VISUAL DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN SAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

VISUAL DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN SAR

Description:

THIS PROGRAM IS BASED ON RESEARCH COMPILED BY. DR. KENNETH HILL. HALIFAX REGIONAL SAR. NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA. 3. OVERVIEW. Introduction to the problem ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: tyg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: VISUAL DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN SAR


1
VISUAL DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN SAR
  • Presented by
  • Sgt. Tygh Thompson
  • Washington County Sheriffs Office

2
THIS PROGRAM IS BASED ON RESEARCH COMPILED BY
DR. KENNETH HILL HALIFAX REGIONAL SAR NOVA
SCOTIA, CANADA
3
OVERVIEW
  • Introduction to the problem
  • Seeing Vs. detecting
  • Why clues are missed
  • Visual search
  • The Visual Briefing

4
THE LOST PERSON LEAVES CLUES
  • At least 1300 tracks for every kilometer walked.

5
INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBLEM
  • Why are so few clues detected?
  • What can be done to increase visual detection?

6
SEEING Vs DETECTION
  • Insert picture here

7
SEEING Vs DETECTION
8
SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY
  • Perceptual judgement is based on a combination of
    sensation and decision making processes
  • Stimulus event
  • The eyes detect an item
  • Neural activity
  • The image is analyzed by the brain

9
SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY
  • Comparison with personal standard
  • The image is compared to what you think the item
    should look like
  • Action or no action - decision
  • Did the item meet my standard of what I am
    looking for or is it important?

10
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
  • The clue must be in the center of focus or vision
  • Edge detection occurs in the Fovea (center of the
    Retina)
  • The eyes recognize the edges of items
  • The sharper the image of the edge, the easier the
    item is to detect
  • The most visual information is revealed in the
    canonical or perfect perspective

11
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
  • How we may expect an item to appear

12
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
  • How we may expect an item to appear

13
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
  • How we may expect an item to appear

14
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
How the item may appear in in the field
15
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
  • How the item may appear in in the field

16
VISUAL PERSPECTIVE
  • How the item may appear in in the field

17
BARRIERS TO CLUE DETECTION
  • Searchers underestimate the difficulty of the
    task
  • They may confuse seeing with detecting
  • They may expect clues to visually pop-out.
  • Visual clues wont pop out unless there is
    contrast such as edge definition

18
DETECTION IS DIFFICULT WHEN..
  • The target is outside of central vision
  • There is poor contrast in color and texture from
    the targets background
  • Contours of the target are disguised or
    camouflaged
  • The searcher does not have a good idea of what
    the target looks like

19
CAMOUFLAGE
  • The purpose of disruptive coloration (camouflage)
    is not to prevent detection, but to delay it.
  • Loss of contrast and edges

20
THE SEARCH IMAGE
  • A mental picture of the target
  • Learned through perceptual experience
  • May guide visual search
  • What you expect or hope to see

21
DWELL TIME
  • Defined as the length of time a searcher looks at
    a specific spot
  • Affected by the searchers expectations
  • Terminated by a decision that a target is not
    there to be detected

22
THE VISUAL BRIEFING
  • Face searchers away from the briefer
  • Place assorted clues on the ground
  • Have searchers detect them
  • Then place them from different perspectives

23
SEARCHER EXPECTANCY
  • The subjective probability of detecting a clue
  • Affects scanning rate
  • Affects follow-up inspections
  • Affects dwell time

24
GOOD CLUES
  • Are relatively large
  • Have high contrast from their background
  • Are familiar to the searcher

25
SEARCHING FOR MULTIPLE TARGETS
  • Is more difficult than searching for a single
    target or clue
  • Improves with practice
  • Improves with printing

26
CONCLUSIONS
  • Detecting a clue is much more difficult than just
    seeing
  • The clue must be detected
  • There are many more misses when people believe
    there is a low probability of detecting a target
  • Form recognition occurs in central vision

27
CONCLUSIONS CONT.
  • In a complex visual field, form is rarely
    detected on the first pass
  • While scanning the searcher will have to return
    their gaze back to the object in order to
    perceive it.
  • The threshold for form recognition will depend
    upon the match between the retinal image and what
    the perceiver expects to see

28
CONCLUSIONS CONT.
  • Forms are more difficult to recognize when
  • They are outside of their usual context
  • They are positioned differently from their ideal
    perspective (canonical view)
  • The searcher does not have a clear idea of what
    the object should look like (search image)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com