Reasoning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Reasoning

Description:

Syllogisms are more difficult if there are many different ... form of the premises of a syllogism influences expectations about the form of the conclusion ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: joannaracz
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reasoning


1
Reasoning
  • Mental Models and Reasoning
  • Typical Reasoning Errors

Solso Chapter 14
2
Mental models
  • Imagery propositional representation (Philip
    Johnson-Laird)
  • Schemata in action naïve theories
  • Mental models are spatial, dynamic and concrete

3
  • Surprisingly inaccurate

4
  • Participant 1 ...momentum is a force that has
    been exerted and put into the ball... The moving
    object has the force of momentum and since there
    is no force to oppose ... It will continue on...
  • Participant 2 ...eventually the horizontal
    force would no longer have an effect, and it
    would be a straight downward motion...
  • Participant 3 ...the momentum from the curve
    gives the ball the arc... The force that the ball
    picks up from the curve eventually dissipates and
    it will follow a normal straight line...
  • a mover...impresses in a
    moving body a certain impetus or force ... in
    the direction toward which the mover was moving
    the body, either up, or down, or laterally, or
    circularly... But that impetus is continually
    decreased by the resisting air and by the
    gravity...

Buridan, XIVc.
5
  • Theories of movement similar to prenewtonian
    physics! (impetus theory)
  • Momentum (impetus) inside the ball that
    dissipates self-expending or because of other
    forces (e.g., does not dissipate in a vacuum)
  • Impetus is gained by pushed but not by carried
    object (plane)
  • Mental Models usually work, even if they are
    inaccurate
  • Navigation in Micronesia

6
  • Mental models studied in cog. psych
  • devices (Hegarty and Just, 1993),
  • electricity (Gentner Gentner, 1983),
  • computers (Norman, 1988),
  • home heating systems (Kempton, 1986),
  • navigation (Hutchins, Tversky),
  • ecology (Kempton et al. 1995).
  • Methods of studying
  • Interviews think aloud protocols patterns of
    answers rt eye-movements patterns of retention
    for new materials in the domain.
  • Why study inaccurate models?
  • Important for learning processes
  • Important for design
  • Explain some types of reasoning errors

7
Mental Models and Reasoning
  • Knowledge -gt transformation of knowledge
  • Logical reasoning involves building a mental
    model of the premises (Johnson-Laird)
  • Models are concrete

8
  • All artists are beekeepers
  • Some of the beekeepers are chemists
  • --------
  • Some of the artists are chemists
  • Syllogisms are more difficult if there are many
    different mental models fitting the premises
  • Models are based on typical (stereotypical)
    situations
  • Some models are easier to create

9
If a card has a vowel on one side, then it has an
even number on the other side. Select only the
card(s) that need to be turned over to validate
this rule. Wasons selection task
10
  • Each check over 50 has to be signed by the
    manager. Which check(s) do you have to turn over
    in order to see if the rule is obeyed?

11
  • Abstract/concrete content
  • All A are B
  • All C are B
  • All A are C
  • All Republicans are human
  • All Democrats are human
  • All Republicans are Democrats

12
  • Other biases in syllogistic reasoning
  • Belief bias
  • All of the Frenchmen are wine drinkers.
  • Some of the wine drinkers are gourmets.
  • Therefore, some of the Frenchmen are gourmets.
  • All of the doctors are rich.
  • Some of the rich people are bankers.
  • Therefore, some of the doctors are bankers.

13
  • Atmosphere effect the form of the premises of a
    syllogism influences expectations about the form
    of the conclusion
  • Conversion error (symmetrical relations) All A
    are B means that All B are A Some A are not
    B Some B are not A

14
  • Individual differences in reasoning performance
  • Evans 2003 dual-system theories of reasoning
  • System 1 rapid, parallel, automatic,
    belief-based
  • System 2 slow, sequential, conscious,
    logic-based
  • Differences in intelligence associated with s2
    functioning
  • Less belief-bias in people with higher
    intelligence
  • Different brain areas active when responses
    correct and incorrect
  • Stanovich West (1998) intelligence predicted
    better performance on abstract version of the
    Wason task

15
  • Are humans rational?
  • Inadequate models, errors in logical thinking...
  • Reisberg, 1997 One might draw rather cynical
    conclusions... Human reasoning is fundamentally
    flawed
  • Wason, 1983 It could be argued that
    irrationality rather than rationality is the
    norm.

16
  • Logical reasoning and the ability to cope in
    everyday life
  • Heuristics are cost-efficient, allow for fast
    decisions (reasonably accurate)
  • Errors are less grave than they seem may stem
    from interpretation problems natural language
    operators (if...then ? if and only if...then or
    ?xor)
  • Is math invented or discovered?
  • Yes!
  • However we do make errors (factors such as
    expertise, explicitly given assumptions or
    motivation do not seem to significantly improve
    performance)

17
Rationality
  • Probabilistic approach (Chater and Oaksford,
    2001)
  • People do not make use of logic-based systems
  • They make decisions on the basis of incomplete
    information or too much (redundant) information
  • Searching for most useful information
  • Often failing to provide a complete
    representation of a problem (Johnson-Laird,
    mental models)
  • Bounded rationality, situated in the environment
  • Simon (1990) Human rational behaviour is shaped
    by a scissors whose two blades are the structure
    of task environments and the computational
    capabilities of the actor.

18
(No Transcript)
19
Judgement and Decision Making
  • Based on inductive reasoning, estimating
    probabilities, also prone to errors (Kahneman
    Tversky)
  • Availability heuristic (easier to generate
    examples greater probability)
  • Representativeness heuristic
  • BBBGGG or BGGBGB
  • In a certain hospital 65 boys and 35 girls were
    born in 1 day. Is it more probable in a small or
    a large hospital?
  • Conjunction error (belief that the combination of
    2 events is more likely than one of the 2 events
    alone)

20
  • Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken and very
    bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student
    she was deeply concerned with issues of
    discrimination and social justice.
  • Rank the probabilities
  • Linda is a bank teller Linda is a feminist
    Linda is a feminist bank teller

21
  • Combining probablilities e.g., changing belief
    in the probability of a hypotesis in the light of
    new evidence
  • Bayes theorem
  • P(E/H)P(H)
  • P(H/E) ---------------------
  • P(E/H)P(H) P(E/H)P(H)
  • If a test to detect a disease whose prevalence is
    1/1000 has a false positive rate of 5, what is
    the chance that a person found to have a positive
    result actually has the disease?

22
  • Harvard Medical School (staff and students)
  • 45 estimated the probability of 95 (neglecting
    base-rate probability)
  • 18 gave the correct answer 2
  • 50 out of 1000 people will give a misleading
    positive finding (and only 1 in 1000 has a
    disease), thus
  • There is 50 times more false positive results
    than true positive results, thus
  • There is only a 2 chance that a person testing
    positive has the disease

23
  • Decision making
  • Maximizing utility?
  • Loss aversion people are more sensitive to
    potential losses than to potential gains
  • Will not bet 20 heads, -10 tails
  • Choose 800 for sure over 85 probability of
    1000
  • Bounded rationality. Heuristic of satisficing
  • Choosing the first option that meets the
    individuals minimum requirements

24
Problem solving Generating solutions, selection
  • Identifying a problem
  • Rarely a topic of cognitive psychology (Gestalt
    problem stems from tension between perception
    and memory)
  • Problem representation
  • Functional fixedness (Gestalt tendency to
    perceive things in terms of their familiar uses)
  • Creativity cognitive activity that results in a
    novel way of viewing a problem overcoming
    functional fixedness, cultural blocks

25
  • Remote Associations Test (Mednick, 1967)
  • Find a logically associated word
  • (RED, BRIDGE, ANGRY)
  • Divergence Production Test (Guilford, 1967)
  • Find possible uses for a comb, a button....
  • Geneplore model (generate (based on previous
    knowledge) and explore). Increasing creativity
    generating representations before thinking of
    possible uses for them (Ward et al. 1992)
  • Solution as representational change
  • Change in representational structure
    (elaboration, constraint relaxation, re-encoding)
    -gt retrieval of appropriate cues from LTM
    (Ohlsson, 1992)
  • VI VII I IV III I

26
  • Choosing strategy
  • Means-end analysis
  • Note the difference between the current state of
    the problem and the goal state
  • Form a subgoal that will reduce the difference
  • Select a mental operator that will permit
    attainment of the subgoal
  • Hill-climbing considering next step, choosing
    one that brigs you closer to the goal.
  • Working backwards starting from the end

27
  • Progress monitoring (rate of progress)
  • Failing progress criterion -gt change of strategy
  • Much greater sensitivity to constraint relaxation
    after experience of criterion failure (e.g. 9-dot
    problem)

28
Transfer of training
  • Positive and negative transfer
  • Far and near transfer
  • Problem solving by analogy
  • In science a computer model of human cognition
    a billiard-ball model of gases, etc.
  • Noticing similarities in structure
  • Dunckers radiation problem

29
  • Patient with a malignant tumour in his stomach
    can only be saved by a special kind of ray.
    However ray of suficient strength to destroy the
    tumour will also destroy the healthy tissue,
    whereas a ray that will not harm the healthy
    tissue will be too weak to destroy the tumour.
  • 10 correct solutions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com