STUDENT AFFAIRS ASSESSMENT A comprehensive, centralized approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

STUDENT AFFAIRS ASSESSMENT A comprehensive, centralized approach

Description:

Lori Varlotta, Vice President for Student Affairs. What is Assessment? Sacramento State's Division of Student Affairs sees assessment as an ongoing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: tri5242
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STUDENT AFFAIRS ASSESSMENT A comprehensive, centralized approach


1
STUDENT AFFAIRS ASSESSMENT A comprehensive,
centralized approach
Lori Varlotta, Vice President for Student Affairs
January, 2007
2
What is Assessment?
  • Sacramento States Division of Student Affairs
    sees assessment as an ongoing process primarily
    aimed at one of two things 1) improving
    programs or services, and 2) understanding and
    eventually increasing student learning.
  • To reach those goals, the Division must
  • Make program objectives and student learning
    outcomes explicit and public
  • Set appropriate criteria and high expectations
    systematically gather, analyze, and interpret
    evidence to determine how well programs and
    services matches those expectations and standards
  • Use the resulting data to document, explain, and
    improve programs, services, and student learning
    outcomes.

3
Expanding the Definition of Student Learning
  • At Sacramento State University, the Division of
    Student Affairs defines student learning as a
    comprehensive, holistic, transformative activity
    that integrates academic learning and student
    development, processes that have often been
    considered separate, and even independent of each
    other.
  • When we say learning, then, we do not mean
    exclusively or primarily academic instruction,
    the acquisition of disciplinary content, or
    classroom learning.

(quoted directly from Learning Reconsidered A
Campus-wide Focus on the Student Experience)
4
Why Do It?
  • Assessment will allow us to
  • Demonstrate how Student Affairs contributes to
    student learning and student success
  • Showcase our strengths
  • Identify areas where we can improve
  • Strategically align ourselves with
  • Chancellors Office Graduation Initiative
  • University planning Destination 2010
  • WASC requirements to demonstrate the impact of
    Student Affairs on student learning
  • Respond to public calls for increased
    accountability

5
Other Good Reasons to do Assessment
  • The Vice President of Student Affairs holds each
    director responsible for conceptualizing and
    implementing an assessment plan.
  • The directors annual evaluation includes
    commentary on assessment.
  • Assessment data has supported requests for
    additional staff and/or funding.

6
Why this Particular Assessment Approach is So
Exciting
  • A true collaboration with departments within and
    outside the Division of Student Affairs
    (Institutional Research, ASI, program units,
    Provost, academic departments)
  • Comprehensive and centralized a level of
    consistency throughout Division and uniquely
    designed for each department
  • Directly tied to the Chancellors Office
    Graduation Initiative, WASC requirements,
    Strategic Plan, etc.
  • Moves beyond student satisfaction to student
    learning

7
Role of Institutional Research
Utilizing On Campus Expertise
  • To support the vision of the Vice President of
    Student Affairs and assist Student Affairs
    Directors (via on-going consultations, one-on-one
    meetings, survey development and data analyses)
    in developing departmental assessment plans that
    are aligned with Destination 2010 and the WASC
    re-accreditation.

8
Six Step Assessment Model
  • Mission 2-3 sentences that articulate office
    name, primary purpose, primary activities,
    audience
  • Goals top 3-5 planning-type statements
  • Program Objectives and Learning Outcomes 3-5
    specific (i.e. measurable) statements
  • Measures Direct measures can verify learning
    outcomes, attitudinal change or behavior
    modification. Indirect measures typically
    reflect student satisfaction and/or self-reported
    understandings
  • Collection of Data Research instruments (e.g.,
    pre-post tests, surveys, focus groups,
    performances) designed to gather qualitative
    quantitative information
  • Closing the Circle Resultant data should be
    used when considering program improvement
    modifications, etc.

9
Step 1 Mission
  • Mission statement should be an expanded statement
    of either institutional or divisional purpose.

Extract from University Mission Statement
California State University, Sacramento is
dedicated to the life-altering potential of
learning that balances a liberal arts education
with depth of knowledge in a discipline. We are
committed to providing an excellent education to
all eligible applicants who aspire to expand
their knowledge and prepare themselves for
meaningful lives, careers, and service to their
community..
Academic Advising Center Mission The Academic
Advising Center offers new student orientation,
mandatory freshman advising, and advising on
General Education and graduation requirements for
all students. The Center engages students in a
developmental process that helps clarify and
implement individual educational plans consistent
with their skills, interests, and values. Through
individual appointments, group advising sessions,
and presentations the professional staff, faculty
advisors, and student interns help students
understand the universitys academic requirements
as well as its policies and procedures. As a
result, students are better prepared to take
responsibility for their education and persist
towards a timely graduation.
Office Name
Primary Purpose
Primary Activities
Target Audiences
10
Step 2 Goals
  • Goals are
  • Broad statements that describe the overarching
    long-range intended outcomes of an administrative
    unit.
  • Usually not measurable and need to be further
    developed as separate distinguishable outcomes
  • Primarily used for general planning and are
    used as the starting point to the development and
    refinement of outcomes.
  • (From the Administrative Assessment Handbook
    University of Central Florida)

11
Examples of Office Goals
Academic Advising Center Goals
  • ? Help students clarify and implement individual
    educational plans which are consistent with their
    skills, interests, and values.
  • ? Help students gain an understanding of the
    universitys academic requirements as well as its
    policies and procedures
  • ? Prepare students to take responsibility for
    their education and persist towards a timely
    graduation

12
Step 3 Objectives
  • Objectives
  • Are specific statements that describe desired
    outcomes derived from the goal statements of the
    unit
  • May relate to the operations and processes of the
    unit
  • May also relate to intended attitudes or
    behaviors that a student having used the services
    provided by the unit should demonstrate.
  • (Administrative Assessment Handbook University
    of Central Florida)

13
Examples of Office Objectives
Academic Advising Center Objectives
  • Objective 1 New students will have knowledge of
    university General Education, academic
    requirements and resources through comprehensive
    freshman, transfer and parent orientation
    programs.
  • Objective 2 All freshmen will participate in a
    three-phase comprehensive, proactive advising and
    major/career exploration program by spring 2007.
  • Objective 3 Develop an assessment model by
    December 2006 for the Freshman Advising Program
    to measure the impact of developmental academic
    advising.
  • Objective 4 There will be a five percent
    increase in the retention of students who have
    been reinstated as Undeclared majors. These
    students will receive comprehensive advising and
    will achieve good academic standing by the
    following semester after reinstatement.

14
Step 4 Measures
Academic Advising Center Measures
Objective 1 Measures Orientation Survey of new
students (pre/post test or post test only) to
immediately assess the impact of orientation
(through both online and traditional sessions) on
students knowledge and understanding of academic
requirements and resources. Objective 2
Measures All advising appointments and sessions
will be tracked through a database. Objective 3
Measures Have 70 percent of the students
participate in a survey that measures the impact
of the advising program and how it affected their
confidence in selecting a major and making
informed decisions. Objective 4 Measures Track
through database and advising sessions. Grades
will be analyzed by the end of the following
semester after reinstatement.
15
Step 5 Assessment Data
  • Assessment data should highlight all significant
    findings, and indicate the extent to which the
    program/service reached its intended outcomes.

Step 6 Use of Results
The results should explain how the findings from
data will be used to improve the program and/or
increase student learning.
16
Suggested Reading
  • The National Association of Student Personnel
    Administrators The American College Personnel
    Association. (2004). Learning Reconsidered A
    campus-wide focus on the student experience.
  • American College Personnel Association (1994).
    The student learning imperative Implications for
    student affairs. Washington, DC.
  • American College Personnel Association. (1996)
    The student learning imperative Implications for
    student affairs on-line. Available
    www.acpa.nche.edu/sli/sli.htm
  • American College Personnel Association and
    National Association of Student Personnel
    Administrators (1997). Principles of good
    practice for student affairs on-line.
    Available www.acpa.nche.edu/pgp/principle.htm
  • Joint task Force on Student Learning. (1998)
    Powerful partnerships A shared responsibility
    for learning on-line. Available
    www.aahe.org/teaching/tsk_frce.htm
  • National Association of Student Personnel
    Administrators (1987). A perspective on student
    affairs. Washington DC.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com