Title: Department of Human Resources Civil Service Reform Preserving the Promise of Government Presentation
1Department of Human Resources Civil Service
ReformPreserving the Promise of
GovernmentPresentation to Civil Service Reform
Advisory PanelMarch 8, 2005
2Civil Service Reform ProjectAgenda______________
__________________________________________________
_______________________________
- Civil Service Reform Themes and Overview
- Review of DHRs Process
- Best Practice Research
- City Stakeholder Process
- Process Timelines
- Change Mechanisms for Reform
- Four Broad Reform Areas
- Discussion on Reform Core Values
- Moving Forward
3Civil Service Reform ProjectOverview____________
__________________________________________________
________________________________
Why? To ensure our personnel system is
best-equipped to assist policy makers, operating
departments and employees to provide San
Franciscans the highest quality services in the
21st Century. Because the mission of our local
government is to provide the highest quality
services to San Franciscans, our workforce is
our greatest asset
4Civil Service Reform ProjectOverview____________
__________________________________________________
________________________________
Why? In 1900, San Francisco first established a
civil service system to protect against
cronyism and to increase the efficiency of its
industrial age workforce. Between 1900 and the
present, San Franciscos personnel system has
evolved into a confusing web of charter
provisions, ordinances, civil service rules, HR
policies and collectively bargained
agreements. Too often in government, we pass
laws to fix particular problems of the moment,
and then we allow a half a century to roll by
without ever following up to see what the
long-term consequences have been. A solution a
decade or two ago may very well be a problem
today.
5Civil Service Reform Project Overview___________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________
Why. In 2005, traditional personnel systems
are viewed by many as overly bureaucratic,
unresponsive, and ill-equipped to meet rapidly
changing needs of our citizenry and our workforce
in an information-based economy. How can we
do it better?
6Civil Service Reform ProjectTheme
__________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
What does Civil Service Reform mean to DHR? An
inward look at our civil service and human
resource systems to identify areas ripe for
reform. DHR will study best practices, review
other civil service reform efforts, learn from
the experts, meet with stakeholders, and most
importantly, engage our own employees to
understand how human resources practices must
evolve to meet the needs of our City in the 21st
century.
7Civil Service Reform Project Review of DHRs
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- What is DHRs process?
- An exploration of how we got here.
- A review of the history of San Franciscos civil
service, HR and labor relations systems. - A review of what our colleagues, industry
experts, academics, and other jurisdictions have
done. - Collection and analysis of reform materials,
studies, reports, data, and experiences. - Communications with our stakeholders.
- Forums, presentations, voluntary surveys,
informational meetings, all designed to solicit
input on reform recommendations from our
stakeholders employees, labor unions, citizens,
internal personnel experts and outside experts.
8Civil Service Reform Project Review of DHRs
Process __________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- What is DHRs process?
- 4. Identifying what works and what needs to
change - Analysis of all stakeholder input to identify
potential reform. - Identifying the tools for reform actions
- Analysis of the mechanisms by which change can
occur - - HR Policies and Procedures, Civil Service
Rules, MOUs, BOS Legislation, Charter
Amendments - Making recommendations
- Policy paper to the Mayor
- DHR internal process improvements
-
9Civil Service Reform Project Best Practice
Research _________________________________________
__________________________________________________
____
- Survey Jurisdictions
- City of Baltimore
- City and County of Denver
- City of Indianapolis
- City of Los Angeles
- County of Milwaukee
- City of Oakland
- City and County of Philadelphia
- City of San Diego
- City of San Jose
- City of Seattle
10Civil Service Reform Project Best Practice
Research _________________________________________
__________________________________________________
____
- Literature Review Partial List of Sources
- Controllers Office Audit 30110-90 A Review of
the Civil Service Commission - International Public Management Association for
Human Resources, Benchmarking Results 2003 - Jonathan Walters, Governing Magazine, Toward a
High-Performance Workplace Fixing Civil Service
in Massachusetts - Katherine Naff, San Francisco State University,
Prospects for Civil Service Reform in
California A Triumph of Technique Over Purpose?
- Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Government
Performance Project, Grading the States 2005 - Partnership for Public Service, Asking the Wrong
Questions A Look at How the Federal Government
Assesses and Selects its Workforce - Sally Selden, Syracuse University, Government
Performance Project, Trends in Human Resource
Management Lessons from the States - Steven W. Hays, University of South Carolina,
Trends and Best Practices in State and Local
Human Resource Management - Washington State Department of Personnel, Human
Resource Systems Research Report
11Civil Service Reform ProjectCity Stakeholder
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- Stakeholder Process Overview
- Mayors Civil Service Reform Advisory Panel
- Town Hall Meetings
- Labor Meetings
- Departmental Personnel Officers Meeting
- Department Head and Chief Financial Officer
Meeting - Board of Supervisors Government, Audit and
Oversight Committee Hearing - Civil Service Commission Hearing on Civil Service
Reform - Additional Stakeholder Input Sources
- DHR Website and Online Survey Suggestion Form
-
12Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- Mayors Civil Service Reform Advisory Panel
- Goals of Panel
- - Ensure strong communication with stakeholders
- - Provide advice, expertise and leadership on
process and substantive issues - Comprised of the Following Representatives
- Department Heads, City Personnel Experts, Labor
Unions, Board of Supervisors, Civil Service
Commission, Controllers Office, Community
Representatives, Outside Personnel Experts - Scheduled and Tentative Future Meetings
- - Tuesday, March 8th at 430pm, City Hall
room 201 - - Friday, March 18th from 3 5pm, City Hall
room 201 - - Thursday, April 7th from 1 3pm, City Hall
room 201 - - Biweekly Meetings thereafter (more
frequently as necessary)
13Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process __________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- Town Hall Meetings
- All employees have been invited to attend one of
three town hall meetings for an overview of the
Citys efforts and an opportunity to provide
comments and suggestions on civil service reform. -
- Meeting Schedule
- Monday, March 14th from 12pm - 2pm at Main
Library, Koret Auditorium - Thursday March 17th from 8am - 10am at SFGH,
Carr Auditorium - Monday March 21st from 4pm - 6pm at Main
Library, Koret Auditorium - Note Upon reasonable notice, release time
will be provided to any employee who attends
the town hall meeting.
14Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process __________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
Labor Meetings On February 25th, labor
representatives were invited to attend a special
briefing on our civil service reform process.
DHR encourages and is committed to ongoing
participation and input from labor in this
process. DHR will honor all legal requirements
to meet and confer in good faith before
implementing any changes involving matters within
the scope of representation. Meeting
Schedule Friday, February 25th at 300pm in
City Hall (Overview Provided) Future meetings
TBD
15Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
Departmental Personnel Officers Meeting All
Departmental Personnel Officers have been invited
to attend a meeting for an overview of the Citys
efforts and an opportunity to provide comments
and suggestions on civil service reform. Meeting
Schedule Friday, March 4th from 200 pm - 500pm
at 44 Gough Street Follow-up Meetings TBD (most
likely the week of April 18th) Department Head
and Chief Financial Officer Meeting All
Department Heads and Chief Financial Officers are
invited to attend a special meeting for an
overview of the Citys efforts and an opportunity
to provide comments and suggestions on civil
service reform. Meeting Schedule Wednesday,
April 6th, time and venue TBD
16Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- Board of Supervisors Government, Audit and
Oversight Committee Hearing on Civil Service
Reform - Hearing Schedule TBD (Most likely early to mid
April) -
- Civil Service Commission Hearing on Civil Service
Reform - Hearing Schedule TBD
17Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- Additional Stakeholder Input Sources
- Council of Human Resources Managers (CHRM)
Symposium - Departmental HR Forums
- Internal DHR Staff Meetings and Recommendations
18Civil Service Reform Project City Stakeholder
Process__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- DHR Website and Survey Suggestion Form
www.sfgov.org/DHR-CSR - Employees and the public may also access
information and provide input through the online
Survey Suggestion Form on the Civil Service
Reform webpage or email DHR-CSR_at_sfgov.org with
additional questions and comments. - The website also contains
- Additional information on town hall meetings
and stakeholder processes - Updates on future meetings, including the Board
of Supervisors Committee Hearing and Civil
Service Commission Hearing - Reference and resources materials for
information on reform efforts in other
jurisdictions and best practices - Contact Information
-
19Civil Service Reform ProjectTimeline____________
__________________________________________________
_________________________________
- Phase I
- February 25th Overview with Labor
- March 8th First Civil Service Reform Advisory
Panel Meeting - March 1st through April 20th Continued
Stakeholder Input - May 2nd Circulate Draft White Paper to Advisory
Panel for Review (tentative) - May 6th Submit White Paper to Mayor (tentative)
20Civil Service Reform ProjectTimeline
_________________________________________________
______________________________________________
- Phase 2
- May 15th and ongoing Begin implementing
recommended (non-Charter) reforms - May 24th Deadline for submission to the Board
of Supervisors any proposed Charter amendments
for the November ballot - May 25th through July 29th Meet and confer,
revisions, negotiations regarding any proposed
Charter amendments - July 29th Deadline for the Board of Supervisors
to approve and submit to the Director of
Elections of any proposed Charter amendments
21Civil Service Reform ProjectTimeline
_________________________________________________
______________________________________________
Future phases Based on recommendations,
future phases involve exploration and development
of additional reforms.
22Civil Service Reform ProjectChange Mechanisms
for Reforms______________________________________
__________________________________________________
_______
- Five change mechanisms through which civil
service reform can be accomplished - HR Policies and Procedures
- Civil Service Rules
- Memoranda of Understanding
- Board of Supervisors Legislation
- Charter Amendment
23Civil Service Reform ProjectFour Broad Reform
Areas____________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_
- Reform issues are grouped into 4 broad topic
areas - Hiring
- Employee Investment Performance Management
- Separation
- Governance
24Civil Service Reform Project Four Broad Reform
Areas ___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__
- Hiring
- Our goal is to hire the most qualified candidates
in a timely manner. - Examples of questions to consider
- How can we shorten and simplify City hiring
processes? - Does our current classification plan provide
enough flexibility to assign and deploy a modern
workforce? - Do we need 1,000 different classifications or is
there benefit in having fewer, broader job
classes? - Does the City have adequate outreach and
recruitment programs? - Do managers and departments have adequate
discretion to employ qualified candidates of
their choice?
25Civil Service Reform Project Four Broad Reform
Areas ___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__
- Employee Investment/Performance Management
- Our goal is to promote high levels of employee
performance through career development,
performance assessment, effective management,
accountability, and flexible compensation. - Examples of questions to consider
- Does the Citys compensation strategy provide
adequate flexibility to recruit, retain, and
motivate the highest quality workforce? - Are we adequately linking job performance to
compensation and promotion? - Are we providing adequate training and
development for our workforce? - Are we managing employee performance through the
probationary period and through regular, annual
performance evaluations?
26Civil Service Reform Project Four Broad Reform
Areas ___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__
- Separation
- Our goal is to minimize the disruption to
employees and departments caused by separations. - Examples of questions to consider
- Do the Citys layoff and bumping procedures
adequately balance employee rights and
protections with departments obligation to
deliver effective and efficient services? - Are there fair and appropriate ways to expedite
the Citys disciplinary processes? - Should the City have broader categories of
at-will employment? - Is the current system for restricting future
employment fair and appropriate?
27Civil Service Reform Project Four Broad Reform
Areas ___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__
Governance Our goal is to streamline and
harmonize overlapping Charter sections, Civil
Service Rules, HR policies, and negotiated
provisions in 48 union labor contracts into a
modern personnel system. Examples of questions to
consider Are there ways to streamline collective
bargaining processes and the types of issues
which are collectively bargained? Should
external agencies (i.e. School District, CCD,
Courts) continue to operate as part of Citys
personnel system? Should the Civil Service
Commission serve as both the rule-making
authority and the appellate body responsible for
resolving employee appeals? Do departmental
personnel offices have the appropriate level of
autonomy and discretion?
28Civil Service Reform Project Discussion on
Reform Core Values _____________________________
__________________________________________________
________________
- Given that the City is committed to ensuring that
merit-based employment, equal opportunity and
strong labor relations remain the foundation of
our personnel system, the following have been
identified as the Citys core values in our
efforts for reform - Diversity of workforce
- A Personnel System that is easy to understand and
use - Effective and efficient services to taxpayers
- Employment based on qualifications and the
ability to perform - Insulation from political influence
- Open and transparent processes
- Responsiveness to operational needs
- Stability of operations
29Civil Service Reform Project Moving
Forward__________________________________________
__________________________________________________
___
- Comments on todays discussions
- Additional recommendations and suggestions
for moving forward - Future Advisory Panel meeting dates