Mid Trent Cancer Network Information Prescriptions the story so far

1
Mid Trent Cancer NetworkInformation
Prescriptions the story so far

• Elaine Wilson Nurse Director/Project Lead
• Sheila Williamson Project Manager

2
Why are we here?

• Mid Trent Cancer Network Information
  Prescriptions Pilot
• To share with you the work that we are doing
• To get your views
• To explore opportunities for developing
  Information Prescriptions in primary care

3
Origins of the pilot

• Our health, our care, our say (DH, 2006) outlined
  a vision that by December 2008
• Everyone with a long term condition or social
  care need and their carers would be given an
  information prescription
• Information prescriptions will become a routine
  part of care, just like prescriptions for
  medicine

4
Information Prescriptions Pilot

• Department of Health IP pilots
• 20 pilot sites nationally covering
• Cancer
• Mental Health
• Long term conditions (asthma, diabetes, COPD)
• Arthritis,
• Parkinsons Disease
• Cystic Fibrosis
• Sight loss
• Deaf and hard of hearing
• Development started in March 2007 and the first
  prescriptions issued in July2007

5
Where we started from

• With a blank sheet of
• paper and a lot of questions!
• What is an information prescription?
• How is it different to what we do already?
• Why is it called a prescription?
• Is this just another DH must do?
• How can this make a difference?
• How will we ever get clinicians on board with
  this?

6
What is an information prescription (IP)?

• Cancerbackup definition
• A source of personalised information that lays
  out clearly
• and simply the salient points about an
  individuals
• consultation with a healthcare professional about
  their
• diagnosis, treatment and/or care plan and points
  the way
• to other relevant sources of high quality
  information and
• support. It is designed to improve the dialogue
  between
• patients and health professionals and enhance the
  valuable
• face-to-face time within consultations.

7
How we choose the clinical areas for the pilot?

• Previous work carried out in developing
  information pathways for 3 clinical conditions
• Head and neck cancers
• Lung cancers
• Gynaecological cancers

8
The approach?

• Engagement - a key feature
• Steering group chaired
• by a carer and with patient
• members
• Stakeholder event
• 10 guiding messages
• Gaining ownership
• Involvement of clinical teams

9
The approach?

• Involvement of voluntary sector
• Information centres
• Cancerbackup
• Macmillan Cancer Support
• Marie Curie Cancer Care
• Continuous improvement approach
• Lets have a go!
• We wont get it right first time!
• Small step changes
• What we end up with may be
• different from what we start with

10
The Process for Delivering IPs?
11
What progress hasbeen made?

• There is clear ownership of project within health
  communities and the clinical teams
• The template and operational policy have been
  developed and agreed across
• 3 health communities
• 3 clinical pathways
• 3 Acute Hospital Trusts covering 7 hospital sites

12
What progress has been made?

• 99 IPs issued to date
• IPs being issued at all points on the pathways
• IP template close to final format
• 15 out of 18 CNSs now issuing IPs
• Some medical consultants now involved in issuing
  IPs
• Interest from other cancer pathways
• Interest from SHA Long Term Conditions group

13
Evaluation at two levels

• Local evaluation
• Focus groups with CNSs
• Discovery interviews with patients and carers
• National evaluation
• GfKNoP questionnaires to patients/carers and
  people issuing IPs
• Economic analysis York University

14
Benefits of IPs for patients and carers - 1

• Anecdotal data
• CNSs are seeing people bringing
• the IP back for follow up consultations
• It provides a plan
• Avoids duplication or repetition of information
• Brings all the pieces of information together

15
Benefits of IPs for patients and carers - 2

• People like
• having the diagnosis written down in a way in
  which they understand what it means
• having a diagram/picture to help explain
• having a point of contact written down

16
Benefits of IPs for Health Care Professionals - 1

• Focus group feedback
• IPs are providing
• a record of the patients consultation
• record of what information has been offered and
  given to patients avoiding duplication
• a focus on patient information needs and how
  these are met
• The IP pilot and process is improving the quality
  of information provided

17
Benefits of IPs for Health Care Professionals - 2

• Focus group feedback from CNSs
• Facilitating team working
• Facilitating CNS access to pre - diagnosis part
  of the patient pathway
• Consultants are becoming more involved in
  information giving
• There is transferability of the template and
  process to patients with non-cancer diagnosis

18
Could this work in Primary Care ?

• Currently the pilot IP does not cover the
  pre-diagnosis stage
• Are there information gaps between GP referral
  and attending clinics?
• Could an IP improve these?
• Could an IP help with communication between
  primary and secondary care?
• Are there any other areas in the cancer pathways
  where IPs could improve care?
• Are there other conditions managed predominantly
  in primary care where the IP would benefit
  patients and carers?