Brain Areas Devoted to Vision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Brain Areas Devoted to Vision

Description:

Brain Areas Devoted to Vision – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:261
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 101
Provided by: kyle86
Learn more at: http://people.umass.edu
Category:
Tags: areas | brain | cpb | devoted | vision

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Brain Areas Devoted to Vision


1
Brain Areas Devoted to Vision
2
The Retina An Approachable Part of the Brain
  • - John Dowling

3
(No Transcript)
4
Spatial ResolutionThe next slide (from Anstis)
shows the fall-off in spatial resolution in the
periphery. By fixating at the center, you should
be able to see all the letters equally well.
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Two types of Photoreceptors
  • Cones
  • Less sensitive to light
  • Three types (usually), responding differently to
    different wavelengths
  • More heavily represented in fovea
  • Rods
  • More sensitive to light
  • Only one type no color differences
  • More heavily represented in the periphery

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
False color image showing the arrangement of
cones in a macaque monkey at a location 1.4 deg
nasal from the central fovea.
13
Because there are only 3 cone types, the retina
can be tricked into thinking a particular
wavelength is present with the appropriate
combination of three other wavelengths.
14
Colorblindness
  • Not really blindness at all
  • Inability to distinguish certain colors
  • usually red and green
  • Often due to differences in which cone types are
    present.
  • Usually in males.

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Retinal ganglion cells respond best to
center-surround patterns.
19
Changes in ganglion cell membrane potential
accompanying center and surround responses.
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
There are a number of different types of retinal
ganglion cells.
  • Magnocellular
  • Larger
  • Lower spatial resolution
  • Faster and more transient responses
  • Important for motion perception
  • Projects more strongly to dorsal (WHERE) pathway
  • Parvocellular
  • Smaller
  • Higher spatial resolution
  • Slower and more sustained responses
  • Important for color and form perception
  • Projects more strongly to ventral (WHAT) pathway

23
Color Opponency in Parvocellular Retinal Ganglion
Cells
24
(No Transcript)
25
The axons of the retinal ganglion cells lead from
the retina to the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
(LGN) of the thalamus.
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
LGN
  • Each LGN represents only the contralateral
    hemifield.
  • 6 layers, each receiving inputs from only one
    eye.
  • Each layer organized as spatial map.
  • Like retinal ganglion cells, LGN cells generally
    respond best to center-surround stimuli.

29
LGN
  • The top 4 layers have parvocellular neurons
    making up the P pathway.
  • Smaller cells, slower responses
  • Carry info from cones about color
  • 80 of LGN neurons in macaque
  • The botton 2 layers have magnocellular neurons
    making up the M pathway.
  • Larger cells, faster responses
  • Important for detecting motion
  • No info about color

30
90 of the axons in the optic nerve connect to
the LGN, and indirectly to V1.There is also an
older visual pathway that passes through the
Superior Colliculus rather than through the LGN.
  • No color information
  • No complex form information.
  • Important for eye movements.
  • Connects with cortical visual areas.

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Axons from LGN neurons connect to Primary Visual
Cortex (area V1). Their axons terminate in layer
4C.The input to V1 is still monocular. V1 has
many monocular cells, but also binocular cells,
which receive inputs from both eyes.Beyond V1,
all cells receive inputs from both eyes.
34
Orientation Selectivity
  • Many cells in V1 and higher areas are tuned to
    respond to edges with a particular orientation.

35
Tuning curve and corresponding polar plot from 2
macaque V1 cells (one orientation selective, the
other nonselective) in response to drifting bars
of varied orientation and direction.
OBorientation bias. DBdirection bias.
36
Different Types of Cells in V1
  • Simple
  • Edge of specific orientation at specific location
    in receptive field.
  • Complex
  • Edge of specific orientation anywhere within
    receptive field.
  • Hypercomplex
  • Edge of specific orientation anywhere within
    receptive field.
  • End-stopping Edge must end within receptive
    field.

37
Simple Cell in V1
38
Complex Cell in V1
39
Ocular dominance and orientation-selective
columns in V1.
40
Blobs and Interblob Regions
  • In layers 2 and 3 of area V1.
  • Mainly part of the P pathway.
  • Blobs
  • Cells that respond to color differences.
  • Interblob Regions
  • More sensitive to orientation and form.

41
M pathway represented mainly in layer 4B of area
V1.
  • Transient responses
  • Not sensitive to color differences

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
The separate pathways seen in V1 are are also
found in V2.
Thick Stripe
Interstripe
Thin Stripe
45
Pathways in V2
  • Thick Stripes
  • Motion
  • Form
  • Thin Stripes
  • Color
  • Interstripes
  • Form

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
Stimuli used to map cortical visual areas.
  • These stimuli create waves of activity that
    travel across each visual area.
  • The timing of this activity wave can be used to
    construct a retinotopic map of each area.

Stimuli used to create traveling waves of neural
activity in retinotopically organized cortex are
shown. The stimuli were composed of a
contrast-reversing checkerboard pattern
flickering at 8 Hz. (A) The expanding ring
stimulus is shown at five moments in time
spanning one stimulus cycle. (B) At each location
within the visual field, the stimulus follows a
square-wave alternation between the
contrast-reversing rings and the uniform gray
field. The expanding ring stimulus was delayed in
the periphery relative to the center hence, the
temporal phase of the square-wave alternation
varied as a function of distance from the center
of the visual field. Two stimulus cycles are
shown. (C) The rotating wedge stimulus is shown
at five moments in time spanning one stimulus
cycle. From Engel, Glover, Wandel (1997).
Cerebral Cortex, 7, 181-192.
49
Mapping One Visual Hemifield
upper vertical midline
eccentricity
horizontal midline
fovea
lower vertical midline
50
How a quadrant of retinal space is mapped onto
cortical space.
Grill-Spector Malach (2004). Annual Review of
Neuroscience, 27, 649-677.
51
Mapping Retinal Space onto Cortical Space in V1,
V2, etc.
  • Left and right hemifields represented in
    contralateral hemispheres.
  • Much more cortical area devoted to fovea than to
    periphery.
  • Some maps have split along horizontal midline,
    separating hemifield into quadrants.
  • Each quadrant mapped onto a rectangular stripe.

52
V1 and V2 in Human Occipital Cortex
  • Showing posterior portion of inside surface of
    left hemisphere.
  • Upper visual field represented in inferior
    region lower field in superior.

53
Flattened Maps of Visual Cortical Regions in
Human and Macaque
54
The Ventral Portion of Human Visual Cortex,
showing activation according to eccentricity.
Eccentricity distance from fovea.
55
These visual areas are just the beginning. There
are over 30 visual areas in humans.These
different visual areas respond differently to
different visual properties.
  • MT responds to motion.
  • V4/V8 responds to color.

56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
Connections Between Areas in Macaque Visual Cortex
WHERE
WHAT
59
WHAT and WHERE Pathways
WHERE
WHAT
60
WHERE Pathway
WHAT Pathway
  • Representing locations of things.
  • Includes representation of speed and direction of
    motion.
  • Important for manipulating objects.
  • Damage can cause spatial neglect.
  • Object recognition.
  • Receives information about color, orientation,
    form.
  • Damage can cause visual agnosia.

61
Attention
62
Convergence within the What Pathway
  • Higher levels of the hierarchy have larger and
    larger receptive fields.
  • At the top levels , each neuron can receive input
    from many different locations and many different
    objects.
  • Potential for interference and crosstalk.

63
Convergence within the What Pathway
  • The flow of information through the What Pathway
    has to be regulated to prevent interference.
  • Information from some objects must be blocked so
    that information from other objects can be fully
    processed.
  • Gating of information.

64
The Need for Selection
  • Visual processing requires a mechanism for
    selecting some inputs and inhibiting others.
  • This selection process is often referred to as
    attention.
  • The same sort of selection process is needed
    outside visual processing.
  • Within the auditory system and other perceptual
    systems.
  • To select between different perceptual
    modalities.
  • To select internal memories and thoughts for
    attention.

65
Two Different Types of Visual Attention
  • Overt Attention
  • Shifts of eye position
  • Covert Attention
  • Selecting certain locations or objects within a
    fixation, without moving the eyes.

66
Helmholtz1894
67
Two Different Factors Affect how Attention is
Allocated
  • Voluntary Attention
  • Governed by the subjects goals
  • Endogenous
  • Top-down
  • Reflexive Attention
  • Driven by salient aspects of the stimulus
  • Exogenous
  • Automatic
  • Bottom-up

68
The neural responses to perceptual stimuli are
shaped by attentional selection.
  • Effects of attention demonstrated experimentally.
  • Same stimuli used in different conditions.
  • Only the allocation of attention is different
    across conditions.
  • Differences in neural response show effects of
    attention.

69
ERP Experiments
70
Measuring Endogenous Attention with ERPs
  • Stimulus on left in both conditions.
  • In one condition, subject expects stimulus on
    left and attends there.
  • In other, attention is on right.
  • Response in occipital lobe contralateral to
    stimulus is greater when that location is
    attended.

71
Measuring Attention with ERPs
72
Effects of Endogenous Attention on P1
  • Shows the difference between cued and uncued
    responses.
  • Note also differences between upper and lower
    visual field.

73
Exogenous Attentions Effect on P1
Inhibition of return at longer delays.
74
Exogenous Attentions Effect on P1
75
Later Attentional Effects
  • P1 occurs 100 msec or left after stimulus
    appears.
  • Another component, N2pc, occurs 200-300 msec
    after stimulus.
  • pc posterior contralateral
  • Stronger on attended side than on unattended
    side.
  • Can be used to track movement of attention from
    one side to the other.

76
Measuring Shift of Attention from One Side to the
Other
  • Visual search task.
  • Target has gap on left.
  • On 75 of trials, target is red.
  • On 25 of trials, target is blue.
  • Attend first to red, then blue.

77
Measuring Shift of Attention from One Side to the
Other
  • On some trials, red and blue will be on same side
    of display.
  • Attention should stay on that side.
  • On other trials, red and blue will be on opposite
    sides.
  • Attention should shift from one side to the other.

78
Measuring Shift of Attention from One Side to the
Other
79
ERP studies show the temporal dynamics of
attention. To get better information about the
spatial layout of the brain images involved, we
need studies using PET and fMRI.
80
Two general findings emerge from brain imaging
studies of visual attention.
  • Brain areas devoted to specific visual features
    become more activated when those features are
    relevant to the task.
  • Location
  • Color
  • Shape
  • Motion
  • Some brain areas serve to control attention.
  • Parietal cortex
  • Pulvinar
  • Superior colliculus

81
Attention Modulates Visual Processing in
Extrastriate Areas
  • When task requires attention to color, activity
    increases in areas devoted to color.
  • Similar pattern for motion and shape.

82
Attention Modulates Visual Processing
  • Attentional modulation is strongest in higher
    areas of the ventral (what) pathway.
  • Harder to find attentional modulation in V1.
  • Attentional modulation found recently in LGN.
  • Connections from cortex back down to LGN
  • No connections back to retina to allow
    attentional effects there.

83
Distractor Interference
  • Spatial attention can help to control
    interference from distractor objects.
  • Compare brain activity when target object appears
    alone, and when it appears with distractors.
  • When distractors are present and target is
    attended, response is similar to when target
    appears alone.

84
Additional evidence on attentional control of
distractor interference comes from single-cell
recordings.
85
In one block of trials, the monkey attends to
stimuli with one color. In another block, monkey
attends to the other color.
86
  • Two stimuli with different colors in the neurons
    receptive field.
  • One (effective) triggers a strong response in
    this neuron.
  • The other (ineffective) does not.

87
  • When ineffective stimulus is attended, neural
    response is weak, similar to response when
    effective stimulus is not present.

88
Attentional effects are seen in higher level
visual areas as well.First, a word about two
higher level visual areas in humans.
89
  • Fusiform Face Area (FFA)
  • Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA)

90
Two Objects Occupying Same Region Produce Rivalry
91
Activity in FFA and PPA trades off according to
reported perception.
92
Object-Based AttentionActivity of higher visual
areas gated by attention to objects.
93
Attention modulates the activity of different
visual brain areas.Other brain areas become
active when attentional control is necessary.
94
Parietal Cortex
  • Task requires shifting attention to different
    locations.
  • Shifts generate activity in posterior parietal
    cortex.
  • Similar activity during visual search, which also
    requires attentional shifts.

95
Posner Cuing Paradigm
  • Cue indicates where to attend.
  • Response faster when stimulus appears at cued
    location.

96
For patients with parietal lobe damage, the delay
for a stimulus at an unexpected location
contralateral to lesion is much greater.
Difficulty in shifting attention contralateral to
lesion comparable to neglect.
97
Parietal damage can also cause spatial neglect
and extinction.
98
There is some evidence of neglect in imagery as
well.
99
Many Methods Contributing to Attention Studies
  • ERP
  • PET
  • fMRI
  • Dipole modeling to link ERP and fMRI results
  • Single cell recording
  • Chemical activation and inhibition
  • Patient studies

100
Brain Areas Involved in Visual Attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com