The Bosnian Crisis 1908 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Bosnian Crisis 1908

Description:

The Bosnian Crisis 1908 THE BALKANS The Balkans is the name given to a large area in South-East Europe. As this map shows, it contains a complex mixture of cultures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:833
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: PauloC4
Category:
Tags: bosnian | crisis | groups | hate

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Bosnian Crisis 1908


1
The Bosnian Crisis 1908
2
THE BALKANS
  • The Balkans is the name given to a large area in
    South-East Europe.
  • As this map shows, it contains a complex mixture
    of cultures with a long history of distrust and
    conflict.

3
The Balkans in the early 20th century
  • The Balkans were a seething mixture of competing
    ambitions between imperial powers and increasing
    nationalism, as shown by this map.

4
Views of the Balkans
  • The whole of the Balkans is not worth the bones
    of a single Pomeranian grenadier. (Bismarck)
  • Some damn thing in the Balkans will set it (i.e.
    the next war) off (Bismarck again)
  • The whole world is festeringWith unhappy
    souls.The French hate the Germans,The Germans
    hate the PolesItalians hate Yugoslavs,South
    Africans hate the Dutch,And I don't like anybody
    very much
  • Kingston Trio Merry Minuet

5
Clash of empires - Turkey
  • Turkey was referred to as the Sick Man of
    Europe.
  • Turkey still retained control of some territories
    in the Balkans area, which were left over from
    conquests centuries ago.

6
Clash of Empires - Russia
  • Russia had always had an interest in developing
    trade through their ice-free Black Sea ports.
  • Turkey controlled access between the
    Mediterranean and Black Seas.
  • Russia supported the interests of fellow Orthodox
    Slavs
  • Russias interest in the Balkans was to have
    allies that would support her in her desire to
    have open access to the Mediterranean Sea

7
Clash of Empires Austria-Hungary
  • Austria-Hungary had gained control of some areas
    in the northern Balkans which were part of her
    multi-cultural empire.
  • Austria-Hungary was concerned about nationalist
    unrest, especially the growing rise of Serbia.
  • Austria-Hungary feared that other nationalities
    under its control would agitate to split from the
    empire.

8
Pan-Slavism
  • This historical force was the idea that all those
    groups of Slavic origin should combine together
    into one large independent state.
  • Serbia saw itself as the core of this new
    Pan-Slavic state.
  • Austria-Hungary saw the desire for Slav
    nationalism as a direct threat to its empire.
  • Russias support for Serbia created tension with
    Austria-Hungary.

9
The Young Turks
  • In 1908, the Turkish Sultan Abdul-Hamid II was
    forced to accede to the demands of the Young
    Turks, a group of army officers who demanded that
    constitutional rule be restored in Turkey.

10
Austria-Hungarys opportunity
  • Austria-Hungary wanted to prevent these Young
    Turks from regaining control of Bosnia and
    Herzegovina.
  • Aerenthal, the Austrian Foreign Minister (right)
    arranged a secret meeting was with his Russian
    counterpart Alexander Isvolsky.

11
The secret deal
  • Aerenthal and Isvolsky (right) secretly agreed
    that Austria would support Russian moves to gain
    its warships free access to the Mediterranean
    from the Black Sea.
  • In return Austria-Hungary would annex Bosnia and
    Herzegovina.

12
The deal falls apart
  • Isvolsky needed to return to Russia to brief the
    Tsars government about this deal, and to get
    support from Britain and France for the deal.
  • However, before this was achieved, the Austrians
    went ahead with the annexation of Bosnia and
    Herzegovina.
  • Austria-Hungarys action caused international
    concern.

13
Relations worsen
  • Serbia was outraged by Austrias annexation, and
    appealed to Russia for help in fighting the
    annexation.
  • Russia was too weak from its defeat by Japan, and
    instead called for an international conference to
    settle the issue.
  • Austria-Hungary refused, and was backed by
    Germany, who promised to mobilise in Austrias
    defence if Russia mobilised.
  • Russia could not face both states and had to back
    down.

14
Consequences of the crisis
  • Russia was humiliated and embittered by Austrias
    actions. It increased the pace of its rearmament.
    It would not back down again.
  • Serbia remained furious at Austria-Hungarys
    frustration of its Pan-Slav ambitions and began
    openly supporting nationalist terror groups.
  • The crisis revealed how desperate Germany was to
    retain the loyalty of her only remaining European
    ally.

Supportive reading Mills et. al. Pg 20-21
15
Applying this information to AS 90469
  • This standard examines how a force or movement
    influenced peoples lives. You are required to
    cover
  • Causes of an event related to a force/ movement
  • Consequences of an event related to a
    force/movement
  • How the force/movement influenced peoples lives

16
A suitable force or movement
  • IMPERIALISM, because this crisis is based on
    competing imperial ambitions, especially between
    Austria-Hungary and Russia
  • ALLIANCE SYSTEM, because Germany backed its ally
    Austria-Hungary in a dispute with Russia, who did
    not at that time have confident backing from
    France (or Britain)
  • NATIONALISM, because Serbia had ambitions to
    create a larger Pan-Slav state in the Balkans
  • Of these, IMPERIALISM is the best choice because
    it offers more opportunity to examine the
    influence on peoples lives

17
Causes of the crisis
  • Long term Turkish weakness in Bosnia, Russian
    aspirations to have access to the Mediterranean
    Sea, Austrian desire to frustrate Serbian
    nationalist ambitions
  • Short term Austrian actions in annexing Bosnia
    before Russia could consult other powers, German
    support for Austria, Russian military weakness

18
Consequences of the crisis
  • Russian humiliation
  • Serbian frustration
  • German desperation

19
Influence of Imperialism on peoples lives
  • Isvolsky was humiliated by being tricked by
    Aerenthal.
  • The Russian Tsar was forced to disown Isvolskys
    plan for expanding Russian influence in the
    Balkans.
  • Russian politicians were angry at Austrias and
    Germanys actions, and were determined not to
    back down again.
  • Serbian politicians were angry at Austrias
    frustration of their nationalist ambitions,
    annoyed that Russia would not back them and
    looked for other ways to reclaim what they
    thought was important to their national
    interests.
  • British and French politicians were alarmed at
    international tensions caused by Austrias and
    Russias conflicting imperial ambitions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com