Tim Petry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Tim Petry

Description:

Is. COOL. Tim Petry. NDSU Extension Service. Updated 01/27/05. NDSU Extension Service COOL Website: http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/aginfo/lsmkt/COOL/cool.htm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: sosb2
Category:
Tags: extension | ndsu | petry | service | tim

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tim Petry


1
Tim Petry NDSU Extension Service
Updated 01/27/05
2
NDSU Extension Service COOL Website
http//www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/aginfo/lsmkt/COOL/coo
l.htm
3
What is Mandatory COOL?
  • Title X of the 2002 Farm Bill Amends the
    Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946
  • a Retailer of a Covered Commodity Shall Inform
    Consumers, at the Final Point of Sale of the
    Covered Commodity to Consumers of the Country Of
    Origin Of the Covered Commodity

Source Wendy Umberger, Colorado State University
4
Provisions of the Law
  • Key Components
  • 284(b) Directs USDA to publish regulations by
    September 30, 2004
  • 285 Applies to retail sales beginning September
    30, 2004
  • 283 Provides USDA with enforcement authority
  • 282(f) Precludes USDA from using a mandatory
    identification system to verify country of origin

Marketing and Regulatory Programs
5
Which Commodities are Covered?
  • Muscle Cuts Of Beef, Pork, Lamb
  • Ground Beef, Pork, Lamb
  • Farm-Raised Wild Fish
  • Peanuts
  • Perishable Ag Commodities
  • Fresh Frozen Fruits Vegetables

Source Wendy Umberger, Colorado State University
6
What Is NOT Covered?
  • Mutton, Goat, Bison, Poultry, Dairy
  • Ingredients in processed food products
  • Food service establishments
  • Retailers with less than 230,000/year in sales
  • (Over 50 of all meat consumed is exempt.)
  • (Over 90 of all imported meat is exempt.)

7
Farm Commodity Fair Labeling Act of 2003
  • HR 2270
  • Introduced on 05/22/03 by Rep. M. Thornberry
    (R-TX)
  • Would include goat meat and poultry meat in COOL
  • Referred to House Subcommittee on Livestock and
    Horticulture on 06/03/03

8
CONTROVERSY
  • USDA The most effective way to ensure
    credibility of COOL is to maintain a verifiable
    recordkeeping audit trail.
  • Proponents Only necessary to keep records on
    livestock and meat imports, and the rest is US
    produced by default.
  • Meat industry Livestock producers must provide
    3rd party documentation proving where animals
    were born and raised.

9
The Controversy Necessary Records and
Verification
  • Retailers must maintain records for 2 years
  • Suppliers must provide information about country
    of origin
  • Producers, handlers, processors, packers,
    importers
  • Verifiable (auditable) records to ensure
    credibility
  • Information must flow through market chain
  • Self-Certification is not sufficient
  • Willful violation results in up to 10,000 fine

10
What Are the Costs?
  • Cost of Preserving the Identity of Animal
    (Covered Commodity)
  • Cost of Labeling the Products
  • Compliance Costs
  • Unexpected Industry Costs

11
Cost Estimates
12
Will COOL Increase Demand?
13
North Dakota Has COOL Law
  • Fresh beef, lamb, and pork
  • Imported meats labeled before delivery to
    retailer
  • Meat from U.S. packing plants is U.S.
  • ND Dept. of Health inspects retailers
  • ND Dept. of Ag inspects meats processors

14
Politics
  • Cow-calf sector is generally supportive except
    for mandatory ID and 3rd party verification
  • R-Calf
  • NCBA was the original proponent (1997 policy)
  • FU and NFB
  • Stocker and feedlot sector less supportive
  • Swine industry opposed
  • Meat industry opposed
  • President, USDA, and Republicans from non
    cow-calf states opposed

15
Peterson Amendment(COOL Lite)
  • Deletes prohibiting USDA from instituting
    mandatory ID
  • Producers will certify country of origin with
    existing records
  • Lower the retailers first offense penalty from
    10,000 to 100
  • Was referred to the House Committee on
    Agriculture (9/11/03)

16
Recent Developments
  • 11/19/04 Efforts to amend the FY2005 Omnibus
    Appropriations Bill to replace mandatory COOL
    with voluntary COOL failed in Congress
  • 9/30/04 Mandatory COOL for fish took effect,
    but enforcement was delayed until April 4, 2005
  • 6/15/04 Sen. Goodlatte (R-VA), Senate Ag
    Committee Chair, and 31 co-sponsors introduced
    HR4576 to establish voluntary COOL
  • 01/23/04 President Bush signed PL108-99 which
    delays COOL, except for fish, until September
    2006.

17
U.S. Livestock ID
  • Mandatory livestock ID may be inevitable
  • A joint industry-state-federal team has developed
    a 74 page US Animal ID Plan
  • www.usaip.info
  • For homeland security, not COOL
  • Who will pay? Taxpayers or producers

18
What should producers do?
  • ID?
  • Cool?
  • NDSU Extension will keep you informed.

19
  • DIS CUSS ION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com