UNIT 2: The Structure of Phrases and Clauses - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 108
About This Presentation
Title:

UNIT 2: The Structure of Phrases and Clauses

Description:

They sent their wives flowers on their wedding anniversaries. The Theta Criterion ... Robert sent flowers to his wife a box of candy. *Robert sent to his wife. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 109
Provided by: ricard7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UNIT 2: The Structure of Phrases and Clauses


1
UNIT 2 The Structure of Phrases and Clauses
  • English Syntax
  • Ricardo de Souza

2
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)
  • Relational Concepts.
  • Argument Structure.
  • Predication

3
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • VERB
  • Constituent selection, or c-selection.
  • Semantic selection, or s-selection.

4
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • SLEEP


5
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • SLEEP

  • Our children slept.
  • ?Our ideas slept.

6
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • SEE
  • Our children saw the concert.

  • Our children saw that the band isnt that good.
  • That the band isnt that good saw our children.

7
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • SEE


8
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • SEND

9
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)Verbs and their ?-grids
  • SEND

  • They sent their children to a boarding school.
  • They sent flowers to their wives.
  • They sent their wives flowers
  • They sent a boarding school their children.

10
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)
  • Arguments.
  • Adjuncts.

11
Theta-Theory (?-Theory)
  • They slept in a tent.
  • They slept well.
  • They saw that the band isnt that good yesterday.
  • They sent their wives flowers on their wedding
    anniversaries.

12
The Theta Criterion
  • Each argument must be associated with one and
    only one theta-role.
  • Each theta-role must be associated with one
    and only one argument.
  • p. 28

13
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion
  • A predicators (e.g. a lexical verb) ?-grid must
    be saturated.
  • A predicators (e.g. a lexical verb) ?-grid must
    not be either over-saturated or under-saturated.

14
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion
  • She slept her bed.
  • ?She slept her baby.
  • They saw that the band isnt that good the
    singer.
  • They saw.
  • Robert sent flowers to his wife a box of candy.
  • Robert sent to his wife.

15
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Locality and
Minimality in ?-marking
  • NPMary showed NPher sister CPwhy NPLouise
    had destroyed NPthe painting.
  • NP T AGT Mary showed NP T RECEIVER her
    sister CP T THM why Louise had destroyed the
    painting.
  • NPMary showed NPher sister CPwhy NP T AGT
    Louise had destroyed NP T THM the painting.

16
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Locality and
Minimality in ?-marking
  • NPMary showed NPher sister NPthe painting
    CPwhy NPLouise had destroyed.
  • NP T AGT Mary showed NP T RECEIVER her
    sister NP T THM the painting CP T ?? why
    Louise had destroyed the painting.
  • NPMary showed NPher sister NPthe painting
    CPwhy NP T AGT Louise had destroyed ?? T
    THM.

17
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to trace theory and movement
  • Which painting did Mary say that Louise had
    destroyed?
  • Which painting did NP T AGT Mary say CP T
    THM that Louise had destroyed?

18
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to trace theory and movement
  • Which painting did Mary say CP T THM that NP
    T AGT Louise had destroyed ?? T THM t ?
  • NP T THM Which painting did Mary say CP T
    THM that NP T AGT Louise had destroyed NP
    T THM t ?
  • NP T THM Which painting did Mary say CP T
    THM that NP T AGT Louise had destroyed?
  • NP T THM Which paintingi did Mary say CP T
    THM that NP T AGT Louise had destroyed NP
    T THM ti ?

19
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • PRO is a specialized NP.
  • In English, PRO is only licensed if
    INFL-finite.
  • PROs reference to an antecedent can be
    controlled by semantic properties of matrix
    clause verb.

20
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
    NP a new bicycle.

21
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
    NP a new bicycle.

22
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
    NP a new bicycle.

23
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
    NP a new bicycle.

24
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
    NP a new bicycle.

25
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • NP I persuaded NP John CP NP PRO to buy
    NP a new bicycle.

26
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • Object controlled PRO
  • I persuaded John PROi to buy a new bicycle.
  • I persuaded Johni PROi to buy a new bicycle.

27
Corollaries of the Theta Criterion Introduction
to the empty category PRO
  • Subject controlled PRO
  • I promised John PROi to buy a new bicycle.
  • Ii promised John PROi to buy a new bicycle.

28
Non-Verbal ?-Role Assigners
  • Deverbal nouns.
  • Adjectives
  • Some prepositions.

29
Non ?-Role Assigners
  • The copula.
  • Other copular verbs.

30
Noun Phrases That Are Not ?-Marked
  • Adjunct NPs.
  • Expletive IT.
  • Expletive THERE.

31
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • An endocentric (head centered) view of phrase
    structure.
  • An architecture that predicts relationships
    between heads and other elements within a
    constituent.
  • A recursive view of syntax.

32
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • Take X, any given lexical or functional head.
  • X0 is a minimum projection.
  • X X0 Compl(X). X is an intermediate
    projection.
  • XP Spec(X) X. XP (or X) is a maximum
    projection.

33
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
XP
X
Spec (X)
  • X

Compl(X)
34
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
NP
N
Spec
PP
  • N

DET
book
P
NP
the
about
grammar
35
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • An endocentric (head centered) view of phrase
    structure.

36
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • That book of poems is fabulous.
  • That book of poems are fabulous.

37
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
NP
N
Spec
CP
  • N

DET
that the teacher recommended
N
PP
the
P
NP
book
about
grammar
38
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • An architecture that predicts relationships
    between heads and other elements within a
    constituent.
  • A complement is the heads sister.
  • An adjunct is the sister of X-bar.

39
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
NP
Spec
N
  • N

PP
DET
P
NP
book
the
Spec
N
about
N
PP
DET
NP
P
the
grammar
semitic languages
of
40
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • A recursive view of syntax.

41
The Architecture of Clauses
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Helen
study
grammar
42
The Architecture of Clauses
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Helen
last term
V
NP
study
grammar
43
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • Helen studied grammar last term.
  • Helen studied last term grammar.

44
The Architecture of Phrases X-Bar Syntax
  • A complement is the heads sister.
  • In VPs an argument (?-marked constituent) is
    normally the complement.
  • In VPs, an adjunct is a sister of V.

45
The Complementizer Phrase
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
DET
CP
V
past
C
IP
Helen
think
Spec
I
that
I
VP
NP
past
V
AdjP
syntax
be
easy
46
The Complementizer Phrase
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
NP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
shocked
PRN
that
VP
I
NP
V
past
us
John
resign
47
Clauses are CPs
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
48
Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
49
Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
50
Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
51
Questions I-to-C Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
did
VP
  • I

NP
t
V
NP
Helen
study
grammar
52
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
53
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
grammar
54
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
?
55
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
?
56
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
t
57
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
t
58
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
study
t
59
Questions WH Movement
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
What
I
Spec
did
VP
  • I

NP
V
t
NP
Helen
study
t
60
Agreement Setting the Problem
IP
I
Spec
VP
I
NP
the teacher
?
V
PP
after lunch
V
PP
talk
to his students
61
Agreement Setting the Problem
  • The teacher talks to his students after lunch.
  • The teacher talked to his student after lunch
  • The teachers talk to their student after lunch
  • The teacher talk to his student after lunch.
  • The teacher ed talk to his student after lunch.

62
Agreement
IP
Spec
I
NP
  • I

...
number
person
number
person
/-finite
63
Agreement
IP
Spec
I
NPthe teacher
  • I

...
number -pl
person 3rd
number -pl
person 3rd
/-finite
64
Agreement Some Proposals
  • Agreement takes place between SPEC(X) and X.
  • Agreement involves specific features such as
    number, person, and gender.
  • In contemporary theory, such features are called
    phi-features, or f-features.
  • The relevant f-features in English are number
    and person.

65
Agreement Some Proposals
  • Languages vary with respect to AGR feature
    strength.
  • Languages can be considered strong AGR AGR,
    or weak AGR -AGR.
  • English can be considered -AGR, whereas French,
    for example, is AGR.
  • In English, morphologically relevant agreement is
    seen when there is a combination of the
    f-features number-pl person3rd, and the
    tense feature finite -past.

66
Just to recollect...
  • The teacher talks to his students after lunch.
  • The teachers talk to their student after lunch
  • The teacher talk to his student after lunch.

67
The Ban on Stray Affixes...
  • The teacher s talk to his student after lunch.
  • The teacher ed talk to his student after lunch.

68
...And Agreement Related Movement
  • Affix lowering.
  • Verb raising.

69
Agreement and Affix Lowering
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
  • I

NP
VP
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
number -pl
V
NP
often
person 3rd
person 3rd
this book
read
70
Agreement and Affix Lowering
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
  • I

NP
VP
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
V
NP
often
person 3rd
this book
read
s
71
Agreement and Affix Lowering
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
  • I

NP
VP
-past
Adv
Louise
t
V
NP
often
this book
read
s
72
Affix Lowering Verb Raising Some Proposals
  • In -AGR languages, affixes lower to V.
  • In AGR languages, Vs raise to I.
  • Check French data on p. 90, sentence 162(a).
  • In English, a -AGR language, verbal morphemes
    which are not VP heads also raise to I.

73
Agreement and Auxiliary Verb Raising
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
  • I

NP
Perf P
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
number -pl
Perf
VP
often
person 3rd
person 3rd
V
NP
HAVE en
this book
read
74
Agreement and Auxiliary Verb Raising
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
  • I

NP
Perf P
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
Perf
VP
often
person 3rd
V
NP
s
HAVE en
this book
read
75
Agreement and Auxiliary Verb Raising
IP
I
Spec
AdvP
  • I

NP
Perf P
-past
Adv
Louise
number -pl
Perf
VP
often
person 3rd
V
NP
HA
s
t
this book
read
76
Just to recollect
  • Louise will often read this book.
  • Louise often reads this book
  • Louise has often read this book
  • Louise reads often this book.
  • Louise often has read this book.

77
Agreement and The Copula
  • The Copula (Verb to BE) is an exceptional verb.
  • As we have seen, it does not assign ?-roles.
  • Also, it is a head of VP that raises to I in
    English.

78
Agreement and The Copula
  • Louise is often interested in this sort of book.
  • Louise often is interested in this sort of book.

79
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
a good student
be
80
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
number -pl
number -pl
a good student
be
person 3rd
person 3rd
81
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
a good student
be
82
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
past
NP
Helen
a good student
83
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
was
NP
Helen
a good student
t
84
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
V
NP
Helen
a good student
t
85
Cyclic Copula Movement in Questions
CP
C
Spec
IP
C
I
Spec
was
VP
  • I

NP
V
NP
Helen
t
a good student
t
86
Case Theory Brief Overview
  • Case is a morphosyntactic operation that relates
    to grammatical relations such as Subject, Object
    and Oblique.
  • Pronouns are morphologically marked for case in
    English.
  • All NPs are abstractly marked for case.

87
The Case Filter in English
  • All overt NPs must be case-assigned.
  • PRO must not be case-assigned.

88
Case Theory Brief Overview
  • Case is an essential operation for NP licensing.
  • NPs must be licensed to become interpretable.
  • NPs must abide by case assignment principles to
    generate grammatical clauses.

89
Case Assignment in English
  • A finite Inflection assigns NOMINATIVE case to
    SPEC(IP).
  • Most transitive verbs assign ACCUSATIVE case to
    their complements.
  • Prepositions assign ACCUSATIVE case to their
    complements.
  • NPs in DET position inherit GENITIVE case.

90
Case Theory Some Facts
  • I want to succeed in this task.
  • I want Mary to succeed in this task.
  • I want her to succeed in this task.
  • To succeed in this task is nearly impossible.
  • For us to succeed in this task is nearly
    impossible.

91
Case Theory Some Facts
  • Me want to succeed in this task.
  • I want she to succeed in this task.
  • We to succeed in this task is nearly impossible.
  • For we to succeed in this task is nearly
    impossible.

92
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
93
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
ACC
94
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
ACC
NOM
95
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Helen
see
Bill
ACC
NOM
96
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
She
see
Bill
ACC
NOM
97
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
She
see
him
ACC
NOM
98
Case Assignment
IP
I
Spec
VP
  • I

NP
past
V
NP
Her
see
he
ACC
NOM
99
Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
NP
P
succed
in
this task
100
Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
this task
101
Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
this task
ACC
102
Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
Ø
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
it
ACC
103
Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
for
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
PRO
NP
P
succed
in
it
ACC
ACC
104
Case Assignment
IP
Spec
I
  • I

VP
CP
AdjP
V
IP
C
past
I
Spec
be
be
impossible
for
VP
VP
I
NP
- finite
V
PP
us
NP
P
succed
in
it
ACC
ACC
105
Inherent Genitive Case
  • The rich schools teachers went on a strike.
  • The rich school teachers went on a strike.

106
Inherent Genitive Case
NP
Spec
N
DET
N
NP
teachers
VP
DET
N
AdjP
  • the

N
rich
school
107
Inherent Genitive Case
NP
Spec
N
DET
N
NP
teachers
VP
DET
N
AdjP
  • the

N
rich
school
108
The rich school teachers
NP
AdjP
Spec
N
Adj
DET
N
rich
the
N
N
school
teacher
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com