Pesticide Residue Surveys; Country of Origin Labeling & Microbiological Data Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Pesticide Residue Surveys; Country of Origin Labeling & Microbiological Data Program

Description:

Pesticide Residue Surveys; Country of Origin Labeling & Microbiological Data Program O. Norman Nesheim UF/IFAS Pesticide Information Coordinator – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: fycsIfas
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pesticide Residue Surveys; Country of Origin Labeling & Microbiological Data Program


1
Pesticide Residue Surveys Country of Origin
Labeling Microbiological Data Program
  • O. Norman Nesheim
  • UF/IFAS Pesticide Information Coordinator

2
FDA Pesticide Residue Survey
3
Pesticide Regulation
  • 3 Federal agencies share responsibility for the
    regulation of pesticides
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

4
Agency Roles
  • EPA
  • Registers pesticides sold/distributed in the US
    and regulates their use.
  • Sets Tolerances for pesticides used on food
  • Tolerances are the maximum amounts of residues
    that are permitted in or on a food or feed.

5
Monitoring and Enforcement of Tolerances
  • FDA monitors and enforces tolerances set by EPA
    in domestic and imported foods and animal feeds
    shipped in interstate commerce
  • USDA
  • Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) monitors
    and enforces tolerances on meat, poultry, and egg
    products.
  • AMS Pesticide Data Program (PDP) tests
    commodities in U.S. food supply for pesticide
    residues.

6
FDA Monitoring
  • Individual lots of domestically produced and
    imported foods are sampled and analyzed for
    pesticide residues
  • Domestic samples are collected close to point of
    production in distribution system
  • Import samples are collected at point of entry
    into U.S commerce

7
FDA Monitoring
  • The unwashed, whole, unpeeled, raw commodity is
    analyzed.
  • Processed foods also are analyzed.
  • FDA uses multi-residue analytical methods capable
    of determining a number of pesticide residues.
  • FDA methods are capable of determining residues
    well below tolerance levels

8
Targeted Sampling
  • FDA uses several factors to determine the types
    and numbers of samples to collect.
  • Review of recent FDA and state residue data
  • Regional information on pesticide use
  • Dietary importance of food
  • Information on the amount of domestic and
    imported food entering interstate commerce
  • Pesticide characteristics and toxicity
  • Production volume/pesticide usage patterns

9
FDA Monitoring Results - 2001
  • Total samples analyzed 6,475
  • Domestic Samples 2,101
  • Collected from 41 states
  • Largest number of samples come from states that
    are the largest producers of fruit and vegetables
  • Imported 4,374
  • Collected from food shipments from 99 countries.
  • Mexico had the largest number of samples. Chile
    was next.

10
Domestic/Import Comparison- All Samples
11
Domestic/Import Comparison Fruits and Vegetables
12
Sanctions for Illegal Residues
  • Domestic
  • Seizure of item or injunction
  • Import
  • Stop shipment at port of entry
  • Stop future shipments for a specific grower,
    geographic area, or country based on the finding
    of one violative shipment, if there is reason to
    believe the same situation exists in future lots
    during the same shipping season.

13
Web Address
  • FDA Pesticide Program Residue Monitoring
  • http//vm.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/pesrpts.html

14
USDA Pesticide Data Program
  • Tested over 50 different commodities
    fresh/frozen/canned fruit and vegetables, fruit
    juices, whole milk, grains, corn syrup, poultry,
    beef, drinking water.
  • Samples collected close to time and point of
    consumption and reflect what is typically
    available to consumers during the year.

15
2002 PDP Results
  • 2002 PDP tested fresh and processed fruit and
    vegetables, barley, rice beef tissues and
    drinking water for pesticides.
  • 12,889 samples
  • 10,056 were fruit vegetables, including apple
    juice, apple sauce, canned and frozen sweet peas,
    sweet corn, fresh apples, asparagus, bananas,
    broccoli, carrots, celery, cucumbers, mushrooms,
    onions peaches pineapples, potatoes, spinach and
    bell peppers

16
2002 PDP Results
  • 58 of samples had no detectable residues
  • 42 of samples had detectable residues
  • 0.3 of samples exceeded the established
    tolerance.
  • 2.7 of samples had no established tolerance.
    These residues detected at very low levels and
    may be due to spray drift, crop rotations, or use
    of sanitizers in food handling facilities.
  • PDP reports such findings to FDA.

17
Use of PDP Data
  • EPA uses PDP data to prepare realistic pesticide
    dietary exposure for pesticide risk assessments.
  • Government and ag industry use data to examine
    pesticide residue issues that may affect ag
    practices and U.S. Trade
  • PDP data are useful in promoting export of U.S.
    commodities and addressing food safety issues

18
PDP Information
  • More information on USDAs Pesticide Data Program
    can be found at
  • http//www.ams.usda.gov/science/pdp/

19
Country of Origin Labeling
20
Country of Origin Labeling(COOL)
  • The 2002 Farm Bill established the requirement
    for Country of Origin Labeling for beef, lamb,
    pork, fish, perishable agricultural commodities
    and peanuts.
  • USDA-AMS responsible for implementation.
  • USDA published proposed regulations to implement
    COOL on 10/30/2003

21
COOL Implementation
  • 9/30/2004 - Original Implementation date however
    Congress passed legislation postponing
    implementation for all covered commodities except
    wild and farm raised fish and shell fish until
    9/30/2006.

22
COOL Requirements
  • Covered commodities must be labeled at retail to
    indicate their country of origin.
  • Country of origin for fish and shell fish must
    include and distinguish between wild and farm
    raised.

23
COOL Exemptions
  • Covered commodities are exempt if they are an
    ingredient in a processed food item. Eg. Bacon,
    orange juice, mixed fruit party trays, mixed nuts
  • Food Service establishments, such as restaurants,
    bars, cafeterias, etc.

24
More COOL Information
  • Information on COOL legislation and proposed
    regulations can be found at
  • http//www.ams.usda.gov/cool/

25
USDAs Microbiological Data Program (MDP)
26
MDP
  • FY 2001 Congress authorized funding to
    establish a microbial baseline in the domestic
    food supply.
  • USDA-AMS Monitoring Programs Office charged with
    implementing the MDP.

27
Congressional Intent for MDP
  • Conferees expect the microbiological data
    program to produce national, consistent and
    statistically reliable data that may be used for
    research and risk analysis purposes by federal
    agencies, such as USDA, FDA, CDC, state health
    departments, researchers and other stakeholders.

28
MDP Objectives
  • Provide comprehensive data on pathogens and
    indicator organisms on fresh fruits and
    vegetables in the U.S.
  • Establish benchmark data for Federal Agencies,
    State Public Health Agencies, industry and other
    interested parties to assess potentially harmful
    foodborne microorganisms.
  • To provide uniform procedures for sampling,
    testing, and reporting.

29
MDP
  • USDA-AMS coordinated development of the MDP with
    CDC, FDA, USDA-ARS, and USDA-NASS
  • Sampling and/or microbiological lab activities
    are conducted with 10 states and 1 federal lab.

30
MDP
  • MDP uses the USDA food consumption surveys to
    select for sampling highly consumed commodities
    that can be eaten raw.
  • 2002 MDP sampled and tested celery, cantaloupe,
    leaf lettuce, romaine lettuce and tomatoes for
    Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella spp.

31
MDP Results
  • 2002 10,317 samples analyzed (86 domestic, 11
    imported, 3 unknown origin. (First reporting
    year)
  • E. coli isolates with virulence factors found in
    0.62 percent of samples.
  • Three Salmonella spp. isolates from domestic
    lettuce

32
Use of MDP Data
  • Establish benchmarks for the incidence of target
    organisms at the wholesale level, understand
    trends, and improve risk communication.
  • Identify priorities for technology development
    and modeling of risks for fresh produce in the
    food chain

33
Use of MDP Data
  • MDP data can supplement the FDA/USDA Guidance
    for IndustryGuide to Minimize Microbial Food
    Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables

34
MDP Future
  • MDP is seeking
  • to use new technologies to streamline laboratory
    procedures
  • improved data collection methods
  • to use improved microbial detection methods that
    are quicker, more reliable, and more sensitive

35
MDP Resources
  • For more information on USDAs Microbiological
    Data Program go to http//www.ams.usda.gov/Science
    /mpo/quick.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com