Mechanical Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mechanical Systems

Description:

Thermal/micro-meteorite shield (MLI and ceramic blankets) Radiator (aluminum) ... Interface may need modification if ACD tile coverage is modified. Spacecraft ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: wwwglastS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mechanical Systems


1
GLAST Large Area Telescope Mechanical
Systems Martin Nordby Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center Mechanical Systems
Engineer nordby_at_slac.stanford.edu
2
Outline
  • Issues and Recommendations from previous reviews
  • Technical status
  • LAT analysis
  • Structural analysis
  • Thermal Systems Analysis
  • Interface design
  • Technical issues
  • Schedule
  • Cost issues

3
LAT Mechanical Layout
Thermal/micro-meteorite shield (MLI and ceramic
blankets)
Anticoincidence Detector (ACD) surrounds TKR
Tracker (TKR) mounts to top flange of Grid
Grid support structure (aluminum)
Radiators mounts to Grid and Spacecraft (SC)
Calorimeter (CAL) inside Grid
Electronics (Elec) mounts to CAL bottom plates
Heat pipes on top of Grid (aluminum)
Spacecraft mount points (4x)
Radiator (aluminum)
  • Radiator mounts to SC

LAT Model with Radiators and Subsystem Stay-Clears
4
Issues from May 2001 Quarterly Review
  • Transient thermal behavior of the LAT
  • Issue 1 transient behavior is driven by LAT,
    Radiator, and SC operating scenarios, none of
    which are well defined
  • Action GLAST operating scenarios being set and
    reflected in updated IRD Radiator and LAT
    operating scenarios becoming understood
  • Issue 2 transient response of LAT has never
    been modeled
  • Action 2 transient response of LAT and
    Radiators fully modeled, and design of thermal
    control system updated as a result More
    analysis in progress
  • LATSpacecraft interfaces
  • Issue design, structural and thermal interfaces
    are still immature
  • Action some progress during SC study still an
    issue
  • Grid prototyping
  • Issue prototype testing must be done to
    validate FEA model details
  • Action prototyping thus far shows design
    carries gt75 margin in CAL joint. Further CAL
    and Grid heat pipe prototyping underway

5
Recommendations from the Feb 2001 Review
  • Finish performance specifications by PDR
  • LAT-SP-00010 LAT Performance Spec revision
    in-progress to reflect better understanding of
    operations and thermal requirements
  • LAT-SS-00115-1-D4  Mechanical Systems Spec
    finished draft ready for approval by LAT project
  • Missing Mechanical Systems Level IV specs for
    Grid, Radiators, Thermal Control System being
    drafted now (drafts complete by PDR)
  • Finish interface control documents by PDR
  • LAT-DS-00038-2-D3  LAT Instrument Layout
  • LAT-SS-00273-1-D3  LAT-Cal Mech Interface
    Control Document
  • LAT-DS-00233-1  CAL-LAT Interface Definition
    Drawing
  • LAT-SS-00241-1-D2  LAT-ACD Mech Interface
    Control Document
  • LAT-TD-00224-1-D1  LAT Thermal Design Parameters
    Summary 
  • LAT-TD-00225-1-D1  LAT Dissipated Power for
    Thermal Design
  • LAT-TD-00227-1-D0  LAT Thermal Operations
    Assumptions
  • Missing TKR and Electronics Mechanical ICDs
    (drafts complete soon after PDR)

6
Structural Analysis
  • LAT2 finite element model delivered
  • Modal analysis results
  • Drum-head mode, F4 64.8 Hz
  • IRD Requirement gt 50 Hz
  • Structural analysis
  • Bowing of Grid closes 2.5 mm gap between TKR
    modules by 0.39 mm
  • LAT stiffness dependent on CAL bottom plate

Drumhead modeF4 64.8 Hz
-Torque test-Tensile test-Validate FEA model
with shear pull test
-Back out bolt forces-Design joint, pick bolt
Tensile Test ofCAL Joint
LAT Distorted-Shape Axial Deflection Contour Plot
Detail of FEA Model at CAL Mount
7
Thermal Systems Development
  • TSS reduced thermal radiation model delivered
  • LAT on-orbit transient thermal model complete
  • Used to characterize LAT performance due to
    varying environmental heat loads
  • Radiator development
  • Detailed Radiator thermal model complete
  • Design decisions
  • Two thermally coupled 2.7 m2 Radiators on
    opposing Y-sides
  • Variable-Conductance Heat Pipes to regulate
    Radiator active area, compensating for variations
    in heat loading
  • Active control system to operate VCHPs and keep
    LAT temperature stable to /- 3 oC
  • Detailed mechanical design and structural
    analysis just beginning
  • This is starting late, the result of delays in
    Radiator work start-up, and needed changes to
    their thermal design
  • Planning to catch up to schedule this fall

8
Thermal Systems Development (2)
  • LAT steady-state thermal behavior
  • 650 W of dissipated power
  • Grid bows 173 mm due to temperature gradients
  • TKR tips 22 arc-sec
  • Requirement 30 arc-min
  • LAT performance due to /- 3 oC swings in
    Radiator temperature
  • Transient temp gradients tip TKRs
  • Tipping 3.7 arc-sec
  • Req max misalignment 7 arc-sec
  • Response to time-varying process power draw
  • TKR tip 3.0 arc-sec for DP 68 W
  • Req tip lt 7 arc-sec for DP 350 W
  • Design mod shunt electronics heat directly to
    Radiators

Tmin -0.3 oC
Temp Variation for 5.25 Orbits(red Rad
interface, blue CAL plate)
Tip 3.7 arc-sec
Distorted-Shape Temperature Contour Plot(red
hotter)
9
Interface Design
  • CAL joint
  • Prototype testing underway Grid, bolt, joint
    design strength OK
  • Interface looks solid, with no surprises in view
  • TKR interface
  • Flexure design in place and TKR is prototyping
    joint for EM tests
  • Design looks good, but testing needs to resolve
    thermal, structural questions (how to align
    flexures affect of thermal gasket on structure)
  • ACD
  • Conceptual design in place, thermal interface
    design in-progress
  • Interface may need modification if ACD tile
    coverage is modified
  • Spacecraft
  • Interface development held up due to
    export-control issues
  • Legal hurdles recently cleared, and progress is
    now re-starting
  • Will not be able to baseline an interface design
    with SC before PDR

10
Technical Issues List
  • Specs and ICDs
  • Issue level 4 specs and ICDs are not yet
    complete
  • Response expect completion of 90 of drafts by
    PDR
  • Thermal systems development
  • Issue 1 Radiator design is immature for PDR
  • Response 1 Contractor is ramping up on
    personnel to develop conceptual design
  • Issue 2 Electronics thermal design is very
    immature
  • Response 2 Handling thermal transients by
    shunting power to Radiator is being baselined.
    Planning EM test and analysis of this
  • Spacecraft interface design
  • Issue Design has not matured adequately for PDR
  • Response Export-control issues have been
    resolved, and progress is re-starting. We will
    miss PDR, but expect conceptual baseline by early
    CY2002

11
Mechanical Systems Schedule
  • Scheduling
  • Mechanical Systems schedule is being
    final-checked for baseline
  • Check links to IT
  • Find and resolve budget phasing discrepancies
    between budget and cost-loaded PMCS schedule
  • Status
  • In general, we have slipped with respect to the
    schedule
  • Short staffing of budgeted positions
  • Late start of thermal contract
  • Expect to make up schedule variances during EM
    development, since this program is being scaled
    back
  • New IT Manager and Engineer will unload Mech
    Systems personnel from double-duty work
  • Thermal contract in-place (possibly approved
    today)

12
Cost Issues
  • Budget vs proposal estimate
  • Current budget of RYM8.5 is high by RYM3.5
  • Areas where cost grew
  • Corrections for lost system-level analysis,
    reserve, and overhead
  • Addition of EM test program, Qual. Grid test
    program
  • Issues in investigating de-scoping options
  • Engineering model
  • Current budget includes 700k for EM
    thermal-vacuum testing
  • We are planning to scale this back to a minimal
    EM program with moderate additional risk
  • Qual Grid
  • Qualification test of Grid and Radiators
    (thermal, mass models)
  • Budget includes 800k for Qual Grid fabrication
  • This reduces technical and schedule risk of qual
    testing flight hardware at the end of the program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com