Comparison of eastern tropical Pacific simulations by IPCC AR4 coupled models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of eastern tropical Pacific simulations by IPCC AR4 coupled models

Description:

Comparison of eastern tropical Pacific simulations by IPCC AR4 coupled ... Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (USA) GFDL ... for Climate System Research (Japan) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: SimonDe7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of eastern tropical Pacific simulations by IPCC AR4 coupled models


1
Comparison of eastern tropical Pacific
simulations by IPCC AR4 coupled models
  • Simon de Szoeke
  • NOAA/ESRL/PSD3, Boulder, Colorado
  • Shang-Ping Xie
  • International Paci?c Research Center
  • Honolulu, Hawaii

2
Tropical eastern Paci?c coupled processes
  • equatorial coastal upwelling fronts and eddies
  • stratus trade-wind cumulus clouds
  • intertropical convergence zones (ITCZ)
  • variability El Niño, TIWs, tropical depressions
  • observations satellite TAO buoy monitoring
    EPIC (2001) VOCALS ?eld projects

EQ
EQ
SST ( C)
Robert Wood
3
Tropical eastern Paci?c
Ocean-atmosphere variability ENSO Pacific
North American (PNA) teleconnection
  • End of the line for the Paci?c equatorial
    waveguide and embarkation point for the PNA
    atmospheric wave train
  • The PNA connects ENSO to North American weather
    in winter.
  • Seasonal cycle is important.
  • Models fail to predict the season of ENSO
    variability (Saji et al., 2006).

convection
PNA winter pressure pattern (Horel and Wallace,
1981)
4
seasonal cycle of interannual SST variability
Saji, et al. (2006)
observed
5
Outline
  • Assess current state-of-the-art coupled models
    IPCC AR4 20th century simulations.
  • Signi?cant variety and biases exist among models!
  • Introduce metrics.
  • Beyond biasesinfer physical relationships from
    the ensemble of CGCMs.
  • Regional coupled modeling.

6
Why the eastern Paci?c warm poolis in the north
Upwelling along a tilted coast (Philander
1996) Wind-evaporation-SST feedback (Xie and
Philander, 1994)
7
Southerly wind propagates asymmetry westward and
cools equator
cold
Wind-evaporation-SST feedback (Xie and Philander,
1994)
8
Precipitation (mm day-1)
9
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th
Assessment Report (IPCC AR4) models
  • Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and
    Analysis CGCM3.1
  • Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques
    (France) CNRM CM3
  • CSIRO Atmospheric Research (Australia) CSIRO
    Mk3.0
  • Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
    (USA) GFDL CM2.0
  • Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory GFDL
    CM2.1
  • Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
    (UK) UKMO HadCM3
  • Institute of Atmospheric Physics (China) FGOALS
    1.0g
  • Institute of Numerical Mathematic (Russia) INM
    CM3.0
  • Institut Pierre Simon Laplace (France) IPSL CM4
  • Center for Climate System Research
    (Japan) MIROC3.2 medres
  • Center for Climate System Research MIROC3.2
    hires
  • Meteorological Research Institute (Japan) MRI
    CGCM2.3.2
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
    (USA) NCAR CCSM3.0
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR
    PCM 1
  • International Pacific Research Center
    (USA/Japan) IROAM
  • 15 models from 8 nations

10
Eastern Paci?c average SST (Reynolds)and rain
(TRMM)
mm day
degrees longitude
C
degrees west
11
Eastern Pacific average SST (Reynolds)and rain
(TRMM)
mm day
degrees longitude
C
degrees west
12
Reynolds
TRMM
13
model a
meridional seasonal cycle of SST and rain 140-90
W
latitude
model b
14
latitude
seasonal SST and rain
15
Eastern tropical Pacific 140-90 W,10 N SST,
25 N precipitation
RMSE
Taylor (2001) diagram

0.2
2
0.4
0.6
correlation
0.7
1.5
d
0.8
d
7
1
5
f
0.9
c
2
7
9
4
8
3
c
2
0.95
3
a
5
6
e
6
0.5
e
8
b
1
4
9
a
1
f
0.99
b
0
0
1
2
normalized standard deviation s/sobs
16
latitude
seasonal SST, rain, and QuikSCAT wind
17
Semiannual equatorial SST bias
observed
latitude
Boreal spring cold bias correlated to northerly
wind at r-0.6.
18
March equatorial cold biasfrom northerly wind
no correlation in August
28
r0.61
9
0
8
f
e
26
b
1
6
a
4
March equatorial SST ( C)
5
c
24
3
2
7
d
22
0
2
4
March v (m s-1)
19
Meridional asymmetry NorthSouth SST
rain Seasonal cycle AugustMarch asymmetry
latitude
20
Annual cycle of equatorial SST governed by
meridional wind speed
AugMar equatorial SST ( C)
21
Westward and disconnected equatorial cold tongue
bias
SST ( C)
latitude
west longitude
warm
cold
Zonal wind small east of 90 W.
22
meridional winds role inequatorial upwelling
v
18 C
2 N
2 S
EQ
  • Meridional wind drives a meridional cell in the
    equatorial ocean with upwelling on the windward
    side of the equator.
  • ? cools equator

23
Niño 12 meridional wind cools SST
Nino 12 80-90 W 0-10S
24
meridional winds role in equatorial upwelling
near the coast
  • Models with stronger southerly wind maintain
    cooler SST 80-90 W (r-0.6).
  • Bjerknes (1969) feedback ampli?es and propagates
    cooling westward (Xie, 1998).

EQ
25
Central American December-February gap winds and
SST
Gap winds prematurely end northern warm pool and
ITCZ.
26
Gap winds cool northern SSTand lead equatorial
northerlies
(2N)
(5-20N, 80-110W)
27
Southern stratocumulus deck influence on
asymmetry through insolation
degrees longitude
C
degrees west
28
Insolation drives SST but is not significantly
correlated to meridional wind
29
Eastern Pacific IPCC AR4 20th centurymodel
roundup
  • Seasonal cycle of meridional asymmetry exhibits a
    wide range of behavior.
  • Models form an ensemble with signi?cant
    inter-model correlations between
  • SST and rain meridional asymmetry (r0.8)
  • meridional asymmetry and equatorial v (r0.6)
  • equatorial v speed and cold tongue SST. (r0.6)
  • Double ITCZ bias is now mostly an alternating
    ITCZ bias.
  • semiannual cycle of wind and equatorial SST
    affects interannual variability

30
Eastern Pacific IPCC AR4 20th centurymodel
variations
  • The seasonal cycle of meridional asymmetry
    governs equatorial wind and SST.
  • Meridional wind is important for equatorial
    upwelling 0-10 offshore.
  • Central American gap northeasterlies in boreal
    winter cool the eastern Pacific warm pool, which
    sends the ITCZ south.
  • End of part 1

31
International Pacific Research Center
(IPRC)Regional Ocean Atmosphere Model (IROAM)
  • Realistic boundary conditions constrain the model
    isolate local coupled feedbacks.
  • Better resolution of orographic and mesoscale
    circulations
  • Verify with point observations.
  • Sensitivity experiments
  • Assess parameterizations
  • Propose strategies to diminish GCM biases.
  • Regional effects of scenarios e.g. last glacial
    maximum (cool North Atlantic 2C at 21,000 ybp)

32
IPRC Regional Ocean-Atmosphere Model (IROAM)
Atmosphere forcedby observed SST
Land surface model
Ocean forced by NCEP reanalysis
Interactive
Atmosphere IRAM, Y. Wang (2003, 2004) Ocean
MOM2, Pacanowski Griffies (1999)
Ocean spin-up
Coupled
19901995
19962003
IROAM is run on Earth Simulator in Yokohama,
Japan.
33
IROAM and COADS seasonal cycle of SST
30 C
30 N
20 C
EQ
30 S
80 W
140 W
110 W
34
Stratus and stratocumulus clouds
  • Low cloud affects how much sunlight reaches the
    surface.
  • SST affects low cloud
  • Cool SST strengthens the capping inversion,
    enhancing clouds (Klein Hartmann 1993)
  • Stratiform clouds have been identi?ed as an
    important contributor to coupled climate.
  • Model cloud representation varies widely.
  • Uncertainty in cloud parameterizations
    entrainment, convection, drizzle, and aerosol
    feedbacks.

35
Surface solar cloud radiative forcing (SSCRF)
ISCCP satellite retrieval
IROAM
W m-2
36
Stratiform clouds reinforce meridional asymmetry
Sc cool
37
  • Shallow cumulus convection scheme
  • Tiedtke (1989) mass flux scheme for deep,
    shallow, and midlevel convection
  • Shallow convection is activated when
  • surface evaporation gt 90 of the boundary layer
    (PBL) moisture source
  • or
  • cloud layer is less than 200 hPa deep.
  • no shallow convection (noSC) experiment
  • All convection is prohibited when either shallow
    convection condition is met.
  • Conditional instability in the lower troposphere
    must be relieved by turbulence or deep convection.

38
Shallow cumulus convection affects stratiform
clouds
  • Shallow convection vents moisture from the
    boundary layer and entrains dry air in.

700 hPa
39
Shallow cumulus convection affects stratiform
clouds
  • Shallow convection vents moisture from the
    boundary layer and entrains dry air in.
  • Reduced venting increases stratiform clouds,
  • which block sunlight from reaching the surface.

noSC
40
Vertical structurestratus clouds at 15 S,
September
noSC
IROAM control
pressure (hPa)
cloud water, 10-4 kg kg-1
41
surface solar cloud radiative forcing(W m-2)
IROAM control
noSC
Stratiform clouds dim sunlight by 50-100 W m-2.
42
Seasonal cycle (80-140 W)
latitude
mm day-1
C
43
Regional Ocean-Atmosphere Modeling
  • simulates realistic eastern Pacific climate.
  • is useful for testing ideas
  • Without SC, stratus cloud is 0.1-0.6 greater and
    SST 1-4 C cooler.
  • Thermodynamically coupled SST is essential to
    many sensitivity experiments.
  • IROAM will be validated against EPIC and VOCALS
    observations.

44
Eastern Paci?c coupled GCM biases
  • are largely due to incorrect seasonal cycle and
    meridional temperature asymmetry.
  • affect wind on the equator and cold tongue SST.
  • The mean state and seasonal cycle affect
    interannual variability.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com