NLC Vibration Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

NLC Vibration Program

Description:

NLC Vibration Program – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ThomasWMa9
Category:
Tags: nlc | duet | program | vibration

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NLC Vibration Program


1
NLC Vibration Program
  • Tom Markiewicz/SLAC
  • MAC Meeting
  • November 2002

2
Beam Delivery RD Plan
  • In Progress
  • SLAC based work on inertial systems
  • Simple block capacitive sensor Himel
  • Long steel beam Himel
  • UBC work on Optical Anchor
  • Fast Feedback demonstration in NLCTA (FONT)
  • Additional Work Planned for FY2003
  • Measuring the vibration properties of a SC quad
    Parker
  • Measuring field position stability of SC
    Detector Solenoid
  • Investigate feasibility of cavity BPMs w/ 1nm
    resolution Himel
  • Future
  • Single beam tests that use 1-nm BPMs to
    demonstrate 1-nm stability
  • Realistic design of IP Girder prototype after we
    down-select magnet stabilization options

3
Differences from May 2000 Plan
  • Do NOT make building a realistic IP Girder an
    immediate priority
  • Discussion to follow
  • MUST begin to investigate vibration properties of
    SC magnets
  • Too important to leave to later
  • Nanometer-BPM RD with BEAM TESTS can answer many
    of vibration stability issues thought previously
    to be uniquely answerably by IP Girder LINX
    programs
  • Push nm-BPM program as much as possible

4
SLAC Inertial Vibration Stabilization Program
Joe Frisch, Tom HimelEric Doyle, Leif Eriksson,
Linda Hendrickson, Richard Partridge
3m magnet and 5.5m support have same
mechanical properties (mass, w) as final design
5
IP Girder Choices
  • Magnet Permanent or SC ?
  • Support Tube Details
  • Material / wall thickness / diameter
  • Resonance / stiffness requirements depend on
  • Support scheme (cantilevered?)
  • Sensor (inertial?)
  • Support (soft)
  • Activator (electrostatic pusher?)
  • Simulate Magnetic Coupling of QD0 to Detector
    Solenoid Fringe Field
  • 1000 lb. non-linear off-axis load on PM QD0
  • Static springs or use real solenoid

6
Final Doublet Technology Choice

REC Permanent Magnet w/ Adjustable Strength
Cold Bore SC Design
7
More Engineering IssuesHow Real do we have to be?
  • Vacuum
  • Implement mechanical design consistent with
    vacuum requirement (1 nTorr?) and 1cm radius beam
    pipe
  • May mean that 3m magnet is broken into pieces
  • Decide whether beam pipe hangs free of magnet or
    not
  • Nature of contact between QD0 magnet and the
    support tube
  • Static FFTB cams as opposed to a fully functional
    FFTB mover
  • Assembly
  • Joints and flanges which allow assembly and
    servicing must be designed and included
  • Do we need to support IP end of cantilever with a
    vibrating detector endcap door?

8
PeP-II IP Girder
A lot of work to do it right and, finally, the
Devil is in the Details
9
IP Girder Prototype
4.5m
  • To be useful must reflect final design
  • Basic technology choices are not in hand
  • Will learn much from the simple 3m prototype
  • Consensus at Nanobeam 2002 was nice but not
    necessary
  • Design of NLC IP on paper for alternate
    technology choices first

.5m
7m
10
Magnet Measurements
  • SC FD Quad See Brett Parkers talk
  • BNL Funds approved to wind test short prototype
    of cold mass
  • BNL group is forming that will address internal
    vibration issues
  • SC Detector Solenoid
  • Couples to QD0 through fringe field if m?1
  • Permanent magnet m1.
  • Directly steers beam through non-zero crossing
    angle
  • Plan to measure field stability in fringe region
    or coil vibration of a detector solenoid to begin
    to get some idea of the size of the problem
  • Adjustable Permanent Magnet
  • M. Kumada (Nat. Inst. of Radiological Sciences in
    Japan)
  • Nanobeam 2002 reports by Kumada, Iwashata
    Antokhin

11
Shintakes C-Band Cavity BPMs
1995 FFTB Tests 25 nm resolution _at_ 6 x 109 /
bunch
Resolution Theoretically sub-nmPractical
Limits -Common Mode Leakage -Angle
Alignment -Losses, Drifts Phase matching in
Cables, Filters, Mixers -Digitizers and Pulse
Shapers not optimized
12
Nanobeam 2002 Development
  • Off-Hand remark by TorIf we had nm BPMs we
    wouldnt need the beam-beam collision to verify
    nm-level vibration stability (LINX)
  • Joe Frisch/Steve Smith No problem in principle

4 C-Band ATF BPMs
  • Improvements
  • Digital Down Conversion Fast Scope (Drifts,
    resolution dynamic range)
  • New BPM design w/couplers that remove CM
  • Angle Adjustments Hardware
  • Improved S/N by using rad hard electronics on
    beamline

13
BPM RD Plan
  • October 2002 Discussions w/ ATF people
  • December 2002
  • Test one cavity w/ high gain electronics,
    tiltyaw control
  • March 2003
  • Array of 3 BPMs with independent tilt/yaw adjust,
    temperature control multi-channel readout on
    common concrete table or in specially design
    common support tube with full positioning
    adjustment capability (under design at LLNL)
  • Future
  • Stabilize array using inertial /or optical
    scheme
  • Create waist with quad array
  • stabilize magnet as well as BPM array(s)
  • A convincing demonstration that vibration problem
    is under control

14
Single Beam Vibration Stability Test
Spot Size
Magnet
BPM
BPM
Artists conception
15
Optical Anchor
Sub-nm resolution measuring fringes with
photodiodes ? drive piezos in closed loop
16
UBC RD on Interferometers
17
UBC RD on Interferometersfrom Nanobeam 2002
  • Test platform challenges
  • clean system
  • high natural frequency
  • Resonances
  • Bandwidth
  • Algorithms
  • Piezo stiffness

From 90 nm to 5 nm at 5 Hz
Stabilize mirror 10 Meters in Air RMS 25.4 nm
before, 0.27 nm after
18
FONT Beam Test on the NLCTA Very Fast
Intra-train IP Feedback
Kicker Amplifier
NLCTA
Kicker
NLC
4.5m
Round-trip Delay
BPM Processor
BPM
Colliding beams
Single beam
(short cable delays, long trip time)
(shorten trip time, lengthen cable delays)
19
NLCTA FONT Installation
Magnet assembly and X-band BPM installed onto
NLCTA downstream of RF structures.
Beam direction
Feedback loop
20
Feedback Performance vs. Gain
21
FONT Results 27 Sept 2002x10 Improvement in
Position
BPM for 5 Dipole Settings
After 1 Latency Period Position corrected
independent of gain, then loop turns off
As above but loop ON Beam stays corrected until
end of pulse
22
FONT Plans
  • Demonstrate removal of high-frequency 'static'
    structure in bunch position within train
  • Reduce latency validates delay-loop FB system
  • Addition of witness BPMs
  • current BPM is part of feedback loop
  • Demonstrate position FB in both x, y, x, y
  • Use solid-state kicker amp rather than tube amp
  • NLC only requires volts

23
FY 2003 Deliverables
  • For Sure
  • New inertial sensor
  • Results from 3m prototype w/ inertial sensor
  • Understanding of resolution limits of cavity BPMs
    by measuring relative motion of BPM array _at_ 1nm
    level at ATF
  • Fabrication of short SC prototype
  • Measurement of SC quad field vibration w.r.to
    cryostat
  • Incremental progress at UBC and FONT
  • Less Likely
  • Incorporate interferometer on 3m prototype
  • Stabilize array of nm-BPMs measure absolute
    stability
  • Measurement of one solenoid coil position or B
    in fringe region
  • Engineering sketch of NLC IR w/ Perm. Magnets
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com