A Lancaster Cardiff collaboration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

A Lancaster Cardiff collaboration

Description:

The study of individual differences at the genetic level (genes and SNPs) ... (Brock et al) Department of Health. There will then be the option to test people ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: SSO68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Lancaster Cardiff collaboration


1
A Lancaster Cardiff collaboration
2
Priorities in pharmacogenomics
  • Ruth Chadwick
  • Lancaster

3
Outline
  • Priority of pharmacogenomics
  • Priorities in pharmacogenomics
  • Principles
  • Patient groups
  • Products
  • Prerequisites

4
Pharmacogenetics
  • The study of individual differences at the
    genetic level (genes and SNPs) influencing
    response to drugs

5
(No Transcript)
6
Pharmacogenomics
  • The application of whole genome research,
    enabling associations to be made between specific
    drugs and genetic factors

7
Priority of pharmacogenomics
  • From medicalisation to geneticisation to pgx
  • Only connect.
  • Nutrition and nutrigenomics

8
Renaissance?
  • The Renaissance period of world history is
    analogous to the renewal of healthcare that will
    arise from pharmacogenomic discoveries
  • (Brock et al)

9
Department of Health
  • There will then be the option to test people
  • for a predisposition to disease, or a higher
    than normal risk. Treatment, lifestyle advice
    and monitoring aimed at disease prevention could
    then be tailored appropriately to suit each
    individual

10
Safety and efficacy
  • Functional foods
  • Undermining the boundary between foods and drugs

11
Priorities in pharmacogenomicsPrinciplesPatien
ts and populationsProductsPrerequisites
12
(1) Principles
  • Safety and efficacy avoiding harm and promoting
    benefit
  • The negative-positive distinction
  • Equity
  • Individual and community

13
Genetic exceptionalism
  • Weight of argument against the thesis
  • Pharmacogenetic exceptionalism

14
Equity
  • Pharmacogenomics has the potential either to
    increase or decrease health inequalities
  • Loss of access to existing drugs
  • Absence of therapy orphan patients

15
The negative-positivedistinction
  • Greater moral urgency of suffering
  • Above all, do no harm
  • But what about the failure to prevent harm?

16
Individual and collective
  • The more the promises are individualised, the
    more collective action is required

17
Individualism?
  • Informed consent
  • Association studies and databases
  • Individual and collective identity

18
Principles of priority-setting
  • Priorities for whom?
  • Diseases of globalisation
  • Economic criteria
  • Criteria of fairness

19
(2) Patient groups
  • Children
  • Draft regulation of the European Parliament and
    the Council of the European Union on medicinal
    products for pediatric use

20
Draft regulation
  • It is essential to ensure that pharmaco-vigilance
    mechanisms are adopted, in specific cases, to
    meet the challenges of collecting robust safety
    data in children, including data on possible
    long-term effects

21
Implications for children
  • Genetic testing?
  • Genetic profiling at birth?
  • Medication for life?

22
(3) Products
  • New medicines
  • Me-toos
  • Existing medicines

23
Existing medicines
  • Once medicines are no longer protected by
    patents, little financial incentive to refine
    their use, especially if this refinement means
    that fewer patients are advised to take the
    medicine (Nuffield Council on Bioethics)

24
Generics
  • Manufacturers of generic medicines have limited
    funds for investing in R D (Nuffield Council
    on Bioethics)

25
(4) Prerequisites
  • Public acceptability
  • Quality control

26
Quality control
  • External quality assessment schemes (EQAs) of
    genetic tests in Europe have demonstrated a low
    but significant error rate in cystic fibrosis
    testing
  • Implications of vast increase in volume of tests

27
Quality control
  • Model for quality control activities at early
    gene mapping workshops, where each new putative
    linkage relationship was discussed by a panel of
    experts
  • Validated genomic information in an open database
    (cf HUGO Statement 2002)

28
Public and professional acceptability
  • The greater the precision, the more reliance is
    placed on compliance
  • Acceptability of what?
  • Public engagement moves upstream

29
A Lancaster Cardiff collaboration
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com