ConvectionDiffusion Analyze based on Hermite Interpolation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

ConvectionDiffusion Analyze based on Hermite Interpolation

Description:

Convection-Diffusion Analyze based on Hermite Interpolation. Part II: Results and Discussion ... Both Lagrange and Hermit interpolation can give reasonable solution. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Hams1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ConvectionDiffusion Analyze based on Hermite Interpolation


1
Convection-Diffusion Analyze based on Hermite
Interpolation
  • Part II Results and Discussion
  • By Yifei Dai and Luling Yang

2
Compare Hermit and Lagrange
  • Both Lagrange and Hermit interpolation can give
    reasonable solution.
  • We noticed that when D0, Lagrange quadratic
    interpolation gave a better solution than Hermit
    interpolation.

3
Peclet Number and Courant Number
  • Peclet Number
  • Courant Number
  • viewed as a guide to minimizing numerical
    dispersion and oscillation
  • For different scheme, Peclet number has different
    criteria.

4
Peclet Number
5
Peclet Number
6
Peclet Number
7
Courant Number
8
Courant Number
9
Courant Number
10
Time Discretization Schemes
Implicit fraction 0 fully explicit
1 fully implicit
0.5 Crank-Nicolson
11
Fully Explicit Scheme
  • System matrix is symmetric
  • System Matrix M
  • Strict constrain on time step to keep
  • stable solution.

12
Fully Explicit Scheme
13
Fully Explicit Scheme
14
Fully Explicit Scheme
15
Fully Implicit Scheme
  • Implicit fraction1
  • System matrix is unsymmetrical
  • Contain convection matrix which is
  • not symmetric
  • No constrain for stable solution
  • -We found for implicit fractiongt0.5,this
    will always be true.
  • Smaller time step will result in more accurate
    solution.

16
Fully Implicit Scheme
17
Fully Implicit Scheme
18
Fully Implicit Scheme
19
Lumping of Mass Matrix M
  • Diagonalization for simplification the problem to
    increase efficiency
  • Only useful for fully explicit scheme
  • Will decrease the accuracy of the solution.

20
Lumping of Mass Matrix M
21
Lumping of Mass Matrix M
  • Lumping will increase efficiency for fully
    explicit scheme
  • Strict constrain for stability exists in fully
    explicit scheme
  • The effect of lumping and stability constrain
    will counteract each other.
  • Accuracy decrease observed.

22
Lumping of Mass Matrix M
23
Lumping of Mass Matrix M
  • We have not observed any increment of efficiency
    for implicit scheme
  • The simplification caused by lumping will
    decrease the accuracy of solution.

24
Conclusion
  • Peclet and Courant number criteria provide the
    necessary conditions for the mesh design and
    selection of time steps
  • Fully implicit scheme has higher efficiency but
    strict constrain of stability
  • We prefer partial implicit scheme instead of
    lumping to increase efficiency.

25
Future Work
  • Analyze the problem with only fixed Ess. B.C.
  • Analyze higher order Hermite interpolation

26
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com