Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview

Description:

Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview CAPT Larry Olsen Deputy Commander MARMC 16 June 2004 Maintenance Initiatives SHIPMAIN the maintenance process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: tasctgicO
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview


1
Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center Overview
CAPT Larry Olsen Deputy Commander MARMC 16 June
2004
2
Maintenance Initiatives
  • SHIPMAIN the maintenance process
  • Waterfront Integration the organization
  • NEMAIS the tool (SAP)

3
Why SHIPMAIN?
  • Address current maintenance and modernization
    challenges
  • Lack a common process and single process owner
  • Excessive handoffs across multiple organizations
  • Unclear accountability for results
  • Funding administration uncertainty cause
    churn
  • High Premiums paid in execution cost due to
    inefficient upkeep planning
  • Excessive spending on ALTS designed and procured,
    but not installed

4
SHIPMAIN Goals
  • Install a common planning process for surface
    ship maintenance and modernization
  • Increase the efficiency of the process without
    compromising its effectiveness
  • Install a disciplined management process with
    objective measurements
  • Institutionalize the process and a continuous
    improvement method (JFMM feedback)

5
SHIPMAIN Philosophy
  • Minimize Growth and New Work (GNW) through
    better planning and earlier MSR involvement.
  • Implement a Maintenance Figure of Merit (MFOM)
    approach to prioritize maintenance.
  • Change the culture to effectively reduce
    premiums paid by managing GNW.

6
SHIPMAIN
  • CFT-1 Requirements
  • CFT-2 Package Preparation
  • CFT-3 Placement and Oversight
  • CFT-4 Alterations and Modernization

7
CFT-1 Requirements
  • Maintenance Teams focal point
  • Planning Board for Maintenance
  • One-step work brokering and screening
  • Prioritized 2Ks Maintenance Figure of Merit
  • Continuous flow of 2Ks to MSR
  • Auto screening of ICMP 2Ks
  • ICAVs provide electronic 2Ks
  • Metrics, metrics, metricsmore metrics

8
What is a Maintenance Team?
Commanding Officer
Project Manager
Port Engineer
Contractor Representative
Ship Supervisor
(Not yet completely in place)
9
Ship Maintenance Teams
  • Primary responsibilities Focused on a Specific
    Ship
  • Identify and prioritize required work IAW
    consistent MFOM validity and accuracy
  • Determine when and where work items will be
    accomplished - based on business practices that
    reduce cost
  • Match resources to prioritized requirements
  • Oversee availability execution

Small cross-functional team executes planning and
oversees execution
10
CFT-2 Package Preparation
  • Master spec catalog
  • Establish reusable specifications
  • Provides template for new specs
  • Package prepared by executing activity
  • Robust feedback for new specs and cost returns

11
CFT-3 Placement and Oversight
  • Coordination of MT and Contractor
  • Continuous Technical Advisory Reports
  • Govt estimates not required
  • Multi-Ship/Multi-Option (MSMO) contracts
  • Flow of maintenance items between CNO and
    continuous maintenance availabilities
  • RMCs control funding

12
CFT-4 Alterations and Modernization
  • All ALTS through same process
  • Two Types Program (K) Fleet (D)
  • Mission and BG Interoperability focus
  • Hierarchical decision making model
  • Prioritized list ALT Figure of Merit
  • Engineering/BCA filters applied before extensive
    development of an ALT

13
Waterfront Integration
  • Fleet initiative
  • Combines RSG, SIMA, FTSCLANT and SUPSHIP
    Portsmouth
  • All RMCs (non-shipyard) similar
  • Mid Atlantic (Norfolk)
  • South East (Mayport)
  • South Central (Ingleside)
  • South West (San Diego)
  • Personnel reductions achieved through attrition

14
Waterfront Integration
  • Goals include
  • Eliminate redundancy
  • Standardize processes both regionally and
    nationally
  • Implement the SHIPMAIN entitled process
  • Reduce reimbursable work gtgt mission funded
  • Somewhat more difficult in Norfolk due to
    complexity, geography, market and density

15
627 personnel 16 military 456 govt civilian
155 contractors
1,851 personnel 1,782 military 68 govt
civilian 1 contractor
3,573 personnel 2,117 military 1,071 govt
civilian 385 contractors
1,016 personnel 267 military 527 govt
civilian 222 contractors
79 personnel 52 military 20 govt civilian
7 contractors
16
MARMC Organization
EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR
WATERFRONTOPERATIONS
PRODUCTION
CONTRACTS
ENGINEERING
INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY
BUSINESSOFFICE
COMMAND SUPPORT SVCS
LOGISTICS
17
NEMAIS
  • NAVSEAs solution for ship maintenance
  • Somewhat cumbersome at present
  • U-NNPI Certification in progress
  • Evaluating additional NEMAIS seats for MA-RMC
    functions
  • Need support while awaiting convergence

18
ISSUES
  • No layoffs
  • Optimal Manning on surface ships PMS
  • Reimbursable work for FTSCLANT
  • Shift from FFP to MSMO contracts
  • Four unions to negotiate with
  • Surface ship maintenance in the MED/GULF

19
AND MORE ISSUES
  • Connectivity and AIS
  • 500 instructions to merge
  • JFMM update
  • Funding churn
  • Lots of moving parts

20
  • QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com