LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND

Description:

Research project, co-ordinated by the Maritime Institute, selected locations for ... fill up the market for logistics services that could have been the domain ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ifec6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND


1
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
NETWORKING LOGISTICS CENTRES IN THE BALTIC SEA
REGION
FINAL NeLoC CONFERENCE 15 16 January 2004 Mauno
Koivisto Centre, Turku, Finland
2
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
Status
  • Research project, co-ordinated by the Maritime
    Institute, selected locations for the main
    logistics centres.
  • There are a number of local initiatives for
    construction of international, regional and local
    logistics centres.
  • There are 4 registered companies whose objective
    is construction of a logistics centre, 2 of which
    are in liquidation.
  • Logistics operators build their own networks of
    transhipment centres, which fill up the market
    for logistics services that could have been the
    domain of logistics centres.

3
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
Location plans
Results of the research project
SourceL. Mindur Theoretical grounds for
organising logistics centres in Poland. Science
and Technology conference Logistics Centres in
Mazowsze. Warsaw 9th October 2003.
4
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
Combined transport in Poland
Zródlowww.pkp-cargo.pl
5
Investments of Prologis
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
Source Own materials on the basis of
wwwgddp.gov.pl and CB RICHARD ELLIS
6
Factors weakening existing initiatives
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
  • No support from the government.
  • no programme,
  • no funds or access to funds,
  • no supportive legislation.
  • No co-ordination.
  • no idea,
  • competing initiatives,
  • no collaboration (initiators PKP CARGO).
  • Weak infrastructure.
  • no motorways,
  • bad condition of many roads,
  • no container terminals or their bad location,
  • poor condition of inland waterways.

7
Evaluation of the situation
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
The seed initiative model
Source Wielkopolskie Centrum Logistyczne Konin
Stare Miasto S.A.
8
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
Evaluation of the situation
The evolutionary model
Mszczonów
Source www.mszczonow.pl
9
Evaluation of the situation
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
  • The sources of problems with construction of
    logistics centres in Poland.
  • No national policy for their construction.
  • No long-term strategy which could be the tool for
    implementation of the policy.
  • Results?
  • No resources for construction.
  • Consequences?
  • No own means in realistic models of financing.
  • No access to the structural funds.

10
Evaluation of the situation
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
  • Wrong assumptions
  • Belief that hundreds of millions PLN have to be
    engaged.
  • Simple methods of calculating returns used in
    feasibility studies and business plans.
  • Calculating incomes from activities that are in
    competition to logistics operators.
  • Commentary
  • Classic tools used by banks to evaluate the
    financial risk do not work. Banks are not willing
    to invest in logistics centres.
  • The evaluation of the efficiency of the
    investment should include indirect and long- term
    profits.

11
Conclusions
LOGISTICS CENTRES DEVELOPMENT IN POLAND
  • Transport policy should support the increase in
    intermodality.
  • There should be a governmental programme for
    implementation of the policy.
  • The programme should be backed up by the
    availability of funds.
  • Investments into logistics centres should be
    limited.
  • The efficiency calculation should take into
    account long-term profits, which would attract
    public funds.
  • Financing models should engage financial
    institutions with innovative products rather than
    banks.
  • Financing models should take into account various
    forms of participation of public funds.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com