Overview of PhotoDetector Properties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of PhotoDetector Properties

Description:

Overview of PhotoDetector Properties – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1625
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Admi127
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of PhotoDetector Properties


1
(No Transcript)
2
Outline of Talk
  • Overview of Photo-Detector Properties
  • A Quick Look At
  • MAPMT
  • MCPMT
  • SiPM
  • Photo-Cathode RD
  • Conclusion

3
Overview of Photo-Detector Properties
Desirable Properties for Gamma-Ray Photo-Detectors
  • Good Linearity
  • Low Dark Noise
  • Single pe Resolution
  • Fast Signal
  • High Gain
  • High QE, 300-600 nm
  • No After Pulsing
  • Dynamic Range gt 1000

Adapted from J. Vanel, Cherenkov2005
Inexpensive would be Nice
4
Overview of Photo-Detector Properties
Plot from Talk by J. Vanel, Cherenkov2005 K.
Arisaka
5
Overview of Photo-Detector Properties
Conventional PMTs
Plot from Talk by J. Vanel, Cherenkov2005 K.
Arisaka
6
Multi-Anode PMTs
Principle of Operation
Very Similar to Conventional PMT
Photo Drawing from Talk by Tomasz
Skwarnicki, BTeV
7
Multi-Anode PMTs
Photo from Talk by Tomasz Skwarnicki, BTeV
8
Multi-Anode PMTs
9
Multi-Anode PMTs
Tests of R8900 at Argonne For Use in Trice
(ref. Byrum Talk this Workshop)
XY Stage
4-Decade Filter Wheel
10
Multi-Anode PMTs
Test Results of R8900 at Argonne (Courtesy Bob
Wagner, ANL)
11
Multi-Anode PMTs
Another Candidate 256 Channels
12
Multi-Anode PMTs
  • Nice Features
  • High Gain
  • Good Pixel Size
  • Good pe Response
  • Good Linearity Dynamic Range
  • Good Dark Count Rates
  • Fair Packaging,
  • Some Improvement of Dead Space Needed
  • Not-So-Nice Features
  • Pixel Non-Uniformity 21 31 Requires
    Calibration, LUTs
  • Triggering from Dynode Incurs
  • Pixel Non-uniformity Penalty
  • Gains Limited to 1E5 for NSB Rates,
  • Reduces Resolution of Single pe Peak
  • Quantum Efficiency 20, Could Use Improvement

13
Micro-Channel Plates
Drawings from Paper by J. L. Wiza, NIM 162,
1976
14
Micro-Channel Plates
15
Micro-Channel Plates
Testing to Begin At ANL Looking at Fast Timing
16
Micro-Channel Plates
  • Nice Features
  • Custom-Tailor Your Pixel Size
  • Good pe Response
  • Good Linearity Dynamic Range
  • Good Pixel Uniformity, Might Still Need
    Calibration
  • Low Dark Count Rates
  • Excellent Timing Resolution
  • Not-So-Nice Features
  • No Dynode for Trigger
  • Current-Return Path Not Well Defined Presently
  • Slow Recovery of Individual Channels, mSec
  • Quantum Efficiency 20, Could Use Improvement
  • Packaging Needs Improvement for Dead Space
  • Operates on 2000V

17
Silicon Photo-Multipliers
Principle of Operation
Single Photodiode
SiPM
APD
  • Mode of Operation Depends on
  • Doping Purity of Silicon
  • Bias Voltage
  • Geiger Mode Needs Quenching

Adapted from Talk by Nepomuk Otte, SNIC06
18
Silicon Photo-Multipliers
Principle of Operation
Photodiode Array Sum Individual Pixels
Premise Pixels are So Small
That 1 Pixel 1 pe
Photos from Talk by V. Saveliev, 5/4/06
19
Silicon Photo-Multipliers
  • SiPM Main Features
  • Sensitive Size 1x1 mm2 24x24 576
    pixels 32x32 1024 pixels
  • 2x2 mm2, 4x4 mm2 Possible
  • Operating Voltage 40 to 60V
  • Gain 105 up to 106
  • Single Pixel Time Resolution
  • 100ps
  • Single Pixel Recovery Time
  • 1 ?s
  • No Sensitivity to Magnetic Fields

Triggered Data, 50 nS Gate
Adapted from Talk by V. Saveliev, 5/4/06
20
Silicon Photo-Multipliers
  • SiPM Features
  • Dark Noise Rate
  • 1 MHz/mm2 _at_ Room Temp
  • 1 KHz/mm2 _at_ 100K
  • Optical Crosstalk
  • Hot-Carrier Luminescence
  • Improvements with Trenching
  • Dynamic Range
  • 1 pe/pixel ? Limit Pixels

Adapted from Talk by J. Vanel, Cherenkov2005
Triggered Data, 1 mS Gate (ANL Data, Bob Wagner)
ANL Teststand
Adapted from Talk by Nepomuk Otte, SNIC06
21
Silicon Photo-Multipliers
  • Nice Features
  • Small Size
  • Low Operating Voltage
  • Good pe Resolution (If Do It Right)
  • Good Linearity, Fair Dynamic Range
  • Good Timing Resolution
  • Potential for Good QE (20 ? 40 ? 60)
  • Potential for Cheap Production (Not There
    Yet)
  • Large Arrays, Direct Integration of Electronics
    Possible

? MAGIC is Considering SiPMs for New
Telescope
  • Not-So-Nice Features
  • Dark Current Rate is Significant
  • ? Needs Cooling, or Coincidence Trigger, or High
    Thresh.
  • Optical Crosstalk Potentially a Problem
  • QE Needs Improvement
  • No Dynode for Trigger

? Not Quite in Production Yet
22
Photo-Cathode RD
Slide Courtesy of J. Buckley
Higher QEgt higher cathode cost/area but smaller
telescopes with lower mechanical costs D2.5, and
smaller cathode area D2 (for a QE50, the
mechanical cost would be reduced by a factor of
gt2.4 and reduced cathode area would compensate
for higher cost/area)
23
Photo-Cathode RD
Slide Courtesy of J. Buckley
MBE AlGaN/InGaN Cathode RD Washington University
Photocathode Group Buckley, Leopold and Rebillot
24
Photo-Cathode RD
Slide Courtesy of J. Buckley
AlN-GaN-InN has a bandgap tunable between 0.8
eV (InN) and 6.2 eV (AlN) or 200 nm to gt 1000 nm
25
Photo-Cathode RD
Detected QE with HPMT in our chamber
Slide Courtesy of J. Buckley
Burle (Photonis) is currently integrating one of
our AlGaN/InGaN cathodes into a conventional PMT
- but still more device features to implement
(thicker InN and higher In concentration for
improved long wavelength response, improved
lattice matching, intinsic gain), and many
manufacturing details.
26
Conclusions
  • Active Photo-Detector RD Programs in Many
    Technologies
  • Many Innovative Ideas being Pursued
  • Many Groups Active World-wide, in Development
    Evaluation
  • Quite an Exciting Time for This Area
  • ? We Can Only Profit from this Development
  • Still Too Early to Tell Which Technology Will
    be Best
  • Many Innovative Ideas being Pursued
  • ? With New Approaches, Need to Choose
    Technology Carefully
  • Personal Comments
  • MAPMTs are Friendly Familiar Need Better QE,
    Uniformity
  • MCPMTs Great for Fast Timing Need Additional
    Study
  • SiPMs Promising Noise, Recovery, Production
    Issues
  • APDs Good QE Need Cooling, Need Low-Noise
    Elec.
  • HPDs Expensive, Good for B-Field, Better
    Options Exist

? Elec. Dev. Closely Coupled to Det. If ASICS,
Need Time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com