Sex, Violence, and Complicity: Martin Amis and Ian McEwan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Sex, Violence, and Complicity: Martin Amis and Ian McEwan

Description:

Jennifer Arbach, Valerian Bowie, Ryan Scovell, Brooke Spake, Ben Suen, and Rachel Taylor ... It explains how debatable topics can influence the authors' reputation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:290
Avg rating:1.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Val1150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sex, Violence, and Complicity: Martin Amis and Ian McEwan


1
Sex, Violence, and ComplicityMartin Amis and
Ian McEwan
  • Jennifer Arbach, Valerian Bowie, Ryan Scovell,
    Brooke Spake,
  • Ben Suen, and Rachel Taylor

2
Introduction
  • This article serves as a tool to help understand
    the importance of controversial topics in Amis
    and McEwans works.
  • It explains how debatable topics can influence
    the authors reputation.
  • Kiernan Ryans article is not a rehash of the
    articles presented before.

3
Purpose of this Criticism
  • The purpose of this criticism is to draw a link
    between Martin Amis works and those of Ian
    McEwan.
  • Kiernan Ryans goal of the article is to show the
    emphasis placed on sex, violence, and complicity
    in the works of both authors.
  • A secondary purpose it to explain readers
    reactions to the novels written by Amis and
    McEwan.

4
Communication
  • The author does clearly communicate the issue.
  • Ryan gives facts and produces quotes from the
    texts to support his argument.
  • His use of language, however, does try to impress
    the audience.

5
Literary Focus
  • Focuses on the unique writing styles of the two
    authors.
  • There is major emphasis on negative and offensive
    topics.
  • His narratives habitually revolve around
    insufferable egotists and moronic dupes,
    heartless bastards and their helpless prey,
    tangled up in lethal webs of mutual manipulation
    and psychological torment (203).

6
Authors Argument
  • Ryan does not build on unfounded assumptions.
  • Ryan does not base his opinions on the works of
    other critics.
  • The article is built on the ideas and works of
    the books written by Amis and McEwan.
  • He does use previous interviews to support
    claims, but does not give any background
    information about them. (Audience cannot be sure
    that statements were not taken out of context.)

7
Method of Persuasion
  • The dominant method of persuasion is usage of
    repetitive themes from the authors works.
  • Ryan uses proof from the texts to justify his
    argument.
  • The individual works are then analyzed to make
    his argument understandable for the readers.

8
Thesis Statement
  • Two-part thesis.
  • The chief factor that guarantees such intense
    scrutiny is the reputation for outrageousness
    that both writers acquired early on, a reputation
    which has barnacled their books ever since,
    whether they have merited the melodramatic
    epithets attached to them or not (203).
  • Whether taunting or flouting the acceptable
    moral response, McEwan and Amis refuse to enlist
    the stock responses and routine pieties, and the
    consequences for the reader can be perplexing,
    especially when our noses are being thrust into
    what actually motivates and gratifies us, as
    distinct from what we would prefer to think makes
    us tick (204).

9
Argument Organization
  • The lengthy article alternates between McEwans
    and Amis novels.
  • The novels are grouped by common topics and
    themes.
  • The article transitions easily from one idea to
    the next. Everything is connected based on
    relativity.

10
Sub-points of Argument
  • Introduction of comparative writing styles Martin
    Amis and Ian McEwan.
  • Both novelists set out to vex and disturb. They
    repeatedly run the risk of antagonizing or
    offending their readers, and of attracting the
    charge of compliance with everything in which
    they should recoil (204).
  • The risk worth taking
  • Interviews with both writers.

11
Sub-points (Continued)
  • Writers Moral Responsibility (or lack there of)
  • Makes readers aware of own involvement and what
    helps in realization of true feelings.
  • Épater les bien-pensants
  • (Outraging the righteous, appalling the
    politically correct)
  • The delinquent, the demented, the vain, the
    lecherous and the vile are authorized in a manner
    that confers normality upon them and compels us
    to wonder whether they may not be the rule rather
    than the exception (207).

12
Sub-points (Continued)
  • Violence
  • -Holocaust (Times Arrow)
  • -Entropy, apocalypse, and Judgement Day
  • ? Using violence and time to warp
  • perceptions of life.
  • Sex
  • -Violence is eroticized and leads to more
  • sex. Pornographic actions more mainstream.
  • Both habits are corrosive and compulsive.

13
More Sub-points
  • Complicity- Having share in guilt.
  • -It is the preoccupation with complicity,
    however, that gives Amis and McEwans fiction
    its most distinctive twists complicity not
    merely as a theme, but as a condition of writing
    and a consequence of reading (212).
  • -Idea that complicity is not innate, but
    acquired.
  • ?Voice and narration- Most all are first-person.
  • -intimacy and secrets own admission of guilt.

14
Times Arrow
  • Withdrawal
  • Regression
  • Redemptive Defamiliarization
  • Domestic Violence
  • More recent scenes of commonplace male brutality
    are rewound too, sharpening our awareness of what
    these acts entail, the appeal for affection they
    betray and the fragile trust they violate (216).

15
Main Argument
  • The Author argues that Amis (and McEwan) writes
    his stories in a linked sort of pattern. Elements
    of ruthlessness, selfishness, greed and lechery,
    addiction and abuse, beat out the deep recurrent
    rhythms of his fiction (203). The same elements
    show up in all of his novels.
  • These patterns help audiences connect with the
    texts.
  • All of his novels intend to offend the good and
    politically correct. Ryan argues that Amis does
    not write to make people happy. He writes what is
    really happening and does not care to offend.

16
Reactions
  • Because we are not familiar with Amis other
    novels, we were all surprised to know that Amis
    uses the same elements in his books. It is very
    shocking to know why Amis writes the way that he
    does, but it also helps to explain those elements
    in Times Arrow.
  • The intended reaction is meant for those who have
    read and are familiar with the other novels.
    However, the group still got the intended
    reaction of realizing the connections and
    patterns between the texts.
  • Being that this article is very informative, the
    author does achieve the goal of helping the group
    understand Amis writing manner and the recurring
    elements.

17
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com