than 15 percent
of the population in over 50 countries These
numbers will grow as demographic push and
pull factors intensify
12
The population of Mexico
  • In Mexico there are 103 million inhabitants
    (2006) (three million less than expected by
    CONAPO projections)
  • 65 million reside in urban localities (more than
    15,000 inhabitants)
  • 10 million reside in semi-urban communities
    (2,500-15,00 inhabitants)
  • 25 million reside in localities of less than
    2,500 people (196,000 villages).

INEGI, 2006, 2000
13
Immigration to the U.S.
  • There are more than 27 million people of Mexican
    origin in the United States (CONAPO, 2004)
  • About ten million are Mexican-born immigrants,
    of which approximately 45 are women and minors
    (CONAPO, 2004)
  • About 35 of the mexicans in the US live under
    poverty, affecting mostly the new arrival men and
    women without documents (CONAPO, 2004).
  • Of the 2, 443 counties (municipios) in Mexico,
    only 93 have no immigrants (CONAPO, 2002(Pew,
    2005)

CONAPO, Boletín de prensa Enero 21, 2004 Pew
Hispanic Center, 2005
14
Immigration to the U.S. 2
  • Most of the new arrival immigrants are younger
    (48 between 18-29 years old) and better educated
    that the Mexican nationals (Pew, 2005)
  • Migrants in the U.S. are one of the main sources
    of the countrys income In 2005 Mexico received
    about 20 billion dollar in remittances, this does
    not count the cash they bring nor the money sent
    with family and friends (Banco de Mexico, 2005).
  • Approximately 30 of the immigrants earnings
    are sent back to Mexico (Banco de Mexico, 2005)

CONAPO, Boletín de prensa Enero 21, 2004
Banco de México, Enero 2005
15
Migration
  • Mexico-U.S. migration is a continuous, dynamic
    and circular process responsible for the
    formation of bi-national circuits characterized
    by a constant and permanent exchange of ideas,
    culture, lenguage, values and life-styles between
    the immigrantes already in the host country, and
    those left behind in the country of origin.

Source Salgado de Snyder, V.N., 1999
16
The Mexican immigrant in the U.S.
  • Immigrants are perpetual mourners because they
    must leave home repeteadly to achieve their
    goals.
  • Most immigrants have the conviction that they are
    only temporarily living in the U.S., and that it
    is only a matter of time before they return to
    take up their lives more or less where they left
    off.
  • Psychologically speaking for immigrants, Mexico
    and their villages remain part of the psychic
    present, not a lost past.

(Salgado de Snyder V.N. Diaz Guerrero, R., 2003)
17
Going North
  • The main reason for going north in the absence of
    opportunities to attain their personal goals.
  • The most frequent motivation is to improve their
    earnings
  • Immigrants aspire to reach a better quality of
    life for themselves and their families through
    their income in dollars.

18
Predictors of wellbeing
  • Control over important things
  • Social support (trust and reciprocity)
  • Immigrants are individuals with needs and
    aspirations They are not statistics
  • A face and a story behind each number

19
The complexity of migration (1)
  • Historical factors
  • Geographical border 3,200 kms.
  • Culrural distance and geographical closeness
  • Financial, political, social, epidemiological
    co-dependency between the two countries.

20
The complexity of migration (2)
  • Push and pull factors
  • Reasons and motivations to migrate
  • Social networks
  • Impact of migration in origin, transit and
    destination
  • The institutionalization of migration

21
Changes in the migratory patterns
  • Phase of circular migration
  • Return and settlment
  • Rural, men, undocumented
  • Geographical concentration in origin and
    destination
  • Phase of forced permanency
  • Legalization and repression
  • Increase of cost and risks
  • Lack of circularity and return
  • Increase of flux
  • Geographical dispersion in origin and destination
  • Multicultural and multiclass emigration
  • Migration of children, women, elderly, ethnic

Modified from J. Durand, 2005
22
The double standard of the undocumented immigrant
  • In their communities of origin they are regarded
    as corageous, responsible and hardworking.
  • In the countries of final destination,
    undocumented immigrants are considerd as illegal
    alliens and are prosecuted by the authorities
    and discriminated by others.

Source Salgado de Snyder, V.N. et al., 1996
23
Crossing the border
  • Undocumented crossing of immigrants has increased
    in the most dangerous border areas.
  • USBP registers about 282 million crossings a year
  • Between 1994 and 2002 more than 1,600 people died
    trying to cross the border.
  • The main causes of death in the border are
    hypothermia, dehydration, sun stroke, stinging by
    poisonous insects, animal biting, drowning, car
    accidents and homicides.

U.S. Border Patrol Statistics, enero, 2003.
24
Health and migration
  • The health of the most vulnerable immigrants
    start deteriorating
  • When leaving the hometown
  • Continues when crossing the border
  • Worsens in the labor market
  • Intensification of risks when moving from the
    origin to the destination (women, minors, elderly
    and ethnics)
  • The are more likely to face long journeys and
    worse working conditions, barriers to benefits
    and access to health care due to lack of personal
    and social resources.

25
Source U.S. Border Patrol Statistics, January,
2003.
26
Mexico-U.S. Border in California
27
Mexican immigrant caught at the U.S. border
disguised as a car seat
28
Photo Google photos, 2006
29
Photo Google photos, 2006
30
(No Transcript)
31
Cemetery in the Mexican border with bodies of
undocumented immigrants
32
WOMEN, CHILDREN AND COMMUNITIES LEFT BEHIND
Foto Omar Fonseca, 1989
33
Characteristics of rural areas in Mexico
  • High rates of unemployment and underemployment.
  • Malnutrition.
  • High fertility rates.
  • Mostly Catholic.
  • Traditional gender roles.
  • Low levels of education.
  • Limited availability of basic services.
  • Social control
  • Social marker Poverty
  • Emigration to the U.S. and urban centers

34
Women left behind
  • Women have to assume obligations and
    responsabilities that did not have before. In
    addition to their traditional role as wives,
    mothers, housekeepers, and caretakers, they also
    play roles of administrators, heads of household,
    financial providers, decision makers, etc.
  • Migration has a similar impact on the mental
    health of those left behind and those who
    migrate.
  • In spite of increased levels of psychological
    distress, women are productive members in their
    communities.

35
The meaning of immigration in the local rural
communities Going north is part of the local
culture in many Mexican villages, it changes the
perception of space time money geography
the border the modern and the
traditional It changes the perception the
villagers worldview.
36
Remittances and family life
  • In 2005, México received about 20 billion
    dollars in remittances from the US (Banco de
    México, 2006).
  • Remittances make families live in uncertainty,
    are nor received regularly, nor periodically to
    efficiently cover the family's financial needs
    (Salgado de Snyder, 2002).
  • When paternal absence translates into remittances
    dn better quality of life for the family, the
    absence is easy to del with (Aguilera, 2003).

37
Changes in communities of origin
Substance abuse Those who go to the north
return as drug addicts, they cannot get well. The
youngsters here use mariguana and cocaine, it is
the influence of los norteños I did not drink
before I went to the U.S. but now, I drink almost
every day
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
38
Modern life styles
I rarely see my children now, since the day they
put videogames in the center square
In this village we now have a place to go
disco dancing
Photo Nelly Salgado, 2005
39
School drop-out
In this village they closed the schools because
there were no students. The children work in the
fertilizer factory
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
40
Feminization of poverty
I am more poor now than when he left to the U.S.
but much worse now I have five children, no
husband, and no money. I have worked very hard to
support my family
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
41
In this village even the masons appraise and get
paid in dollars
Dollar economy
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
42
Access to goods and services
Now, all my children can go to school I have
money for uniforms, shoes and school supplies
I bought cattle, and another piece of land. I
also bought a truck for the ranch We live
better now than before, we have food on the table
and then some extra money to spend
43
Access to health care
He left when I got pregnant, with the money
he sent I had my baby in a private clinic and had
better care. Now I use the money to buy diapers,
food, medicine We can buy medicines and go
the doctor. Now he is paying the dentist for the
childrens braces (orthodontist)
44
Improved quality of life
With the money he sent we now have a microwave
oven, gas stove, a large refrigerator, washer,
two televisions, two stereos, a telephone and
everything to make my work around the house much
easier People look at us with respect,
but some are very jealousYes it makes me feel
very good, I am proud of my husband and his
accomplishments
Prestige
45
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
46
Photo Nelly Salgado, 2005
47
Changes in communities of origin
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
48
Changes in communities of origin
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
49
Changes in communities of origin
Photo Nelly Salgado, 2005
50
Changes in communities of origin
Photo Nelly Salgado, 1997
51
Changes in communities of origin
Photo Nelly Salgado, 2005
52
THE PARADOX... The main purpose of male
migration to the U.S. is to improve the quality
of life of the family left behind, but this goal
often results in the deterioration of family life
and empoverishment of quality of life for both,
the migrant and his family.
53
Risk factors in the U.S.
Overcrowded living conditions Malnutrition High
rates of fertility Illiteracy in English Working
conditions Unemployment / underemployment Low
income Isolation Undocumented stay Prejudice and
discrimination
54
RETURN AND SETTLMENT AMONG MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS
55
The dilemma of the successful immigrant
Settlement in the United States
Return to their country
The decision to settle in the US or return to the
countrry or origin depends on structural,
cultural, familial and personal factors
56
Factors that influence the decision to return
  • Human resources
  • Social resources
  • Material resources
  • Economic conditions in the communities of origin
  • Macroeconomic conditions in both countries

Source Massey, D.S. y Espinosa, K. 1997.
57
Return vs. SettlementIt is all a matter of
perspective
  • Studies in Mexico show that most Mexican
    immigrants return to their communities of origin.
  • Studies in the U.S. show that most Mexican
    immigrant stay in this country.
  • Such controversial findings are intimately
    related to the economic, political and social
    repercussions of the migratory phenomenon in each
    country.
  • Migration is not a static phenomenon and cannot
    be seen as a glass that is half full or half
    empty.

58
Men get turned off in the North
  • Men get turned off in the North, that is
    why they want to go back to Mexico... In Mexico,
    my husband is a completely different person from
    the person he is here. Overthere (Mexico) he acts
    and even talks different, he is a very strict
    man. In Mexico he feels that he is Don Franciso,
    he uses his machismo, he shows it off and is
    proud of it, he uses ranchero clothes, and he has
    a horse. Here he doesnt care, he is not as
    responsible. Overthere he takes things seriously
    not here.

Interview excerpt taken from Espinosa, V.M.
(1998). El dilema del retorno. Mexico El Colegio
de Michoacan, p. 30.

59
Why do immigrants return to Mexico?
  • ...what makes us go back is a sense of
    community and belonging. I am part of this town,
    (...). This village is ours and we are always
    happy to come back. When you return you can tell
    everyone Look, I am no longer poor, I
    succeeded. There (in the U.S.) you cannot tell
    this to anyone, they all succeed, everyone has a
    home and a car, not here. We all go there with
    the idea of improving, but they dont notice when
    you improve, the ones who notice are people from
    here, that is why we return.

Interview excerpt taken from Espinosa, V.M.
(1998). El dilema del retorno. Mexico El Colegio
de Michoacán, p. 30.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com