1001 Good Reasons to Upgrade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 68
About This Presentation
Title:

1001 Good Reasons to Upgrade

Description:

Progress Developers World 2004. Moore's Law ... Coupled with increases in clock speeds raw compute power per dollar (or euro) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: TomBa71
Category:
Tags: clock | good | reasons | upgrade | world

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 1001 Good Reasons to Upgrade


1
1001 Good Reasons to Upgrade
  • Tom Bascom
  • Greenfield Technologies

2
Introduction
Tom Bascom Greenfield Technologies http//www.gree
nfieldtech.com tom_at_greenfieldtech
3
Agenda
  • History of Progress Releases
  • The Benchmarks
  • Data
  • Summary

4
Agenda
  • History of Progress Releases
  • The Benchmarks
  • Data
  • Summary

5
Just How Old is Version 8?
  • Or 6 7 for that matter?
  • V9 was released when?
  • What else was current way back then?

6
V6 -- 1990
  • Fuzzy Checkpoints
  • -spin
  • PF Files
  • UNIX System V r4
  • RS 6000
  • Windows 3.0
  • MS Sales 1B
  • 10mhz 286 PS/1 2000
  • NEC Laptop 850016mhz 386sx2MB RAM42MB
    disk(color)

progress-list_at_thinc.com launched by Ethan Lish
7
V7 -- 1992
  • Jumpstart
  • GUI
  • -mmax
  • Load n Go!
  • OS/2 2.0
  • Windows 3.1
  • SLS Linux distribution
  • 486DX2 25/50mhz
  • 66mhz PowerPC
  • HP 9000 72550mhz PA RISC16mb RAM, 512MB disk
    18k
  • Thinkpad 700c 4,35025mhz 486sl4MB RAM120MB
    disk

progress-list_at_math.niu.edu taken over by Greg
Higgins Approximately 175 subscribers and 10-12
messages/month
8
V7.3 -- 1995
  • Persistent Procedures
  • VBX
  • MS Consent Decree
  • Win95
  • Linux 1.0 (94 actually)
  • Pentium Pro 200mhz
  • DEC Alpha 300mhz
  • Something called The Web explodes onto the
    world

Peg.com domain registeredApproximately 700
subscribers and 1000 messages/month
9
V8 -- 1996
  • User Defined Functions
  • VSTs
  • Variable Block Sizes
  • App Servers
  • WebSpeed
  • Fast Schema Change
  • -zprofile
  • NT 4
  • 1GB disks start to appear
  • Linux 2.0

dba_at_peg.com created in May 98
10
V9 -- 1999
  • Pentium 3 announced
  • Judge Jackson declares MS is an abusive
    monopoly
  • Windows 2000 released
  • SCO IBM start working on Monterey
  • Fujitsu Lifebook 2,600333mhz PII64MB
    RAM6.4GB disk
  • Storage Areas
  • Publish and Subscribe
  • Dynamic Queries
  • XML
  • SQL-92
  • Load n Go actually works

dba_at_peg.com created in May 98
11
OpenEdge 10 -- 2004
  • The SCO Saga
  • P4 Xeon _at_ 3.0ghz
  • Dell Latitude 2,500Pentium M _at_ 1.2ghz640MB
    RAM40GB disk
  • Data Clusters
  • ProDataSet
  • SOAP

DateTime!!!
PEG has more than 3,000 messages/month and
approximately 5,200 subscribers -- theyd all be
here but theyve got important work to do
12
History Bonus Slides
  • Moores Law
  • Disk Performance

13
Moores Law
In 1965 Gordon Moore famously observed that
transistor counts were doubling every two years
and predicted that this would continue
14
Moores Law
Coupled with increases in clock speeds raw
compute power per dollar (or euro) raises very
quickly
15
Disk Performance
  • Disk Performance is Complex!
  • Capacity
  • Increases roughly 100 annually
  • Bandwidth
  • Increases roughly 40 annually
  • Access (especially random access!)
  • Increases roughly 8 annually

16
Disk Performance
  • Non-DBA bias is towards Capacity
    (beancounters...)
  • The trade press occasionally pays attention to
    Bandwidth.
  • A DBAs bias is Random Access.

Time to read whole 3.5 disk Year Size
Sequentially Randomly 1990 100MB 4
minutes 1 hour 2000 8GB 12 minutes 46
hours
17
Hardware Performance Summary
  • Amdahls Law! The potential for performance
    improvement is limited by the amount of time that
    the improved component is being used.
  • Constant Workload
  • 10x faster CPU 10 disk 5x faster system.
  • 50 of potential improvement is lost.
  • 100x faster CPU 10 disk 10x faster system.
  • 90 of potential improvement is lost to disk IO.

18
Agenda
  • History of Progress Releases
  • The Benchmarks
  • Data
  • Summary

19
The Benchmarks
  • ReadProbe
  • 4glProbe
  • Populate
  • Workload
  • Big Report
  • Dump
  • Load
  • Index Rebuild
  • DB Analysis

Maintenance
20
Test Platform
  • Mid Market Hardware
  • Dell PowerEdge 6600
  • 4x2Ghz Xeon w/HT
  • 2GB RAM
  • 6 disks
  • Windows Server 2003
  • Linux AS 2.1

21
The Database
  • Sports2000 schema
  • Randomly generated data
  • Mix of Table Record sizes
  • Some Scatter

22
Database Analysis
Table Records Size Min Max
Mean Scat Benefits 5000 282.3K 42
73 57 2.5 BillTo 200000
32.0M 76 258 167 2.6 Department
20 1.0K 36 74 53 1.0 Employee
5000 1.1M 153 333 236
3.0 Invoice 1000000 52.0M 46 55
54 1.9 Order 1000000 168.3M 98
263 176 2.0 OrderLine 1500000
94.5M 46 81 66 1.7 POLine
8000000 505.6M 49 82 66
1.4 PurchaseOrder 20000 920.0K 33 61
47 2.7 RefCall 9997 917.8K 45
144 94 3.1 Salesrep 300
25.3K 52 122 86 3.2 State
50 3.5K 44 102 70 1.0 Supplier
5000 1.0M 121 293 210
3.1 Warehouse 100 16.0K 101 219
163 1.0 Subtotals 15771467 1.2G 20
409 83 2.0
23
Tuning Parameters
  • Mostly Out of the Box
  • Basic tuning only
  • -B
  • -i
  • Simple File Placement
  • Tried not to make this a disk performance test.
  • No Heroics

24
Not Tested
  • SQL-92
  • Effects of After Imaging
  • Client/Server
  • Exotic Parameters

25
Feature Focus
  • Variable Block Sizes
  • Introduced with v8
  • 1k, 4k 8k (2k not tested, 4k not shown)
  • Rows Per Block
  • Introduced with v9
  • 32, 64, 256 (1 not tested)
  • Type 1 vs Type 2 Storage Areas
  • Type 1 1 block per cluster (aka v9 style areas)
  • Type 2 8, 64 512 blocks per cluster
  • Type 2 areas are a new capability introduced with
    OE 10

26
Database Configurations
  • Apples to apples comparisons
  • Version 8, Version 9, OpenEdge 10
  • 1k, 4k, 8k db Blocks
  • 32, 64, 256 Rows per Block
  • 1, 8, 64 512 Blocks per Cluster
  • 48 Comparisons in all

27
Issues
  • _ActRecord VST is broken in OE10.0a making some
    data gathering difficult (but does not impact
    functionality.)Fixed in 10.0B
  • 9.1d07 contains many, but not all, OE10
    enhancements which occasionally blurs the
    distinction between v9 OE10
  • 8.3e, 9.1d09, 10.0B (no service packs)

28
Agenda
  • History of Progress Releases
  • The Benchmarks
  • Data
  • Summary

29
ReadProbe
  • Measures the ultimate limit of record read
    performance under IDEAL conditions (NO disk IO).
  • Youll never actually get performance this good.
  • But you should be able to get close.

30
ReadProbe -- Linux
31
ReadProbe -- Linux
32
ReadProbe -- Linux
33
ReadProbe -- Linux
34
ReadProbe -- Windows
35
ReadProbe -- Windows
36
ReadProbe -- Windows
37
ReadProbe -- Windows
38
Results -- ReadProbe
  • v8 is very fast for a single session which is
    important (high profile issues).
  • But v8 gets in trouble with contention quickly.
  • v9 scales better than v8.
  • 9.1d07 acts a lot like OpenEdge 10 on Linux.
  • 9.1d 9.1d07 act a lot like OE10 on Windows
    OE10 is about 5 faster.
  • Linux is a tad faster than Windows (5 to 10).
  • Windows has improved a lot since v8.

39
4glProbe
  • Ordinary 4gl string manipulation functions
  • Loop constructs
  • Measure the time required to complete a set of
    these operations.

40
4GL Operations
  • 2GHz P4 Xeon

41
Populate
  • Randomly fills the database with a configurable
    number of records.
  • Target record count is configured per table.
  • One or more simultaneous threads per table.
  • Field data is randomized.

42
Populate -- Windows
43
Populate -- Linux
44
Results Populate (Insert Update)
  • V9 is a big improvement over v8 under Windows.
  • Larger block sizes are A Good Thing with v8 and
    Windows v9 likes them too.
  • More rows per block are A Good Thing especially
    with Windows.
  • OpenEdge 10 is generally better than v8 or v9
    especially when using type 2 storage areas.
  • Windows has improved a lot from v8 to OpenEdge 10
    (between 20 60).

45
Workload
  • Starts X sessions
  • Each session has a tunable target for Creates,
    Reads, Updates and Deletes.
  • Each session randomly fulfills that target much
    as a user would.
  • Time spent working is measured and logged.

46
Workload 25 -- Linux
47
Workload 100 -- Linux
48
Workload 25 -- Windows
49
Workload 100 -- Windows
50
Results Workload
  • Progress version number is dominant.
  • V8 is best for very light workloads.
  • V9 is worst in almost all cases.
  • OpenEdge 10 does very well with heavier loads.
  • More rows per block are usually A Good Thing.
  • Type 2 storage areas (only available with OE10)
    are much better than Type 1 areas.
  • 32 rows per block in a type 1 area is generally
    asking for trouble.
  • Scalability improves as you upgrade from 8 to 9
    to OpenEdge 10.

51
Big Report
  • Queries a whole bunch of records in multiple
    tables.

52
Big Report -- Linux
53
Big Report -- Windows
54
Results -- Reporting
  • Windows performance has improved a lot.
  • Otherwise V9 is the slowest.
  • OpenEdge 10 Type 1 storage areas are somewhat
    performance challenged.
  • Large block, row cluster sizes are A Good
    Thing.
  • Its easy, and painful (a 30 swing), to shoot
    yourself in the foot with v9 OpenEdge 10
    defaults planning and testing pay.

55
Maintainence
  • Binary Dump
  • Binary Load
  • Index Rebuild
  • DB Analysis

56
Maintenance -- Linux
57
Maintenance -- Windows
58
Results -- Maintenance
  • 1k db blocks are a bad idea.
  • 8k blocks _at_ 32 rpb are a really bad idea.
  • 4k and 8k are generally roughly similar in
    performance.
  • OpenEdge Binary Dump can be much faster (60 to
    70) than v8 or v9 if you use type 2 areas and 64
    or 512 blocks per data cluster.
  • OpenEdge 10 Binary Load does not like 1k db
    blocks or 8 block data clusters.
  • Index Rebuild isnt much different from 9 to 10.
  • Index Rebuild is about 40 faster from 8 to 10.

59
Agenda
  • History of Progress Releases
  • The Benchmarks
  • Data
  • Summary

60
Upgrade - Myths
  • MYTH Upgrades require more resources.
  • Truth Upgrades make better use of your existing
    resources if you use the new features.
  • MYTH Newer releases are slower than older
    releases.
  • Truth Upgrades perform better on identical
    hardware if you leverage new features.
  • MYTH You need to spend the same money for a new
    server as the old.
  • Truth You can get much better performance for
    much less money.

61
Upgrade -- Con
  • 8.3 was very good and remains very good in its
    niche.
  • Conversion with type 1 areas and default values
    shows little benefit over v9 (and may be a step
    backwards in some cases.)
  • Straight convXY upgrades may be harmful to
    performance (especially with 1k blocks or 32 rows
    per block.)

62
Upgrade -- Pro
  • Day-to-day Workload improvements.
  • Maintenance Improvements.
  • Conversion to larger block sizes and row per
    block settings can be very beneficial.
  • Conversion to type 2 areas can be very
    beneficial.
  • Additionally, 4gl performance is getting a lot of
    attention.

63
The Case For Upgrading
64
The Case For Upgrading
65
Wrap-up
  • As a general rule the db is not your ultimate
    constraint.
  • The most advantage comes from leveraging new
    features.
  • Never underestimate the impact of cheap hardware!
  • There is a clear positive trend in the numbers!

66
Why Upgrade to OpenEdge 10?
  • How does an aggregate database performance
    improvement of 25 sound? (Of course YMMV)
  • As much as 60 faster 4gl performance!
  • Greater efficiency of DB reads/writes
  • Great Leaps Forward on Microsoft Windows
  • Substantially faster maintenance less downtime
  • And thats only the beginning!!!

67
?
Any Questions
Tom Bascom Greenfield Technologies tom_at_greenfieldt
ech.com http//www.greenfieldtech.com
68
Resources
http//psdn.progress.com/library/white_papers/ben
chmarks/index.ssp http//www.greenfieldtech.com/d
ownloads http//www.greenfieldtech.com/articles
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com